Is there any good reason why I shouldn't be voting for Gary Johnson if I the political issues I care most about are...

Is there any good reason why I shouldn't be voting for Gary Johnson if I the political issues I care most about are economic conservatism, capitalism and free enterprise?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=KQIuHGbKckY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

If you don't want to be a cuck, for one

>Is there any good reason why I shouldn't be voting for Gary Johnson
he has no fucking chance

>pro-globalization
It's funny cause I got a 94% match with Johnson on the isidewith page, but I still wouldn't vote for him

Open borders.

I don't really care about globalization as long as capitalism is preserved. It's socialism and populist pandering that I can't stand, which is why I can't vote for Sanders, Clinton or Trump.

Again, I don't give a fuck about that as long as people can freely invest in, start and run businesses with as little government regulation and interference as possible.

Too bad there are already government regulations and structures in place that do regulate the economy. Trump would serve to deregulate protections on companies exploiting asian slave labor and would invoke protectionist policies for the American people. In a world where indian software developers work for literal pocket change, with vast disparities in currencies, purchasing power, and cost of living among different countries, do you really think open borders and completely unregulated trade is beneficial to the American people, or ANYONE other than the leaders of massive corporations?

Keep in mind, even a free trade stance would still have regulations for monopolies, which the US has established in practically every third world country.

...

...

...

He's a cuck candidate funded by the Kochs purely to spoil the ballot for Trump by splitting the Republican vote and handing the election to Hillary.

>free trade doesn't work because foreign goods are to cheap

wew

Because Austin Petersen will get the nomination, not Gary. Vote for him instead.

You know hat they say about big hands... big Johnson.

He is not a real libertarian. He wants you to bake the faggot cake.

...

See Ralph Nader:

In the 2000 presidential election in Florida, George W. Bush defeated Al Gore by 537 votes. Nader received 97,421 votes, which led to claims that he was responsible for Gore's defeat. Nader, both in his book Crashing the Party and on his website, states: "In the year 2000, exit polls reported that 25% of my voters would have voted for Bush, 38% would have voted for Gore and the rest would not have voted at all." (which would net a 13%, 12,665 votes, advantage for Gore over Bush.)

Also see Ross Perot.
Also see Spoiler Effect.

Johnson > Hillary > Trump

fucking this

He is a progressive that will allow SOME free market as long as it does not trigger minorities

wow, i used to care about national sovereignty and the value of culture having primacy over the almighty dollar but now I'm #feelingthejohnson

Demographics dumbshit. Your lolbertarian paradise will never happen if you import a bunch of people who vote democrat.

There are two spoilers in this race: shillary and the guy with the small hands.

>Hillary > Trump
Found the shill

...

A spoiler is someone who has no chance of winning but takes votes away from someone who would otherwise win, and who is closer to the spoiler than the alternative candidate.

So Ralph Nader was a spoiler for Gore, because he had no chance of winning and he was closer to Gore than to Bush.

And Ross Perot was a spoiler for HW Bush because he had no chance of winning and he was closer to Bush than Clinton.

Spoilers have recently given us the following two presidents:
Bill Clinton
George W. Bush

Without the spoilers, the election would have gone the other way.

Spoilers are just huge egos that fuck everything up.

...

If you have the time check this out and see what you think afterwards.

youtube.com/watch?v=KQIuHGbKckY

My only major fault but it is to fucking major for me to support him is his open borders views.

>value of culture having primacy over the almighty dollar

Well, this is where we disagree. I think cultural issues have almost no place in public policy. I also don't particularly care for nationalism except for the fact that America is, for all its faults, still the best country in the world to build a business from the ground up.

Without Johnson that poll is 45-42 Trump vs Clinton. It seems like he either pulls equally from both sides. Another poll indicated that he pulls more from Hillary.

And he hasn't even started campaigning yet. He has focused his staff's efforts on getting libertarians on the ballots.

Trump and Clinton?

