Hey retards! let's see if you can figure this out. Correct answer gets $20 venmo to them. Add @name
The earth has been around for 4.5 billion years, yet human civilization has
only been here a fraction of the time. Humans produce more carbon
dioxide, sulfur, nitrogen, and air pollution than ever before. With a population
of over 7 billion expected to reach 15 billion by 2100, do you think humans
can and will have an impact on the overall structure of the earth’s atmosphere
and climate?
Other urls found in this thread:
blogs.scientificamerican.com
twitter.com
Sure. Billions of tons of greenhouse gases etc. into the atmosphere annually. What would stop that from having an impact?
...
no. which one of us gets money
Volcanos have been around since the early bombardment phase. With an estimated 1500 active volcanos pumping out an estimated 60-100 BILLION tonnes of CO2 alone in the past 10000 years (not inclusive of SO2 and other inert gases) it is safe to say that humans are not the source of global warming, only a contributor in a small fraction of the total pollutants measured.
Go fuck a rosebush you tree hugging cunt, and give my $20 to a bum on the street that needs it.
No
This guy is correct. I was going to refrence the heavy bombardment period myself, but you sir have beaten me to it. Now take his 20 bucks and give it to some bum on the street and go fuck a rosebush as he has previously stated!
this!
you asked a yes no question one is right
No one?...
Yes, people COULD have an effect, but it would be a ratio that's unreasonable. By the time there's enough people to actually affect it, we won't have any oil or coal left anyway.
Don't forget we are cutting whole forests which limits the carbon that can be absorbed by the planet. You people only see half of the problem
impact? definitely
but just like how we've inherited our parents situation, so will our child
my grand children can deal with global warming, ill continue fapping to porn and drive my car.
Magnetic poles can
flip
Ah yes CO2, but there are other greenhouse gasses which are produced in far greater quantities by humans than naturally. And they are worse for the environment than CO2. Look at methane from all the cattle farming
>do you think humans
>can and will have an impact on the overall structure of the earth’s atmosphere
>and climate?
A butterfly can have an impact. The question is; how much?
>pumping out an estimated 60-100 BILLION tonnes of CO2 alone in the past 10000 years
"Estimates of today's CO2 production go as high as about 40 billion tons per year."
blogs.scientificamerican.com
Could be.
It is important we try to warm the planet as much as we can. It's fucking freezing in the winter in most places that matter very much.
Remember Fessenheim
This guy gets it. When that happens we're fucked.
How do satellites help? Do we ignore the science or put economic stability
ahead of making any necessary changes that creates a more sustainable
environment for generations ahead?
We've actually replaced more trees than have been taken, and there's currently greater forestation than there's ever been.
mmmm, beef tastes good
>beef