bbc.co.uk
>This photograph of a father holding his son in the shower has been shared tens of thousands of times on Facebook in the last fortnight. But over the same period it's also also been taken down by the social media platform more than once before ultimately being reinstated each time. Why?
What do you think Sup Forums?
oh shit waddup
I don't get why people share their intimate moments with the rest of the world, but that's just me.
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS
That's his kid?
If yeah, no problem at all
Filthy pedophile. Who could do this to their very own child?
It's disgusting. Pedophiles can (and probably already have) whacked off to this. And that kid was shitting everywhere while that photo was taken. The dad was being a good parent but the mom was being an attention whore and unintentionally feeding cp to pedophiles.
This. Your husband did a good thing. Just keep it to yourself.
it's not like he's jerking off on his kids face or shoving 25 cm of wood up his ass. If the kids isn't being abused I don't see the problem
you've got the right idea
Your kids are allowed inside your balls but not on them
>tfw no dad butt in your face
It's fine
...
attention whoring is always disgusting
That child has no business being that close to the man's bare penis, it is unacceptable.
Even if it was innocent, it still looks very bad.
If it was a woman in this photo instead of a man it would be seen as a expression of beauty and feminism and all that other shit they love so much
Couldn't he at least wear shorts or something? Why did the mother feel the need to share this with everybody?
So many questions.
Nothing wrong with a father comforting his sick child.
My problem is sharing the fucking photo on the Web, the wife needs a slap the narcissistic witch.
And the husband needs one for allowing her to do it.
You guys have your good got glasses on.
This picture is attempting to normalize pedophilia.
Everyone who sees this photo at first glance thinks it's fishy to see a naked toddler on an equally makes hairy, fairy man's lap.
It's too unusual and it makes your parental instincts act up.
FUCK AUTO-CORRECT
>got not goy
>fat not fairy
>man's not makes
How does that hurt anyone if pedophiles have masturbated to this electronic photo? It's 2016. Pedophilia is an orientation, not a crime.
Very intimate very caring, shows a very loving attitude between parent and child.
But why would you
>Step in
>See incredibly sick child who later needs to go to hospital
>Instead of getting in and helping
>Instead of caring for you child
>You decide to go grab your camera
>Take a bunch of photographs
>Then after you get your child hospitalised, post your pictures on facebook and brag about how good a man your husband is!
>It's too unusual and it makes your parental instincts act up.
you never heard of parents washing their kids before?
I think it's a bit off setting knowing that someone filmed their child with an adult male in the shower and posted it online.
for all you know his thick, erect penis could be in the childs tight, virgin, unused asshole.
>It's disgusting. Pedophiles can (and probably already have) whacked off to this
australian logic:
>don't stop criminals
>instead stop people from doing normal things so that criminals can't act
>giving criminals that much control over what people do/don't do
is this a legacy of australia's past?
Source on pic?
I always wondered what a bedroom/pool hybrid would be like.
It would be mold.
Mold everywhere.
Dude should lift more so he could hold his child high enough to not give the impression the kid is resting on his erect dick.
this
closer to being disgusting than beautiful for sure
True facts.
I hated bathing when I was that age. My dad did similar at this age to teach me to shower.
My mother never did anything so kind. I turned out to be a fag.
Nigger stop it. Kek will destroy you, you have been warned.
Is this called art?
Stupid picture
It's subversive. It has nothing to do with the father.
Pretty as normal as if he were washing his son or if it were a woman. Jesus, I don't even have kids but seeing how my friends are with theirs, it's normal to show your kids affection and skinship. And it's good for them, there's no reason not to show young children unconditional affection.
disgusting bc of hair
>post a picture of yourself naked while holding your naked child in your arms
This is basically a bait. If it wasn't a bait they would be clothed.
disgusting, not the actual content just the fact someone felt the need to take this picture and share it all over the internet, in the end until a certain age there isnt really that much wrong in showering with your children.
who the jiggy nigga with the gold links?
its a poorly taken photo. was it candid/
It's not the photo, it's the fact that the photo shouldn't be plastered up on social media. Just keep it in a fucking family album.
got me reminiscing bout the old days
There was a recent shitstorm when a danish dad took a picture of himself in a bathtub with his daughter and posted it. My reaction to this is the same as with the other picture. If your reaction is "he's a pedophile/this is inappropriate and a dad shouldn't take a bath with his daughter" you're mentally defective and should invest in a helium bag for the future of our race. If your instinct and first reaction is to sexualize a situation with a kid involved, gas yourself.
Probably smell like chlorine
This, I can't tell you how many times I've heard my friend's kid say he'd rather take a bath with "dad than mom".
I'm a firm believer that if you see anything sexual in these photo's, you're a closet pedo. Sad reflection of our corrupt society.
this desu
...
how
>Pedophiles can (and probably already have) whacked off to this.
>ban pictures of animals, because some people are into zoophilia
>ban pictures of feet, because Sup Forums
>ban pictures of vegetables, because some people are into food-sex
>ban cartoons, because some people are into 2d porn
>ban pictures of Bernie Sanders, because some people are into cuckolding
>ban kids
It's the only solution. The final solution!
it's britbong logic too
spoons will be banned next
Not disgusting or beautiful, it's not really something you should share with the public though.
No problem with the situation but sharing a pic on social media of your sick child in distress is pretty fucked up. Not saying the guy isn't a good dude but his wife is just attention-whoring, as women do.
I don't find anything inherently wrong with the picture. But I am deeply opposed to sharing such a photo on social media.
The people who took it and posted this picture of themselves should be shot and the people who are sharing this photo with their friends should be imprisoned in a labor camp for 5 years so they learn a lesson about the cost of being total faggots on the internet.
What's the backstory to this?
His dick is inside of her
doesnt belong on the internet.
Hell anything with your naked body, face or real name doesnt belong on the internet if you ask me.
Kid had severe food poisoning and was vomiting and shitting with a fever, Dad took him in to a cold shower and held him for a few hours. They eventually took the kid to the hospital. Mom snapped the picture.
It's kind of artsy. there is a big contrast between the hairy bulk of a grown man, obviously masculine, tenderly holding a tiny smooth-skinned son.
so get boys to shower with moms
give them a straight-shota fetish
got it
Both disgusting and beautiful. I still fapped to it.
Disgusting? The proper word here is "foul".
Pictures of shelled corpses from Syria are less disturbing than this.
God-fucking-damnit this fucking society
does it even matter?
why is this on bbc news
downsize state when
Well desu, it has more to do with my mom being such a bitch as to teach me each and every flaw of the female psyche by age 12.
Had I been forced to shower with her, it would have been absolute torture.
She never really loved me, simply tolerated me out of some sense of obligation. Maybe she knew I was gay early on. Who knows?
typical white man fucking kids
>I don't get why people share their intimate moments with the rest of the world, but that's just me.
This.
Why can't you keep that shit to yourself? Maybe tell a trusted family member or friend if it becomes relevant in conversation. But 99% of the time you shouldn't air that shit out.
I've done good for people without taking credit and I've done things for strangers and never told a soul. Why? Cause I'm a decent human being. I don't need Facebook likes to help me sleep at night, I can live with myself because I know I did what I could have done to help someone and I have done what I would want someone to do for me.
Can you refrain from cheapening your actions with your narcissistic attention whoring? Let your actions stand on their own merits, even if the world doesn't find out about them.
>Now to get preachy
If you believe in a God then He has seen what you have done then that should be good enough for you.