When did you realize that western women should have their rights abolished?

When did you realize that western women should have their rights abolished?

Other urls found in this thread:

heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/01/08/men-invade-women-invite/
psychologytoday.com/blog/high-octane-women/201109/meet-the-least-happy-people-in-america
theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/18/womens-rights-happiness-wellbeing-gender-gap
i.4cdn.org/pol/1503832344838.webm
youtube.com/watch?v=f-wWBGo6a2w
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

as soon as they got em

never

op is retarded

...

This problem will fix itself.

As white people become more and more a minority surrounded by niggers, white people are going to grow increasingly sick and tired of niggers nigging and our race will become more unified in the future.

The backlash against multiculturalism is going to be brutal.

t. coalburner

>caring about who people have sex with

God, you're a faggot.

...

A picture of a rapefugee and a girl together? Try harder, Pekka.

Amen

What you're referring to as rights aren't rights. They're state privileges. Big difference. You can't give or take away rights as they're inherent from birth 'till death. You can only violate those rights. But even then they're still apparent.

But yeah back to the subject matter at hand. About two years ago I figured that the majority of the issues western society faces today are as a result of women essentially working to flip the power differential / dynamic in their favour. We have lived in a patriarchal dominance hierarchy to some degree, but with matriarchal elements. Men have been in the majority of positions of power yes. But women have subtly manipulated the way society has gone due to their influence over their men and their children in their family units. However, now, they want that Matriarchal influence to be overt rather than covert, and that's all Feminism is about. They want to have absolute power. They want to dictate how society progresses. And as a result, as usual when women take the lead, utter chaos is beginning to take place, and they are just about dismantling all order that we have worked so long to create as a race and a culture.

Society will only heal once men take back the society and civilisation they built, and return to philosophical and moral principles as opposed to what "feels good."

Taking women's right to vote, drinking in public, be on the streets after 8PM..
Plus a divorced woman shouldn't have the right to receive any money unless the partner explicitly states he wants to give otherwise women shouldn't receive anything. That would be a good start

Muslim here. Your women really seem to love us. Don't worry, we take good care of them.

I agree with alimony as it's stupid and not many western countries have it, but

>Taking women's right to vote, drinking in public, be on the streets after 8PM..

That's just straight out retarded.

wow truth in /b jus wow

fpbp

A woman's right to vote isn't a right, it's a state privilege. You don't need to vote in nature. Only in an artificial state-ran society. But I get what you mean. I'm not gonna argue with the point that women voting has caused many problems in society. Women are natural socialists and they will always vote for the redistribution of wealth (theft). Which is problematic to say the least.

As for the drinking and being out 'till 8PM, personally I don't think anyone should drink. Alcohol ain't good. But being out 'till 8PM is a matter of freedom of movement so that's outta the question for me.

The alimony stuff I can get behind, but there needs to be something to protect both men and women, and of course the children, in relation to failed relationships. The state favours women far too much in these situations atm. Which is totally intentional politically speaking.

Only the streets after 8PM part, maybe.

>That's just straight out retarded.
Pic is retarded to me

jokes on them most important racial DNA is in the
mitochondria so they jus making themselves whiter
looks like the jews were right make ur women a
perceived violation and they come running to become you and let their own DNA degrade
and be replaced with your own didnt think it
would be so effective tho...

>Women are natural socialists and they will always vote for the redistribution of wealth (theft). Which is problematic to say the least.
It goes deeper than that. Here's a read that you'll never read:
heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/01/08/men-invade-women-invite/

Also if we restrict women's rights 99% of pro immigration and pro-black organizations will cease to exist since women shouldn't be allowed to work in those places.

sauce

Why is it worse than if a man does it?
They have a higher risk of getting raped in a state like that, we have a higher risk of getting mugged or beaten.

Why do women invite refugees, fight for blacks, etc? because they know all those groups will do everything for them. Also they don't mind replacing white men as long as receive facebook likes and social status in the process

Women enjoying rotting society because just like jews they benefit from it
Easy jobs and women's studies pay well

and where do we get this amount of females u ask well its simple if u jus turn the frogs gay.....

>heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/01/08/men-invade-women-invite/

I've been saying for months that women want open borders because it increases their access to a variation of different kinds of men. Because they dislike "indigenous" men, e.g. white european men, because they've become so effeminite and docile. Women are pack animals, they want to be led, they want a man to take the lead. Most western men today couldn't lead if they wanted to, and most don't even want to anymore. They're just women with crew cuts.

