Is Anarcho-Primitivism the ultimate redpill?

Is Anarcho-Primitivism the ultimate redpill?

Other urls found in this thread:

theanarchistlibrary.org/category/topic/anti-civ?page=1
rousseaustudies.free.fr/articlejohn_zerzan.pdf
marxists.org/archive/index.htm#anarchism
docs.google.com/document/d/1wJrXYBXAmNH9zwyfgg1-yAYN_Cda-26pFCk0u_QhyBc/edit
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

vargism

Anime is

There is a lecturer on anarchism who is anarcho primitivist. Ironically enough he sells his lectures on the internet
yeah, pretty much

Yes
We need to exterminate most humans on the planet, so the small minority that is spared can live in an ecotopia rich in wildlife and nature

Anarchism is just as unrealistic as Marxism and its variations.

lol

Anarcho-municipalism is superior.

We can achieve ultimate peace only by eating more vegetables

I'd say it's pretty realistic since humans lived an anarcho-primitivist lifestyle for 99% of our existence.
Only way it will happen honestly
Fellow anarchist?

Do have a link?

It's in russian

You misspelled "anarcho-transhumanisnm".

I would considerate the ultimate red pill because as a anarcho-primitivist you are rejecting civilization itself. I believe it was Thomas Hobbes that said civilization is what causes suffering, somewhat giving birth to anarcho-primitivism

Yes mah man

what is the guys name than?

Fuck all these ideologies about beating people up and leaving everyone to die.

Anarcho-Syndicalism is the true redpill.

What is your proposed ideology then?

True my northern friend.

I guess he enjoys more shooting unarmed kids that are trapped on an island.

Petr Ryabov (Пeтp Pябoв)

Thanks

>Leaving everyone to die
What gives you this impression? Primitivism promotes mutually beneficial and communal ideas that serve to help those in the community. It's not just people running about in the wild, murdering and pillaging.
Holy shit anarchists.

Also, for the rest of you, if you're interested, I'll leave a of link to some good primitivist texts.
theanarchistlibrary.org/category/topic/anti-civ?page=1

I could include some Anarcho-Syndicalist stuff as well?

>good primitivist texts.
I found this to be an appropriate primer:
rousseaustudies.free.fr/articlejohn_zerzan.pdf

Marxists.org as a good section on anarchists as well.
I actually got into Anarcho-Syndicalism through Marxism.

marxists.org/archive/index.htm#anarchism
Here is the link for anarchism on the MIA.

I haven't seen any that I entirely agree with, and probably never will. What I am pretty sure about, though, is that anarchy goes strictly against human nature. We need a hierarchy in order to function as a society. Not a hereditary one, but one based entirely on individual merit.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

By this point I don't give a shit about human nature and if an ideology works. I see inequality and I want to fix it. Marxism, Anarchism, and only a few other ideologies attempt to actually end inequality once and for all.

ANCAP. BEST. AN.

...

>tfw Baader was more of a psychopath criminal rather than a genuine anarcho-communist

Easy way to make money desu

Thanks my man, this is greatly appreciated.

>We need a hierarchy in order to function as a society
Most primitive societies/groups had little to no hierarchy (dependent on the society) and survived that way for hundreds of thousands of years. I'd say that anarchy is most suited for human nature as it promotes equality, collective ownership of land, capital and is beneficial to all participants.

wewlad

j-just kidding, hahahaha...

Is this anarcho-x a new meme or something?

absolutely

Most of these ideologies are older than your grandparents. I'd argue ancap and stuff like queeranarchism are the most meme joke ones around and also the most recent.

What do think of the legitimacy of anarcho-transhumanism?
Its a newer form of anarchy but I do think has some legitimate claims.

I think anarchists need to consolidate their thinking along political and economic lines. Transhumanism is an interesting concept but it doesn't really fit into this mold so it seems to me as though it would be better served as a field of study within an already existing school of thought as opposed to being a standalone ideology.

No, it is shit

They have attempted to fit into this mold as they are currently working on a manifesto.
docs.google.com/document/d/1wJrXYBXAmNH9zwyfgg1-yAYN_Cda-26pFCk0u_QhyBc/edit

Without a doubt

Interesting I'll give it a read.

>Anarchism will never work
It's literally about to

>We need to exterminate most humans on the planet, so the small minority that is spared can live in an ecotopia rich in wildlife and nature
I hope you wiped the doritos dust off your fingers before typing that you larping fool.

Ancap is best

it's monarchism

>People unironically want to live in a world without a state
>People unironically think that there will be unlimited progress
>People unironically think no group of individuals is going to exploit another group of individuals to the point that the relationship is no longer efficient in a Paretian sense

Anarcho-anything is grade A retardation

>not ubermenschism

Green anarchism is superior to anarcho-primitivism.

What's the difference?
Give me a run down

Green anarchism focuses on environmental issues and protecting nature, but it does not eschew civilization nor technology.

Primitivists are a bunch of unwashed troglodytes.

>People unironically want to live

Death is so much preferable in every way

lmao OP is actually serious.

How old are you, 12?

Green anarchism is the most appealing ideology to me now
Anarcho primitivism is too memeish

Is there a difference between that and anarchist federalism? I feel like I've seen them rather interchangeably.

god you shill things so much that I know who you are every time you post, it's equivalent to namefagging.

Society and systems correlate with your overall goal. If goal is to live dangerous, shitty lives with extreme infant mortality, disease, etc; yet relatively free and unbound lives? Sure Anarcho-Primitivism is then a good option (but still basically impossible to enforce/implement). But most people don't want that and it would eventually go back to where we are today, groups absorb other groups and eventually, you have modern-day nations again and we're back to some NEET in a developed nation with an easy-mode life shilling the same shit we've started from twice now.

>human nature
Which is mostly defined by several hundred thousand years of societal and cultural development and the by the limbic system. We can be many things, our brain is very adaptable. What I'm saying is there is no such thing as definite and static "human nature". It's a meme (mostly). We have a broad range of what our nature can be.

I don't think Anarchism is good though. Mostly because it resigns us to being simplistic animals, who will then go extinct fairly quickly. I prefer Collectivism with the goal of dominating the solar system, and eventually the galaxy. Making something of ourselves, eventually shedding all of our biology too. It really doesn't matter though, because Nihilism. But why not be defiant towards the void and dominate/propagate anyway.

Of course Anarchist ideas aren't to be ruled out. If implemented correctly you can make a society that is more efficient, less corrupt and more Collectivised despite being more Anarchistic.