Whats really wrong with interracial relationships? We live in a free country after all

Whats really wrong with interracial relationships? We live in a free country after all

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outbreeding_depression
jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/18/1270.ful
online.wsj.com/article/SB116096445875393515.html?mg=com-wsj
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle_cell_anemia
nps.gov/plants/restore/pubs/restgene/1.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because Blacks are included.

...

Tards on this site get mad when they see a white girl with a black guy because they think they're taking ' their girl' when in reality they would just be fucking Chad instead of them anyways if interracial relationships were banned

Nothing. We're moving towards one race, and there's nothing bigots can do about it

Also, this

If interracial relationships were illegal, these white girls would still be dating blacks because they obviously love danger.

Women would reproduce with dogs if they could. >Who's it hurting after all?

>implying men don't fuck their farm animals

>don weedotte

Imagine a beautiful blue and violet flower.

Now imagine a beautiful red flower.

Now you wanna cross pollinate them all to produce some muddy brown flowers. You see nothing wrong with that?

>equating humans to flowers

Keep telling yourself that. Women love bad boys, no matter what race

Let me help you out leaf. Genetic diversity you moron.

>Yea, we should just let people do whatever they want. I mean, everyone is consenting adults right? We should totally allow interracial/gay/group marriage. If someone thinks they are another sex/race/species we should all just go along with whatever severe mental disease the person has.

That's your argument.

nice strawman

that color contrast

> Letting somebody marry and reproduce with somebody they love

> somehow a bad thing

That's your argument

>equating interracial marriage to transgenderism and polygamy
Are you legitimately autistic?

Posts like this make me realize I'm on Sup Forums instead of infinity.

I.e. NeoGAF 1.5.

humans will never mix to point where they are all the same.

Actually, transgenderism and polygamy is less dangerous, few people do those things.

But interracial marriage? Give us a few decades and we'll be like Northern Brazil. You should visit some of the favelas there before you declare you want America to be like that.

Genetic diversity is a good thing. Have several homogenous populations and it'd be easy for one to quickly succumb to a virus because no one was resistant.

Basic fucking biology.

Please, you disgusting nigger, stop spamming this picture.

>Look, this country is shit.
>It also does X.
>Don't do X, because suddenly you'll become shit.

Solid logic you fucking retard.

Any other explanations for Northern Brazil's shittiness? What, do they not have enough capitalism?

Of course it is easy to ponder the benefits of race mixing when you live in a rich Asian country without blacks and hispanics, isn't it Chang?

Genetic diversity in this context simply means don't fuck your first cousin. It certainly does not mean go fuck members from another continent.

Just because I don't have an explanation for a region I have never seen or cared about in my entire life doesn't mean that suddenly faulty logic isn't faulty after all.

You're fucking retarded and you need to go back to school.

Blacks are disgusting and so are mixed race people.

[citation needed]

Genetic diversity means genetic diversity. Whether that's fucking someone from the next county, state, country, or continent, the more you can get of it, the safer humanity is.

There's nothing wrong w/ interracial marriage. Those couples just need to realize that there are a lot of haters out there that will give them shit.

Stick to your cancerchan, user. If you had been here any appreciable amount of time, you'd still be here through thick and thin

How is the logic bad? A country is the people who live in it, therefore if the country is shitty, then that must have something to do with the people in it.

Oh that's right, anything you disagree with must be bad logic. Don't get triggered so easy next time, my yellow friend.

Alright that's it. Canada's filtered. I can't take this anymore.

Start importing Jamal and Ahmed into your country, then speak about the wonders of genetic diversity.

Or, you know, it could have something to do with the natural resources available, the countries surrounding it, or an imperial state, be it Portugal or Brazil, with no regard for the locals exploiting their wealth and not building infrastructure.

You can't be stupid enough to think there are only two variables in this equation. Correlation doesn't equal causation. It's shitty logic and a 9th grader could tell you that.

Not an argument. Show me a scientific study that says the less genetic diversity, the better. Just one.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outbreeding_depression

The Race for Ancestral Genetics in Clinical Trials
>A seasoned cancer researcher would never set up a study in which all the ill patients were, say, Canadian, and all the healthy controls were Japanese. And yet cancer researchers risk making a similar mistake if they overlook genetic information that fleshes out what many of us like to think of as race or ethnicity, some experts say.

>Fortunately, awareness of how ancestral genetics might contribute to risk of disease and drug response in people has risen over the last several years. Studies that look directly at the problem are on the rapid rise, and this increased interest has biotechnology companies lowering the cost of tests that determine genetic ancestry, thanks to a little competition. However, experts have yet to decide on how to genetically define ancestry, suggesting examining anywhere from a handful to hundreds of gene variants.

