How will she ever recover?
HILLARY BTFO
I am now a #RomneyZombie
That's it, I'm now a #Cruzmissle
>conservatives want open carry rights in all states
>refuse to allow guns into RNC events
Wow, it's almost like practical concerns should override ideology sometimes
she doesn't want to get rid of all guns
she wants to close loopholes such as the gun show loophole & provide background checks for when you get guns
Why is it so hard for you commies to distinguish private action from government action?
Oh thanks shill. We needed that clarification.
NOT.
stay retarded, Trumpfags
This is the final straw, I now have a #Bernia
>what are private events?
There is no "gun show loophole." It's not a loophole. It's that way by design and it should remain that way.
>guns okay for Hillary because she needs protection
>guns not okay for citizens who need protection
And you're calling other people retarded....
...
Liberal double think exposed
Also
Witnessed
Praise Kek
>Percentage of population
Literally says nothing about actual gun death rates. Niggers in Detriot/Chicago are killing themselves more than Cletus and the boys down in Alabama.
It's almost like places with more guns will have more gun related deaths.
Almost like a place with more cars will have more accidents.
1. Quads.....
2. Just wait until pic related becomes the weapon of choice for those in the know.
>pass me the rust remover
>Quads
I am now a #JebPleb
She wants "Australian style" gun control.
...
Why would anyone living in USA not own a gun?
no she doesnt
WITNESSED
>cali
>low gun death rate
>Australia
>gun show loopholes
>unicorns
What are things that don't exist
She wants to ban all guns regardless mate, no shows, no ranges no nothing
Make trump post
Get quads
It's a good day.
She straight up said that in her fuggin speech
Aus, england, ect are all "good examples to follow"
Quite honestly the dumbest thing I've seen today
Probably drowned out by all the awful drives crashing their cars into one another
That place is Boston-level shit driving
>England
Bin yer guns m8s :DD
why are you redditors even here? i thought you hated Sup Forums
source plz
>America
Even your link says outright that calling it a "loophole" is a "viewpoint" and not a matter of fact. Because it's not a fact. A "loophole" is an unintentional legal oversight that allows the spirit of a law to be circumvented or twisted. That is simply not the case with the private exemption. It was left there on purpose, by design, because it's a good idea, and the alternative is a terrible idea.
Same reason Hitler was able to take Germanys guns, people are stupid my brother. My grandma makes some mean lefsa
I heard it on the radio, lemmie try and find the speech
>still using suicides to pad your numbers
Stay Jewish, kike.
>California
>New York
>Illinois
>low gun death rate
>Alaska
>Montana
>high gun death rate
fucking please
>You know, Australia’s a good example, Canada’s a good example, [and] the UK’s a good example. Why? Because each of them had mass killings, Australia had a huge mass killing about 20 or 25 years ago. Canada did as well, so did the UK. In reaction, they passed much stricter gun laws. In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program. The Australian government as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of…weapons offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns and basically clamped down going forward, in terms of having more of a background check approach–more of a permitting approach. -Hillary Clinton
breitbart.com
If you don't own the gun you use to kill someone you don't get added to that metric. Or they could be using some other cause for those deaths, like "gang related violence."
where does she specifically say she wants to take all guns away
she just says she wants stricter gun laws and a background check
>SHALL. NOT. BE. INFRINGED.
>unless it's a private event, then it's fine
Nice to see exactly how far your courage goes, fuckers.
What part of "Shall not be infringed" do you not understand motherfucker
She praised the Australian buyback program, dipshit. Do you know what that was? That was when the Australian government required Australians to hand in their firearms so they could be destroyed.
breitbart.com
m.huffpost.com
I dont have enough data to comb through speech footage.
It's almost like the Constitution is a set of limits on government action, and not on private action.
Bullshit.
She has said many times that she doesn't find the second amendment to be about the right to keep and bear arms.
She wants Australian gun laws.
How retarded do you have to be to not see that she wants a ban on gun ownership?
Don't be naive, dude.
I'm assuming you think people should be able to smoke cigarettes wherever they want as well.
Very obvious shill. Do you really think we're going to take you say seriously?
it's a private event. if you don't want to give in your gun then you can fuck right off. it's the person/group's right to do whatever they want.
it's called free will and freedom of association, dickweed
...
