Trans debacle

>laws don't stop criminals
>we need bathroom laws

>we hate the government
>obama might take away federal funding we suddenly want

>people need to feel safe
>we don't care about the safety of transgenders who might be assaulted and beaten for going in to the bathrooms of their birth sex, wearing clothes that suit their identity

>think of the children who are weaker and need protection
>muh social darwinism and capitalism

>we need to respect people's privacy and comfort zones
>we have to stop people with certain genitalia so we have to know what everyone's genitalia is

>some girl might see a penis in the shower
>we don't care if a boy sees boobs and vagina

right wingers, you have no argument. laws don't stop criminals, it isn't a loophole, disgusting degenerate pedos will be disgusting degenerate pedos regardless of laws. you can't say this is a special case that needs different reasoning than the 2nd amendment

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=2gNXfrMR_Lw
theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
politico.com/story/2016/04/transgender-bathroom-republicans-2016-222271
dailydot.com/politics/transgender-republican-bruce-jenner/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation_sole
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>laws don't stop criminals

Then why does the left care about Gun Control?

liberals are right of center laissez faire capitalists who use identity politics to divide people along lines of alienated labor.

liberals are not leftists.

>look at how I just spent 20 minutes eviscerating every strawman I can think of
>RETHUGLICANS BTFO
neck yourself op

>laws don't stop criminals

my argument for the 2nd amendment is that it's a right

go fuck yourself

>we hate the government

I hate the "leftist" government you dumb cuck not government in general

>we don't care about the safety of transgenders

Honestly I would sleep more soundly if they were all deported to the Middle East where they belong

>muh social darwinism

That's a meme created by jewish historian Richard Hofstader with no basis in fact

>>we have to stop people with certain genitalia

Are you really arguing "for" pedophilia?

Oh wait you're a leftist of course you are

>some girl might see a penis in the shower

>what a biological differences between the sexes

>not until you put all the niggers in jail

then crime magically goes down

>no true leftist fallacy

every time

so you can't address the inherent contradictions of republicans?

i'm glad you said something though. i should have asked what libertarians opinions are.

>2nd amendment
yes, it's a right. i'm not disputing that, idiot.

>i want right wing government
so... you're a monarchist?

Why has this become an issue in the past 3 months?

All of the sudden you get this big push by the media to shed light on this 'issue' that only affects a few.

How many trans individuals are out there? Even the gays/lesbian only make up a fraction of the American population.
It's is estimated that 3.8% of the United states population is LGBT and of that 1.7 are gay or gay and 1.8 are bisexual. That only leaves .3% of the population that identifies as the other alphabet soup letters. That's on 956,700 and probably not all of them are trans.

Literally who cares?

>arguing for pedophilia

dude, just because a kid sees a naked body doesn't mean sex will automatically happen. like if someone's kid watches a show about some tribe in the rainforest and sees some naked people in the jungle, they are not going to be scarred for life.

what's your point? leftists support the right to bear arms. right of center capitalist "free trade" liberals do not.

So according to you every single republican, nay the majority of republicans give a shit about trannys going into bathrooms different from their biological sex? Do you have any data to back up your Assumption?

so if they're a minority, why makes them different from the 1%?

how is it that right wingers think we should bow to the minority ruling class that robs the citizenry with corporate subsidies and bailout but they get flame butthurt at the thought of having to adjust for trans?

Agreed.

If this walked into the women's room literally no one would care.

This is such a non-issue. I'm beginning to think this is just some made up issue to distract us from what's really happening.

i think it's a distraction too, and fox news conservatives are eating that shit up. conservatives are gorging themselves and enraged over it.

bump

Yeah, what was stopping passable trans people from going to the bathrooms before? Literally nothing. I'm not saying we should outright ban them from bathrooms or make it into law, i stand with Trump:

>"There have been very few complaints the way it is. People go, they use the bathroom that they feel is appropriate. There has been so little trouble, and the problem with what happened in North Carolina is the strife and the economic punishment that they're taking. So I would say that's probably the best way."

Literally making a mountain out of an ant hill.

literally why would you bump a thread that has no purpose other than you parading around your own poorly constructed assumptions and their accompanying straw-men?

>le nazis were leftist maymay
>I call everything I don't like fascism but it's still left wing

kill yourself

>It's just adult nudity it doesn't matter XD

kill yourself

Leftists "used" to support the right to bear arms, but now they don't for numerous reasons

It's almost as if *gasp* policies and ideology change over time!!!!

so do you have an argument that makes sense on why people who identify differently should be forced in to one bathroom or the other?

>the economic strife

that's people/states voluntarily choosing not to do business with north carolina.

My argument is that I don't care. Your argument was fallacious from the start. try again

nazis were not leftists

youtube.com/watch?v=2gNXfrMR_Lw

theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar

>adult nudity
flashing children is a crime. being naked in a shower (not a bathroom stall with privacy) is not.

>fallacy of dismissal/appeal to stone

politico.com/story/2016/04/transgender-bathroom-republicans-2016-222271

someone tell ted cruz that jenner's conservative
dailydot.com/politics/transgender-republican-bruce-jenner/

Ok let me correct myself I never had an argument because I don't need one. Your argument is a nonstarter. try again

still fallacy of dismissal if you can't refute the central premise that there isn't any reasoning behind discriminating and telling people what bathroom to use.

