Tfw we destroyed the Holy Roman Empire

>tfw we destroyed the Holy Roman Empire
Feels good man

Other urls found in this thread:

greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/hope_on_the_battlefield
chateauversailles.fr/l-histoire/grandes-dates/chronologie/1871-proclamation-de-lempire-allemand
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Prussian_War
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2044614/Sex-stormtroopers-How-French-women-fell-Nazi-invaders-Second-World-War.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flags_of_Napoleonic_Italy
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

How far you've come.

>But not Prussia.

>
>
>

Why was Napoleon so based?

DELET

Your people destroyed Europe because you couldn't stand the idea of a unified Germany threatening your influence. You even fell so low in WW2 to bring Algerians and niggers to fight for you. Sad.

No point being nostalgic now France, you and I have bigger issues to tend to.

...

fpbp

>France never defeated an united Germany alone

When will you destroy the Ebony American Empire?

So did Russia. And here we are two lost wars later.

He didn't use infantry as much as others. He loved artillery which was the primary way people died in wars. It's pretty much accepted today that men don't fire upon the enemy line voluntarily, the men of 18th and 19th century combat would have fired just above enemy lines. Napoleon stumbled into his wins by just spamming artillery, the other side didn't know their men were firing over enemy troops.

greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/hope_on_the_battlefield

MOAR

We did better

>"Holy Roman Empire".

This is very difficult to say while keeping a straight face. I wonder who can, because indeed it is hard.

"Holy", you say, while grinning like Voltaire did. "Holy", it is its name. But then, thinking of "Holy", you think about all the Emperors who were excommunicated. You think about all those who tried to fuck with the pope. You think about the wars of religion and how many of them ended up as protestant heretics.

But then, the funniest is coming: "Roman". Yes, now, you cannot contain your laughter. "Roman", it is called despite the fact that this "Roman" body is standing on Germania, a land so harsh and poor that the Legions of Rome refused to set foot on it. A germanic and barbaric people, yes, but still calling themselves "Roman".

And now, here is the end of the fun: "Empire". Now you fell on the ground, laughing so hard that you cannot breathe. An "Empire", a body made of dozens of petty duchies and counties, all fighting for themselves, giving strange names to their position, full of Grand-Dukes or Archdukes. An "Empire" who will stay between Poland and France, while the great powers of Europe will create colonies all around the world.

>"Holy"
>"Roman"
>"Empire"

Yeah, great fucking job. Congratulations, your whiny bitchy nation made the unification of the german nation state under prussian rule possible.
How did this dank dissolution of the holy roman empire work out for you, Pierre?

feels good you live a shit life.

>
>
>

The name is pretty lulzy, and I'm a germaboo.

>the men of 18th and 19th century combat would have fired just above enemy lines

Stop projecting the modern male's fear of killing onto your ancestors. They saw death regularly.

>A 1986 study by the British Defense Operational Analysis Establishment’s field studies division examined the killing effectiveness of military units in more than 100 19th- and 20th-century battles. They compared the data from these units with hit rates from simulated battles using pulsed laser weapons.
>The analysis was designed (among other things) to determine if Marshall’s non-firer figures were consistent with other, earlier wars. When researchers compared historical combat performances against the performance of these test subjects (who were using simulated weapons and could neither inflict nor receive actual harm from the “enemy”), they discovered that the killing potential in these circumstances was much greater than the actual historical casualty rates.
>Battlefield fear alone cannot explain such a consistent discrepancy. The researchers’ conclusions openly supported Marshall’s findings, pointing to “unwillingness to take part [in combat] as the main factor” that kept the actual historical killing rates significantly below the laser trial levels.
>Thus the evidence shows that the vast majority of combatants throughout history, at the moment of truth when they could and should kill the enemy, have found themselves to be “conscientious objectors”—yet there seems to be a conspiracy of silence on this subject. In his book War on the Mind, Peter Watson observes that Marshall’s findings have been largely ignored by academia and the fields of psychiatry and psychology.

The simple fact is that a conscript doesn't want to kill anyone for empire.

>comparing 18th century muskets with fucking lasers
>comparing someone with adrenaline rushing through them, probably shaking as cannonballs explode near them and kill their friends to a faggot in a "simulated" laser tag session
Only the bongs could do something so stupid.

>destroyed the Holy Roman Empire
Literally the only thing that keep in power Eternal Kaizer. You CREATED Eternal Kraut.
God, 1789 was a fucking mistake.

Pretty well Mehmet, pretty well

It's funny when you know where the event in this painting took place
chateauversailles.fr/l-histoire/grandes-dates/chronologie/1871-proclamation-de-lempire-allemand

>Feels good man
Yeah and all it took for your nations accomplishment over the Russians and HRE was to have an Italian noble take control of your countries sovereignty

>Italian noble take control of your countries sovereignty
Still better than a nigger

>germaboo
Those exist?

ebin

We're on Sup Forums

>redditfag
How long are you on Sup Forums?

...

