Check mate alt-righers

Check mate alt-righers.

You all keen talkin' bout facts, are ye?

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/18/africans-apologise-slave-trade
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

But there's a lot more whites
Yet white on white murders still dwarf black on black murders. Black crime statistics dwarf white crime statistics overall too. And that's only 13% of the population

Niggers aren't wired the same as humans and that's by nature

But they are poor, grow up on poor neighbourhoods, and are basically socialised into crime? Still, this number is that high.

name a peaceful area in the world that is majority black

White people just call it murder. It's the whining niggers crying about white on black statistics that causes the need to highlight black on black.

...

Just a reminder, black people have skin the same color as feces, and they're not even people

Name a majority black area in the world the white man hasn't oppressed and made poor.

Name a majority black area in the world that is unaffected by either imperialism and/or structural racism?

Do you think it is easy as a group of people, pre-defined by their skin tone, to thrive and develop? Not for most, but it is possible for some. That's why some negroes are eminent, but most are left with few or no options.

The negroes with the best genes probably wins the local competition, and become individuals like Big Meech or Larry Hoover. Imagine what people like this, with their drive and leadership skills, could do in the private sector!

But they are smart enough to understand that that world was never available to them in the first place, and they won the ghetto game.

Rip this guy

More poor whites than blacks in America.
More black on black murder than white on white murder.
Black on white murder is very close to white on white, while white on black is very low in comparison. Any way you slice it blacks are more prone to violent crimes, and over represented in all violent crimes.

Ethopia

Basically all of america.
And africa is in its current state because local (black) politicians sold their economy.
No oppression involved.
Did you know that blacks profited greatly from the slave-trade, since they sold rivaling tribes to slave-traders at the african coasts?
Did you know that the biggest slave-traders today also happen to be black?

Truth is a bitch, ain't it?

Underrated.

Now Sup Forums will come here soon and trash this thread with stupidity though.

Name one where they are still doing this

...

Lol facts are stupid? Or your narratives are?

...

Or we will point out how government social programms, racial profiling against gang-violence and affirmative actions are all policies set in place to uplift black communities.

Magically, they stay as shitty as they are...
So, is it whities not doing anything, or niggas slaping the hand that wants to help them getting up?

It's all narratives and interpretations. Most of you are not social scientists, and hold no degree making you even close to competent to distinguish fact from fiction in these scenarios. It is complicated.

What's the percentage of murders of blacks committed by blacks? Why aren't libs or nignogs themselves talk about big on nig violence?

There programs are set to fail. They won't change the mind of the majority. The mind and opinions of the population is to any extent what will steer any democracy in one direction or the other. A small elite implementing shill programs doesn't mean anything, nor do their failures.

Nig on nig violence is huge. I'm kind of a liberal (however slightly racist too, admittedly).

The smart negroes will tell the dumb niggers (Roughly 99.9% of negro population) to stop killing each other, but they don't listen

I don't need a degree to look at the fbi crime stats and see that blacks commit more murder.

And when someone says its due to poverty I dont need a degree to look at labor stats and see there are more white people on poverty. So no, I domt have a degree. You would only need one if you were trying to explain why black people kill vastly more people than any other ethnic group. And I'm not trying to do that. I'm only letting you know it is not due to poverty and there is no ethnic group close.

it's rather simple:
poverty creates crime.
crime destroys any shot at life you may had
the result is a failed education, which perpetuates poverty

how to break the cicle?
racial profilling to target gang-culture specifically.
Worked wonders in the 90's.
Why did it get worse again? Cause dumb BLM niggas yell "muh racism" at cops, and shit brix all over what was accomplished in the past decades.

Got any sources? Because i do.

African criminals and bandits practiced slavery, no African kingdoms or empires did as it was considered wrong.
Therefore, all whites are criminals because it was okay by their standards at a cultural level.

That's the truth no one wants to talk about. The toxicity of white culture.

