DUDE WEED

What will ''''''''rebellious''''''''' teens group around once Weed is legalized and the scene becomes completely gentriefied?

There doesn't seem much left.

Other urls found in this thread:

huffingtonpost.com/entry/nixon-drug-war-racist_us_56f16a0ae4b03a640a6bbda1
nydailynews.com/news/politics/nixon-aide-war-drugs-tool-target-black-people-article-1.2573832
reverbpress.com/justice/war-on-drugs-nixon-slave-labor/
harpers.org/archive/2016/04/legalize-it-all/
reason.com/blog/2016/03/22/nixon-invented-the-drug-war-to-decimate
upi.com/Top_News/US/2016/03/23/Nixon-aide-War-on-Drugs-created-to-target-black-people-anti-war-protesters/2991458704478/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

MDMA/Ecstasy or Ketamine

It's already happening over here.

Have you guys never met an adult smoker?

Heroin here.

Thanks, dudeweed faggots.

Quite a few actually. Some manage to be pretty successful, the rest are either working class or drug dealers.

> rebellious
> weed

> anything whatsoever that indicates a modicum of effort
> weed
pick only one

guns

and entertainment

>weed leads to heroin
D.A.R.E.fags actually believe this

>D - I won't do drugs,
>A - won't have no attitude,
>R - I will respect myself
>E - I will educate me

Did the end of prohibition bring the end of alcoholics?

Boy scouts honor

They can rebel by doing heroin, and stealing to support their habit. Rebellion.

molly it has already happened also purple drank

Alcohol is much more ingrained in our society from an early age, it's more addictive, and its an all-around superior vice. People who conflate alcohol prohibition with any other modern drug prohibition are silly

it has to be Jenkem, the true patrician drug

>people still considering weed as "rebellious"
wew

I dont even smoke weed but you can fuck off you pretentious faggot

>Marijuana decriminalization is just another step to legalization

>In 1973, Oregon became the first state to decriminalize cannabis possession. By 1978 Alaska, California, Colorado, Mississippi, New York, Nebraska, North Carolina, and Ohio had some form of cannabis decriminalization. Certain cities and counties, particularly in California, have adopted laws to further decriminalize cannabis.

And not all of those states have legalized it. Is decriminalization really a scapegoat to get away from the marijuana issue?

>What will ''''''''rebellious''''''''' teens group around once Weed is legalized and the scene becomes completely gentriefied?
Either MDMA, or they'll just go back to drinking

Or they'll continue to smoke pot.

Synthetics; going to be a shitshow.

this
synthetics in the next 10/15 years, software drugs in the next 20/30

this is the future of drugs anons, listen to me: trips are gonna turn into a form of art, like quite literally people are gonna start shaping and timing the effects to make it thematic

it will start with the psychedelic fags making the perfect god-head trip as a way to bring ppl to their cult, but it will trickle down into the entertainment industry and the arts

Sup Forums Sup Forums

>"DON'T SLUT SHAME BRO"

Elaborate.

Why would teens suddenly do things like Spice instead of pot?

Shut the fuck up you retard. You all damn well know that there is nothing wrong with Cannabis, and I'm willing to say that there is VERY little wrong with the other illegal substances.
Infact, what you retards fail to adress, is the health hazards associated directly and indirectly with alcohol compared to the other drugs. If we compared alcohol, alcohol would be pretty much on the same level as Methampetamine and heroin in terms of health risk. So stop making these retarded threads, we get it, you're all bluepilled as fuck when it comes to the war on drugs. You don't have to shitpost about it.

What akes you think this

>take a look at this retard

LOOK I WROTE SENTENCES!

>Infact, what you retards fail to adress,

lol

You cannot prove me wrong. Try me faggots.

Prove me wrong other than picking on my grammar.

Sucking cock.

pls daddy

>compared alcohol to heroin.

That's how I know you don't want to be taken seriously.

>take a look at this retard
>LOOK I WROTE SENTENCES
>lol
>pls daddy

Really taking the shitposting up a notch today

>Cant prove me wrong

There is nothing to prove wrong, you only gave your opinon. I've been smoking for 6 years i can tell it has worst effect on my body then alcohol.

Meems.

>I've been smoking for 6 years i can tell it has worst effect on my body then alcohol.

That's interesting. How often do you smoke? How often do you drink? And what negative effects do you feel; and, do you feel these effects while you're high, sober, or both?

Do some fucking reaserach then, then you'll find that alcohol is comparable to heroin, somewhat atleast.
Stop listening to everything the government tells you you cuck. This proves just how young you are.
It's not an opinion, it's a fact. And if you would substitute aclohol for your supposed "6 year cannabis smoking" You'd probably be dead. Besides, if you smoke every day for 6 years, doing anything really, you bet you will feel fucked up. Try eating hamburgers for as oftent as you smoked those 6 years.
Also
>Because I had a negative reaction to smoking cannabis reguraly others will too.
Nice logic.