Muslim men fit the bill of a higher status alpha male compared to western men. Although this isn't entirely true as their heightened aggression and forceful nature doesn't come from a sense of overall dominance. It's simply a result of low IQ. Appearances can very much be deceiving. This is why women have been restricted in their behaviours, especially in relation to men, for generations. Because when left to their own devices, they're all about feels rather than facts. They follow their instincts with little to no self-reflection and ultimately lead themselves and those around them into self-destructive patterns of behaviour.

It's not worse. However, the frequency of it happening with ''our'' women the past 2 decades is MUCH higher than with men (feel free to deny it, my empirical evidence won't convince you but I won't be convinced otherwise either).
By the way I also clean 2 clubs. Are you aware of the men vs women toilet condition?

We've let the demons loose.

Btw this has all happened because of social manipulation via the state. Give women more privileges, make them of equal status to men within a society and you rob men of their special status which makes them docile and essentially, eventually reduces men to nothing more than adult children. Which eventually flips the social dominance hierarchy to a matriarchal one, which causes the state to be the pinnacle of power due to being the provider for women and having no men to challenge it's supposed authority.

>because they've become so effeminite and docile
Yeah women raised a whole generation to be effeminate. They love having strong sex and at the same time having weak beta slaves.

then get out their and lead faggot!

Oh goody more fun Sup Forums shit on the wrong board because of retards

I can attest to this.

I was raised by a single mother, and she raised me to be an appeaser. Taught me (of course), why I should respect and love women. And of course, that never worked out well for me. That always led to me being taken advantage of or outright fucked over.

Thankfully I'm pretty much red-pilled now and I see through these dynamics, but most men still don't and likely never will.

women do enjoy rotting society it's not just about wanting sex with black and brown skin

Maybe one day kek.

Just think about it this way. Imagine there was a huge influx of ANIMU WAIFUS in e.g. USA. The women, naturally seeing a ton of competitors arriving, they dislike it and express their scorn.

How would you feel as men about having so many extra (and in many occasions better) options to pick from? Would you feel threatened?

It's not exactly the same, but you get the gist.

>Muslim men fit the bill of a higher status alpha male compared to western men.
Absolutely, I also believe that this is mostly the men's fault for letting it happen. Women just lack the patriarchy figures they NEED.

Everyone knows women can't be trusted
Religion people know they deceive since Eve and people who believe in science knows their brains and hormones are fucked up

user I fully stand behind you. I think I've screencapped you in the past.

Irreverent! Fuck all the betas women and keep yours faithful and your seed will cover the planet like a beautiful white foam!

It is Sup Forums, stands for random and anything is allowed. Who knows, we might be posting artistic works of fiction. Only a fool takes Sup Forums seriously.
Plenty of porn breads for you still, chop chop.

>revolotion
is grammar sexist and patriarchal now?

Wait people here think we want to take away women's rights? that's a joke
Women should continue to enjoy freedom and everything will be fine.

Post screencap and I'll tell you if it's me haha!

>everything will be fine

Of course not, we're all roleplaying, yessir.
I sincerely hope you stay ignorant; not even a hint of sarcasm.

White women are lost. Too degenerate to recover.

Yeah I totally agree. I could go back and forth with why men or women are the primary issue or the root of it but at the end of the day we're two sides of the same coin and both to blame. We essentially form a symbiotic relationship and when one half of that relationship dynamic changes so does the other. We need to reunite and come to some sort of agreement in my opinion, so we can regain control of our own destiny as a race and a culture (because this issue isn't really occuring with any race other than the white european race), but of course, this won't happen unless we force women into submission.

I've always said also, and this point is kinda in relation to what we're talking about. That Feminism is the collective form of a shit test. Women are kicking off constantly, and more virulently as time goes by because they want to piss us off to the point where we force them into submission. Kinda like when a girlfriend does all she can to piss her boyfriend off so he's aggressive towards her. She does so because she finds it attractive and loves to be forced into submission. This is what Feminism wants, it wants to be forced into submission, not appeased. And this is also why so many Feminists have rape fantasies (discovered this on Tumblr).

I'm so damn tired to comb through 1000 unnamed screencaps. Damn you laziness! (nop it didn't start with 'woman')

kek that most certainly isn't me

you've probably seen me post in these kinds of threads before tho if you're a regular on Sup Forums.

I'm usually typing massive essays on the nature of women and relationships etc

you mean the latinx crap along with the pronouns and all that? fuck, I didn't even remember

such a fucked up world

Food for thought: only society dominated by socialists and women accepted refugees: german, canada, france, greece...
In Saudi Arabia they would rather start a nuclear war than accept 2 million negroes even if the negros are muslims

>That Feminism is the collective form of a shit test. Women are kicking off constantly, and more virulently as time goes by because they want to piss us off to the point where we force them into submission.

