Happy may day lads communism will win :3

Happy may day lads communism will win :3

Fuck Commies
Fuck London
Fuck you OP

2nd USSR minus stalinism when?

Never
Why there are so many commies among westerners?
Do you people just not aware how shit is it to live under such regime?

2nd Soviet when?

>what is libertarian marxism when there is no big government
>not realizing lenin was based

Yeah so based sure

t.kulak

My grandfather was.
Apparently being a farmer make it enough to recieve a bullet to the back of your head.
I will never agree that communism is great.

Kulaks deserved it :^) burn the rich tbqhwy

no it won't. anything lefter than axis on political compass is going to fail.

BASED CORBYN

> burn the rich
t. poorfag

No it's more of a meme tbqwhy I'm alri financially I just want control of my workplace

so, ancap. (irony)
but anyway commienism is not going to give you any control

It won't if you go down the authoritarian route mao, stalin etc did. I believe the workers councils should have the power ergo the workers
>ancap
Oxymoron :^)

I'm celebrating worker's day by going to work

stalinism was literally the best time in the ussr

that's why is so devilished as hitler

Horrendous post anyone could do his rapid industrialization

this
el pce se tiro por la ventana con jose diaz
carrillo merecia un tiro en la nuca por revisionista

i said
> (irony)
Why do you think so though? Isn't paid voluntary labour more efficient? It creates healthy concurrence and encourages employers to create better conditions and employees to maintain higher standards

how the fuck is ancap an oxymoron you dumb nigger

>uuuuuuhhhh it's capitulusem
>and uuuuhh capitalusm is authoritaryun

* i meant why do you think the control of your workplace in communist way is going to be that good

Communism is inevitable. It's just the next stage of human evolution, accept it already.

The state and capitalism are entwined. Wht do you think ancapism has never been tried? amk salak

maybe because capitalism creates authorities, allows rulers and presidents (of corporations), etc?

The workers would do the same as it affects them as well

The same reason any anarchism has never been conciously "tried"?

>it's an oxymoron because there never has been an environment fit for it

but that doesn't have to do with capitalism. since when capitalism meant there had to be an authoritarian regime? american politicians for example, are a bunch of neo-cons, not libertarians

>allows rulers and presidents (of corporations)
what's wrong with everyone being able to run for presidency?
should that be prohibited because they have power? honestly i'd agree but that takes away freedoms