These people are confusing your comparison with the DEA clumping all drugs together. They only think in memes and association fallacies, that's the problem. I don't agree with you but it does say something as to why people dismiss marijuana legalization if the people for it will dismiss people like you so easily.

The problem is that you've all been brainwashed to think that prohibition is a good thing, despite the fact that NOTHING good EVER came out of the war on drugs, the bad effects of the war was atleast 10 to 1 to the good effects ( If any good effects at all ).

Think about it, was there really any problems with drugs BEFORE the war on it? I haven't seen any outstanding reports saying that the world was about to crumble because of substance use.

Let me first state that weed and alcohol effect can differ a lot from one person to another.
>around two beers a day(obviously much more on week ends)
>about 5 or 6 bongs almost every Friday and Saturday.

Beer only gives hangovers if you drink a lot
and doesn't really affect my athletic capabilities Weed just kills whatever cardio i have.

>Because I had a GOOD reaction to smoking cannabis regularly others will too.
this argument is invalid it works both ways?

They go straight edge and start bitching about "degeneracy".

I put that argument out there becase you are in the minority when it comes to really shitty side effects with regular smoking, most people don't experience that.
And the bad feelings you feel is probably just your head, again if you subistituted cannabis with alcohol, you'd be feeling ALOT shittier, both head and body, because unlike cannabis (not the heated plant material, Im speaking of cannabis induced lotion, food, or vapor) alcohol actually harms your body.
If you drank as often you'd most likely become insanely addicted to it, while with cannabis it is relatively easy to get rid of the addiction.

...

The best part of the war on drugs is that it locks up dangerous criminals. It might be hard for the cops to prove that the bike Tyrone is riding is stolen, but they can sure prove the rock in his pocket is made of crack

I'm not your fact checker. If you want to stay relevant in a discussion it is your responsibillity to be fact oriented. Do the research yourself, I've done it enough times already.

>I didnt like a thing
>Instead of me not doing thing anymore, noone should be able to do thing

>Get a load of that genius

>Alcohol users are way more dangerous than any other substance induced user.
Locking people up and giving them a criminal record for doing something that should be a human right (Putting whatever you want inside you own body) is a retarded thing to do. If you support it you are also a retard, give me one good reason why you shouldn't be classified as a retard

Bernie Sanders / Socialism

I win this discussion, and you proved yourself to be retarded. Seriously, the facts I am speaking of are not hard to find. 1 google search is all it takes

How come burgers never make any sense?

Radical Christianity.

Since the majority of parents will be stupid liberal twats the next era of edgy rebellious teens will be Nazi-core goths. The new drug will be called Sniffilis and it's made up of ground-up Jew bones and smoked in a bong through your nose.

On the bad side our kids will be addicted to Jews.
On the good side hot goths will be back in fashion with Nazi overtones.

He proved how stupid your "argument" is, why don't you try to do the same to him?

>Implying cannabis is a jew plant
>Not seeing that alcohol is the real jew.

>hot goths will be back in fashion with Nazi overtones.

Why is good porn of this aesthetic so hard to find

If you google search the opposite you get as much research disagreeing. I'm just telling you to take a look at everyone around you that ever smoked they all reacted the same? and you could say the vast majority started smoking everyday because: ayyyy its harmless and cool dude!

I literally said nothing in relation to either of those except for the words "Jew" and "drug".

uwotm8

How far up your ass did you have to reach to find that one, user?
>im not even gonna bite the b8

meth, sideways peru, meth.

Like I said, it is all in your head that you feel "fucked up" your body is fine, unlike what it would be on alcohol.

That's what it seemed like.

hopefully they start shooting up with superglue

I think all drugs should be legalized

The most dangerous and addictive are already legalized (tobacco, alchohol)

According to WHO smoking is the most preventable cause of death in the world. Why is smoking legal?

Because muh freedumbs. Why can't we extend that to less harmful drugs?

Al Capone didn't get busted for mobster shit, he got busted for tax evasion. Jamal doesn't get busted for aggravated assault and theft, he gets busted for drugs. Drugs are only a pretense used to get people off the streets

>Substance intolerance or allergies are not part of your universe

Finally some sense into this discussion, not discluding you It is true, all drugs should be legalized and regulated over the course of the 50 year war on drugs, it is OBVIOUS that this is the right decission to make.

Just because people die/kill others in car crashes, do you make cars illegal then? No of course not, you regulate it with taxes and security steps that needs to be taken.

I am an adult smoker. I am an engineer with mortgage and wife and a pretty boring life, still smoke weed pretty much every other day to relax and put things into perspective. I quit for almost a year and my wife didn't like me sober all the time (too serious and too focused on the work) so I started it again. It helps me be a more grounded and happy person.

