Can we get a Danielle thread going I just lost all of my pics

Can we get a Danielle thread going I just lost all of my pics

just add her on ig/snapchat

does anyone have any nude pics of her?

bump

doesn't exist

...

...

Lol

...

Fuck off fed

...

>Lol
lol indeed, user.

Mooooooodddssssss

...

That's CP, user

AHAHAHAHAHAHAA
Sup feds

Love this slut

...

ikr

Why does anyone give a shit? Did she make a sex nudes or something?

Technically, but she looks 18, is it unethical?

yeah she did. someone posted on here before.

It's crazy how NOT her age she looks. I wouldn't fuck her being she's so young, but I'll be damned if my dick doesn't want to.

long nails are so fucking gross

Why do you guys like her so much? She's a cunty 14 year old who wears push up bras lol

Any gifs??

>reminder that she's just a little kid, pervs

Bump

ur jus making them fap harder..

so like, what are we talkin here, missounary? doggy? bj? hj? uncut fj? buttstuff? or just retarded boring self-mirror pics?

$20 says she sucked them off. Except logan, logan doesn't seem like the kind of person to do that

Who the fuck are any of these?

>a little kid
A massive slut that's already gone through puberty that looks about 18*

I think it was a selfie of her tits. I guess I have to download photo restore software in order to get it back lol.

ITT: Pedos who justify it by saying she looks 18

sounds boring

Moar Pics anyone!?

Episode aired in 2016
shot in 2015
14 on the show
its been 5 years since 2016

so tell me again how she is still 14?

A pedo is someone attracted to a pre-pubescent child, no? She has clearly gone through puberty. Addition, a minor can't be a pedo, I'm 16

Y'all are fucked in the head shes 14!! All though i do want to see her tits just once lol I'm fucked up and hate myself for this..

That's where you're wrong kiddo. Assuming you live in a country where age of consent laws are for consent to be either 16 or 18(most common for western countries) and assuming there are no "romeo and Juliet" laws in place a minor can be tried for statutory rape even if consent was given. Also get off Sup Forums underage fag

if I can recover the pic I lost I'll post it lol

15* and like it's been explained, she doesn't look her age, it's technically a crime but it's not unethical.

How? Statutory rape for someone a year younger than you? Why do they give out condoms at fucking middle schools then, you have autism. It's legal.

Ohh fuck off cuck it's perfectly ok for me. You're just mad because you can't fuck teens anymore :)

>age of consent where I live 16
>cant fuck teens
Yeah for sure bud.

So what's the age difference limit if I'm 21 how young can I go? 17 or 18? I figured 4 years max

He could just go to mexico and fuck 12 year olds?

>5 years since 2016
oof

Depends where you live user

>14 year old
Welcome to Sup Forums...

mods

PICS PEOPLE!!

danioli ravioli

Tx but don't matter in relationship anyways

Fucking an hero plz

depends where you live.

here in the UK, the age of consent is 16. but if you're over 18 and fuck a 16 year old, you can still be imprisoned for it.

but that depends on the circumstances. if #1 you were actively seeking sex from a 16 year old, #2 in a position of trust as in a carer, teacher, tutor or #3 if the parents decide you took advantage of their son / daughter and mistreated them then you're likely fucked.

the conservative party here in the UK actually considered changing the age of consent to 14 for a while until there was lots of public backlash. kinda fucked up. I think though, that it was because of mass immigration and the fact that young teens are targeted by shitskins. lowering the age of consent, if accepted by the general population, would kinda normalise such behaviours.

NEVER!!!

Quit calling for the authorities like they'll do anything, the days of moot have passed.

Oh yeah for relationship doesn't however you'd have to be careful as parents/courts could easily press charges even if she didn't want them if you had sex and if you didn't theoretically parents could still and it'd be up to the girl to testify you never had intercourse.

>here in the UK, the age of consent is 16. but if you're over 18 and fuck a 16 year old, you can still be imprisoned for it.

