Fuck off guys

Fuck off guys
We don't need help with this

Mexico and USA have enough infrastructure to host the event singlehandedly.
This would only be a pain in the ass to travel around.

But why? Money can't be the only reason...

Money is always the only reason, monkinho

>Motivated by money
>FIFA
Stop being so cynical.

this. also, there will be 48 teams playing by then

lastly,

|
|>
|
|3
|
|

>“We will encourage co-hosting for the World Cup because we need FIFA to show we are reasonable and we have to think about sustainability long-term,” Infantino said, per Reuters. “[We could] … maybe bring together two, three, four countries who can jointly present a project with three, four, five stadiums each. We will certainly encourage it. Ideally the countries will be close to each other.”

Basically they're worried about countries passing on hosting because there would be too much cost in infrastructure

Thing is, the US has enough stadiums to host 2 different 48 team world cups and give every game it's own stadium

I don't understand why we would need it want to share

>Canada

I hope they hold the final there. I can see it now

>X beats Y 5-0
>Trudeau presents Y the trophy
>People cry that Trudeau doesn't understand football
>He tells them they don't understand life

What a fucking jerk.

With just USA is a pain in the ass to travel

They could do a better job of regionalizing stadium pairings

In 2026 there will be a wall between the US and Mexico, another wall between US and Canada and a third wall and moat between US and California

How about Brazil hosts it?

Burn you globalist cunts.

smells like fake news

Trump better build the wall

Can we fence off California the let them secede

Cities?:

Mexico City
Monterey
Guadalajara
Los Angeles
New York
Miami
Santa Clara
Chicago
Toronto
Seattle

When?

16 groups so I'm guessing 8 and 8 then split 50/50 across the board
Mexican national stadium gets the third place game and at&t stadium gets the finals
T. Infantino

We have literally one stadium in the entire country

co-hosting are incredibly uncomfy.

Won't there be an issue when Trump seals the borders with Mexico?

This is fucking retarded.

3 guaranteed spots?
3 countries to cross? I mean that's just stupid, how much time will players be traveling.

That's a lot of needless travel. Fuck off with this shit.

Mexico does not currently have the infrastructure to host a world cup, let alone a 48 team world cup. We have 3 stadiums that are world cup ready. Some others might be salvageable but it wouldn't be easy. The only shot we ever have is a shared cup.

That's clearly Baja California my man.

How would you even pay for the wall and host the world cup, it's too much.

More like two countries as most Canadian cities are very close to the US border. Also, Brazil is a huge country and teams had no problem traveling to every shithole they could stuff a stadium in.

I think it'll be fine

>No city in Tejas

wtf mang. Miami doesn't even give a shit about sakker

>Secedes
>Gets immediately invaded by Mexico
>No one notices

>Implying there wont be an Empire by the time

>California is wealthier than all of Mexico and (((protected)))

By 2026 CONCACAF should be getting 6 spots I kid you not, so it'd be pretty good to have 3 spots available for Costa Rica/Honduras/Panama.

So why would or should we help you/

Hopefully we continue our proud tradition of not scoring any goals at the world cup

Just moving around domestically in either America, Mexico, or Canada is a task in itself, why spread it over the three countries?

At least 2002's co-hosting made sense because South Korea is a country of negligible size and is very close to Japan.

>Doesn't even have its own water supply
>implying Cartels give a fuck about (((them)))

The storm is coming. I hope you MMG and then we can all get on peacefully the way it should be :)

I head 2030 is pretty much confirmed for Argentina+Uruguay because muh centenario

I doubt we have so many world cups in a row outside of Europe

>2026

Venues split between California and the USA, problem solved

California's national team might not be competitive by then, but then neither is Canada's

Meh. I'm okay with this.
It's gonna be nuts anyway with 48 teams across 4 time zones.

Talk about a world cup without culture...kek...

The world cup should never be in a country outside of Europe or south America (Mexico) included.

Prove me wrong.


Also ps Canadians are ultimate cucks. We didn't even out a bit in for the Olympics in Toronto because all the cucks on reddit were going crazy.

>in 2026, i'll be halfway to 70

lol

I'll be 29, still good.
>tfw I don't get a job by 2026

It scares me

2 times zones, they don't call them flyover states for nothing.

>mexico and canada
>countries that will exist in 2026

pick one lads

It'd be 3
>LA, Vancouver
>Texas, Mexico City, Guadalajara, Monterrey
>NY. Toronto, Miami

Our water came back famiglia. It's been raining for two months the straight. Need more snow in the Sierras though.

It's raining hard right now you cunt

so basically we're only doing it for a favor to mexico?

nah fuck that shit, mexico doesn't deserve a world cup. even 3rd worlders like brazil can pull it off, mexico is a joke. sad!

Tijuana Dallas Phoenix lad
the final is going to be in Jerry's world

we can but it's going to cost us a lot of money tho

>going to cost us a lot of money tho

yeah and you beanniggers can't even afford a wall, how are you going to host the entire planet of soccer fans?

Watch your mouth you piece of shit

SPICS AND BURGERS ONLY

NO LEAFS

you have to go back

You have to go back to whatever inbred European country you're from

North American Union

you probably have european blood

Texas has the infrastructure to unironically host the World Cup on its own. California and Florida probably do as well.

>playing the Footy in July in Mexico
laff
that's Qatar-tier of stupid 2.0

>it's a third world shithole world cup
How many of those we need?

How about a world cup shared between England, Scotland and Wales?

No one wants to go to Scotland though.