/sag/

/sag/

Post your Political Compass edition

Pic related.


I'm not a Communist tho...

Other urls found in this thread:

macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/26363/53/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Gardner_(soldier)
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Clear lefty bias.

>Libtard

uuuhhh... is this good?

Out of the way, children

RADICAL CENTRIST COMING THROUGH

...

hello friendo

Hola hermano

I fixed the axis.

you're like a little brainlet

Get on my level

who /radicalcentrist/ here?

I want to throw all the commies in this thread from aircraft into large bodies of water

Where are the /sag/ guys?

I got a result similar to yours and I'm a natsoc.

So I am a Libertarian Capitalist.

VICTORY TO SWARNA BHARAT PARTY!

I love being a capitalist pig tbqh

...

Off you go !

I'll probably be one soon at this rate

Wtf I love Sup Forums now

...

updated

Hello mate. /sag/ zindabad.

Libertarianism is the only way to improve our economy after the harm done to it by bureaucracy and decades of socialism.

C'EST LA LUTTE FINALE
GROUPONS-NOUS, ET DEMAIN
L'INTERNATIONALE
SERA LE GENRE HUMAIN

bump for the glory of South Asia.

is bangladesh worth touring?
macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/26363/53/

It seems like I'm settling down

People quite hospitable, food is great.

Cox Bzar beach is nice if you avoid the Rohingya infested areas.

Visit Sunderbans before it's ruined by the coal plant. Though you probably won't see a tiger.

Other than that, no.

you stepped on snek for the last time, you commie motherfuckers

/sag/ lives on!

Are those Rohingyas refugees? How are they treated in Bangladesh?

Thats close imo

...

The government wants them out. They seek to relocate them in an island. Only about 30,000 out of the maximum estimate of 500,000 are considered legal refugees.

The average Bangladeshi is sympathetic to them but the locals in the area that live close by don't like them. They think they take jobs from them because they work for much lower wages. Plus, there's also the fact that they block any further development for more tourist attractions in the area.

The regulars are here.

>Based paki
>Nepali Bro

We miss you

...

Sorry I was too busy sucking cock

Well it's just the Nepali fag now.

...

I don't even fucking know anymore

How do Pakis feel about Bangladeshi independence?

It's been relatively consistent over the past few years.

...

It was a sad event that was a result of our army and Government mistreating them.

Most of us here want Pakistan to be united but understand the dicrimination. India's intervention was an asshole act. You aren't supposed to interfere with other countries internal affairs.

Took this a while back, I lost the picture but I got liberal. (Green square but still close to the centre).

I got the similar results in both the tests.

Yet our nations are noticeably different.
Interesting. I guess humans are pretty similar regardless of where they are around the world.

B'ump

Nepali guy just disappeared after asking about video games...

What the fuck is wrong with Sup Forums?

Green sqare is less authoritarian commie. It dosn't even make sense. But it isn't liberal. The purple one is liberal. If people are to be provided with liberty then you have to decrease the role and power of government and hence capitalism is needed to run economy as there will be less public funding and investment with a weaker goverment.

>2017
>not being libsoc

Maybe he is buisy playing a new videogame.

Liberal simply means non-authoritarian.
Calling green square commies is like calling purple square fascists

But how can a liberal society be socialist if there is no powerful Central Authority to keep control of all means of production.

Like many Scandinavian countries.
You have the wrong kind of socialism in mind. That's Marxist socialism.

...

Green master race.

...

But according to your Ideology there should be no master.

Anarchist?

Anarcho socialists with their 'muh hapiness' meme.

...

...

Sup Forums is a leftist board confirmed

btw I'm always somewhere like OP
too lazy to do it again

same here

Triggered Sup Forums isn't a Sup Forumstard echo chamber?

WTF I hate Sup Forums now!

As expected

Kinda dumb that Tradition and "Science" aka. Progress are contrary of each other

Moderation is healthy

That is kind of dumb, but what site is that?

8values

They kinda are though
Traditionalism is opposite of progressivism. Traditionalist (especially religious fundamentalist) societies are also not very big on scientific ventures usually

ty, found it anyways though

Traditional v. Science works with religion, but not customs and culture.

So I was reading into some history about South Asia since I asked a and I got into the Maratha Empire. They had a lot of skirmishes with the Mughal Empire but my favorite conflict was the Afghan-Maratha war.

