Why are his films barely discussed on here?

Why are his films barely discussed on here?

No films are discussed here

>JUST
>capeshit whining
>Star Wars shit rumors
>cuckposting
>Star Wars shit whining
>Ghostbusters whining
>shitty show general
>shitty show that has a general not being made to use general
>nu-male
>capeshit company wars
>/r9k/
>celeb said this on social media whining
>gender / race of cast whining
>AYO HOLE UP
>interracial porn
>capekino
>"movies women will never understand"
>SJW falseflagging
>waifu thread
>"Me on the left"
>Sup Forums
>pedo thread
>it aint me starts playing
>"is it kino?"
>Who will play [unrelated to film & television] in the inevitable biopic?
>eceleb trash
>[unrelated to film & television] black person doing anything
>reddit
>Sam Hyde
>JEWS
>celebrity's personal lives drama
>persecution complex whining
>wtf I hate [unrelated to film & television] now!
>thinly veiled Trump shilling
>"What did [unrelated to film & television] mean by this?"
>WE WUZ
>unflattering pic of celebrity
>screencap + forced meme from shitty movie
>HOWEVER
>Really makes you think
>quote from Spider-Man movie altered to include edgy Sup Forums humor
>PAN. HOT.
>screencap of RT score of blockbuster
>Late night talk show host is... *Sup Forums leans forward in anticipation*.... a cuck! *Sup Forums erupts in applause*
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA etc.

/film/ never

Pretty much. Say what you want about reddit but at least you have a higher chance of getting an actual discussion (if you go to places like r/flicks, r/Criterion & r/TrueFilm

This, /film/ when?

It's impossible to have serious cinematic discussion on here because of all the Sup Forumsermin

/film/ got meme nuked and was kill in under a day. /cel/ containment board is the only way

...

Last one I watched was Notorious. It was kinda disappointing tbqh. Didn't have his usual suspense and comfiness.

Why did hiroshima nuke it after just one day? The memers would leave after awhile

delet this

/film/ never happened. Some user found it in the code and posted it on Sup Forums and Sup Forums flooded the board before there were mods or rules.

>comfiness

I don't think you understand Hitchcock films.

because they speak for themselves

like any true kino

>delet this
Because this board isn't for film discussion, it's for shitty shows generals, posting Twitter and clickbait screencaps and meme forcing

That being said I've never found Hitch to be that great a filmmaker, I mean his most acclaimed films are all basically thrillers which just automatically cheapens them as entertainment first and art second

Is he Sup Forums incarnate?

Making a great well crafted suspenseful thriller is as hard and demands as much craftsmanship as making a emotional "art" film. It's just 2 very different things and i don't think less of any of them

Truffaut would largely disagree with you about Hitchcock's movies

because hes overrated garbage. the only people who like him are
>old people who grew up watching his movies
>pretentious kids who like what they are told too

hitchcock was an inventive movie maker sure. but everyone has been using his techniques for decades now. there is nothing unique about his suspense anymore, it has gone through a MILLION itterations since he began. movies like the Bourne trilogy are what people are familiar know and when you go from a modern movie back to hitchock it just feels slow dull and obvious.

It would be hard to find someone who does NOT largely disagree with him about Hitch's movies.

was it autism?

your and idiot:)

you write up all this shit and forget BANE?

>X was great, y was good, z was great...
They talk like fucking Donald trump. They type an awful lot yet never go into any specifics

And a bet you post this everywhere because you think mentioning French films somehow make it "detailed analysis"

He's trying to pretend he's been here longer than 2014

He actually likes Baneposting.

>implying Hitchcock movies aren't usually comfy

Because his films aren't memetic like Refn, Nolan or any other of the directors talked about here.

I agree /cel/ is the only way.

Antonioni was Italian you utter retard

>discussing Hitchcock without ever having seen any of his films

>They type an awful lot yet never go into any specifics
Yeah but this board doesn't even do that.

Yes, that would be stupid. Why do you bring that up, though?

But they were and ithe was agreed that they're Scooby-Doo tier trash.

>his most acclaimed films are all basically thrillers which just automatically cheapens them as entertainment first and art second
any plans to kys soon?

Because if you had seen any of his films you would have noticed that they are NOT comfy

because his films are actually good

Because his movies were plebby as fuck. Hitchcock had extraordinary talent, he even innovated techniques, but he mostly made movies for the common man. He was the Michael Bay of his day. There is much to discuss regarding how he changed the art form, but none of his actual films warrant note.

>Hitchcock had extraordinary talent, he even innovated techniques, but he mostly made movies for the common man.
>implying there's something wrong with that

Please Read Truffaut's interview with Hitchcock before discussing him
The number of peasants in this thread is starting to trigger me

The masketta man?

DUDE MYSTERY LOL

Because you don't discuss the rules, and Hitchcock basically forged them.