...
Rank the Beatles members from best to worst
Jaxson Jones
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Thomas Reed
>Ascended tier
George Harrison
>Absolute Madman tier
John Lennon
>Shit tier
Paul McCartney
>Literally who
Ringo Starr
Aaron Roberts
beatles
Parker Flores
The other Beatles may have musical talents, but can they draw like Ringo can?
Liam Bell
George = Paul > Ringo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John
Jackson Cox
YOU MAY SAY IM A BEATER
Blake Lopez
George > Ringo > Paul > John
Jayden Thompson
George Harrison > the rest
Jason Clark
HEY, ETER
Thomas Price
ABSOLUTE
Daniel Barnes
Dominic Long
Paul >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the other 3 in any order (not like it matters)
Chase Morales
this
Nathan Wood
my hairy cum stained butt hole>literal shit>harrison>the rest
Matthew Gonzalez
Switch Paul and George and you have the objective order.
Leo Cooper
fools like you should stop pitting them against each other
the superior opinion is that all 4 are equally great
Anthony Flores
5. George
4. John
3. Ringo
2. Paul
1. Guy who replaced Paul
Carter Diaz
John > Paul > George > Stuart Sutcliffe > Ringo > Pete Best
Zachary Hall
4. Paul
3. Ringo
2. George
1. John
Dominic Hill
objectivity post has arrived:
john > george > faul > ringo > paul
Xavier Price
/thread
Hunter Russell
Only good answer ITT:
Martin > Lennon > McCarthy > Harrison > Ringo
Andrew King
how is paul the worst?
Isaiah Carter
1. John
2. Paul
3. George
4. Ringo
Aiden Bailey
that yer baby gets me everytime xD
Lucas Torres
>The Beatles were the quintessence of instrumental mediocrity. George Harrison was a pathetic guitarist, compared with the London guitarists of those days (Townshend of the Who, Richards of the Rolling Stones, Davies of the Kinks, Clapton, Beck and Page of the Yardbirds, and many others who were less famous but more original). The Beatles had completely missed the revolution of rock music (founded on a prominent use of the guitar) and were still trapped in the stereotypes of the easy-listening orchestras. Paul McCartney was a singer from the 1950s, who could not have possibly sounded more conventional. As a bassist, he was not worth the last of the rhythm and blues bassists (even though within the world of Merseybeat his style was indeed revolutionary). Ringo Starr played drums the way any kid of that time played it in his garage (even though he may ultimately be the only one of the four who had a bit of technical competence).
>even though he may ultimately be the only one of the four who had a bit of technical competence
what did he mean by this
Joseph Stewart
retard
Bentley Watson
Agreed
Landon Jackson
Ringo > Paul = John > George
Oliver Torres
She's completely right lol. Lennon was deluded if he thought his stunts were actually bringing the world any closer to peace.
Easton Johnson
greedy scumbag
Alexander Jenkins
They all were except Ringo.
Andrew Wood
kek
Juan Allen
>Townshend of the Who, Richards of the Rolling Stones, Davies of the Kinks, Clapton, Beck and Page of the Yardbirds, and many others who were less famous but more original
But those guys were all famous as fuck. You could split hairs over whether they're more or less famous then George Harrison, but why?
>The Beatles had completely missed the revolution of rock music (founded on a prominent use of the guitar) and were still trapped in the stereotypes of the easy-listening orchestras.
The Beatles didn't prominently use their guitars??
Eli Reyes
George Harrison > John Lennon > Ringo Starr > Paul McCartney
Wyatt Nelson
God Scarruffi is such a faggot. McCartney is by all means a great and surprisingly inventive bass player. Also Harrison was better than Richards and far more tasteful than Townshend.
Ryan Brown
rude
Owen Mitchell
you're boring
Zachary Bailey
Paul>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ringo>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ony faggots and normies care
Carter Reyes
George>Paul>John>>>>>Ringo
Based on musical ability and nothing else. John is a faggot so I'd rate him lower if personality counted.
Matthew Sanders
John = Paul > George >>>> Ringo
Liam Price
>Absolute best, saved the band from being a boring pop band by injecting the influence of the avant-garde new york fluxus scene into the band.
Yoko
>Mediocre hacks
John, Paul, Ringo, George
>no talent
Brian Epstein
Dominic Barnes
...
Julian Robinson
not bait, I just prefer music with some originality in to lowest-common-denominator commercial pop
Bentley Lopez
I agree on every point. Paul and George can both be described as "tasteful" players. Not flashy or a master of their instrument, but overall very solid with nary a misstep in their playing.
As for my rankings:
>Paul
>George
>John
>Ringo