>Ahmad Shah comes storming in his third (and finally successful) invasion of india with 100,000 soldiers
>he meets 70,000 Maratha troops right around Panipat
>the Maratha forces were (allegedly) fasting for some Hindu ritual and escorting 150-200,000 civilians, but they still manage to take out a decent number of the Afghans

But then I read some more and I've got to ask. Is the Sikh Empire a giant meme? Basically
>Maratha's never go back to a dominant position in India because (at maximum) 60% of their army was lost
>Ahmad Shah loots Delhi but loses the chance to take over India then because (at maximum) 40% of his own army was lost

They then basically swooped in when everyone was weakened and took control over Northern India. They were outnumbered for the vast majority of their battles, don't get me wrong, but they still never had to face an army in their top form like the Maratha's did.

Also, why didn't the Maratha's make allies with the Skih Empire or the Rajputs? They could have easily turned the tide of the battle. The Durrani Empire did so I don't know why they didn't follow.

And why did the Maratha's chimp out on the Rohilla-Afghans the first chance they had after they got a little unfucked?

what he said
those question really give you an impression that you are anti-science if you are a traditionalist. At least to me idk...
Your traditional ways of life, customs, culture should not be so contrary to "science" which is somehow a part of progressivism in this poll

Nothing makes me angrier than seeing teens and edgelords thinking they are some kind of science geeks because they are anti-religious and liberal.
"Science is my religion"
Fuck off.

Where have all the poo's and ahmed's disappeared to?

...

In India, religion is a dominant part of society. From what I have seen, throughout the history of South Asia, religion has only led to violence and misery in the region. The chauvinism surrounding "Indian culture" is widespread.
Despite what you think, not being a fan of religion doesn't mean someone is a fedora wearing fat neckbreard.

top quality Sup Forums thread lads.

>Is the Sikh Empire a Giant meme.

Sikh empire had the most modernised militery with great tactics and were able to control relatively large empire compared to their tiny population. The sikh empire was the last one in India to fall under the British control and it was during when their Emperor died. After the Anglo-Sikh war the British admitted that the Sikh empire was the toughest to conquer and they titled the Sikhs to be martial race.

The Marathas were able to create a larger empire simply because they were more in number.

Marathas have won just few battles from Afghans while the Sikhs have ruled over Afghans.

The Sikh Empire only survived because Rana Ranjit Singh was allied with the Company and it was invaded only 10 years after his death.

Actually..
Lets be more realistic. The only part where science and religion are so different from each other in modern times is creationism vs bing bang theory. Both unproven theories

Science is also a biology, chemistry, physics, maths, geology, psychology... There are so many religious people in these fields and then you have some fedora fags claiming to be more progressive and pro-science just because their minds have been poisoned by modern, liberal views

Religion is not anti-science. But some religious people are.
I can believe in God and believe in evolution, that we are not the centre of the universe and that we have so much more to discover.
I can live by the traditional/religious values and still believe in all the wonders that science gives us.

Yeah, I get that. Religions have done a lot of evil in this world as well.
What bothers me are large number of faggots around internet thinking they are smart because they are anti-theist

>Sikh empire had the most modernised militery with great tactics and were able to control relatively large empire compared to their tiny population. The sikh empire was the last one in India to fall under the British control and it was during when their Emperor died. After the Anglo-Sikh war the British admitted that the Sikh empire was the toughest to conquer and they titled the Sikhs to be martial race.
You say that, but the only thing I can see is that they were in the right place at the right time. Maybe they are what you say, but history will always argue otherwise.

And are you Sikh?

Why was the Sikh army so well trained anyway? The Afghan military was known back then world wide and inspired a lot of many orthodox Muslims and Mughal royalists (even the British were a little wary). The Maratha Empire had fought the Mughal Empire for a centuries and were the reason they got run inro the ground.

The Sikh's were just a bunch of backward hillybilly Punjabi's who got bullied by the Mughal Empire and other Indian kingdoms so much that they went and made their own religion.

* for centuries and were the reason they got run into the ground

They weren't well trained but they were passionate enough like the Rashidun Arab Armies.

>They weren't well trained but they were passionate enough like the Rashidun Arab Armies.
This isn't anime. You don't beat battle hardened people by having will power.

Afghans have ruled over India for a long time but the Sikhs were the only Indians to rule over Afghans. They had conqured their past conqerours and even when they were outnumbered by Afghans. It's not a small feat.

>Are you a Sikh?

No.

> The Sikh's were just a bunch of backward hillybilly Punjabi's who got bullied by the Mughal Empire and other Indian kingdoms so much that they went and made their own religion.

