So I have a computer with internet via router, the router is 10.4.4.4/8. A computer on 10.3.3.3/8 can ping it...

So I have a computer with internet via router, the router is 10.4.4.4/8. A computer on 10.3.3.3/8 can ping it. This computer has another interface, 10.2.2.2/8. On the other side of that is a computer on 10.1.1.1/8. The computer in the middle can ping everything. The computer on 10.1.1.1/8 can ping as far as 10.3.3.3/8 but it cannot ping the router. Why is this?

>>inb4 enable forwarding at the kernel, did that
>>inb4 what strange ips you have, was hoping to have everything talking cuz same subnet
>>inb4 misuse of Sup Forums/b
>>inb4 misuse of inb4, posting tits

none of that shit makes sense what are you even doing just get a switch and run everything through that to the router or something

Bump

I got 2 computers and a usb hotspot, no dhcp

Can you do a TCP dump on the Router to see if packets are reaching it? Also, what's between 10.1.1.1 and 10.4.4.4? Either packets are received and the router does not reply based on firewall settings, or something is stopping it along the hops.

Don't ask Sup Forums to help with your Networking 1 summer course homework.

your subnet masks are probably bad. Get new subnet masks. pour them into the right most hole in the router.

Don't do this!!!! It makes mustard gas!!!

Was thinking it was routing table issue

If the subnet masks are good, the only issue would be:
a) pointing to alternate default gateway that doesn't connect to 10.4.4.4
b)Subnet mask is incorrect on one of the devices, making it not reachable within it's network
c) something is blocking the request and/or reply for the proto 1 packets.

arp issue somewhere. looks like either the switch they're all connected to or the router itself.

>something is blocking the request and/or reply for the proto 1 packets.
you mean like an immigrant or something?

Or the fact everything is on the same subnet.

That would be raping of the packets, faggot

It would be more libtards and their never ending agendas

Yes, why is this bad?

>Delete System32

Well.. pinging by name or ip?

It's an idiot's design for 4 fuckin PCs. Same subnet should not be a problem, but why use a /8 if you aren't going to allow for expansion of network later on.

Go back to formula, dickless

Ip

isn't enough they are on the SAME subnet, the question is are they on a subnet that allows all the ip addresses thru.

By the way, if I buy Viagra on the internet, how can I be sure I am getting good Viagra, not some fake pills that are just painted blue?

>Ask a friend to take the first one.
>Slip it into girls drinks at a bar to help discover traps

I guarantee that you've fucked up a netmask somewhere.

A 10/8 should let everything starting 10. See eachother i thought

I may not be understanding the description fully of the topology. But the way I read it sounds like a couple of computers act as routers , but all their interfaces are in the same /8 segment.

It should, unless you fucked up the subnet mask somewhere, or you fucked up your cabling.

So I have to travel around with traps to test my Viagra? Sounds like I could get trapped alone with a bunch of bonering traps. Sound dangerous. In an exciting way.

I like to call it Date Roulette. It's where you buy girls drinks and talk about the first thing that pops up.

sometimes I attach a network cable into our router and the other end in my ass. Then I sit and feel like I am part of the network.

This. You should not be using /8. That tells the computers that 10.x.x.x is all reachable on the local interface. use /16 or /24 for your subnet mask. That should fix it, but you may also have to update routing tables and set default routes appropriately on everything.

Talk about a shitty node

bismuth is homo.

Whats the difference between what i did and 192.168.1.1/24
192.168.2.2/24
192.168.3.3/24
192.168.4.4/24

Delete $(echo {system,/}32)

everyone's switched to systemd

Go wiki subnets, you literal retard.

Apparently not the catholics, lol.

{S darudesandstorm.wav}

There's a board for this kind of bullshit, why are you asking Sup Forums?

Cuz i went to school for this and didnt get it, need a bit more edge. Thank you all of Sup Forums

Exactly.

Next time study instead of sucking off the teacher for grades.

uhhhmmmmm

So you're asking Sup Forums instead of Sup Forums, you really are retarded.

Inb4 misuse of Sup Forums, shutup fag

need routing to traverse to non connected networks.
insert static route on middle computer. And if you want to use different subnets don't use /8 for networks where /28 will do. Nothing says imbecile like using /8 in a LAN with

I misused your mother

Ive done /29 before, couldnt get a /30 though
I like the scalibility of /8

Only faggots avoid CIDR house rules.

128.1.1.1/32

bitch!

Dafuq, dont you mean 127?

What's the gateway on the last PC?

why are you daisy chaining PCs together you fucking moron just get a cheap $30 unmanaged switch and connect everything to that.

So im doing this on linux boxes, they dont have a pretty gateway ip box like windows does. They have a routing table and im not entirely sure how that works other than default gateway is like this

Ip route add default via 10.2.2.2 dev eth0 src 10.1.1.1

This is on the farthest computer 10.1.1.1, gateway would be 10.2.2.2

Cuz it should be possible derp

it's an overly complicated way to solve an easy issue.

Security, simplicity, portability, possibility; fucking a Sup Forums it doesnt matter. For the record, not every walmart router lets you plug a hotspot into it. At least not one with a dhcp server that crashes when you tether

So im thinking maybe pre/post routing iptable -t nat rules have to be set. Im not sure how that works and the packet counters dont show much promise as far as packets wanting to get routed