Long enough to not be a redditfag.

m8

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Prussian_War
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2044614/Sex-stormtroopers-How-French-women-fell-Nazi-invaders-Second-World-War.html
Yeah, my dear baguette. Worked out pretty well.

>Confederation
>of German
>Principalities

after the French Revolution and the NPoleonic wars the west went to complete shit

>French Revolution
>The Catalyst the Began Western Civilization's fall into Degeneracy

cute pepes

...

Don't forget your allies Mohammed.
Pretty well :'-)

Here is the pic

Really makes you think about how everything went so wrong.

I will never understand why Sup Forums loves to suck off Hitler while shitting on Napoleon, when it should be the other way around.

>Military and political genius, innovated strategy and created lasting laws and institutions across Europe
>What could be called "red pilled", believed in liberalism and to a certain extent the Res Publica but through familiarity with Voltaire's work learned to distrust the masses
>"Women are nothing but machines for producing children"
>Probably Deist, but had a pragmatic approach to religion ("Religion is what keeps the poor from stealing from the rich")
>Wasn't a genocidal fuck
>Revamped the entire justice system, not just through the Code Civil but through redividing the cantons in his empire to ensure everyone had a court within a day's walk
>Revamped the education system, initially with the intention to raise a generation of patriotic Frenchmen who deeply loved their nation
>Meritocratic, "Every soldier has a marshal's baton in his backpack"

But instead you worship Hitler. Why? Because le germanic mustard race. And you hate Napoleon. Why? Because le manlet maymay. No wonder the "far" right is considered a joke.

>waring your friend
>TWICE

>Germans defeated us "alone" ONCE
>"HUUUUR DUUUUUR WE WUZ INVINCIBLE PUSSIES !"

Nobody make pixellated videos with two steps from hell soundtrack about napoleon, that's why.

>Swedish and finnish dick shape is sticking out on maps like these

>holy
>roman
>empire
Tfw none of these are true

>Sweden being the only (don't really care about Switzerland) neutral country in Europe

t-thanks

Poltava

HRE destroyed itself get your head out of your own ass

bravo

>"once"

Because Napoleon lead the French and everyone hates the French because they're cunts
No ody hates the Germans because hey were based and not french
Also Napoleon was technically a race traitor since he was Italian and decided to not lead Italy to take over Europe like he should have

Germany always destroys itself while trying to destroy those around it.
I thought this was quite obvious by now.

Fuck germany, least trustworthy cunts out there

He claimed to be a liberator against european aristocracy and then he ended up placing family members in positions of power.

Yes, once

We always, always, always kicked your Teutonic ass

Your only victory was fucking Franco-Prussian war (WWII is technically a victory)

>Italy
>1804
American education at work here. Go back to school Tyrone

Only Joseph and Louis-Napoleon Bonaparte, and only as puppet rulers over nations directly bordering his own, and he removed the latter when he proved untrustworthy. You make it sound like the entire administration was nepotist.

And when looking at the most suitable candidates for puppet rulers of client nations, he did go for the most fitting candidates: his two brothers and his most trusted generals (Bernadotte, Murat etc.).

you still went from a republic to a monarchie thanks to Napoleon

I always thought Napoleon was pretty based but Sup Forums has told me he was working for the jews and spreading degeneracy. Not sure how, are those just monarchists whining?

>Redpill me on Bonaparte pls anons

I thought Napoleon got good praise around here as well.

Flags were tripping, too bad they didn't last.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flags_of_Napoleonic_Italy

lol france

>independence of south america
>liberal degeneracy.
>atheism, dismantle of several christian religious orders.
>weaken catholic church.
>collapse of best empire.
>collapse of Portuguese and Spanish empire
>rise of the USA, decline of Europe.

THAT FUCKING MANLET WAS THE RUIN OF EUROPE!

HOPE YOU FROGS CHOKE ON MUSLIM DICK!

you mean italy dont you

They indeed were not trustworthy.That's why we fucked them over in WW2.

...

>"yay, we fought Hitler & made sure that Europe would turn into a leftist, multiculti shithole & our former colony 'Murica could dismantle our Empire" t. britcuck
British cuckservatives are the most pathetic people that exist on this planet.

>the foundations of the rise of Brazil due to our monarch's cowardice

Few people remember this.

lol build the wall

>independence of south america
So?

>liberal degeneracy
Get off the internet Paolo, liberal mean entirely different things in Europe and America

>Atheism
>Weaken the Catholic Church
I know Poortuguese education is bad, but I never thought it was this bad. Ever heard of the Concordat of 1801? It RESTORED a lot of the power of the Catholic Church (though not the temporal possessions that were taken away and sold off)

>Collapse of best empire
You'd best not be talking about the Profane Germanic Clusterfuck

>Collapse of the Portuguese and Spanish Empires
Iberia has been a joke since at least the end of the 17th century. Following the War of the Spanish Succession, the two warring faction (Not Spain!) traded pieces of Spain back and forth as diplomatic concessions. The FRENCH gave away Gibraltar to put a Bourbon on the Spanish throne, not the Spanish

>rise of the USA, decline of Europe
That was your precious Hitler, not Napoleon.