White people aren't protesting about the 'disproportionate' amount of murders at the hands of cops. This is mostly a class issue and to conflate it with race is sad yet inevitable.

p.s. anyone who identifies as alt-right is just as bad as anyone who identifies as a sjw

You can't create a program to take the Africa out of the man. Only the man out of africa. They rape murder and steal because it is who they are. They are not all criminals. But if youre white youre 20x more likely to be assaulted by a black person than a white person. After everything given to them.

Statistics can only tell you so much. It won't provide any context. It won't tell you 'why' or 'how' things are happening, only how things look at the status quo. Therefore, what are you doing is an interpretation, and these interpretations are extremely hard and warrant reference to sociological literature on the field. It is obvious that your mind does not understand what statistics and quantitative methods can and cannot tell you. This is why you need a degree.

Ethiopia and parts of central Africa

nice b8

>more race baiting threads

I like how this post has no responses

>I don't need a degree to look at the fbi crime stats and see that blacks commit more murder.
But you do need a degree to extrapolate data correctly and think critically about the various factors that cause crime. You're basically being psuedo intellectual by starting off with a prejudice and using stats to "prove" your prejudice.

>hurr durr
>niggers had slaves too
>hurr, this explains anything negative about niggers today
>checkmate liberals
>durr

>They won't change the mind of the majority.
the mayority voted for the politicians who put this programm into place. Their failure is rooted in the lazyness of dumb, black single mothers who shit out niglets for wellfare-checks, so they can feed their genetics with Kool-aid and KFC.
And the niglets, abandoned as they grow up, are perfect goon-squads, fucking up their lives and those of others.

The system is there.
And the culture that needs to change is the black culture.
Sincerely,
"Uncle Tom"

Congolese kingdoms sold people to be eaten, and slavers bought them to free them from that fate. Whos terrible. Whites? Blacks? A little bit of everyone? I'm for a little vit of everyone. You forget yourself though. Not onlt were blacks, whites, abd Arabs buying slaves, whites were the only ones to outlaw it. And you're incorrect about "lawless blacks" being the only ones to sell slaves. Warring tribes would capture opponents tribes and sell them

I like how this post has no responses

Get a job nigger

X is X.
X is X therefore Y
One is an interpretation.
I'm staying facts.
Blacks kill more
I'm not saying why.
I don't care why.
Stop murdering. Just fucking stop it. Its so easy.

which came first, the nigger or the egg?

None of us have a degree in niggerology, so we can't interpret what it means.

Nope. Fending off invasions for a long time.
Almost all of Africa was oppressed by white men.
Even if small parts weren't, it affected the development of the region as a whole as it hampered neighbouring countries from growing together and living in constant threat of white greed.

Nice try white apologist... We know your tactics now. Whites will be legally discriminated against until there are no more of you greedy bastards left.

Statistics be all racist n shit. White folks literally be gettin away wit murder.

before the whites where there, we lived in mud huts.
After they were gone and left their infrastructure, we did shit all to keep it running.
Then we voted in crooked snake-oil sellers, who sold our economy to western companies.

We ruined our countries ourselves.
And before we don't accept this, we won't ever fix them.

>facts are racist
- random nigger, 2017

Niggers. Not the same user.

>1 posts by this user
SSSSSAAAAAGGGGGGEEEEEE

Explain to me how black people had a disadvantage when humanity was nomadic for thousands of years and had equal opportunity to evolve and thrive?

Explain to me why the majority of slave trade was done by fellow black men enslaving their own?

I have more, start with these.

Whites would murder just as much under the same circumstances. You have to change the circumstances, not the blacks. Nothing wrong with the blacks.

This is why 'why' matters.