>Not including information on the race or ethnicity of study volunteers could skew disease risks as stronger or weaker than they really are.

>"Alzheimer's disease is the poster child for this problem," says pharmacogeneticist Esteban Burchard, M.D., of the University of California in San Francisco. A variant of the gene ApoE4 is a strong genetic risk factor for early-onset Alzheimer's disease, and the characteristic most likely to raise or lower that risk is race.

>"It occurs in about 20% of the African American population, and it means nothing. It occurs in about 6% of the Japanese, and it makes their risk six times higher [than that for white people]," Burchard said. "Something about being Japanese unleashes the wrath of the gene, and something about being African American attenuates it."
jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/18/1270.ful

BiDil
>The FDA have approved a heart failure drug called Bidil, but only for blacks, as blacks do not benefit from conventional heart failure drugs.
online.wsj.com/article/SB116096445875393515.html?mg=com-wsj

Sickle-Cell Disease
Sickle cell anaemia is a condition found almost exclusively in blacks, about 1 in 4 west Africans carry the gene for it, almost no whites do. Any whites who carry the gene most likely have a black ancestor.

As a result of population growth in African-Caribbean regions of overseas France and immigration from North and sub-Saharan Africa to mainland France, sickle cell disease has become a major health problem in France. SCD has become the most common genetic disease in this country.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle_cell_anemia

Nothing wrong with interracial marriage...so long as its between a white and an Asian

Reducing any and every argument to your logic is fucking retarded.

Sure faggot, your reducing of every argument is childlike and fucking retarded. Pretty easy way to argue.

Also, move to fucking Brazil if you want to ladymen to fuck your ass, don't bring that shit to somewhat civilized countries.

>wikipedia

>The concept is opposed to inbreeding depression, although the two effects can occur simultaneously
>although the two effects can occur simultaneously

The entry itself says that this largely depends on the environment at hand.

PROPAGANDA EVERYWHERE

Ah yes, because reducing an argument to it's core logic is somehow strawmanning it.

Kill yourself.

Well it's good for hu-whites, but Asians are reducing their average I.Q. when they breed with us.

Look up Malmo, Sweden. They import the third world trash there and can't maintain all of the crime, gangs, and rapes. You want fucking statistics to satisfy your anal urges for proof look it fucking up, it isn't too hard.

No, not a crime study. A study profiling how somehow we become more resistant to viruses as we become more homogenous.

>not using alternative chans in conjuction with cuckchan
It's impossible to have an actual discussion or get anything done here. If you really were an oldfag that contributed you'd realize there's no point in crippling yourself.

Your children will find out.

And what about Delhi, hmm? It's one of the most homogenous cities I can think of, and it's crime rate is shit.

>Discrediting any and all proof, as unreliable.

How convenient for your nigger worshiping argument.

>Imblying Brazil doesn't have enough natural resources
get a load of this goy, also Africa is the most resource rich continent on the planet, and look at them...
>Countries surrounding it
Well that's a good point, they are surrounded by mestizo countries, but i think that adds to my original point
>Imperial state
They've been independent for well over 100 years. when does the white imperialism excuse wear off? 200 years, 500 years?
>

Exactly where did I do that in that post?

Mixing people together doesn't increase the genetic diversity of the planet because the amount of genes stay the fucking same.
If you mix everybody together, you run the risk of all of humanity being wiped out by a disease because none of us were different enough to counteract it.

Nothing, the idiots here are just really insecure.

It's also full of subhumans.

this.

No amount of proof will satisfy Singapore-bro. He will continue to misrepresent, intentionally or not, our statements to suit his narrative.

Only real racists want everyone to be mixed.

I never said mix everyone together. Who's strawmanning now?

There is more than one human population, and their allele frequencies are different. It only does good to sprinkle in, if you will, a few new alleles.

...

Define "subhuman".

And point out to me studies which somehow prove that Indians fit this definition.

After all, isn't it Indians that head up the largest tech companies in Silicon Valley?

Do what you want.

Just don't expect me to care when you end up in a ditch.

Where did I misrepresent your argument? Point it out for me. Once again, reducing an argument to it's core logic is NOT strawmanning.

>Whats really wrong with [murder]? We live in a
>Whats really wrong with [racism]? We live in a free country after a free country after all
>Whats really wrong with [discrimination]? We live in a free country after all
>Whats really wrong with [rape]? We live in a free country after all

...

Several of your graphs contradict each other. For example, the bar graph about 2008, and the marriage pattern pie charts.

Fine, I was strawmanning and I'm sorry. But adding a few new genes for the sake of new genetics is dangerous. Mixing a superior people with an inferior people can only hurt the superior people, no matter how small the amount of mixing.