She also wants to hold gun manufacturers accountable for gun violence, and wants to ban "military and assault weapons." Do you shills even read her website?
Based swiss
These numbers don't seem accurate. First off, the "deaths due to injury by firearms" is disingenuous because we would prefer nobody getting killed; it doesn't matter what you get killed by. Secondly, the numbers in the second image are absurd. 20.0 per 100,000 die due to firearms in Montana? That's nonsense; that's third-world tier numbers and that happens in shitholes like DC or Detroit.
quads confirm...................I'm done with DRUMPF
Now I'm feeling the Hillfire Missile!
#HeLostMe
#ImWithHer
#FeelTheHill
>hold gun manufacturers accountable for gun violence
I saw that when I flicked through her website a while back.
Doesnt this create a precedent though? If I get hit by a drunk driver, I can sue jack daniels because thats how the driver got drunk or Ford because thats what the vehicle was.
And arent there lots of guns in America which feature parts made by completely different companies? Lots of people people their own ARs, who on earth do you sue?
Fucking this.
I'd guaranteed have at least a fucking shotgun, M1a and pistol and perhaps a concealed carry license if the state permitted it.
The only thing stopping me from getting a gun here is the ridiculous amount of waiting time involved, the cucked laws in which I can't use them for self defense and the fact that all shooting range are small as fuck.
he is using "crooked" so often, it almost seems like that's her firstname
Should have called the magazine a clip.
lots of people build their own ARs*
>"I want to ban guns, except the ones the bodyguards of my wife's sons use to protect him"
Every rich libtard ever.
That's the point. Hillary is already dishonest in a lot of people's minds, so that nickname brings it up every time.
nice
its not, must be her middle name
Every fuckin dictator ever lol
to your first point: no. Liberals only car about consistency with the prosecution of anyone involved in the production, sale, or ownership of firearms because they are pure evil. they don't give a fuck about anything else.
Kek
There's like 17 gun murders every weekend in Chicago alone.
Why should I need a background check to get something that is my right to own?
A
Yes it creates problems, its a ridiculous rule, yet there it is on her website
#Bearlivesmatter
Ok but what does that have to do with abolishing the 2nd amendment? Worst case scenario you can still own guns and buy guns in other ways.
>What part of "Shall not be infringed" do you not understand motherfucker
Hello Correct the Record
>allowed to carry your weapon with you in public where it isn't hurting anything except pinko's fee-fees
>the same as being allowed to carry your weapon into a private area where doing so would pose a massive security risk
>Texas
>16.8% gun ownership rate
fake and gay
Hitler made more laxed gun laws for the white Germans you dip.
Do you even know how gun control works? Are you blind or something?
Gun control works by chipping away gun ownership little by little. It might take 20 or 50 years but they are in for the long run, once you start to give them what you want, it will never stop.
In the end you have shit like in Scotland where they want to confiscate air rifles.
I wonder when he's going to get a nickname for Bill?
>Rapin' Bill
>Womanizing Dick
>Rapin' Dick
Due to the information ITT, I now #FeelTheRodham
Remember, Scott Adams says the nicknames have to fit them perfectly, like something you're already thinking about them but haven't realized it yet until he says it.
What word could work for Bill?
I don't need one
If you keep repeating something over and over it'll get engrained into people's memory and stick out more. The current generation is taught that things which stick out the most are either obviously true or obviously false depending on the implied narrative. It's subtle brainwashing and one of the reasons memes have become increasingly popular amongst the general public.
-the supreme court is wrong on the second amendment and we are going to change that.
Hillary Clinton
>> not allowed to have guns
wow we needed scott adams to tell us this?
Kek
Good job proving my point for me. You should look for a new job because you suck at shilling
Then there should be no opposition to banning them
He's explaining exactly what makes persuasion persuasion.
Why would we ban something that is made by design?
If the law that says americans can have guns is muted then all laws will be muted. Including tax law and general order. You do not want to fuck with that. Americans are rabbid
Private sales are not a loophole
Who told you that? Rush Limbaugh?
Memes are popular because thr general attention span is about 3 seconds. The public school system is basically a daycare
>Calling something a loophole that we intended from the beginning
Banning something doesn't sound very free.
Maybe you should go back to the USSR.