Need to replace his name with "EGOMANIAC"

public policy needs to evolve out of the cultural zeitgeist, otherwise you get america as it is now. free enterprise only works when everyone's on an even moral and legal playing field -- other countries don't have our values, so they don't play by the rules and we get fucked. nationalism first. culture first. america first.

Because he is for open borders which would allow a flood of people in that don't support any of those things.

there is nothing good in letting people that already have more money than you lay claim to even more.

>people unironically voted for Johnson instead of McAfee

Done

But you would lose all of that with open borders, because because brown people vote overwhelmingly Democrat.

Johnson has no chance of winning, so he's not running for that reason. He's just running so he can bask in the attention, consequences be damned. Stroking his ego comes first. Everything else comes last.

...

Vote libertarian = split vote = liebrals win

Also, Peterson > MacFee > Johnson

not really, third party votes are just votes for whoever is leading at the time. The primary argument against this is usually that this very mentality is what makes that true, but that doesn't change the fact that it is still true.

Just vote Hillary you fuck. Be honest. Stop pretending like you don't know how a two party system works.

mfw all the 3rd grade johnson insults fail

>I don't really care about globalization as long as capitalism is preserved
Typical libertarian idiot.
This is what's most tragic, globalization is no longer even profiting average American, yet you still support it like good dogs.

you should vote for the candidate you feel will do the best job, that is how democracy works. you aren't picking horses on a Sunday you degenerate.

...

>I don't really care about globalization as long as capitalism is preserved
Literally a useful idiot
thx

This, and based on that fact alone that I will not vote for him, even as a Libertarian. Other lolbertarians here have said the same thing.

A vote for Gayry Johnsons is a vote for Crooked Hillary

...

No, voting for whoever you want is childish in the face of the oncoming series of supreme court justices, if you throw a bet on third party you could literally sell the entire country under the bus.

Two-party system sucks
It's like your citizens are too retarded to compare more than two candidates
...well, what can belarus say about elections anyway

The Monmouth pools tell otherwise

This is only true if you're not in a swing state.

...

I'd vote for him just because of his cyber security background.

You're advising willful ignorance.

Once you're aware of how the system works, you realize it's simply a matter of choosing the lesser of two evils.

Only a child could imagine otherwise.

...

This mother fucker wants what is happening in German and Scandinavia to happen to the USA. He wants to allow Muslims move here in droves. He wants to enable radical Muslims to infiltrate American in a way they cannot at this time.

What a truly glorious meme for this election cycle.

Bravo!

>Only a child could imagine otherwise.

Perhaps closed minded adults like you are why we have a two party system to begin with. Both of which have nominees that favor regulation over freedom.

This assumes that those who voted for the "spoiler" would have voted for a different candidate rather than not voting at all. This is a false premise

>standards of living rising in China
>state raises wages to avoid rebellion
>American manufacturers move to Vietnam and Malaysia like a swarm of locusts

This is already happening. What happens when US firms run out of countries with plentiful slave Labour willing to accept $1 a day? Prices go back up, or profits shrink, or both. But the economic damage in our country will already be done

See

Reminder that Reddit is promoting this guy right now to divert from Trump. It's just shilling.

Oh, right. Hello, Tarl. Have you been working hard on those gardens lately?

We have a two party system because we have a two party system, dumbass.

If you want to change it, change it, don't bitch me out for articulating obvious facts.

because he wont win

If you're in a blue or red state, you can vote however you want, because your vote will not matter. But if you are in a gray swing state, you have no choice. You must vote for Trump. Don't be a faggot.

Gayboy Johnson is a massive ultracuck, and I say that as someone who voted for Bob Barr in '08

good goyim

>this circular reasoning

try explaining how this comes about in some sort of coherent manner instead of bullshitting buddy boy, it's not that hard

Fuck off, Correct the Record. You divide and conquer tactics won't work here.

the fallacies in your logic are a self-fulfilling prophecy. voters, overly concerned with voting for the winner, end up electing someone they don't want. the train is not leaving the station, polls are manipulated statistics, you don't know who will win until the final ballots are counted. educate yourself on who you believe the best candidate will be and openly advocate for him/her prior to the election. when poll day comes, choose who you feel is right.

we fought against the establishment and served the epic meme of trump, now we must redeem our actions and do what is truly right: get our prophesied libertarian leader into office.