It's because white guys know that they can't possibly compare to black men. Black men were selectively bred to be well endowed and stronger than the white people who ruled over them, and now it has bit them on the back in a great piece of poetic justice.

Well then we have the same opinion, where we differ is where the few new alleles come from.

You say it doesn't matter. An African allele is just as good as an European allele.

Most of the sane nationalists on this board will disagree.

I don't have any studies. I just don't like Indians and I think they have a self destructive culture.

So your definition of subhuman is:

>muh feels

Lovely.

Subhuman is an insult, not a scientific idea.
Get over it.

Oh, do tell me how Europeans are superior to Africans in every single way you can think of.

Races have their advantages and disadvantages. Genetic diversity has it's advantages, period. Given enough time, the clustering of alleles that would have entered from the race mix would have been dispersed. Next argument.

Then why'd you try and present it as an objective argument? Stop contradicting yourself.

Delete this, goy.

You're high if you think blacks or arabs want to be a part of your "one race"

You must be getting me confused with the other burger. I never said that.

>Show me a scientific study that says the less genetic diversity.

I never claimed that less diversity is better. I have problems with race-mixing because it lowers white I.Q.

>Whats really wrong with interracial relationships? We live in a free country after all

What's right for you is wrong for others.
White guilt makes some people do a lot of retarded stuff. You become a sad racist (Liberal left) rather than an angry racist (i.e. Christians) because of white guilt.

The only way to be a happy racist is to have an actual community, not feeling akin to all white people for some reason.

Is a first generation mixed race person superior to an ordinary person?

The argument is that Indians suck so a place with a lot of Indians sucks.
What's so hard to get about that?

Depends on the mix itself, not as in between each races, but the genetic code of the new individual. But, as I've argued, they have the benefit of virus resistance from both sides.

That's subjective. Why'd you try and present it as otherwise?

IQ which has been rising among all races for centuries? A tiny setback of a select section of the population isn't going to stunt the overall growth, nice try though.

I gave my own, personal, subjective opinion.
Is that so weird?

>nice try though
I'm getting tired of this shit

>Feelz > realz

Really?

Admit you've lost the argument and give up then.

Never said that Europeans are superior to Africans in every single way either.

I just don't my people to race-mix with blacks.

Each ethnicity has it's own special characteristics and should be preserved.

You're the goy you lier
איר ליגנער

Not evening arguing, buddy

>leaf
>free country

>Each ethnicity has it's own special characteristics and should be preserved.


It literally will though, while building up disease resistance. No one is fucking calling for everybody to have an interracial relationship.

>I just don't my people to race-mix with blacks.


Also, no one elected you representative of the white race either you daft twat.

>utterly btfo
>N-Not even arguing, b-buddy

Pathetic.

And he never said he had power over it, did he?
He's just giving his own opinion because he can.
It's okay, though

But you and he DID argue that genetic homogenity was objectively good. Don't pull the "Hey man, it's just an opinion man, all that time I spent spewing bullshit was just an opinion man, I can have opinions that completely contradict common sense man" card/.

Show me a scientific study that says the more genetic diversity, the better. Just one.

Sure.

nps.gov/plants/restore/pubs/restgene/1.htm

>1c. Diversity within populations reduces potentially deleterious effects of breeding among close relatives.

>1d. Genetic diversity is the primary basis for adaptation to future environmental uncertainty.

Well, if your white women prefer blacks, it's their own fault. It's, like, natural selection.

Great so you're against race mixing. You want genetic diversity.

Oh fuck, they're even doing it subliminally now

Race mixing doesn't fucking imply that everyone should throw romantic interests out the fucking window and mix with the nearest black, it means that YOU LET PEOPLE LOVE EACH OTHER BECAUSE OF THE POSITIVE EFFECTS OF INTRODUCING FOREIGN ALLELES INTO THE GENE POOL.

8 to 9 times out of ten you'll marry into the same race. It's best to keep that balance.

It is obvious there is a narrative being forced through music, movies, and pretty much all of Western culture to promote white women to mix. It doesn't appear to be working since
>White women demand more money to fuck niggers in porn
>White women are statistically the least likely to mix
>White men and Asian women are the most desired of their respective genders
I have lived in the South half of my life, we have no shortage of coalburners down here. One thing I have noticed from them is they are trashy, masculine, and above all else they seem to hate their white features. Many coalburners tan obsessively, dye their hair and put product in it to make it flat and thin, and they also talk like black women and act abrasive and brash. Literally every coalburner I went to high school with came from a single-mother home.

I guess what I am trying to say here is if your interracial relationship is based on love and the relationship is healthy then go for it. But if you're doing it because you're self hating, or subconsciously repeating the cycle of single-motherhood that your mother doomed you with, or what ever else you may do it for other than love/stable reasons, you're simply trash.