You sure about that? That makes no sense. What on earth does the age of consent even mean then?

Most other places it works the other way around so to speak.

Above AoC = Free for All
Below AoC = OK if age gap is 3 years or less

this.

it's especially dangerous because the general consensus is that young women (aged 14-15-16) are naive, easily led, and open to abuse because of these factors. and that young men are simply instinctual, sexual predators who just want one thing and will get it via any means necessary.

which I kinda find ironic because it was younger women that would actively seek out older young men for sex when I was roughly that age. I was ridiculed by young women in general because I wouldn't have sex with anyone at that age and so was anybody else that either couldn't or wouldn't.

young teenage girls generally take the lead sexually speaking. they're hormonal sex machines that just wanna fuck all the time in my experience. so it's kinda unfair that men are tarnished with said brush and women are considered innocent little angels. it's quite the opposite most of the time.

Here in Canada age of consent is 16, with exception of someone in power over you eg teacher, police officer etc. Then at age 18 that no longer applies. Obviously anything that would break other laws such as incest still would be illegal and non consensual.

there's a specific title for that clause in the law but I can't remember what it is. but it's basically there to stop much older people from preying on much younger people sexually. I kinda agree with it. but of course, I feel as though that law is abused because of the fallacy that young teenage girls are naive and vulnerable therefore impressionable. when in reality they're a lot more socially aware than people give them credit for, and they use how people see them to their advantage (learning to play the victim at an early age because society enforces and rewards that narrative).

I mean, I myself have been involved with many much younger girls. I'm 27, and within the last 7 years or so the lowest I've gone is 17 (just recently), I'm a decent guy. not a pushover, not an appeaser. but I don't abuse or anything. but young girls always play the victim when they can't get their own way and demonise men because it always pays off to do so. I'm lucky that none of them accused me of rape to be quite honest. because of course, nobody questions a young girl with tears streaming down her face.

...

>minors can't consent
>minors can be charged with crimes
this is what cognitive dissonance looks like.

Moar!!

this inconsistency is quite interesting to be honest

what do both points have in common?

well, both points benefit the prison system and the state narrative of "we need to protect you from yourselves"

so could it be that the state is actively demonising natural instincts for the sake of proliferating its own choke-hold on society?

MOAR

valid points.

in Denmark, where I'm from, the AOC is 15 and you can be tried and jailed as an adult when 15 (though the latter never happens in practise), which seems fair and square.. if you can consent to fuck, then you have the mental faculties to understand right from wrong and the concept of crime.

but..

you're first considered legally adult when 18 -you get to vote, run for office, pay taxes etc. That seems off, I'd say.

.. fun bi-fact: when I was young (born '75) there were no age restrictions on alcohol and cigarettes, a toddler could walk into a convenience store and buy a fifth of scotch, a pack of Camel's and a porn magazine. He could still buy the latter, and they still sell them in convenience stores.

also, demonising and criminalising these instincts will undoubtably cause people to indulge in them far more than they would if they were accepted, but in far more destructive ways. this always happens when you restrict behaviours, especially natural behaviours. they manifest in much more virulent and destructive ways as overcompensation for the restriction. so I feel as though if society was honest about said instincts and approached them in a morally sound manner, then there would be a lot less sexually destructive behaviour towards and from these young girls.

for example. it was pretty commonplace in ye olde world, for young girls to marry and begin to procreate. obviously this wasn't always ideal, there will have been examples where they were abused etc. but there will have also been examples where they were looked after. society was generally a lot rougher back then than it is now, so I feel as though if we were to go back to that system, and approached it with a more traditional viewpoint and an emphasis on morality. there would be pretty much no problem with older men being with younger women.

not for the sake of simply having sex though, for the sake of having a family.

holy shit boiz

QUADS

worship me

thats not how quads work....

You're an idiot

...

