It is apparent that when people say "life isn't fair," they mean "you are not entitled to equality of outcome."
The rich are allowed to have *their wealth* and the poor *are not allowed to have the wealth of the rich* because one is entitled to their wealth based on some certain agreed-upon mechanisms: wage, investment, profits, etc. "Might" is not one of these, and is in fact a vague word.
Fundamental, gut disagreement with illegal immigration comes naturally from an extension of the property relationship to allocate the United States as the "property" so to speak of its citizens, which they contribute to and maintain through certain mechanisms (taxes etc.) and non-US citizens may become a part of through certain mechanisms (migration process, green card etc.)
None of these have anything to do with "fairness" or "might makes right."
You may disagree with these ideas, mechanisms, and channels of legal activity--that one is entitled to equality of outcome, that one is not entitled to their wealth, that nations are not allowed to have borders. Capitalism is in fact, not the default. The default is ideological void. You could in theory convince people to trade capitalism for socialism. But you face two steep obstacles: one, your complete and utter lack of persuasive power whatever; and two, the fact that no socialist/communist nation has survived to the present day.
This is of course why you decided to be a little shithead on Sup Forums. Because you can't convince anyone else of your socialist fairy tale.
>"The rich have made my life shittier since the 90s."
It appears that you have zero inner locus of control, seeing as you blame everyone else for every single one of your problems.
All of the other NEETs on Sup Forums have been greatly inspired by the success, wealth, and masculinity of Donald Trump. You have doubled down on your sense of entitlement to the labor of others. This is the difference between conservatives and socialists.