This made me shiver because I say it SO frequently. Fuck off user, stop being me.

Quads of truth btw.

This user speaks truth.

>mfw I realise women would rather betray their native men, culture, society, country and everything else they grew up with for the sake of being involved with a male they deem worthy.

women are naturally betrayers my friends. the sooner you all realise this the better, this is why traditionally speaking we've always restricted them, and it's why ancient texts like the Bible basically tell us that women are evil. they will betray you if you allow them.

Forgot pic EXTREMELY related.

And they call these monsters the fairer sex kek.

>with a male they deem worthy
You know the most disgusting fact? It's not a male they deem worthy, it's a male THEY WERE CONVINCED by others is worthy (reasons, reasons).

>they will betray you if you allow them.
That's why liberalism, socialists and libertarians are cancer. They all ignore women have a different nature.

Btw, make no mistake. The points I'm raising relate to ALL women. It's in their very nature to betray everyone around them if they think it's in their best interests. Even mothers. Their overruling instincts that bypasses all other cognitive functions is "what's in it for me."

My own mother betrayed me for a meal ticket. Raised me on her own. Practically no father figure present in my early life. She eventually got herself a new man, let's call him J.

J was somewhat abusive. Clearly a beta male masquerading as an alpha. Had major self-worth issues, had lots to prove. Thought he was going to be the man of the house. Take upon himself the mantle of "Dad", he thought wrong. Couldn't handle the fact that I didn't respect him (he didn't earn it), told him outright that I hated him one night. He lunged at me, jumped on me and screamed down my ear.

And guess what, my mother didn't chastise him at all. She walked into my bedroom, looked at us, and walked out. I decided from that second onwards that I wasn't going to live under that root as long as he was there as it was dangerous. I moved out. What did my mother do? Accepted it. Cried, of course, but made the choice to allow me to move out (at 16), and essentially chose her man over me.

Being with this man has enabled her to be unemployed for years, she's mostly living off his money and pursuing "creative endeavours" while he pays the bills.

So yeah, she chose a long-term meal ticket over her son. And this is the nature of women.

>I'm usually typing massive essays on the nature of women and relationships etc
You're doing Dog's work, user. Have another gem.

I never really understood why any reasonable woman (paradox, I know) would not be ok with their traditional nature. In my village we always said that behind every great man hides an even greater woman. They were good at what they did and evidently they also enjoyed it. Then their heads got poisoned. Just look how unhappy they are lately (if that isn't clear).

psychologytoday.com/blog/high-octane-women/201109/meet-the-least-happy-people-in-america

theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/18/womens-rights-happiness-wellbeing-gender-gap
etc

>supplementary pic

Why would you give fanatics a legitimate reason for their fucked up beliefs?
I mean heck Christianity became a thing because people tried to repress it.

There is no worldly explanation for why women do what they do.
It doesn't help the fact that 99% of their beliefs are based on jewish lies (multicultural propaganda, materialistic literature, NYT best seller garbage, etc).

I'd say that she's trolling, then I saw the number of retweets

jesus christ women's brains are doomed

o shit, first quads now trips, NICE.

That's true. Women operate under the general social consensus. As I said earlier they're pack animals. As opposed to men who are more akin to lone wolves. Who can operate in packs but more often than not wander off and do their own thing. If something isn't socially acceptable, they simply cannot follow through with it. Same goes with people. If someone isn't deemed socially acceptable or "popular" women resent them because a woman considers herself valuable only if she's popular herself, by being popular with other high status / popular people.

Yep and they do so because doing so keeps people confused in relation to the social dynamics at play, which means no solutions will likely be presented. Just lots of pointless arguements with little to no objectivity.

HAHAHAHA BRO, that pic is pretty true y'know. I've read before that high IQ males are far more likely to induldge in homosexuality to some degree than low IQ males. And the theory goes that it's because they can understand the dynamics at play between men and women, and recognise the patterns of behaviour in women. And as a result they become disgusted by what they see and look elsewhere to satisfy their needs.

No, Christianity became a thing because it was a slave cult that the Romans thought they could rebrand their empire with before it was fubar.

Honestly, she would have driven me out of the relationship if I read shit like that. Then they start to wonder why some men want to keep their distance with crazy twitter feminists like that

I swear it's like they don't realize it's phrases like that

>The points I'm raising relate to ALL women
Oh I know. I'm the type who doesn't even exclude ''mom and sister'' like some people say all women but those. Everyone in or no one, we're not dishonest hypocrites (just mildly autistic).

