Is Dawkins Red Pilled?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=ecJUqhm2g08
youtube.com/watch?v=U0Xn60Zw03A
youtube.com/watch?v=vqQdc0mX1_c
youtube.com/watch?v=TX4RK8bj2W0
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

is it really "red pilled" to state obvious fucking facts in 2016?

Son, you don't know your history. Read your history, son.

Dawkins was redpilled before redpill was a term.

Yeah, sadly.

when you're actively brainwashed by the media and education system, and when your contemporaries are mostly bernouts fighting for free shit, it is

Dawkins is based.
I know Sup Forums is upset because he made fun of their invisible sky nigger, but he shits on islam regularly and often compares christianity favourably to islam.

When there is massive propaganda trying to brainwash people into thinking that those facts are false, and when said propaganda is effective, then yeah it is.
"Islam is a religion of peace" is being pushed everywhere all over Europe, and Europeans are eating it up.

The leaders of the fedora crowd have been increasingly anti Islam ever since they realized what it overwhelming Christianity would be like

Oy vey!

He's redpilled but it's too late. The damage he's done is irreversible.

B-B-But doesn't Dawkin's comments play into the hands of the extremists by alienating moderate muslims and making it more likely they will be radicalized?

Kind of. The red pill is seeing reality as it obviously is without any dress ups or naive illusions, such as stating the obvious that Islam is violent and the jews have a disproportionate amount of influence and often have an agenda.

He's a fucking white male

he's a leftist feminist

Richard "Dick" Dawkins

Imagine being Richard Dawkins today

>become famous for being the pope of atheists
>young people flock to you
>your books are worldwide bestsellers
>force Christianity to accept changes
>now in comes a new religion, Islam
>this one is 10 times more bigoted, sexist and repressive than modern Christianity ever was
>think to yourself that you and your fellow atheists aren't going to let Islam dictate the rules like Christianity did
>but suddenly Dawkins finds himself alone
>all his followers have abandoned him
>all of them calling him a racist
>for some reason he is not allowed to say any criticism towards Islam
>the very same people who praised him for taking on Christianity are literally felating a religion that would have them all convert or die just because its a "minority"
>get ostracized into becoming a pariah for being the only one to stick with your ideals
>Dawkins is now alone on Twitter, occasionally posting a anti-Islam tweet

Such are the wages of sin

Oy vey, am I ever glad I was circumcised in a hospital.

>am I ever glad I was circumcised
good goy

He's that edgy kid from high school who didn't grow out of it.

He literally got banned from some convention because he tweeted a video comparing feminists to Muslims

gr8 b8 m8

He's truly red pilled. I'm not trying to sound fedora but science red pills you more than anything else.

He got in shit and had Sci speeches cancelled for posting this in his twitter:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=ecJUqhm2g08

Summed it up perfectly, spaghettibro.

He's rich, and the atheism movement has gone far downhill. He doesn't have anything to prove to anyone. You should appreciate him for taking a stand against Islam, though

Atheists have always hated islam you nonce
The """liberal degenerate atheists""" that cry white guilt are AGNOSTICS who never take a strong stand on anything

Or really, "do you even know any poet/composer/scientists?"

Islam is bad, BBC is just a-ok

Are you retarded? Feminists hate him.
Dawkins regularly BTFOs the following groups:
>muslims
>jews
>feminists

Tell me again how he isn't Sup Forums tier?

Unlike relatively obscure yt channels like black pigeon or molyneux, Dawkins has mainstream appeal. He is on our side you faggot.

But against Islam is not even red-pilled, I see liberals who are anti-Islam. It takes more than that to be red pilled.

>they don't realize that less religious Jews don't use moyels

Honestly, if you're going to think that we're all your enemy, at least educate yourself about us

Stupid goys, for reals.

he built his entire anti-christian career around being fondled by a priest as a kid

>atheism movement has gone far downhill

We just don't talk about it as much. No one believes in Santa, that doesn't mean there has to be a movement

>moderate mudslime

You're need to pull a few more tubes out.

>if you baited bites the bait, the baited wins
no thanks justin

This

I still have an in tact cock.
Why should anyone pay someone to mutilate them or their children?
Absolute degeneracy.

...

>Tell me again how he isn't Sup Forums tier?

10. By “feelings of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strict sense but a whole spectrum of related traits; low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self- hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have some such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.

13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc. ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)

15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.

Historys helluva drug

Liberal atheists have always favored Islam over Christianity. My guess is that they feel like they're rebelling against their Christian parents or some shit because Islam is 100x more dangerous to liberal ideals like gay acceptance, gender equality, ect. than Christianity

It's libfaggots who coined the term "Islamophobia" and decided that criticism of Islam is off-limits and a form of bigoted hate speech

A lot of people on this board confuse common sense with redpill

WE WUZ poet/composer/scientists

>attack piece on Salon

He's red pilled

>SALON

the sad part is yes, to not be a fucking idiot blue pilled notallmuslims idiot, its redpilled

thats how bad its gotten

It took alot of pressure to get him to turn his gaze upon islam, he has grown a pair since so good on him.

