How good are these movies?

How good are these movies?

listverse.com/2013/11/11/top-10-racist-movies-of-all-time/

Archive, motherfucker, ever heard of it?

Go back to Sup Forumseddit where they give a fuck about that pedantic shit

Whoever made this doesn't know how to do Clickbait you need to put at least one classic on the list that makes people turn their heads in exasperated gasps not a bunch of movies most people already agree are racist in some way.

Put one of the original Star War's trilogy, Ghost Busters or one of the Indiana Jones movies that isn't Temple of Doom or for next level bait say Citizen Kane or Vertigo is racist and then explain why in a flippant way that makes it seem obliviously obvious to you. Then watch as the clicks roll in.

Song of the South is okay.

>0.25 shekels have been added to your account

>passion on the list

Get the fuck outta here

Careful letting everyone know how old you are, user

You can get banned for that

>Passion of The Christ

Opinion discarded.

>Passion of the Christ didn't use white supremacist stereotypes of jewish peoples.

kek stormfags

>Disney makes a movie with black main characters in the 40s.
>Shows them as good people
>Became friends with Uncle Remus' actor and let the man characterize Remus as he saw fit.
>Campaigned to get Remus' actor an honorary Oscar, making him the first black to receive one.
>Gets called racist because a movie made in the 40s has some stereotypes.

I'm not giving them views, can somebody list them pls?

The Romans were white and tortured him more than Jews did.

Pilatus was gud boi. He dindu nuffin.

>Passion of the Christ
Also
>stereotypes are bad, even if they are positively portrayed

Do you even know what half of those words mean?

Do you?

you?

(You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You)

Literally all amazing movies, mostly in part of how real they portray the world which is largely racist (which isn't always a problem)

nice

>Public perception of this movie wasn’t helped by Mel Gibson’s overt anti-Semitism, but The Passion of the Christ clearly depicts the Jewish people as the cause of Jesus Christ’s death, an unfortunate misconception that has resulted in an unknown (but certainly extremely high) number of Jewish deaths over the years.

Link in the article says that this was anti-Semitic because...

>The Second Vatican Council condemned attempts to lay blame for Jesus’ death either upon all first-century Jews as a group or upon Jews of later generations (Nostra Aetate 4).

So the Jews DID have a hand in Jesus' death, we just aren't allowed to say that modern Jews are bad. How does their depiction in the film express the idea that modern Jews are bad? Was Mel supposed to cast Puerto Ricans instead so that people didn't get mad at the Jews? They're not even criticizing the film itself, they're criticizing the audience's reaction to it as anti-semetic.

If a movie portrays a historical event as it happened, and the audience feels angry over it, then how is that the directors fault? Isn't the anger the fault of the historical event?

This list is pretty dumb 2bh.

Your inability / unwillingness to plainly answer the question implies that you don't.