I am sorry to hear about your story, btw. I recently had a fallout with my uncle at the dinner table, my fiance was sitting next to me and he started subtly insulting me and after I warned him 5 times I snapped at him so hard the entire family was gasping for air. He tried to play the older + uncle card and I should respect him and shit but that cuck failed to realize that the moment I showed weakness when challenged by ANYONE in front of my fiance is the moment she'd be my fiance no longer.
He's lucky I didn't kick his teeth in.

This is what happens when we let Sand Nigger cults run the show for 1800 years.

Yeah I always used to have that saying in the back of my mind and I started to look for a "good woman" as a result, someone to back me up and see me for my greatness (sounds egotistical but I know my worth, I'm not boasting or anything). And I had many try and take up that mantle, but I realise it was always about them and making me be of service to them rather than there being an equilibrium of sorts. Needless to say I swiftly ended those relationships because they didn't serve me at all, they were one-sided, completely.

I think that dynamic can only occur if women's behavours are restricted socially speaking. I don't think laws should be passed or that women should be forced into behaving in certain ways by way of coercion of violence, I just think that society needs to reform into something more traditional and look down women who behave in certain ways and reward those who behave in others. That way, women are simply socially ostracised (which is hell for them), until they pull their socks up, and do their duty.

I'm no Christian as such but I firmly believe the purpose of a woman is to support the man, as it was with Adam and Eve. Eve was created as a counterpart to Adam, to be his companion but also be submissive to him and support him. I believe this is the natural dynamic between man and woman.

>give women the power to do anything
>they use that power to suck an infinite amount of cocks
who would have guessed?

who is the girl top left?

Yeah same here. I don't even trust my mother now, even though we're on speaking terms and get on really well. As far as I'm concerned she still sees me as a future investment the same way she sees other males. When she's old and grey she'll want me to take care of her to some degree. So she's smoothing over the relationship and making it beneficial for me so it pays off for her towards the end of her life.

And it's all good bro. I don't even care so much anymore. If it wasn't for that shit I might not've ever understood these dynamics. So I probably wouldn't have been able to contribute to resolving the issues at hand.

Yeah that was uncalled for. He was likely doing it simply because she was there and he wanted to show himself as the alpha male of the group. Good on you for not tolerating that though. Had many men try to do that to me in my own home when I had female flatmates. Never went down well with me. Always stand your ground, never relax. Because men like that will always seek to put you below them in terms of dominance hierarchy, by any means necessary. No morals, no principles, just raw instinct, almost as bad as women themselves.

>And as a result they become disgusted by what they see and look elsewhere to satisfy their needs.
I've thought about this once when I got my first heartbroke at the soft age of 17. However... tfw not intelligent enough to be gay :DDD

Result of hundreds of years of liberalism and multiculturalism
Now our boys are going to be holes for muslim sperm
What a nice society we built
i.4cdn.org/pol/1503832344838.webm

Adam and Eve never existed.

Humans are more complex than that anyway.

Please stop thinking in dualistic ways, it will make you retarded.

Die.

Teenage girls literally spell it out for young men as well. They always go for dickheads that treat them like shit because they want to be dominated by uncaring men who are so high status that they don't need to care about how women feel lol.

No that is what happens when you let Christianity run everything.

Europeans lost their culture 1800 years ago you nunce.

I never said Adam and Eve existed but in response to your claim, you can't know that because you're alive now, thousands of years after they're claimed to have existed. So unless you've somehow managed to travel back in time specifically to look for a living Adam + Eve then you can't really say anything. What you should've said is "I don't believe that Adam and Eve ever existed" which is fair enough.

But yeah, I'm not sure how I'm thinking in dualistic ways either, care to explain?

I mean I think I was being pretty straightforward. I was simply speaking of a social dynamic highlighted in the Bible and how it's true to life.

>and how I believe it's true to life.
FTFY

Yeah, the social dynamic. Not the actual allegory / story of Adam and Even existing.

The bible has nothing to do with how life works you dumb fuck kid.

Adam and Eve CAN'T fucking exist because THAT ISN'T HOW EVOLUTION WORKS.

I get what you're trying to say, but in all fairness I think the real issues started in 1949.

