Pitchfork reviews

>Pitchfork reviews
pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/2134-discovery/

Other urls found in this thread:

pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/the-beach-boys-1967-sunshine-tomorrow/
pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/717-born-free-forever
twitter.com/AnonBabble

That review was correct. Daft Punk weren't innovative and weren't particularly good.

Should've been lower

this album is a meme and he didn't fall for it

ONE MORE TIME

except for when he did and Pitchfork went corporate

>Schreiber
>Not falling for a musical meme

>

WTF

Discovery deserves a lower rating

>Daft Punk weren't innovative

lol only someone who knows nothing about 00s dance and electronic can say a similar thing.

yeah but the point is this is before that and it shows

pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/the-beach-boys-1967-sunshine-tomorrow/

at least they finally fixed that mistake and gave it an 8.1

...

pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/717-born-free-forever

This is a pretty good record. It's been years, but I still can't tell what the reviewer is trying to say.

music "criticism"

Frances the Mute deserves 1 out of 10, just like any other album by The Mars Volta

that's a good rating/review

>

Dumb cunt is comparing it to SMiLE

what the fuck did you just say to the king of salsa you little bitch

jesus christ. the sad thing is there are people who actually thought pitchfork were ever good, and the only reason they dislike it now is because they review shitty black music instead of shitty white music

yikes.

All of these albums should have been rated lower.

yeah but they still suck. i used to think they were at least technically skilled until i figured out what arpegiators were

>caring about other people's opinions about music

this