Why aren't you vegan, Sup Forums?

Why aren't you vegan, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-realism/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because I am not a faggot

Because I'm not a faggot

I like meat

Because there's no ethical consumption under capitalism.
Also

Because I am not a faggot.

Because I'm adult.

>vegans using the term noblesse oblige
I am not sure if you know what irony is.

because i like meat, because humans are more inteligent than the rest of the animal kingdom and we do what we want and fuck them if they ar not smart enough to develop some way to defend themself from us

and fuck you because you are implying you are a degenerate vegan and that we are the bad guys

There is no need.

I am.

cuz i like meat

terrible arguments/not arguments

shitty idiom that you think you're clever using

you can't be perfectly moral in a capitalist society but you can be less immoral

It's bad for you.

Vegans are cucks

hi stefan

...

Because I'm not a faggot.

>muh objective morals
To answer your question: because I am not a pretentious faggot who thinks his personal morality is absolute

>Vegan Jihad
That's the only thing more pathetic sounding than Beta Uprising

I like hemes

a vegan diet is in general far healthier than the average american diet

in fact it's the only diet that's ever been known to reverse certain clinical diseases like type 2 diabetes

it also makes you more intelligent

>Among the British respondents in the National Child Development Study, those who are vegetarian at age 42 have significantly higher childhood general intelligence than those who are not vegetarian at age 42. (Childhood general intelligence was measured with 11 different cognitive tests at three ages before 16.) Vegetarians have the mean childhood IQ of 109.1 whereas meat eaters have the mean childhood IQ of 100.9. The difference is large and highly statistically significant.

Because meat taste good.
This is the deep fried skin of a pig, in Mexico we call it "chicharron".

The preservation of the human species requires getting humans on other planets.
Primitivists are the worst anarchists. Ancom or seppuku

Alright, we don't have acceptable fake meat yet, and I enjoy burgers. I'm selfish.

Forgot pic. Also i just ate some good steak.

I am not white, nor am i a self-righteous libshit.

Meat is good for your brain
I don't want to live on supplements (b12 etc)
And meat tastes REALLY good

Cons;
- I care about animals

But I also care about humans in the 3. world that slave for your "green" food.

please don't pretend you known anything about moral realism/anti-realism (Dunning-Kruger in full effect)

lol that is funny

Ah yes, this thread again.

>We are omnivores.
>It is necessary to kill animals to control their population.
>We do need to work on making farms and processing plants more humane.
>Human beings, americans in particular would benefit cutting down on meat.
>Vegan is healthy the same way drinking only water is healthy, by limiting the amount of shit you consume.

The big corporations will pay "reseachers" and "scientist" to prepare studies that say eating meat and dairy is not that bad if it is done in moderation, it is literally too big to fall.

I am anarcho-communist, though I also consider myself influenced by veganarchist tendencies. I don't deny that preserving human species may ultimately require interplanetary habitation, but that doesn't necessarily mean that we should necessarily do so irrespective of its effects on the planet or local ecosystem.

looks like a pig skin that went through somebody's intestines

Because the innocent souls of baby animals is gods gift to man

>Alright, we don't have acceptable fake meat yet, and I enjoy burgers.
I'd reject the first bit. And even if I didn't you can at least concede we're getting close to good replacement meat. In vitro meat will probably be a thing soon too.

>I'm selfish.
I mean, fair enough. I've seen post-grad moral philosophers fall back on this.

bacon

I know it looks like shit specially with that lightning but it's pretty good.

Reminder that morality is literally a spook and if we didn't eat cows snd chickens they would go extinct.

Halal slaughter is also humane so veganism is offensive to Islam. Checkmate faggots.

>>>/leftypol/

>average american diet
Yeah. Well, eating half rotting meat is better than the garbage most people here eat on a daily basis. It's most healthy to get all your nutrition from a wide variety of different meats, grains, fruits, vegetables, etc. No dyes, fake sugars, enriched bleached grains, chemical preservatives. I don't go fucking ape shit about the GMOs and shit they give to the meat animals, and "organic" is an expensive meme thing here. Personally i just try to stay away from reprocessed fake food.

