So I have a computer with internet via router, the router is 10.4.4.4/8. A computer on 10.3.3.3/8 can ping it. This computer has another interface, 10.2.2.2/8. On the other side of that is a computer on 10.1.1.1/8. The computer in the middle can ping everything. The computer on 10.1.1.1/8 can ping as far as 10.3.3.3/8 but it cannot ping the router. Why is this?
>>inb4 enable forwarding at the kernel, did that >>inb4 what strange ips you have, was hoping to have everything talking cuz same subnet >>inb4 misuse of Sup Forums/b >>inb4 misuse of inb4, posting tits
Michael Powell
none of that shit makes sense what are you even doing just get a switch and run everything through that to the router or something
Blake Gray
Bump
Luis Jenkins
I got 2 computers and a usb hotspot, no dhcp
Andrew Watson
Can you do a TCP dump on the Router to see if packets are reaching it? Also, what's between 10.1.1.1 and 10.4.4.4? Either packets are received and the router does not reply based on firewall settings, or something is stopping it along the hops.
Zachary Anderson
Don't ask Sup Forums to help with your Networking 1 summer course homework.
Zachary Allen
your subnet masks are probably bad. Get new subnet masks. pour them into the right most hole in the router.
John Baker
Don't do this!!!! It makes mustard gas!!!
Austin Anderson
Was thinking it was routing table issue
Oliver Allen
If the subnet masks are good, the only issue would be: a) pointing to alternate default gateway that doesn't connect to 10.4.4.4 b)Subnet mask is incorrect on one of the devices, making it not reachable within it's network c) something is blocking the request and/or reply for the proto 1 packets.
Tyler Rodriguez
arp issue somewhere. looks like either the switch they're all connected to or the router itself.
Adam Watson
>something is blocking the request and/or reply for the proto 1 packets. you mean like an immigrant or something?
Ethan Adams
Or the fact everything is on the same subnet.
Mason Morales
That would be raping of the packets, faggot
It would be more libtards and their never ending agendas
Hudson Nelson
Yes, why is this bad?
Ayden Reyes
>Delete System32
Isaac Clark
Well.. pinging by name or ip?
Colton Long
It's an idiot's design for 4 fuckin PCs. Same subnet should not be a problem, but why use a /8 if you aren't going to allow for expansion of network later on.
Go back to formula, dickless
Brayden Ross
Ip
Noah Lopez
isn't enough they are on the SAME subnet, the question is are they on a subnet that allows all the ip addresses thru.
By the way, if I buy Viagra on the internet, how can I be sure I am getting good Viagra, not some fake pills that are just painted blue?
Parker Lee
>Ask a friend to take the first one. >Slip it into girls drinks at a bar to help discover traps
Jack Thomas
I guarantee that you've fucked up a netmask somewhere.
Ayden Miller
A 10/8 should let everything starting 10. See eachother i thought
Brody Edwards
I may not be understanding the description fully of the topology. But the way I read it sounds like a couple of computers act as routers , but all their interfaces are in the same /8 segment.
Nathaniel Cox
It should, unless you fucked up the subnet mask somewhere, or you fucked up your cabling.
David Bailey
So I have to travel around with traps to test my Viagra? Sounds like I could get trapped alone with a bunch of bonering traps. Sound dangerous. In an exciting way.
Owen Fisher
I like to call it Date Roulette. It's where you buy girls drinks and talk about the first thing that pops up.
Nolan Nelson
sometimes I attach a network cable into our router and the other end in my ass. Then I sit and feel like I am part of the network.
Logan Gonzalez
This. You should not be using /8. That tells the computers that 10.x.x.x is all reachable on the local interface. use /16 or /24 for your subnet mask. That should fix it, but you may also have to update routing tables and set default routes appropriately on everything.
Samuel Gutierrez
Talk about a shitty node
Tyler Martin
bismuth is homo.
Asher Scott
Whats the difference between what i did and 192.168.1.1/24 192.168.2.2/24 192.168.3.3/24 192.168.4.4/24
Andrew Price
Delete $(echo {system,/}32)
Colton Moore
everyone's switched to systemd
Daniel Gomez
Go wiki subnets, you literal retard.
Michael Ross
Apparently not the catholics, lol.
Kevin Green
{S darudesandstorm.wav}
Chase Perez
There's a board for this kind of bullshit, why are you asking Sup Forums?
Xavier Watson
Cuz i went to school for this and didnt get it, need a bit more edge. Thank you all of Sup Forums
Matthew Wilson
Exactly.
Jonathan Morgan
Next time study instead of sucking off the teacher for grades.
Thomas Jenkins
uhhhmmmmm
Andrew Young
So you're asking Sup Forums instead of Sup Forums, you really are retarded.
Grayson Perry
Inb4 misuse of Sup Forums, shutup fag
Gabriel Stewart
need routing to traverse to non connected networks. insert static route on middle computer. And if you want to use different subnets don't use /8 for networks where /28 will do. Nothing says imbecile like using /8 in a LAN with
Isaac Martinez
I misused your mother
Jordan Gray
Ive done /29 before, couldnt get a /30 though I like the scalibility of /8
Isaac Bailey
Only faggots avoid CIDR house rules.
Parker Mitchell
128.1.1.1/32
bitch!
Lincoln Brooks
Dafuq, dont you mean 127?
James Bailey
What's the gateway on the last PC?
Ryan Murphy
why are you daisy chaining PCs together you fucking moron just get a cheap $30 unmanaged switch and connect everything to that.
Colton Barnes
So im doing this on linux boxes, they dont have a pretty gateway ip box like windows does. They have a routing table and im not entirely sure how that works other than default gateway is like this
Ip route add default via 10.2.2.2 dev eth0 src 10.1.1.1
This is on the farthest computer 10.1.1.1, gateway would be 10.2.2.2
Jayden Butler
Cuz it should be possible derp
Elijah Ward
it's an overly complicated way to solve an easy issue.
Jordan Wood
Security, simplicity, portability, possibility; fucking a Sup Forums it doesnt matter. For the record, not every walmart router lets you plug a hotspot into it. At least not one with a dhcp server that crashes when you tether
John Stewart
So im thinking maybe pre/post routing iptable -t nat rules have to be set. Im not sure how that works and the packet counters dont show much promise as far as packets wanting to get routed