Yeah, those polls show that Johnson would hypothetically grub up 10% of the vote, probably more than half of the would come from likely Trump voters because dem-leaners think libertarianism is racist and sexist. In a close election decided by swing states, every vote stolen from Trump is a vote stolen for Hillary.

Luckily there's no way this cuck will even break 5% nationwide, just like he didn't in 2012, but it's the principle of the shilling which offends me

The system needs to change but retards like you think things will improve so long as you play the corrupt system, which is stacked against the people, the "right" way. You're fucking delusional and YOU are the problem.

johnson shills look like they get their material from facebook

Someone who is polling 11% will not win. All they will do is siphon votes away from the actual contenders and spoil for the candidate they are closest to, so it has the opposite effect of what you wanted.

That's the reality of it. Being hopey-dreamy about it doesn't change it.

Yeah, I saw it, and it is conjecture.

spending an awful lot of time thinkin about dudes dix there user

>le kind of a badass meme
xD

we're winning Michigan faggot

Why not, if you live in a solid blue or solid red state?

Doesn't he get to be in the debates or get funding or something if he gets 5%?

Self-fulfilling prophecies sure are great!

Get out HillShill, this is a blatant attempt to try and split Trump's voting base on a Turkish Delight Internet Forum by having people vote third party.

>voting for Gary "we need to stop Iran because they fund ISIS" Johnsonberg

can we get one of him & pootie rubbin bellies together on horseback?

Conjecture based on exit polls. You can vote however you want, but you should be informed of the risks and honest about them before you do.

Who?

The founding fathers did not intend for either parties ("fractions") or campaigning (one stood for office, he did not "run," and only landowning white males could vote), so they accidentally created a system that is almost impossible for a third party to break into.

Even if fagboy Johnson got 40% of the vote, he would still most likely lose the electoral college in a three-way split

>stolen
>your vote belongs to Trump! How dare you steal it by voting for the person you agree with most

The only person with a ego problem is you.

>fractions

Factions, thanks autocorrect

I voted for Johnson in 2012, but Trump is a way better candidate than Romney. If you don't vote for him I think you're a retard.

Interesting thing about Nader is that after he spoiled the 2000 election and handed it to George W. Bush (a horrible disaster), Nader went on to run again in 2004, even though his poll ratings were even lower than in 2000. And he tried to run again in 2008. This egomaniac didn't care that he wouldn't win. He didn't care that what the consequences were of his run. The only thing that mattered was his ego strutting around, and fuck the consequences. His principles didn't matter. His policies didn't matter. Only his ego mattered, and all the spotlight and attention he would get. These people are fucking disgusting.

If they would've voted for Trump without King Cuck in the race, and if his entry throws it for Hillary, who will literally be the worst president in US history, then no fate is too harsh for those who voted Cuck party

Conjecture based on "what if reality wasn't really reality, then how would you act?". You might as well ask people who they would vote for if aliens invaded.

>polling 11% in May
>May
>M A Y
>A
>Y
there's no hopey-dreamy in taking action over the next five months for the future of your country.

further, you are contributing to the data modeling process that is being used to crystal ball our nation's politcal future. if we allow these models to become very accurate they will inevitably be gained by the members of everyone's favorite religion to further their agenda.

you're advocating being a number worshiping sheep. take control of your future. there is no shame in voting for a loser.

DAILY REMINDER THAT CLINTON IS PAYING SHILLS TO SHILL GARY JOHNSON ONLINE IN ORDER TO CHIP AWAY AT TRUMP'S SUPPORT AND SO THAT SHE CAN STEAL THE ELECTION

GARY JOHNSON IS AN OPEN BORDERS KEK WITH NO CHANCE OF EVER BEING ELECTED