Now that the Drider/Spider wars are over...

Now that the Drider/Spider wars are over. How afraid are you that they're going to screw up the design of the drider like they did Pennywise's costume?

are you forgetting the original IT messed up the drider as well?

So hes a drider?

...

For it's time and budget they did the best they could.

Yeah it's all connected to the Dark Tower series confirms driders. This is from the comic book.

This cast is gay.

Maybe they picked gay kids so they can do the orgy scene and won't be offensive to the girl.

kek, that's a prime logic right there

It's what the softcore porn industry does for cable networks. Most of the guys are gay so they can do intense wildly passionate sex scenes without fear of it accidentally slipping inside because the guy isn't even hard.

That's pretty interesting, but we all know they won't do THAT scene in It and the cast is gay anyway.

I wish this is what the Crimson King looked like in the book, instead of skinny angry Santa

can someone tell me about sewer orgy, i haven't read the book.

Oh shit, who's the other boy?
Hes qt

Which one is other? The curly one is Wyatt, the shirtless one looking like gollum is Jaeden

WEW LADS

f-fu-fuck
just imagine being in that group

That it looks shit compared to the original.

The tallest guy has the most gay pose

So yeah, this two are fucking, right?

they're all fucking and getting fucked

explain

Well, they seem naked in that bead, and just look at these photos

Why is the fat kid all the way in the back and the black kid not there?

it was never supposed to be a fucking "Drider" you fat piece of shit D&D player, NOWHERE in the book does it say anything about being a fucking drider, just a huge spider.


>"HUUU I DUNT CARE BOUT BOOKS I GUT MUH DEE DEE N MUH WOW"

>"ah shure du wish i culd git sum uv dat yung boypusshy it aint gay er nothinlil boys need to be taught how ta use da peepee"

Okay, but explain Finn's presence in this twink sandwich.


Fat kid was probably doing something else at the moment and when they were taking pic he was just approaching. Dunno what's up with black kid.

Ive never read the book. Why does everyone freak out over this picture?

Did the book have a gay orgy scene with underage boys?

Just an orgy scene, some user used to paste it in It threads, but looks like he's not around today

So how do you think they're going to distinguish the final showdown with It in the first movie versus the showdown in the second movie? In the book it cuts back and forth between them, so you experience both at the same time. Functionally, though, they're almost the same. First time the spider shows up, Bill begins the Ritual of Chüd, the rest of the group provides spiritual support, the spider loses the battle. The only significant differences is that the first time the spider escapes because the kids are too worried about the place collapsing, and the second time Richie joins Bill in the ritual and then when the spider flees they manage to run it down and kill it.

Thy can't have both movies end with an almost identical climax, though. It works in the book, but that would be terrible screenwriting.

Finn is just an innocent straight boy, the others are clearly lusting after him.

Place actually collapses interrupting the ritual the first time, second time they complete it and kill it.

Why does frog look sad?

>Finn is just an innocent straight boy
I don't believe it at all

>the others are clearly lusting after him
With that I cannot disagree

That's still not going to be enough for two separate movies. Most of John Q public is not going to have read the book. They're going to view this as just a movie and its sequel. They'll be pissed as fuck if they realize the sequel has an almost identical climax to the first movie. Not just sort of similar, like Alien and Aliens for example: almost identical.

They're going to have to change things at least a little from the book to keep things form seeming too predictable and repetitive to the general audience.

He really does look like a person on the verge of tears, not ironically like Jaeden but just in a serious way.

What happened to our poor Froggo?

The real question is, will the orgy still be in

Who's taking this picture?

Looks like a woman.

Is she a slut?

Except that's not IT.

She

This.

The kids are all twelve years old. There's six boys and one girl. The boys all fuck the girl one after another.

Did Stranger Things completely kill the hype for this movie? I mean, no matter how good it might end up being, it's still just gonna be a shorter, inferior version of ST, just with a less interesting plot because everyone already saw the original and knows what's gonna happen.

You're saying that a shitty fly-by-night internet show is better than one of the greatest horror novels ever written?

To the average redditor yes, they won't be able to do the book justice. It's only half the story to begin with.

It's one of the filmmakers, Barbara Mus. Dunno if slut

Or at least I think so

It does seem like It is eclipsed by Stranger Things for now, but the film premiers in 2017 and by then ST might be old and cold. unless they do season 2

ST was good, but it had no heart, no vision. It wasn't about anything, its appeal came from the performances and the way it executed pastiche. Good, not great, and it only works for you if you already appreciate the 80s aesthetic it's chasing, which not everyone does.

IT, on the other hand, does have a vision, at least in the book. It's genuinely about something, namely the transition from childhood to adulthood, and more specifically about the weird, existential horror that we will largely forget almost everything from our most formative years. Will the movie convey that? Hard to say.

I'm interested because I think it'll be interesting to see the Stranger Things treatment get applied to something with a meatier story, see if that aesthetic has more weight to it when it's got actual themes and subtext to it.

>unless they do season 2
They do.

Yes, but will it premier before It?

Even if it does, it remains to be seen if season two of ST will be able to match the first. I liked season one, but none of the ideas I've seen floated around for a season two premise seem that engaging, and the plothooks in the final episode of season one didn't resonate with me.

