Death Grips

Dose any faggot get this album? Or is it just a weird nigger with 2 masters making music.

You couldn't be more obvious if (You) tried.

reported

a man's bare wang dang doodle does not belong on a work safe board

This is their worst album, absolute shit

>circumcised
Disgusting, I actually prefer the censored version

That's where you're wrong, kiddo. 2nd after Bottomless Pit. Exmil is third.

>exmil
>bad
Consider suicide

Best thread on Sup Forums

>Andy Morin is a weird nigger
Yep

Show me where I said Exmil is bad.

Oh, I thought you said it was third worst. Still not bad either way.

My parents always told me I wasn't circumcised.
Why the fuck don't I have a foreskin?

Maybe yours is just short or something. I'm sorry you have to deal with your pants rubbing your dick head raw when it's flaccid, drives me nuts when mine gets pulled back.

...

What did he mean by this

The jews

Though I don't prefer the censored version because censorship is abhorrent, it is true that this album cover would look much better if the penis was not circumcised.

>Tell brother and mother if I have a son I won't circumcise him
>they proceed to go into a hissyfit about it being safer to be cut because it "prevents STDs"
Reminder that most people here in burgerland still believe this shit.

I hear the shit about circumcision keeping your dick clean more than anything else. I've only found like one speck of dick cheese in my entire 20 years. People just straight up don't know what they're talking about.

Literally their best album, kys faggot.

Foreskins are to Jews as mushrooms are to Mario.

True though. Don't see any foreskin dumps around the world

its actually just zach hill producing apparently. him and ride shared an apartment and fucked around.
btw ride is college educated and zach is a high school dropout, so while zach is an amazing artist, ride is not the nigger here

...

>What began as speculation has resulted a century later in 60-75% of American boys being circumcised with no clearly confirmed medical benefit. In the interim, no solid epidemiological evidence has been found to support the theory that circumcision prevents STDs or to justify a policy of involuntary mass circumcision as a public health measure. While the number of confounding factors and the inability to perform a random, double-blind, propective trial make assessing the role of circumcision in STD acquisition difficult, there is no clear evidence that circumcision prevents STDs. The only consistent trend is that uncircumcised males may be more susceptible to GUD, while circumcised men are more prone to urethritis. Currently, in developed nations, urethritis is more common than GUD [34]. In summary, the medical literature does not support the theory that circumcision prevents STDs.

Van Howe, RS. Does circumcision influence sexually transmitted diseases? A literature review. BJU Int., Vol. 83 Supp. 1, pp. 52-62, Jan. 1999.