Why do people hate this man again, badlands, thin red line, days of heaven, and tree of life are all great movies
Why do people hate this man again, badlands, thin red line, days of heaven, and tree of life are all great movies
Other urls found in this thread:
Because he's a psychopath
>Even actor Adrian Brody wasn't safe from Malick's twisted vision.
>"One time I had my head held underwater and Mallick turned to me and said 'what if someone just cut this scene from the release? Maybe the pathetic performance you turned in won't even make the special features DVD menu"' My jaw hit the floor and it never really came back up. That's when I thought, is he getting in character to play a cunt, or is a cunt something that's been in him all along?"
>"Sometimes i would go to look into the cameras, and I noticed Malick had put something in the lens. It was stuff like 'What if we make this scene one long shot? Would you still be alive' and 'Lights. Camera. Grass' I had to ask him to stop because I was getting too out of breath to act."
His films are too complex for plebs
Also he is a christian.
wew, nice switch from mom-core
>what is Knight Of Cups
that literally made me get off my ass, not I'm here only once a day.
where would he be without lubezki
The New World is better than Badlands and Tree of Life
not better than badlands
People who hate him are usually not Heideggerian Christian existentialists
Other way around, friend
NO, NOT REALLY
Damn he rooffless.
Look up that quote where Lubezki gushes about how working with Malick has changed him as a cinematographer, as a parent and as a human bean
I publicly praise others whom I have actually influenced more than they did me all the time. It's called humility. You wouldn't know anything about that because you're a simple-minded braggadocious piece of literal human shit.
>It's called humility
It's called being a cuck
Yeah, he is a cuck for letting Malick use his work like that.
i hate his hat tbh
Look at his other works pre and post ToL
Revenant and Last Days in the Desert are basically Malick-lite
If it had been Lubezki influencing Malick you'd see more of those ToL guidelines cropping up in Children of Heaven or Little Princess
he's a shitty writer:
I actually agree with you. Lubezki is talentless trash and a Malick apprentice at best. Was just engaging in some harmless memeing.
>badlands
is bad.
>thin red line
Just some shitty flick focusing on the least important theatre in WW2
>days of heaven
Days of zzzZZzzz
>tree of life
Unironic pleb baiter.
oh fug u god me
pretty much this
10/10 argument right there user, well done, such detailed analysis
No, but it's still bizarrely vilified.
I don't get how someone could both like his previous films and dislike this one.
Is there a better movie about passion being followed by marriage?
ITT Ten directors we don't care for.
Antonioni --zzzzzz why do the characters have no motivation
Lars von Troll --half baked and over stuffed philosophy
Bela Tarr --zzzzzz did they invent colored film in Hungary yet?
Kiarostami --get out of that fucking car
Resnais --same shit looping for 2 hours
Fassbinder --be more melodramatic
Kubric --genre slut
PTA --frankly I just don't get what's good about his movies
Hitchcock --soulless and meaningless
Almodovar --
stale pasta
Thank you, you reminded me I need to see more Resnais.