If season two comes out and blows the doors off, yeah, IT might be seen as a pale imitator. But if they don't really know quite where they're going and flub season two? IT could steal the baton and run with it. Plus, I'd say the vast majority of the movie-going audience doesn't have a Netflix subscription, so it may be apples and oranges. ST doing well may not stop IT from also doing well. It's not like we haven't had a bunch of other 80s nostalgia movies in recent years. Turbo Kid, Super 8, It Follows, etc etc.

Yeah, ideally both productions should bomb in their respective sectors, ST as a tv series, It as a good cinema film.

The main problem the IT remake faces is that they will have to significantly surpass the original movie, otherwise it's bound to get shat on by critics and fans of the novel and the original will call it a cash grab that has no reason to exist, even if it's otherwise decent.

hey, faggot. after reading OP's post i googled drider. then i typed that post.

dumb cunt

you have to realize that IT is a horror story while ST is a suspense story, its not really scary at all. while the IT movie which could be rated R has a vastly more restricted audience than jsut anybody with a netflix account. so ST will probably be more popular

but at the same time its had decades of a building fanbase and a 'known in every home' author.
honestly froggo himself will probably get a shitload of ST fans to go see IT

its actually very accurate to the book - the hair color, the outfit (right down to the red pom poms) and the overall appearance of a turn of the century clown. My hopes have been lifted a little.

daddy?

It looks like shit and doesn't fit with the character at all. The original was bright, cheerful-looking and colorful in order to lure children and once captured the drastic transformation would cause great fear and confusion for IT to feast on. This outfit wouldn't lure in kids for jack. What kind of idiot designed this?

That won't be a high bar. The original movie blows.

fugg

most people remember it quite fondly, or at least as a movie that made them piss their pants when they were kids. It also had a certain charme that will be very difficult to capture, if they are even trying to at all.

...

>The original movie blows.
Only shits who say that are the ones who complain about the spider puppet.

It still makes me chuckle that people hold that shitty TV movie in such high regard...

What is shitty about it? Everything when they are kids is incredibly good, Curry is perfect. The adult stuff drags a little bit but the only stupid things are Billy Idol Henry, Bill's catatonic wife, and the Spider.

It still makes me chuckle that people still make such shit-tier bait.

Is Finn getting too thic?

Boys name who's coming out of the pool please. PLEASE.

There is no such a thing like a too thicc Finn, but he's not getting fat anyway

Finn is easily the least attractive one here, why are you all obsessed with him?
m-muh dick, at the other three

>no one could possibly have an opinion that differs from mine

Did your mom drop you on your head when you were a baby?

Finn is the only one not trying to look cool and chic, on this photo, otherwise he's the prettiest. Also he is the most based and fun.

How many people here have read IT?

I read it while I was in the hospital for a few days. Oh my that was a major mistake. Book is so damn depressing.

I think I found my new boyfu, what a qt. Hope the movie does well now

/ourbabyboy/ had to leave his buds to come 2 brasil

I've read it. It brought a lot of nostalgia, especially parts where losers were coming together as a gang. It's a strange kind of book. I know King isn't about depth of language and fanciful details, but yet he managed to turn cheap horror story into a really decent read. It my opinion, anyway.

a giant spider is much scarier than a clown

Wyatt Oleff

But he's with his boys, safe and sound. The look on his face though, it looks like he's come to Brazil and seen some shit

To me it just shows that justice does not exist. From the start of the book when they killed the gay guy to the Pennywise Lives stuff it just shows that life is simply unfair!

He was in Guardians of the Galaxy and is going to be in the sequel. He's doing just fine.

Bill and Richie while riding silver escaping a werewolf/leper creature just got very erotic.

I legitimately think ST will end up being better than this movie. The Duffer Bros pitched the remake to WB and they turned them down, so they decided to do something similar. I think they will probably try to emulate ST style with this movie.

Yeah, that's too, there is some vague lingering feeling of despondency and resignation. People keep dying, evil never really disappears from the picture, no justice, like you've said. Pretty sad desu

>not loving Curry's performance and the first half at the very least
Might as well say you hate breathing air because everyone else does it.

ST has proven to be far better and avoid the modern schlock that makes modern movies and TV shows so awful.

>richie

wait but that's finn. hes going to get some hot scenes?

IT is nostalgia for me, it scared the fuck out of me as a kid. The make-up of the clown, with that deathly white face and in your face hellish red hair, combined with Tim Curry's presence and effecting lighting + scenery was brilliant.

The problem was that the movie needed to be R and needed to be more menacing. Pennywise in the book really chased and tried to kill the kids in a ruthless way. In the movie, he mostly terrifies them and then doesn't finish em off/chase them.

Another problem was the lackluster ending of course. The spider itself was a letdown, sure, but so was the absence of the ritual of Chud and the backstory of the monster. The battles with IT made IT look much weaker than IT really was. As a result, the epic scope of the book was lost (in the book IT is like a dark God representing consumption and terror, and the kids are the vessel through whcih IT's enemy works in order to stop IT).

Like why does Pennywise deserve to be so powerful and immortal when she has no morals.

>70 ▶
>File: grryyu.jpg (173 KB, 1600x800)

wtf is that?

>You missed out on young, experimental gay sex
Feels bad man.

I'd fuck them all hard desu

you should better keep that to yourself, senpai

Who won? Team Drider:

Same here. When's this coming out again?

Are you threatening me?

>just

It's just a friendly advice, bub

This
jdimsa

Pennywise will probably look fine when we see him outside smiling naturally trying to lure kids

He's already edgy tho
He's supposed to be friendy looking at fist