>treat blacks like sub-humans
>get called a racist

>treat blacks like equals and try to help them be functioning members of society
>get called a racist and treated like a sub-human

sounds like a fair cop
thanks for convincing me that the best option for whites is to treat blacks like sub-humans

>nothing wrong with blacks
see
fucking dumb nigga

Lol, white revisionist and apologist spotted.
So you're telling me that black empires, which you swear never existed because blacks never progressed beyond nomadic societies and mud huts, enslaved themselves to gain wealth and money, which never existed before the white man gave it to them, all on their own without the white man?... Makes perfect sense to a delusional revisionist retard.

You people are pathetic and evil. Whites must disappear for the world to see peace.

I bet the same criteria applied globally looks similiar. Cross referencing, try it conspiracy nigger.

theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/18/africans-apologise-slave-trade

Whites have never treated other races fairly by their own will. It came reluctantly after many decades/centuries of struggle.

>Whites have never done X
>X came after many centuries

Fucking choose ONE.
Your double-think is showing.

I'll bite.

Back then, niggers had no disadvantages. Actually, quite the opposite, they lived in a large very rich continent where resources (such as food) was easily available. Also, winter wouldn't kill you, like in Europe.

In Europe, however, the competition increased throughout the 12th, 13th, and 14th century (and ever more so about a millennium before and some with Rome). Small space, harsh winters, confined space, and increasing populations, clans, and wars. Wars and conflicts will historically lead to rapid development, as will the environment you live in. However, 2000 years is not enough to see any notable change in the human genetic, except from those controlling skin tone and so on.

Slave trade is human. Domination is human. All races, including (and perhaps especially) Asians had a lot of slaves. It makes sense to create an economic surplus to force people to work for free. The Viking of Scandinavia took slaves in their raids in the British isles (they were called "Trells"). The fact that niggers had slaves only makes them human. Frankly, humans are quite shitty to each other.

so the british empire was forced to use their navy to block the atlantic ocean being used for slave trade?

Whites are the only race in history to pursue an ideal of racial justice. All other races are still comfortably racist.

The British Empire is the most humanistic superpower to have ever existed.

>Your honour, you see, I did not do anything wrong by importing 100s of kgs of cocaine from Columbia. It was the Druglords of the region that sold it to me and I was just a victim. Maybe that country should solve their drug problem first before you accuse me of creating an illegal market.

Yup, rogue tribes and bandits. These are the people that whites associated with in Africa because white society has no morals.

America tho

This is true too, but it has more to do with Europe that with the genes controlling skin colour of the population in question. The political development in Europe fast forwarded and surpassed the rest of the world, but this is not historically unique. It has happened elsewhere before, and is one of the reasons Mongolia was on the the biggest Empires in the recordable history. The Chinese dynasties too, and you can see similar rapid change among Aztecs for instance. This is not genius hidden in the DNA of some races, it is certain circumstances that makes change possible quickly and more effectively.

I guess you missed the "by their own will" part you ignorant twat.
"Fair" treatment did come, but not willingly.
Lrn2read.

Nice strawmen and still besides the point.
Slave trade was a mutual effort by many parties, including black ones.

Deal with it.
No racial victim card to gain here.

Yeah...

All we hear about is white on "brown" crime

cuz shekelman

So is it there or not?
Is our current society treating everyone equally before the law or not?
Get your shit together and start living in the present.

These threads are a complete waste of time at this point.

Each side sounds completely retarded to the other and no one is changing anyone's minds. Just hunker down and get ready for war.

That's because whites were the only ones to invent the concept of racism. Everyone else are merely xenophobic due to fear of unknown cultures, but quite accepting of other races if they adopt the language and culture.
You cannot pursue a racial ideal when there was no toxicity in the first place.

Whites are uniquely scum in this regard.

>the majority of black people are killed by black people
>but you hear ALOT about white on black crime

War? Who vs. who? There is already domination in the world, and those in power holds the weapons. The sorry little guns of the Texans wont't be enough to topple the US army, son.

