Redpill me about North Korea Sup Forums

How come communism is successful there?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-A0eem5ON6Q
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cleanest_Race
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>communism
>successful

pick one

They are one of the three countries (along with Iran and Cuba) not to have a central bank controlled by the Illuminati.

How do you mean? Half the country is in poverty.

>successful

And you know how?

Kike media?

CHYNA.

I bet you think the moon landing was fake too, right Einstein?

how do you know it's successful?

One of the few countries where religion is illegal.
No Mc Donald's. No Coca-Cola. 100,000 MBs internet.

Yes, kike media with their kike cameras filming kikes posing as North Koreans being kike bums.

It's not successful, it doesn't work bc extremists of either side are bad

>extreme left = communism
didn't work

>extreme right = US republicans
Also doesn't work

No I don't.

I bet you're the type to support "hurr freedom and democracy" through military force on countries that were doing just fine before

They have nukes and their own space program?

>They haven't been Red Pilled.
Oh my dear children.

/thread. This man has it right.

youtube.com/watch?v=-A0eem5ON6Q

North Korea isn't communist. I also don't mean it in the "they don't practice true communism" type of way either. Their officially ideology is known as "Juche" now.

You might want to try brushing your teeth a little more because the plaque buildup is clearly starting to impair your cognitive function. North Korea is one of the worst totalitarian countries in the world and it's run by a cheese eating lardo known as Kim-Jung-Un. The only news people can read is state propaganda. Fuck off, you fat greasy bastard and brush your damn teeth already.

> extreme right = republicans
Man they fuckin did a number on you in public school.

Juche is pretty much just communism senpai.

I wonder who could POSSIBLY be behind this post?

so does india and half of their people don't poo in loo.
are nukes and spaceprograms really a measure of success when the rest of your country is dirt poor, people are malnourished and don't know about proper feces disposal?

You see those black things they are carrying in their hands? That is what makes communism "successful" anywhere.

also the best korean space programm is a meme. they cant even bring a small satelitte into a stable orbit... i did that a gazillion times on kerbal space programm

what part is wrong

its not you fucking moron. The people are short from malnutrition, they have crumbling buildings, rolling black outs, people that go blind from cataracts even at a young age and don't have the equipment to even do such a simple procedure to fix it, multi generationa forced labor camps, and need handouts to survive. anything good is fake for photos.

Payne?

Good sheepherders.
There is no opposition, you need a permit to leave your village - this fact itself makes it impossible to form any kind of bigger resistance.

Pyongyang is the only functional area of the country, and the only thing the DPRK media itself will let anybody see. The rest is a literal shithole with no resources.

>bongs desperately wanting communism to work

You don't even deserve a country.

I don't mean to shit on your argument, Hans, but you're aware that putting satellites into orbit is enormously more complex than KSB, right?

their people starve regularly, and they need to threaten nations with weapons of mass destruction so they can feed their own people and ideology, it's pathetic and communism is never successful

here's a thought i had looking at your pic:
since the korean war technically never ended because no peace treaty was signed, maybe what we have been witnessing for the past 60 years is a new type of warfare. no open confrontation but instead the west lets the best koreans become smaller and smaller due to malnutrition and then when they are only 5 cm tall we march in and just stomp them to death.
it'll be just like smashing bugs

come one weedman, how hard can it be?
you put your satellite on top of a can which you fill up with highly explosive material.
you light that shit and you need one retard to operate a small steering system et voilà you're in orbit...russia did it, even india did it. yet best korea did not...

is your definition of successful people living in poverty and oppression from their government? Little to no advances is technology science or medicine?

If so, they're very successful

It's a potemski country, sustained by China. A firewall between China and the NATO.

> sell huge amount of rate earth elements to China for a bargain
> manage to get enough money to not crumble on yourself

most of dprk stuff is repeled Chinese goods handed for free

""""""""""successful""""""""""

There is no communism at all there, it's rather a hereditary absolute traditional monarchy than communism

>successful

are you fucking retarded?

>NK
>Communist
>successful

>tfw you finally realize why britbongs won't fight for their country
OP has the lowest standards of all time.

>How come communism is successful there?
It's not. Look at "Best Korea". If it has to depend on handouts when it's under embargo, it's not successful. A non-communist government can weather trade embargoes and can survive in isolation. Norks, like other commie gov'ts, have been hit by terrible famines that has killed countless people. It was so bad that some had to resort to cannibalism, like Russia did, like the other (former) Soviet states did, like China did.

What the commies don't tell you is that the communist design is a slow descent to oblivion. Why do you think commies talk about capitalism being a stepping stone to communism? It requires infrastructure and other systems to be in place and for the economy to be very established before switching to communism. A more wealthy country would take longer to collapse and implode under communism. Then the commies move on and reiterate their bullshit of "true commienizum hasn't been tried yet, DURR!"

Most of the commie leaders are only in it for the power and to rob the victim country of its wealth before moving on. There's no effort towards sustainability or compromise--only consume until everything's gone or the country could no longer support them.

And it always devolves to totalitarianism. It's either a party or one man with absolute power over everyone else, instead of the promised "people's rule" or whatever bullshit. One person and/or one party /= "the people". Look at Norks. There's no "people" there; just the Kims.

They are actually not communist. Their regime is deeply rooted in confucian ancestor worship and korean royal dynastic loyalty. They are more the continuation of their kings than anything else,

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cleanest_Race

I don't think this guy even knows what red-pilled means

It's because they aren't corrupt like other failed communist states.
In these failed states like the USSR, the leaders would take from the rich and poor and give to themselves. But in glorious People's Democratic Republic of Korea, they take from the poor and give to the army. Truly a great model of proletariat emancipation.

>And it always devolves to totalitarianism
it's because communism can't handle opposition.
they cant counter someone who says: no i'm not taking part in your commie bs"
it always becomes violent and opposition is killed.