How can you be so sure climate change isn't real?
All these world leaders seem convinced and they fact check these things.
Doesn't it seem more likely that big oil tries to hide it?
2015 was warmest year in recorded history ever btw
pic unrelated
Global warming
Cooper Reyes
Nicholas Sullivan
Of course the climate is changing numb nuts. The controversy is at what rate and how much of an impact humans have on it.
Spoilers: our impact is so low that "scientists" have to cook data to show that it's increasing a rate much higher than it actually is.
Nathaniel Turner
Everyone knows, Sup Forums is just satire
Carson Cox
I'm tiring of discussing this shit over and over and explaining why anthropogenic climate change is nothing but a political narrative (a fairy tale).
So instead of wasting my time I will link you to this video and tell you to do some thinking yourself:
youtube.com
It's five minutes and it won't kill you.
Lucas Garcia
>Doesn't it seem more likely that big oil tries to hide it?
Sure, but in my country, exon and chevron paid more taxes than any other company last year, so it's not like they are getting away with anything.
>All these world leaders seem convinced and they fact check these things.
They are convinced that they need more of my money, so they can fly their private jets more often and increase their carbon foot print as long as I am a good sheep. To them it's about control, not about science or environmentalism.
Ethan Jenkins
It's witchdoctor bullshit. None of the alarmist claims show up in the actual paleoclimate data, and all of the model predictions have utterly failed. Pic related.
Cooper Russell
Did you even watch the video? He says Co2 is a greenhouse and it increases temperature
Mason Morris
The question isn't whether CO2 blocks certain wavelengths of light. It's whether the conclusions made about laboratory observations translate to the climate system in general. The alarmist hypothesis is that they do, but as we have so far seen, the predictions made based on this hypothesis have all been completely false.
So what should we do with a hypothesis that proves to be wrong over and over again?
Also, see
Joshua Rogers
1. Co2 has a greenhouse effect
2. More Co2 is pumped into the atmosphere
That 3. The greenhouse effect increase is thus a necessary conclusion no? Will look through that pic
Jonathan Morgan
See how all these charts works with thousands or millions of years and in the only pic working with 2010-2020 they admit a drastic increase in temperature?