This.

he didn't say it was humanistic, just the most

Sure, all whites did invent racism...
And you don't even see the irony in this generalization, topkek.

this is true

read what ppl actually write

You also don't hear folks talk about 'black on white crime'... we hear people talking about white on black, police on black, etc. This spurs people scratching their heads and saying... 'um... most of the cop cases are justified, and actually are less prominent based on crime rates than police killing anyone else... and beyond that, they are killing each other in black communities far more per capita than any other demographic... so what the hell are they talking about...?'

>Sure all whites gave me technology
Funny how generalizations don't come up when you want to jerk yourself off to thought of your superiority

Because I, personally, never do.
Tell me, having met some white supremacist bigots who sing the song of the white master-race has planted the validation to do the same in your head?

Are you a bigot or hypocrite?
Are you both?

(citation needed)

>However, 2000 years is not enough to see any notable change in the human genetic, except from those controlling skin tone and so on
>2000 years not enough for genetic change
>Clearly lips, skin colour, bone shape, blood cell structure (read sickle cell) etc all changed in that time but not any genetics affecting mentality or intelligence
>What are Darwins finches
>What are different breeds of dogs

Face it, because living in Africa lets you sit around hunting all day without having to build, develop, farm or in anyway plan for the future, niggers never developed mentally beyond children.

>black people are violent
>hangs black people for not being slaves anymore

>implying you accept any sources that aren't mein kampf

do you believe julius cesar to be black?

Do you think negroes came to be in the last 2000 years, Sir?

don't you? look at him. clearly black. no white dude has a fro like that.

>Face it, because living in Africa lets you sit around hunting all day without having to build, develop, farm or in anyway plan for the future, niggers never developed mentally beyond children.
and it shows on IQ tests. I don't see how admitting to this would make you a "racist" but I don't see what we have to gain from discussing the subject either.

Something tells me you never counter or contest those claims when they are spread by your fellow whites, the way you counter and contest my claims...
You are just a closeted Nazi friendo.

>percentages
>not actual raw data
>nothing weighted for percentage of population
OP has at least confirmed he is a nigger, so there's that

>BSc Computer and Information Science, MSc International Relation
just saying, don't assume shit

Topkek, actually I had a thread just 3 hours ago where I stumped a fellow german into the ground for singing the song of the white master-race, wearing the feathers of his ancestors accomplishments and boasting about them.
Had to teach him that his ancestors deeds do not make him a better man, and she should focus on making his own story, instead of pretending to be superior by inheritance.

Just because you don't have any integrity, don't make the mistake to project your shortcomings onto me or others.
Most people actually stand behind their principles.

also, since you seem to like to generalize by race, are you sure that it's not you who's the closeted nazi here?

Well maybe blacks are prone to violent crimes, (question - are you talking about all blacks or america specificaly?),
but any way question is what is the cause of this behavior,
because i dont blieve as the first guy said "Niggers aren't wired the same as humans and that's by nature".
And you talking about poor whites but being poor isn't the only factor, it's one of the more important ones but not the only one.

...

The claim I was countering was that whites are the only ones pursuing the ideal of racial justice. Where was your outrage about that generalization?
Obviously there was none because it's not really a generalization, thus my rebuttal is not a generalization either.

user/I was speaking of white culture and ideals, not white individuals who can be shaped by all sorts of cultures and ideals.

From CS to Political Sciences? How did that happen user?

OP here. A factual, logical post with raw data wouldn't attract 40 unique posters I'm afraid. That's just the nature of Sup Forums - you gotta trigger those Sup Forumsrethens.

so, what is "white culture"?
Last time I checked the leftist narrative, we need refugees because we don't have any culture of our own.

Beyond that, were it historical trade companies that traded slaves, or were it entire cultures?
What about the american north who waged war with the south, amongst other things, to end slavery?
What about all the white, european nations that never did partake in the african slave trade?
Germany, all of Scandinavia, Italy, greece? All nations with access to the atlantic oceans. All nations who never traded slaves on a mayor scale.

Learn to differentiate, if you want to have a decent discussion about this topic.

YouTube -> Stefan Molyneux -> black crime