>atheism
>redpill
Yes goy, atheism is truly redpilled and totally not a degenerate metareligion

>taking strong stance on something you don't know
LOL

On religion he is. He's not the fedora tipping liberal atheist Sup Forums likes to paint him as.

But he' still bluepilled in other areas - HBD for instance

>out of Africa
>we waz kangz

The "boyfriend " "Kyle" is actually a mentally ill FtM tranny.

If he's calling out Jews and Islam I really don't care

Ah yes, it totally makes things more acceptable.
>captcha: select all bananas

Just watch him dodge having to say negative points about islam here despite his enthusiasm to rip christianity apart, he was a blue pill fanatic until islam went into overdrive.

youtube.com/watch?v=U0Xn60Zw03A

Also: typical leaf.

Wait up do rabbis actually suck baby cock blood? If thats true that might make me go from ironically antisemitic to actually antisemitic

...

I wasn't saying it to excuse it, but to highlight just how degenerate the Amazing Atheist is.

Pic related is from his instagram

...

Yes, some quotes in this book indicate he is redpilled on the lesser races overcoming civilization.
He knows the consequences so won't say it explicitly but yes he is fully redpilled.

>a cricket bat

...

kek

...

Don't use this banana loving faggot as a representative of atheism.

Getting real tired of people trying to peg all atheists with the far left

He was oblivious to the culture stirring up around him. After his stroke which he suspects was caused by the tornado of attacks by SJW's after he made a comment about feminism has left him quite blue pilled.

He posted shit about transgender rights the other day. Oh well, hes old let him die in peace I guess.

They are totally not correlated goy, trust me

>you have to have perfect knowledge of a subject in order to take a position on it
Don't you think this standard is kind of ridiculous though given it's impossible to have perfect knowledge about any subject? Every stance we take is on something we fundamentally don't know, our perception of the world is imperfect. We just make the best guess we can based on the information available and stick with it until a better explanation presents itself, how can you "agnostics" not understand this very simple idea, is your fear of being wrong really that great?

I used to live near there, just Jews live in Stamford hill. I think it has the highest concentration in Europe

>le "not all atheists" meme
Nice meme.
There is a correlation between atheism and leftism.

youtube.com/watch?v=vqQdc0mX1_c

Yeah. Like practically every Western atheist, he started as an anti-christian, because it was the religion with the greatest presence in his environment. The argument was mainly philosophical (truth is better than a lie; it's stupid to base your life on something that isn't there, leads to self-guilt, support bad policies etc).

Then he becomes aware that there is a religion that is far far worse. Death, violence, hate, on a global scale. It's like Christianity that never progressed from Middle Ages. No separation of religion from politics and law. Even in its moderate form Islam is like christianity from the 19th century. Practically no Christian outside redneck america starts off a sentence like this: "As a christian, I..." With muslims this mind set is everpresent. For most people christianity is an afterthought. They identify with their nations first. For muslims on the other hand, religion is their first community.

Suddenly Christianity starts to seem pretty tame and harmless. Sure, he wants it to go away too, but most of the time it doesn't do anything except make people waste their time.

The thing is that Dawkins wasn't afraid to alter his direction once the threat of Islam became apparent. It shows he's genuine and isn't motivated by hatred of tradition, west, etc but by love of those things. That is also why "progressives" and "liberals" abandoned him. They are against religion only if it means to be to be against their own communities. Once it means being against minorities, they close their eyes.

Poisoning the well is not an argument

Too little too late you piece of crap. He is one of the criminals that transformed Christianity into a weak object of mockery in the West. You reap what you see. On your "death bed" you realize the reality. Filthy maggot, you sons and daughters will live your world - rape, killings, fear. Good job. May God forgive you for I have not such an amount of strength left in me.

>It's like Christianity that never progressed from Middle Ages.
It's far worse than Christianity ever was

>I won't bother rebutting any of his points
>I'll just attack the content of his character
LITERALLY not an argument.

Dawkins really hates himself. Look up some of his shit on the more prominent atheist forums. Hes had a number of tantrums criticizing left political staples, and everyone hounded him for it. One time a poster told him that all the people who despised in the "community" were his ilk whether he liked it or not, then said something about him being responsible for them. He rambled a bit and said that the guy was right. He knows the position hes gotten himself into, and he totally hates himself for it which is why hes so off the cuff on twitter.

It'll come out after his death that hes far softer on atheism than he has publicly stated, and that he was really agnostic. Just like Hitchens.

Pretty much all of you are exactly like that. A bunch of smug dragon dildo owning faggots who lack the self awareness to realize how annoying you are. Worse than vegans and crossfitters put together.
You might as well pour hot oil on your dick just like your mascot. Dye your hair green and get some thick rimmed glasses while you're at it.

SJWs and atheism go hand in hand like terrorism and Islam.

>Is Dawkins Red Pilled?
Isn't he?

SHUT IT DOWN

god doesn't exist m8

Please annex Moldova

>SJWs and atheism go hand in hand like terrorism and Islam.

