Why is loli and shota allowed on Sup Forums?

Why is loli and shota allowed on Sup Forums?
Doesn't it violate US law?
Pretty sure people have been locked up for it, no?

Other urls found in this thread:

law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-795.ZO.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Um no, newfag.

LOLI THREAD!

...

...

It's a grey area. Porn is legally defined in the US as "you know it when you see it", so a judge can convict for drawn porn if they chose; However, in reality the only convictions were when they know the defendant had something worse (real cp or otherwise) or were trying to pin them for something else. Like getting Al Capone for tax fraud

agreed, loli thread

No, it's not against the law in the US, though it might be illegal in certain states IIRC.

...

...

...

...

law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-795.ZO.html

Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition.

...

...

...

Stop getting mad at cartoons.

...

...

Not illegal in the U.S. since there's no victim.

It IS illegal in Canada, though.

>implying I live in burgerland
tbfh I don't even know what the law says about this in my country lol

if you wanted to make a map of people potentially breaking the law. you support them doing something that is a minor offense / not illegal and filter than (smaller) list for the actual offenders.

its called "Rasterfahndung", the nazis started it. they encouraged people to do minor acts of civil disobedience and whoever acted up there was either resistance or a family member trying to "help".
so then they had a list of people among or by whose cooperation to identify the offenders.
the later federal republic used it to successfully find leftist terrorists ("RAF") in the 70s.

>acquire massive amounts of data.
>filter for indications often applicable to POIs.
>filter more.
>check our the remaining, very small list.
>those you are interested in are very likely on that list.
and now every law enforcement agency in the world is using it.

>Both genres likely constitute child pornography and should be Sup Forumsanned from Sup Forums.

Unfortunately, the MODS are pro-pedo and it doesn't matter how many times an image is flagged as illegal, they will allow it to remain up. It is hard to imagine that there are people in this world who go out of their way to collect/archive/publish cartoon images of children (toddlers/infants in many cases) being abused. Horrifically for the rest of us, these people do exist and this is one of their lairs.

>Sup Forums might be fucked up but we are better than this. If you see it, flag it continuously until it is finally taken down for good.

>I dont like it
>censor it

Here you go

Nope, read the rules you dumb faggot.

Most people understand by now that pedophilia is a mental illness which can/must be treated. Unfortunately, loli/shota exacerbate its symptoms by normalizing deviant/criminal behaviour. By publishing the various obscenities which are frequently copy/pasted into these threads, each poster is in fact victimizing the entire Sup Forums community. There is absolutely nothing normal about being attracted to prepubescent children. It shouldn't be considered art, it should be banned, and its publication stopped.

>Anyone who participates in these threads for sexual gratification should seriously consider speaking to a professional regarding their obvious sexual dysfunction. In the meantime, the rest of the sane world will flag/hide/delete this shit wherever and whenever we find it.

Seriously dude, talk to someone before you waste your life on pixels. Real women are waaaaaay better than anything you will ever find on the interwebz.

I'm just playing the devil's advocate here but would you also censor the artwork of David Hamilton?

no u

why do you care so much faggot

...

...

...

...

i would not censor loli, but i certainly would censor hamilton

...

...

...

...

By censor do you mean, make illegal?

>Stopping destructive forces from normalizing the sexual abuse of prepubescent children isn't censorship - it is common sense rooted in both necessity and logic.

>Cartoon images of post-pubescent individuals should be allowed as a form of free expression. The issue isn't that a variety of pixels happen to resemble a teenage tit. It is that pictures of infants being raped are absolutely disgusting and can never be normalized. Our society has very few bulwarks of morality left and we should never compromise(more so than we've abdicated already) our definition of healthy sexual function.

>There is absolutely nothing normal about being attracted to prepubescent children.

That's a really stupid way to phrase it. Pedophilia is normal because a statistically significant percentage of the population are pedophiles. Also, it doesn't matter if something is normal or not. If you were born with green skin and no other symptoms, that would be abnormal, but it would not matter. Saying that something "isn't normal" when you mean to say "isn't healthy" demonstrates that you are uneducated and stupid.

...

...

...

nah, more like "dont give a platform"

you dont have to make everything illegal that pisses you off.
there should be a clear distinction between illegal and not illegal, not some arbitrarily large grey area.

...

When did you find out you were a towering faggot?

So basically everything that doesn't fall under your very narrow definition of morality should be censored. Got it.

...

...

...

...

...

...

/thread

...

...

It's not illegal, but it's against the rules:
>You will not upload, post, discuss, request, or link to anything that violates local or United States law.
I think posting drawings of kids getting fucked constitutes at least a discussion of an illegal act. But we allow it anyways because of tradition. Try to post a text-only copy pasta about how to molest your daughter, and you earn a permaban.

>Against the rules

If its not a real person, you can fap to it all you want

>Just keep on flagging all loli-stuff as illegal. Sooner or later the mods will either ban it permanently or at least give pedos their own board so that the rest of us don't need to be assaulted by it every time we refresh Sup Forums.

One hilarious aspect of this site is that almost every loli thread has warnings that it is being monitored by some legal agency (FBI etc etc). In spite of this, people continue to post images which are as close as you can get to CP without involving a real person.

>There is no doubt in my mind that "the Watchlist" is real and I am certain that those posting toddler/infant abuse images will be the very first ones prosecuted. Good riddance I say.

Stay strong fellow Sup Forumselievers, one day we will be able to enjoy our data mining porno dumps without having to rub electrons with the baby raping crowd. Never stop flagging.

sauce?

>Just keep on flagging all loli-stuff as illegal. Sooner or later the mods will either ban it permanently or at least give pedos their own board so that the rest of us don't need to be assaulted by it every time we refresh Sup Forums.
Loli has been a part of Sup Forums since its inception, not you or any other butthurt faggot will get rid of it. Also
>Durr, I'm too much of a retard to know how to hide threads!!!

I understand that you struggle with the shame of being a pedo. As long as you haven't acted out on your fantasies, you are still redeemable. Find someone you feel comfortable talking to and try to work your way through it. Your attraction to children is completely unnatural and can be broken. It will be a lot of work but it is definitely worth it.

>Sup Forums is praying for you. You can do this!

>Sooner or later the mods will either ban it permanently

Hi! You must be new here. Welcome to Sup Forums. Good luck getting that loli banned, slugger!

Nah, I'll continue jerking off to whatever I want.
Toodle loo!

>our definition of healthy sexual function
THE FUCK
dude

we dont fuck children
not because that is unnatural
not because that conflicts with natural sexuality
not because it would be weird or disgusting

but because we protect the weakest of our society from abuse.
it should have NOTHING to do with what other kinds of sex and kinks we want have.

ITS NOT ABOUT US. its about protecting children.

sad reactions only

And here you have the average Sup Forums user in his natural habitat. You will notice every time he posts he uses a different politically charged infographic to assert his intellectual dominance over what he perceives to be the "degenerates".