Sikhism was founded before the mughals entered into India. Although Sikhs have leaft their non-violent culture and adopted a martial culture later to fight from Mughals. They were peasants fighting for their rights against a powerful empire and were able to create an empire of their own and even conquered Dogras and Afghans who were known to be great warriors.

>Afghans have ruled over India for a long time but the Sikhs were the only Indians to rule over Afghans.
Why did India get their shit together so late in history? Is Hinduism a beta religion at its core?

>Sikhism was founded before the mughals entered into India. Although Sikhs have leaft their non-violent culture and adopted a martial culture later to fight from Mughals. They were peasants fighting for their rights against a powerful empire and were able to create an empire of their own
How?
>and even conquered Dogras and Afghans who were known to be great warriors.
Who are the Dogras? I got Rajputs on google so I'm guessing from them?

I get the feeling from reading all this that India's divided inherently on ethnicity and clan status. Do people get all autistic if women marry other ethncities (like a rajput with another non-rajput) or is that just a Paki thing?

The main reason for the success of sikhs was that they recognised the superiority of European military tactics and weapon technology and they hired American, Dutch and other European mercenaries to train their troops and included battalions with advance artelaries.

>Who are the Dogras?

They were warriors of Kashmir. They used to provided warriors to mughals.

I don't want to push my head into a history of the region I don't command any expertise on, but
>This isn't anime
True, but nor is this industrialized warfare with machine guns that can decimate a full battalion in less than a minute. You would've been considered an extremely capable soldier if you could fire three rounds in a minute with a breech-loading flint lock musket. A lot of times, you could've fed the first rank to the initial volley, charge over the bodies, then force the enemy into prolonged cold steel melee.

Motivation and morale mattered hugely in warfare like that. Even against the enemies who weren't particularly worse trained than themselves, we have example from the 18th century Jacobites and the 19th century Japanese civil wars that the 'warrior spirit' brought out in close-quarters combat often turned the tables around frequently. With the Mughals consciously aware of their own demise, and Marathas suffering from war fatigue, I think the combat willingness from the Sikhs must have played a big part without making things look like an anime.

>The main reason for the success of sikhs was that they recognised the superiority of European military tactics and weapon technology and they hired American, Dutch and other European mercenaries to train their troops and included battalions with advance artelaries.
Wasn't that the Maratha's?

>They were warriors of Kashmir. They used to provided warriors to mughals.
What? I thought the Rajputs were longstanding enemies of the Mughal Empire. So basically, Sikh's>>>le warrior caste?

>I thought the Rajputs were longstanding enemies of the Mughal Empire

Rajputs, as you denote, are a caste, not some sort of national-ethnic-religious community. After the Mughal conquest and consolidation of the Rajasthan in the 16th century, many of the Rajput clans ended up working with the Mughals if anything. From my scant knowledge of the Indian history, I don't think the Rajputs as a group ever had a clearly defined political allegiances. And there were/are plenty of Muslim Rajputs to be found, too.

And also chronology. The wars between the Rajput states and the Mughals are mostly the affairs of the 16th century. The revolt of the Sikhs against the Mughals broke out at the tail end of the 17th century.

Don't know about Marathas but Sikhs hired western mercenaries to train their troop. The pic related is an American mercenary in Sikh Army. He later wrote a book about Sikh Empire under Maharaja Ranjit Singh. But I don't remember that book's name.

He looks like a malnourished Scottish grandpa that got into cosplaying

sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/23990-scottish-american-mercenary-of-ranjit-singhs-army/

Wel he looks Scottish because he was a Scottish American.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Gardner_(soldier)

>By his own accounts he was born in Wisconsin to a Scottish father and an Anglo-Spanish mother. According to Baron von Hügel, who met Gardner in 1835, he was Irish, but the evidence for that assertion is obscure.
Fucking plastic paddies and fake-ass Scots

>Don't know about Marathas but Sikhs hired western mercenaries to train their troop.
Your welcome :)

He looks like a skinnier, whiter version of Ganishka (albeit with a longer nose).
Why do most Poo's or poo-ified people (like Gardener) have weird beards like that?

>Why do most Poo's or poo-ified people (like Gardener) have weird beards like that?

Sikhs wear turben and keep uncut beard so Gardner also did that when he was in Sikh Army.

>Sikhs wear turben and keep uncut beard so Gardner also did that when he was in Sikh Army.
Not that. I mean it has it's own distinctive look. Muslims let it grow everywhere like crazy.

Pic related is what I'm talking about.