ST

What did she mean by this ?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/jU-idssPYXM?t=27s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

If you were literally perfect you'd have jarring scenes of you in your underwear forced into a movie for no reason too

>Literally perfect
>Australian

no

this single scene was more fast & furious than the whole trek movie made by the fast & furious director

>trailer showing the only second of fan service in the whole flick

If I was literally perfect I'd probably be showing off my body a lot on my own, too.

...

tight tight tight

someone post her big big bum

>TFW you will never have a hot nanny in your home

Physically perfect. 10/10

that picture always, without fail, reminds me of this meme

everything from the lighting and same style of underwear down to the horrific androgynous manface, it's uncanny

...

Alice Eve is English

Damn i wonder how many actors hit that

Isn't kirk shirtless in the first movie? Multiple times?

Sure is strange how feminists didn't get upset over that.

Just found it, he is literally in his underwear youtu.be/jU-idssPYXM?t=27s

Arnold's expression nails it

>Imagine being Arnold in that scene and having to be all like "damn, Jamie Curtis, you fuckin' fine, all sexy with your tight body and horrific androgynous monster face. I would totally have sex with you, both my character and the real me." when all he really wants to do is fuck another 16 year old in his dressing room. Like seriously imagine having to be Arnold and not only sit in that chair while Jamie Lee Curtis flaunts her disgusting body in front of you, the favorable lighting barely concealing her stretchmarks and leathery skin, and just sit there, take after take, hour after hour, while she perfected that dance. Not only having to tolerate her monstrous fucking visage but her haughty attitude as everyone on set tells her she's STILL GOT IT and DAMN, JAMIE LEE CURTIS LOOKS LIKE THAT?? because they're not the ones who have to sit there and watch her mannish fucking gremlin face contort into types of grimaces you didn't even know existed before that day. You've been fucking nothing but a healthy diet of blondes and supermodels and later alleged rape victims for your ENTIRE CAREER coming straight out of the boonies in Austria. You've never even seen anything this fucking disgusting before, and now you swear you can taste the sweat that's breaking out on her dimpled stomach as she sucks it in to writhe it suggestively at you, smugly assured that you are enjoying the opportunity to get paid to sit there and revel in her "statuesque (for that is what she calls herself)" beauty, the beauty she worked so hard for with personal trainers in the previous months. And then the director calls for another take, and you know you could kill every single person in this room before the studio security could put you down, but you sit there and endure, because you're fucking Arnold. You're not going to lose your future political career over this. Just bear it. Hide your face and bear it.

based runkle

>Isn't kirk shirtless in the first movie? Multiple times?
>Sure is strange how feminists didn't get upset over that.

It's not so much *that* Carol was shown in her skivvies, but *how* it was done that irked people. Carol ask for Kirk to turn away, but is shown changing anyhow because they depict Kirk as having the impulse control of a three year old and turning back to look. It becomes an intrusion into her privacy for the sake of a cheap thrill that also manages to show a man who is now a veteran starship captain as being absolutely immature. It says a lot about the overall maturity of Abrams and his writers. You could do it in a more naturalistic way by simply not having Carol be bothered by changing around Kirk.

MUH REVERSE SEXISM

I want to cum in her perfect little puss puss

I want her to grab my testicles VERY HARD and twist them.

>r/redpill
>fit
>College educated

That man's got jokes lmao

>lighting
>same style of underwear

None of that is the same.

I'm pretty sure the only scene in the first film where Kirk is shirtless is an actual sex scene, i.e. a scene where a person taking their clothes off makes sense.

what the fuck man

This is proof that there is no god. Why would any superior being allowed faces like hers or the OPs to be attached to bodies like that? It's just cruelty.

They had it in the movie so they could put the shot in the trailer. Titillate the audience and hope they forgive the sub-par script.

>uneducated
>thinking you're anything other than fodder
Trump himself said he loves uneducated people. Why do you think that is? College teaches people, not what to think, but how to think.

Why did they not include her in Beyond? They're always talking about how hard it is to work in a greater female presence yet they just ignored a character that, at the end of the last film, was adventuring with the main cast.

They wanted you to forget that garbage film existed