>The most dangerous and addictive (tobacco, alchohol)
>not cocaine

No, your body is still fine and healthy, it might FEEL fucked up, but it really isnt, it will heal quickly.

Tobacco and alcohol is equally if not more addictive as cocain.

Straight edge, good christian values.

And your point is?

You have to do both of those a good amount of times before you get addicted, where as cocaine immediately comes with a physical addiction. Depriving your body of cocaine after taking it even once usually will lead to nausea, vomiting, and migraines.

Wrong there burger. D.A.R.E. was a psy-ops movement to get those that would question authority onto hardcore drugs so they wouldn't cause any problems with the system as it is and keep the standard narrative floating along because they'd be too disabled to actually do great works.

>D - Drugs
>A - Are
>R - Required
>E - Everyday

Medicinal Jenkem

In worst cases yes, I'm talking about addiction levels, not the effects of withdrawal, besides, I'm fairly certain a few lines for pure cocain will be easy to not become addicted to.

>Depriving your body of cocaine after taking it even once usually will lead to nausea, vomiting, and migraines.
kek are you speaking from experience?

>Depriving your body of cocaine after taking it even once usually will lead to nausea, vomiting, and migraines.
wheeew

>i've never done cocaine

Yea, I can tell. Alcohol and benzos are the only drugs that will kill you if you try to quit cold-turkey.

ITT: People who read about drugs rather than doing them.
People that do drugs but never read about them (proper literature).
People that do both and refuse to chime in because both sides of the coin are fucking retarded.

Who are you referring to here?

Holy fuck this

Ty for the look into the near future

Connect the dots

Otherwise law abiding people rarely go to jail for drug use because it's really easy to be a junkie and not get in trouble with the law. Drug possession is an easy charge for a prosecutor to make stick on a criminal scumbag when the rest of the charges won't hold up in court. The War on Drugs isn't about drugs at all. It's was created because crime was getting out of control in the 60s and 70s, so cops needed a reason to start putting people behind bars.

Here's an example, you've got a guy who all the neighborhood hearsay says is up to no good. There's no overwhelming proof, but there's plenty of circumstantial evidence suggesting he's involved in numerous unresolved crimes. A couple of people in the neighborhood also have implicated him in some crimes, but are afraid to testify in court because they think either he or his buddies will take revenge. This doesn't appear to be a one off occurrence either and these rumblings suggest the guy is regularly involved in crime.

What are you supposed to do as a cop? You can leave the guy alone and wait until you have the perfect evidence, but in the process risk someone getting hurt. The alternative is to arrest him on drug charges and definitely remove him from the community for a while.

I really dont like potheads but there are some exceptions.
I found out my doctor that I had for like 8 years was a pothead (very long story as to how I found it out) but he's a really professional, smart, competent guy and I have no problem with him treating me desu

>It was created because crime was getting out of control.
So what you're saying is that criminals who used now illegal substances, were being made into even bigger criminals, and that that would help?
That sounds fucking retarded.
And you're wrong.

With a bit of research you would've found that the war on drugs was created to keep the chineese, mexicans and black people from stealing american jobs, because they each had their drug associated with them, the simplest thing to do is to make those drugs illegal and haul them into jail, thus giving the american people back its jobs.

Nixon's colleges even admitted saying that they were bullshitting.

huffingtonpost.com/entry/nixon-drug-war-racist_us_56f16a0ae4b03a640a6bbda1
nydailynews.com/news/politics/nixon-aide-war-drugs-tool-target-black-people-article-1.2573832
reverbpress.com/justice/war-on-drugs-nixon-slave-labor/
harpers.org/archive/2016/04/legalize-it-all/
reason.com/blog/2016/03/22/nixon-invented-the-drug-war-to-decimate
upi.com/Top_News/US/2016/03/23/Nixon-aide-War-on-Drugs-created-to-target-black-people-anti-war-protesters/2991458704478/

Leftists and SJW. Gavin McInnes talks about this pretty often and I think he's on to something. Right now in our culture SJW are being purged. People are realizing that they are degenerate jokes and it won't be long before no one wants to associate with them. They are following the trajectory of that other factions like Evangelical fundementalists went.

The bigger picture is that the entire left is collapsing throughout the western world right now. Meanwhile the right is rallying culturally and politically. We are shutting down the leftist control that has infested western society since the 60s.

The right wing is the new counter culture. It will not be long before right wing is "cool" and everyone pushes back against leftists. Teens have always rebelled against speech control. Whos controlling speech right now? SJWs and Leftists.

Strap in boys, Trump is just the beginning. We arent going to take back America, we are going to make the entire fucking Western World great again.

>this argument is invalid it works both ways?

Yep, it works both ways. Unfortunately neither of those posts were making that argument. Not that it's not a good point to make.