Why does the media defend Trump so much?
Why does the media defend Trump so much?
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
>Vox
that graph is total bullshit
Yeah?
>Clinton
>Sanders
?????????
What exactly is this based on?
wtf is this graph? -36% negative/6% positive? -36% of what?
This graph is garbage. I see very little negative coverage of Clinton, and Bernie barely gets coverage at all.
Read the article. It's pretty thorough and hard to counter.
vox.com
Too much weed, dude.
Try and find one positive article about trump that isn't written by his staff.
i aint gonna click that shit site
You sound upset...
try to link one positive Trump article written by a mainstream news site
How about that CNN interview where he started off by crying like a bitch because people were being mean to him, and the reporter, rather than telling to fuck off and go be a nigger somewhere else, started asking him about the weather and how his day had been?
>vox
To the trash it goes
It's total bull shit.
> Clinton gets more negative press
She's the queen of scandal, if she didn't break the law so often, or run a multi national money laundering ring, she wouldn't have those problems.
She did a horrible job as secretary of state.
It's almost impossible to find anything good she's done, even her own campaign struggles with it.
Her bad press is a result of her lawbreaking and horrible performance, not a media bias.
Countered.
>media evaluating media
Wow, that's terrible Does she also rape babies and eat orphans?
yeah right, the media doesnt protect clinton at all...
Had to show this to my Bernout father
Even he thinks it's bullshit
I see you are incapable of discussing this like an adult after your tissue paper argument was used to wipe my ass with.
Nice scientific evidence you got there.
Wouldn't put it past her 2bh.
If u say so
Becaus liberals like you
Enjoy being living Hippocrates
>Source: Crimson Hexagon
wtf is this shit?
i dunno is it good for the polls?
Nice post.
...
>Clinton
>Negative
Kek. Nice try, $hillary.
What a great source you have there.
in absolute terms trump's negative media time must be bigger than the summation of all the other's negative media time.
Hey shill. Read the article, the method is terrible science to begin with but this particular study was especially bad. Good luck finding a new job come november. Here's your (you)'s don't spend them all in one place
i'm upset that you're trying to source vox
at least post a screenshot so i dont have to give them views just to read their garbage article
>Hey shill. Read the article, the method is terrible science to begin with but this particular study was especially bad.
All right.
God I hate leafposters so much. It makes me wish for more Australians
>muh anecdote
galo sengen
Are you fucking kidding me
great.
you're
No
>Vox
The guys who labeled Obama's statement that ISIS is defeated "Truth" just TWO DAYS before the Paris massacre
Literally a Soros website, almost self-admitted.
Already branded borderline criminal in its propaganda by the Society of Professional Journalists