Fuck you man, i'm atheist and i hate sjws

>Religion=/=politics when it comes to Dawkins.
Just because Dawkins hates the leftists taking his atheist side doesn't mean he doubts if there is a God or not.

>Hitchens was an agnostic
I bet you got this from the apologist Lennox. It's a lie by all accounts.

>be atheist in 1st world Christian country
>make career out of bashing it
>n-no what is this islam sucks f-fuck what is happening to my country n-no pls stop

>Atheist
>Red pilled
He's pretty cool though. We'll need to enlist the help of atheists like him when we finally wake up and stay the next crusade against Islam. Here's going the anti christ cuck pope dies soon and we get a red pilled one next.

You can't argue against the numbers.
The overwhelming majority of atheists are extreme left leaning. The overwhelming majority of atheists support gay marriage, they support tranny bathrooms, they support giving hormones to 5 year old kids so they can "transition."

So you say you're an atheists and you're not a left leaning statist. Congrats, you're an extreme minority. Just like Muslims who don't support sharia in any form are a minority.

Is the new pope the worst pope ever?

Hands down.
Did you see what he recently said?
He called the bible the same thing as the Koran and said that in his time, Jesus was like ISIS.

Yes.
I'll admit he's done a lot to help quash the stigma of, "Hurr they're all just a bunch of boy fuckers tho!"

Other than that, he's a parasite who needs stopping.

>not all religions are violent
>some gave it up centuries ago
>let's demonize them because their not on our timetable

yep, good to see that everyone seems susceptible to propaganda - but maybe dawkins is just spreading the kind he likes the most.

>The overwhelming majority of atheists are extreme left leaning. The overwhelming majority of atheists support gay marriage, they support tranny bathrooms, they support giving hormones to 5 year old kids so they can "transition."

Maybe in USA

In my country it's not like that. Sure, athiests even here are leaning more to the left but no where near supporting faggots or accepting gender fluid shit

The redpill is obvious fucking facts.

Welcome, the year is 2016.

>The overwhelming majority of atheists are extreme left leaning. The overwhelming majority of atheists support gay marriage, they support tranny bathrooms, they support giving hormones to 5 year old kids so they can "transition."

Sure, but why do you care if faggots can call each other husband and husband/wife and wife? Why do you care if mentally ill people may use any restroom they like or give fucked up 5 year olds hormones?
What is it to you? It's just fodder for you to laugh at.

you're right. conflating all muslims ironically puts the ones trying to give up violence and those seeking to spread it.

but don't make that point here; your advanced reasoning abilities have no affect on those without the capacity to understand.

I don't dispute that but I wanted to draw parallels between contemporary Islam and medieval christianity.

Both have concepts of holy wars, both regulate private life, etc.

Even in Swedish Carolean army during 18th century, taking God's name in vain was punished with a death penalty.

One of these religions abandoned all of these concepts long time ago, another has instead regressed to them even worse in the last decades.

youtube.com/watch?v=TX4RK8bj2W0

Muslims in the 50s were more advances than they are now. Probably the most important thing today is that christianity has an inborn concept of secularism built into it (Render unto caesar what is caesars; which was realized after peace of Westphalen)

On the other hand, Islam does not. Mohammed was a not only a prophet, he was also a warlord, lawgiver and a ruler. The two most importand strands of to impose secularism in the muslim word have failed. Arab socialism is gone and the heritage of Ataturk is being eroded in Turkey.

THAT was it?

He said Europe will be enhanced by the Arab invasion.

I'm almost ashamed to say I was baptised

I used to have many leftist friends who would make jokes about the Catholic Church sex abuse, but as soon as I made a joke about Muhammad fucking children, I was the bad guy.

I'll tell you my perspective on this if I may, swedebro. If they would keep it real - they are an insignificant minority - then ok, their business. But when they go around daily, inventing excuses, promoting all of this degeneracy as normality, encouraging others to be like them even though "they were born this way", change laws that affect dozens of millions just for their attention and scream so much that they would seem as a majority - then it is a personal vendetta against these worms.

found the terrorist

OMG PEOPLE, JUST BECAUSE PEOPLE BLOWING UP OTHER PEOPLE IS LEGITIMIZED BY THEIR RELIGION, DOESN'T MEAN WE CAN DEMONIZE IT, OR HOLD PEOPLE TO WESTERN MORALS. GAWD YOU'RE SUCH A FUCKING BIGOT TRY OPENING UP YOUR MIND YOU FUCKING NAZI

Is Dawkins pro-tranny? Genuinely curious, I've never seen anything on this issue from him.

The moral fabric of a nation isn't something so meaningless, you retarded Swedecuck.

There is no such thing as a slippery slope, it is reality. When there is no moral absolute, even if it as as arbitrary as allegories and parables written on thousand year old parchment, then society will progressively shift towards wanton self indulgence. Decadent societies free from real strife stew in degeneracy until they fail. The western world is failing across the board because of this. Trannies are nothing more than the pox boils on the skin of the dying body.

Good posts, Elias.