Because I would never cut eggs or fish out of my diet

You like them big sausage, don't you? Me too, I like them fat and juicy.

And you do, goat fucker? Doubtful.

I kind of want to have sex with Sakurako-chan.

That's a pretty good argument desu

>Why aren't you vegan, Sup Forums?

Because I've got a boner for murder.

I just want to kiss her

Because I am not a faggot.

>morality is a spook, therefore it has no utility and should be abandoned entirely
>seriously believing that livestock populations are wholly dependent on human consumption
>seriously believing that the extinction of a species justifies its perpetual exploitation as a commodity to be consumed at our pleasure
Stirnerites are morally stunted Stage II philosophical sociopaths. Kill yourself forthwith.

>implying /leftypol/ isn't just a circlejerk for armchair revolutionaries and wannabe leftists

>Reminder that morality is literally a spook
edgy teen thinks he's figured out the secrets of moral philosophy (probably via word of mouth on /lit/ or something)

if you can read I suggest starting here plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-realism/

You're a tard m8

It's a rough world out there. Chickens and cows actually have it pretty good compared to the wild. They have been domesticated for so long that they would be extinct if left alone in nature.

Kinda like you.

I'd literally kill just to cuddle with her for a few minutes.

well yes, I've had a semester's worth of lectures/seminars on Ethics at a top university

I at least know to have some humility when speaking on a subject that history's greatest thinkers have been writing about for millennia

Fair enough from the angle that we use this, we own it, and it's suicidal really to harm the environment to an extent. Though if we ever got a 3d printed replacement to nature or something I wouldn't complain.

Hey if it's accessible and tastes good enough I'd do it.

Plato? More like, shit.

Are the Aztecs uncultured savages for human sacrifice?

Are Eskimos evil for eating only meat?

Fucking racist.

Because I'm not a monumental bellend.

>Plato? More like, shit.
1. this implies you didn't even click it (it has virtually nothing to do with Plato)
2. this also implies you don't know how URLs work (.plato. is part of every article on that website)

>rationalizing the abuse, commodification, and slaughter of over 50 billion land animals a year
>not understanding how to reintroduce domesticated livestock into wild
>not knowing what animal sanctuaries are
>I'm the retard

When the revolution comes, expect to be lined up and shot like all the rest of the fascists, lumpens, and pigs.

What do you mean? By the way, just to clarify: I'm not a primitivist. I'm closer to transhumanism and posthumanism than primitivism.

>I can't do that
>What would people think about me?
How very masculine

I did not click it.
Maybe it's a website about Plato. I wouldn't know.

Say we could artificially fill all the functions of trees, I wouldn't care if we don't have any trees after that, same goes for the rest of nature.

You are neither an Eskimo nor an Aztec

You only eat meat because you want to

lad, utter lad

well eskimos die at 40 so yes. evil

That's a seriously technologically-reliant liability. I don't know if I agree with that position, preferring instead to digitize consciousness, but I have no principled opposition against it, so I guess I can't really object.

Vegan reporting for duty, meat eaters fart way to much,carbon bum printers.

no, it's the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, an online resource with introductory articles on key areas of the subject which are published, edited and reviewed by leading academic professionals

that was an article on Moral Realism, which purports that morality is indeed grounded in reality (there are different interpretations as to how), which I posted in response to someone naively claiming that 'morality don't real!' (a common mistake for laymen)

Are all vegans ITT left-wing?

I don't understand your point here? Is it that because cultures have different interpretations of morality, morality must then be false?

..because that's the most common argument for naive moral anti-realism

Stop roleplaying you pathetic fruit.

Communism killed more people than animal's i will eat in my entire life.

I don't know why moral absolutists even exist. Fucking retard.

Most probably are. Veganism entails a certain level of compassion and commitment to egalitarian ethical principles which is characteristic of leftism and radical leftism (and markedly uncharacteristic of rightism and alt-rightism).

>I don't know why moral absolutists even exist. Fucking retard.
that's because you haven't read a word of the relevant literature, only a scattered paragraph on here or reddit (or any other intellectual blackhole) reaffirming your naive anti-realism

Well, I'm one as well desu

Vegetables make you gassy, meat makes it smell horrible.