Did merica land on the moon Sup Forums?

Did merica land on the moon Sup Forums?

>Third man on the Moon: Alan Bean makes a "brilliant" explanation about the Van Allen Belts
youtube.com/watch?v=dHfsHYg7Yoo

Other urls found in this thread:

popsci.com/blog-network/vintage-space/apollo-rocketed-through-van-allen-belts
ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/geekquinox/celebrate-moon-landing-10-debunked-moon-hoax-arguments-211040304.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Point_Observatory_Lunar_Laser-ranging_Operation
reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/qw30x/can_an_amateur_astronomer_test_the_lunar_laser/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Yes we did.

It was impossible to "fake" the moon landing in '69 due to the lack of technology.

It was easier to go to the moon then fake going to the moon.

C'mon.
Why are people still talking about this? It's so last year.

Didn't happen, get over it.

yup, back when we were great. now we can't. america needs to be made great again, but trump seems to think that can be accomplished by making everything go to shit so much we circle back around

Two points stolen from somewhere.
First: sitting on top of millions of pounds of rocket fuel, where else do you think they went?
Second: if NASA was willing to fake such a great achievement, why haven't they done it a second time?

We placed reflectors on the moon, you can actually test this yourself with a very high power laser and sensor array

Had the technology to get through the Van Allen Belt of radiation in '69, but haven't got the technology to do it now.
Hey, where's the telemetry data from the mission? All hundreds of pages of one-off vital information?
Oh, they lost it. No one knows who lost it or where it should be. Sounds reasonable.
Gotta love those intersecting shadows! Amazing how they managed to find the exact same hill two days later after traveling in only one direction! Also, they should sell those flags that can go in front of etched cross hairs on cameras - that's a great trick!
Totally happened.

As long as the russians didn´t cover the americans faking it, it did happen. Cause triangulation. If you didn´t get it, find someone to explain it to you :-)

>Bailey, J. Vernon. "Radiation Protection and Instrumentation". Biomedical Results of Apollo
>popsci.com/blog-network/vintage-space/apollo-rocketed-through-van-allen-belts
>Woods, W. David (2008). How Apollo Flew to the Moon. New York: Springer-Verlag. p. 109

>but haven't got the technology to do it now.

What the hell are you talking about?

>Oh, they lost it. No one knows who lost it or where it should be. Sounds reasonable.

Never worked for the government have you?

>Gotta love those intersecting shadows! Amazing how they managed to find the exact same hill two days later after traveling in only one direction! Also, they should sell those flags that can go in front of etched cross hairs on cameras - that's a great trick!

ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/geekquinox/celebrate-moon-landing-10-debunked-moon-hoax-arguments-211040304.html

Give me enough time and funding and I'll make up proof for anything.
Then give eminent personalities my proof and fund them to agree and write more proof.
You've now made a lie Truth, with Proof.
Best to believe what the establishment says.

read

Not sure if bait....

Have you done zero research into this subject?

definitely bait

Have you done this yourself?

Or did you just see it on Big Bang Theory?

Apparently you haven't either.

The shadows have been explained away for decades.

Pretty sure everyone agrees that the moon landings were fakes filmed by Stanley Kubrick.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Point_Observatory_Lunar_Laser-ranging_Operation
>reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/qw30x/can_an_amateur_astronomer_test_the_lunar_laser/

I personally do not have 30k to dispose of, but I'm sure someone who doesn't believe could foot it

So no then.

It appears that you are an idiot.

Well I remember meeting Santa when I was young, so I guess he's real too.
Something I saw as a youth can't possibly be a lie can it?

Speaking to yourself?

Bait

What if the moon is not a rock but a big shiny thing?
It would reflect back light then.
How come temperature goes down in moonlight but up in the shade?

Sending a mirror to the moon is not the same thing as landing on it and playing golf like they want us to believe happened.
And it just magically happened just as Soviet sent the first man into space.
Mystical, secret space program was finished and ready to go to the moon.
The lunar lander had the same computing power as a modern day toaster if you look at the specs.

Bait bait

Have you seen the nearly floating off on a spacewalk footage from ussr or usa?
So funny, so stop motion, so kek.

Bait bait bait

Bait bait bait bait!

Explain all the ISS greenscreen fail footage

Have you seen their panel interview after they went to the 'moon'?
They do not look like guilty people.

Oh wait, yeah they do.

The face of people regretting what they got themselves into.

Was earthfall faked too? The return to earth?

Wasn't that a Bond movie?

What are you talking about?
They look really happy and content with themselves.

Is that a panel interview?
No.

Bait bait bait bait bait!

Y'all know it's a lie.
You just can't admit it.

jesus you don't know how stupid you actually are...

What bit exactly?
Also, no need to call me jeez.

Newton predates toasters, though, so your point is ... ?

You have literally no conception of 'radiation'...
You don't understand light and film...
You believe the absence of information is evidence of something...

And that's just from one of your simple posts.

If merica can have child slave colonys on mars, then i dont see how they could'nt land on the moon.

But that's all just opinion on a person's post.

Where's your proof to the contrary?

not wasting my time.
literally an internet of proof.
at least learn about the radiation belts and get that one off your list - it's embarrassing.

Just 'saying' you know then?
That's some strong proof.

So, the telemetry data?

The intersecting shadows?

The exact same hill two days later?

Things that can go in front of etched cross hairs on cameras?

Any reality based reasons for these?
Or let me guess, 'it's on the internet'.

If that's how you create your 'belief' system, then good luck with life.

Ftw

>really happy

There we go