So the current most popular republican candidate is pro tranny getting into whatever bathroom they want. You aren't really helping prove your assumption, but aleast you're trying.

there is no need to refute a non argument m8 you never proved or even attempted to prove your assumption you based it entirely on your own feelings.

>supporting the republican nominee is the same as agreeing with him on everything

no, my argument was based on YOUR feelings, not mine. that's why i said you don't have an actual argument. and you don't.

so do you have any other data to back your assumption of all or a majority of republicans opposing trannys in bathrooms
>no, my argument was based on YOUR feelings
congratulations you now understand that you not only based your argument on things you can't know or prove, and admitted to your entire argument being based on a faulty assumption.

>assumption

it's a fact that the people opposed to it are right wingers. that's what makes them right wingers. I used the phrase "right wingers" in the OP.

i still don't know what the libertarian opinion is though

>faulty assumption
you just made a strawman argument about what you say is a strawman argument.

do you have a logical reason to discriminate against people and tell them which bathroom to use regardless of their identity?

If they weren't leftist then your whole line of """""""reasoning""""" that everything right wing is monarchism falls apart.

if they not leftist, that means they would be right wing. you're making a strawman argument.

nazis were right wing.

koala bears are not actual bears just because the word "bear" is in the name.

>you just made a strawman argument about what you say is a strawman argument.
I don't think you even know what you're talking about at this point friendo. You could always go to a community college and ask for help understanding concepts such as this.
>do you have a logical reason to discriminate against people and tell them which bathroom to use regardless of their identity?
The onus is on you to prove that your original assumption that all or a majority of "right wingers" disagree with trannys using non biological bathrooms, and the myriad of other assumption you made, and then you can complete your argument that they contradict each other. So enjoy quantifying your argument m8 you were doomed from the start because you just decided to spew as much as you could without even trying to quantify them.

>The onus is on you to prove that your original assumption that all or a majority of "right wingers" disagree with trannys using non biological bathrooms

there is no left wing backlash from transgenders using the bathroom they identify with. i cannot prove to you with evidence for something that which does not exist

>laws don't stop criminals
Said no one ever.

>Why has this become an issue in the past 3 months?

It was simply a coincidence.

you just said all right wing ideology is "monarchism" you dumb fuck

That makes the nazis left wing by default

do you believe in gun free zones or something?

I don't give a shit about trannies using their preferred bathroom, nor do I care about predators inevitably taking advantage of the law. My problem is with the federal government enacting SJW laws and forcing states to comply. This is the kind of shit that led to the Civil War. That's why I'm against this shit.

nazis are right wing. they were allied with a monarch appointed fascist dictator

>all right wing ideology is "monarchism"

how is it not? the logical conclusion of capitalism is corporate personhood

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation_sole

>there is no left wing backlash from transgenders using the bathroom they identify with.
irrelevant that's like saying that something doesn't taste like grape jelly so it must be peanut butter.
>I cannot prove to you with evidence for something that which does not exist
And so now you realize where you fucked up. I'll let you think for awhile how you could have better made the argument without resorting to non demonstrable generalizations.

allying with a monarchy doesn't make you a monarchy

the US allying with the USSR in WW2 didn't turn the US into a communist country.

holy fuck you are too dumb to live.

i also pointed out that the 3rd reich could not have logistically functioned without IBM, a u.s. corporation

nice strawman by lie of omission

non demonstrable generalizations were made in the OP, where I stated the arguments of those who are against transgenders using bathrooms they identify with. try again

that's a good point.

now why are people who want less government suddenly worried about federal funding?

>non demonstrable generalizations were made in the OP
Now now friendo their is no need to get angry. Think really hard how you could have made those not generalizations. It's really easy. Just think

are you against transgenders using the bathroom they identify with?

if not, you are speaking for others.
if so, answer the question.

Ok friend I know when you came over from deviant art you though something like "haha I'll just make thread owning all those republidums" Unfortunately for you Sup Forums has a minimum quality of posting in an op if you want to have an actually thread arguing about a topic instead of a mere shitposting thread. You need to try harder.

bump

i downloaded those pics in a thread on Sup Forums years ago. i did not get them from deviantat

the sliding is hard. someone upset?

You have to go back

what, back to the future?

...

the butthurt is real

Really? The trans meme came from the Liberal Media and they seem to be the ones obsessed with it.

trans have existed long before television and the internet

this thread is shit and im too tired to read and comprehend your bullshit

mcfucking kill yourselves

fallacy of dismissal

you're not as smart as you think you are
you're just another stupid ameriturd lol
i bet you were in one of those silly debate clubs you pretentious piece of shit

i volunteered only a guest for a forensics team once, and it was only so the "home team" could have enough participants to even qualify in the debates they were hosting

thats nice honey

Self-identification means nothing.

Based as Fuck
Dubs checkem

then segregated bathrooms mean nothing

beat you to it

now you're just scatter shooting random bullshit irrelevant to political ideology.

I recommend you kill yourself

>checking your own dubs
disgusting

I personally think it is all a bunch of horse shit, but if it is going to stay this way, make a third bathroom for all people who want to identify as a fucking helicopter.

Then, Men or Women or Helicopters are all able to go into the third bathroom for inter-societal degeneracy.

Leave the other two bathrooms the fucking way they were intended to be used and get the fuck over it already.

learn the difference between cherry picking and empirical evidence.

this makes sense