I don't think you have to be 'something' per se (eg Christian) to believe in common sense. Maybe modern atheists are just pissed that super old religions had some things figured out without 'peer reviewed proof', I don't know. The sure thing I've noticed is that deep down, women do not want to have the role they are led to believe they have. They simply don't. My fiance works and she doesn't want to, she wants to stay at home (especially now with the internet, hahaha enjoy your equality). I keep telling her sorry, blame those who cut male salaries by half so they can give it to you for your financial independence. My upper boss is a woman also, she's relatively cool but you can tell she would simply prefer to just take orders. She often asks me for advise. It is SO fucking easy to take orders, you simply have no responsibility whatsoever if things go bad. What woman doesn't like that? They fucking ROLEPLAY it if they cheat on you, they make up a scenario in their heads where they have no responsibility (your fault for not fucking them 15 times per day).

The couple of vegan/hippy/anarchist females I know are all single at the age of 30++ and by the looks of it will die alone. Looks like nature... uh.. finds a way.

>Women are natural socialists and they will always vote for the redistribution of wealth (theft)
Be careful, you might cut yourself.

Ok so you have little to no arguement obviously because you've resorted to name-calling, ad hominem attacks and are making rough points with little to no actual substance.

Also, you're kinda conflating what I've been saying.

I never said the bible has anything to do with how life works, and I never said Adam and Eve exist.

I simply said that the dynamic put forth in relation to the relationship between Adam and Even is how I believe relationships should be, that the woman should play the supportive role behind the man who plays the leading role. This is not an arguement for or against scripture, it's simply me relating current-day gender dynamics and how they should be to something said in the Bible that accurately depicts the correct dynamic.

It's really not that hard to understand, you're finding fault because you want to.

>Because men like that will always seek to put you below them in terms of dominance hierarchy, by any means necessary.
I noticed. The sad part is I felt bad because we're a quite close family but after some brainstorming I deducted the same things. Fuck him. I'm not a boy anymore.

LOL, indeed. In my school 9/10 girls date much older dudes who are obviously dominating them.
>Make fun of me and my dream of finding a same-age girl to grow up with and have babies

You're being rude and obnoxious. The correlation of life and the bible may be deeper than you think. Stop accusing others of dualism while you are guilty of monoism.

youtube.com/watch?v=f-wWBGo6a2w

>women have a different nature
So do retards like you. So what?

Fuck me, both the dude and the bitch in those messages are as bad as each other. I can't even feel bad for the dude, I just cringed.

Totally agree. I've also found that in employment, pretty much all women hate working. They never stop complaining about it as opposed to men who just get on with it. Especially female management. They're literally constantly harping on about the difficulties of their jobs and again, the men just get on with it. And do so with quite a bit of swagger as well, because they clearly enjoy the grind and get a sense of satisfaction out of it. It's always women that bring drama into the workplace as well. Men generally wanna be left alone to do their thing. The only drama I've ever seen occur as a result of other men, is when one man feels threatened by another either because he seems smarter or is more attractive or whatever. But that's natural. Women however just make up issues for the sake of causing drama and doing as little work as possible because they're too busy arguing and bitching. Even management does this.

And well yeah, no genuine man wants a free woman. He wants a woman to be anything but free because he wants security in his family unit. Hippies are generally ratty as fuck, especially the women, because they have such an over-emphasis on freedom and do whatever the fuck they want, so they're really not a good choice for long-term relationships unless you're a cuck or an appeaser who's willing to tolerate anything for the sake of pussy.

...

So, the different natures of retards like him (us), women, normal men like you etc are being ignored, disregarded or dangerously grounded together in a mix that simply isn't working well as a social setting.

I find it hard to believe that there are so many people that think like this, yet they're also against Muslim culture and sharia law?

Respect to you for not tolerating that shit. I'm gonna assume he's an appeaser of women btw?

Yeah back in the day when I was in high school I remember that it was teenage girls that took the lead in the school's sexual hierarchy. I had lots of girls make moves on me but I wasn't interested because I had dumbass romantic ideals and guess what, was ridiculed for it, called gay etc. Just because I wouldn't fuck some dumb teenage girls. I found that contrary to popular belief it was these teenage girls that were mainly introducing young men of their own age to sex. They wanted it, so they made the boys want it so they could give them it. And if they couldn't get it from them, as you said, they went to older men.

Kinda funny because the general belief is that teenage boys prey on teenage girls for sex and do it via any means necessary but it's actually the opposite a lot of the time because of the dynamic I just highlighted.

>you can't know that because you're alive now
Selective skeptics are the intellectual equivalent of rectal cancer. If you can't "know" that then you can't know anything, but I bet you don't live like a guy who claims one can't know anything so kindly fuck off and be edgy somewhere else.

Once they started abusing them. Things were great until the 70s.

You realize rights aren't gifts granted by nature.

Nature doesn't provide you with guns either. So how do you explain the second anendment?