It was a real set though

It was a real set though.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=HMUKGTkiWik
starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Toilet
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

where's your proof?

That's a big set.

Not sure which is worse; that they make a CGI room that looks fake as shit or that they make a real room look like shitty CGI.

Making something real look fake is actually kinda impressive.

It's meant to look unrealistically clean and expansive, to give the movies a sort of fairytale, golden age old timey feel.

I don't think so. Lots of scifi has this problem where all the sets look really clean and bare because it's difficult to imagine what kind of clutter would make a room like realistically occupied in a futuristic setting.

>carpet in space

Anybody else hate this? It's why the TNG Enterprise looks shit too. They never had carpet in the OT.

Looks like the lobby of a 1993 movie theater

It doesn't need to look like a plastic toy fresh out of the box though.

>it's difficult to imagine what kind of clutter would make a room like realistically occupied in a futuristic setting.

Even if it's bare, you can make it look worn/used. We're supposed to believe that for over a thousand generations the Jedi were guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic and the buildings that all of the stuff takes place in looks like it was built from an Ikea flatpack that morning...

You're so right. Like there's a rack of postcards with movie stills at the bottom of a staircase right around the corner.

The do cgi in the door in some shots though, which looks awful.

It's not carpet in space.

It's carpet on a planet.

Just like earth.

Because earth have carpets

And it's in space.

I mean.

You know.

Buttcakes.

Carpet in sci-fi then. I don't like carpet in sci-fi. It's ugly.

Yeah for ep 3

The shot that looks like horrible cgi in ep 2 is the same room, but i guess they learnt their lesson.

>and the buildings that all of the stuff takes place in looks like it was built from an Ikea flatpack that morning...

Maby they were? Maby Sheev had OCD or something and everything had to be constatnly clean and new. Maby that was why he turned to the dark side

I loved the way Bespin looked though

Looks like a big porno set.

why is everyone complaining about the room being empty. its literally his 'sit in comfy chair and watch speeders go by and think about sith stuff room'. theres no need to fill it with a bunch of fucking office clutter that we wouldnt understand

...

...

...

Lets be clear phantom menace did a great job balancing visuals and sets its just the plot is somewhat dumb
And george threw the balance out with the sequels

...

There's a shot where Anakin's foot clips through the carpet though.

...

Wall-to-wall carpeting IRL is an abomination too.

...

...

(you)

...

...

Who gives a damn what you think, you disney cock swallowing piss of human excrement. Fucking TFA was pure shit. fuck off.

also there are no toilets in the star wars universe.

It's actually post release damage control PR to dampen the criticism of the CG fest that was the prequels.

>tfw OCD and wash my hands a lot
>can't make it through a single medieval fantasy flick because everything/everyone looks dirty as fuck all the damn time

The emporor palpatine center for kids whole can't read good

TFA had bad CG too
shit like orange yoda and the rolling tentacle balls only stook out more when put next to all the practical effects they had in the same movie

>Even if it's bare, you can make it look worn/used

Dude, Lucas knows that. He practically *invented* that with Tattooine and the Millennium Falcon. Star Wars is one of the first movies to have a "used future" look to it.

But the office of the Supreme Chancellor of the Galactic Republic isn't a place that should have a "used" look to it.

In that "I ain't even mad" kind of way.

>Build a set
>CGI over it anyway
Bravo Lucas

...

This

What's worse is that you have no clue what you're even complaining about. Go sit down.

They're floating at the beginning.

Jesus, the CGI really aged like fucking garbage. It looks like a PS3 game. Those fucking chairs.

The shittiest part of that shot isn't the CGI, it's the horrible matte painting hallway.

NEWSFLASH: practical effects aren't always good.

>complain about effects in the original star wars
>"well it was the best they could do at the time"
>complain about effects in the prequels
>"haha yeah they look like a ps3 game"
Quit being a hypocrite.

And TFA's CGI was such utter and complete shit and unlike the prequels which was a world elsewhere, I felt like TFA used ST into darkness unwanted set pieces and set ups.

Who complains about the effects in the original star wars? They are and will always be GOAT.

The effects in the original Star Wars look like shit.

Yoda looks like a shitty puppet. He looks like a shitty Kermit the Frog.

Fuck your nostalgia.

Lucas had an uncanny ability to make even real things look like shit CG,

Did you guys know that spinning actually works in real life? Had a rowdy Uber driver last night and I was able to fend him off using this exact maneuver.

TRANSLATION: I didn't know what I was talking about and still don't.

...

Yoda looks real though, unlike orange lady. His face is no less expressive than CGI and it's actually really there and not just a cartoon pasted into the footage.

youtube.com/watch?v=HMUKGTkiWik

starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Toilet

How can the highground even compete against that?

For you

look at the numbers in the upper left corner. the guy in red has already almost won, so he just stays passive while the blue one is desperate

how did they not burn it during the lightsaber fight?

The effects in the original /were/ the best they could do at the time. The effects in the prequels were not.

>Yoda looks real
He looks like a puppet. Even a child can tell that he is a puppet and not a real human being.

And he isn't even a really good puppet at that.

To put it another way
>take sock off foot
>put on hand
>make eyes with marker
>"hurr durr this effect is good because it REAL"

Nah, a lot of the effects in the original trilogy looked hokey as fuck back then. I remember, at the time, laughing at a lot of the shitty costumes, especially the stupid ones like Satan in the space bar. Chewbacca was the worst looking thing, and I remember laughing when Leia pushes him out of the way and calls him a rug.

>The dark side of the Force is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be ... unnatural.

I hate this place sometimes

is that room at the 0:07 just painted?

>that muslim is "german"

You might as well complain that the Oval Office looks too clean.

Yep. It's called a matte painting.

you obviously have never been to a combat sports school. many of them are full of shitskins

>PS GAME
Do you realize this is a compliment? We've come a long way with effects for you to compare videogame graphics.

Also, the set is real but the actors or super imposed on it.

>Yoda looks real though
Take off the nostalgia googles. There are OT purists that edited the films because he obviously looks like a puppet. He doesn't blink, he doesn't breath and he doesn't move natural. The OT is even more dated when looking at them in HD.

>blotches surrounding fighters
>matte paintings really stand out
>obvious puppetry

Perhaps the materials do not agree quickly. Also droids clean everything.

They couldn't even use real lava, WTF!

no