Damm what a wasted get

yeah man I agree with you on that shit.

also, I bet that since legislation came about whereby it was made illegal for kids to buy that shit, the amount of kids trying to access that shit skyrocketed because all of a sudden it was rebellious and edgy.

I think you find this across the board with a lot of things tbh. make it illegal and people suddenly want to do it because they don't like being told what to do and they revel in rebelling against authority.

so you could kinda argue in that case, that laws actually make a society less secure because with each law that's enacted, people's desire to rebel and act out increases.

why am I an idiot? and how does it work then?

Dubs trips etc etc need to start at the end.. so it needs to look like XXXX7777 or XXXXX333... not XXX7777X or XX333XXX

This wiggress is not very attractive

rly nigga

been here for two years and never have I seen people say this shit

but I've seen a ton of people celebrate quads that are all over the place in ID

the fuck

personally, I feel an AOC of 15 is fine and dandy. It works here, it feels right. Younger than that, it's starting to get sketchy.

my personal limit is 17, if I was to go lower than that (16, no lower), the girl would have to make all the moves and make it clear what she wants. I'd say she'd have to be a mature 16 year old but women don't mature at any age, so...

Well thise people need to have a 10 inch black cock shoved right down their time piehole until the suffocate on the unrelenting torrent of jozz that will gush from said cock.

You're new and probably a reason this board is shit, just look at the amount of moral fags who mention the young woman's age and try to shame other anons

Girl has sex appeal and she flaunts it. If the age is off the clock she's ready for cock. If there's grass on the field play ball

Here the AoC is 15. That exact age can of course always be debated. But it seems okay to me. I believe it's 14 in Germany. I don't see anything wrong with that either tbh. After all, we still have rape laws in effect that make it illegal to force anybody to have sex (the force doesn't have to be physical so a much older guy could indeed get in trouble if he took advantage of the immaturity of the girl).

fuck off mate, see previous reply on this

been here 2 years ^

>admitting to newfaggory
>thinks his point is valid

I have a mate who lives in Canada and apparently the age of consent used to be 14 there and there were teachers having affairs with 14 year old girls. everybody knew about it, but nobody did a thing. it was socially acceptable. he's like 40 now so this was a good while ago.

less of a newfag than most

we were all newfags once

at least one day I will become less of a fag, you on the other hand...

Aoc laws and the stigma surrounding sexually attractive teenage girls was brought about by women who realized their advancing age sharply decreased their value

Ive been here since around 2005/6. This site has changed so much. And not for the better. Thats how dubs trips etc work. Every other cunt that says any different is a newfag.

well, it goes both ways.. when something is outlawed, you have those who previously didn't give a shit who all of a sudden now feels compelled to break said law because "fuck you I won't do what you tell me" and those who previously felt the act, that is now unlawful, was fine and dandy but now that it's been criminalized "it's prolly for the because.. eh, muh law and order derp".

example: anabolic steroids were legal (or at least not criminalized) in Denmark up until 1994 -and no one gave a shit, at least about the few, fringe bodybuilders roiding in their basement gyms. Then some jocks got their panties in a twist because doping cheats dominated sports (oly lifting mainly) and demanded action, and subsequently steroids were outlawed -and suddenly all the common folks went "oh yeah, good, steroids are bad mmkay".

same with bestiality, it was legal up until two years ago and no one cared, then some idiot raped a few ponies and the tabloids got all hot and bothered and the politicians saw a chance to score points and outlawed the shit.

now everybody agrees that if old missus Lonely McLongtit gets her dog to fuck her, then she's literally a rapist.

You're a newfag, but nice dubs

...

>missounary

confirmed retard pleb

>but women don't mature at any age, so...
this is bullshit and you know it, ffs... go tell your mother, who reared and raised your ass, that she's immature.

Personally the lowest age I'll go is 16 and has a driver's license that allows her to drive alone then yes I will fuck. If shes granted the right of driving a 2000pound vehicle by the government then she can definitely make her mind up of who's cock she wants inside her.

Can't fuck teens if you can't fuck anybody