From an objective standpoint, what makes Sup Forums so conservative...

From an objective standpoint, what makes Sup Forums so conservative? I don't considered myself vigilant enough (or interested enough) to have a well informed political opinion, so I tend to lean left when I am unsure of things. Pretending that I know nothing about politics, what makes you lean one way or the other?

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/The_Donald/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Your what's wrong with this country

You'll find that any forum with free speech will lean to the right.

To lean left you need to regularly moderate and ban people you don't agree with

Sup Forums has people of every walk of life

Anyone who tries to label Sup Forums is just pushing their own agenda.

That hostility is one of the reasons I lean left. The left is more open and caring. Moving one of my point pins to the left side

What Sup Forums perceives as normal people are lefty, so they want to go the other way

I'm fairly liberal, but I can accept other people's opinions, am I the exception?

because Sup Forums is 90% bots, trolls and people who get off on fucking around with everyone

...

leftists are thought police

anonymity attracts people that don't like thought police

Caring about your feelings is a very left thing to do.

Facts, however, don't care about your feelings.

Laws should be made around facts, not feelings.

yes

I don't know what you think the left is but it ain't what you just described.

Sup Forums isn't Conservative. Hating niggers doesn't automatically make you Conservative

I was once hardcore lib. So hardcore. Nothing could change me. I was practically SJW type-shit. Then I realized that I was libertarian-left. Family (lib) hated me. I slowly moved to libert.-right and then conservative while hating myself. I then realized that rep.s weren't racist, sexist, fascist, or any other -ists or -isms out there.

It helps.

both sides say this about the other. both are correct

Left libertarian here libertarian socialist to be exact

>I then realized that rep.s weren't racist, sexist, fascist, or any other -ists or -isms out there.
race and IQ are strongly linked, making racism just a slur people throw when you say facts to them.

...

>race and IQ are strongly linked
and then there's your dumb ass. quit embarrassing your honky family

Found the low IQ nigger.

I don't think Sup Forums is anything (perhaps more libertarian), but Sup Forums has a way of being a "trendy" bunch. This is more a phase than indication of any real political leaning

I know I went to a better school than you. And I'm probably just as pale as your redneck ass

he was also sexist. but he wouldn't have discovered the structure of DNA without Rosalind Franklin, so yea he's not that great

From where i stand Sup Forums really isnt all that conservative. Its board full of trolls, NEETs and bored mother fuckers. Now if you take all the vitriol you can muster from a trump thread i would say an exceedingly large portion of the people one might consider as 'right wing' or 'alt-right' based on what they say are just chumming the waters to see what rages out of the ocean that is Sup Forums.

Also Sup Forums took down Hal Turner, bitch slapped the Church of Scientology and helped people in places like Egypt and Tunisia through the Arab Spring

>"better" school automatically means higher IQ
Confirmed for low IQ nigger.

Perhaps you should explain this to the Republicans in the house and senante.

IQ is a subjective artificial concept made by whites

go back to smoking your meth so you can get nice and ready to fuck your cousin, white trash trailer park degenerate

SJW detected

well all she did was some xray diffraction but it was the building block watson and crick needed to do the rest of the work
it's too bad they didn't give her credit

aren't you sad you'll never get to vote for trump a second time?

I voted for bernie you idiot

You act as if they're mutually exclusive.

Anyone who says "Sup Forums is" or "Sup Forums isnt" should be ignored immediately. Don't listen to the cringy teens trying to form their own club that suits their own agenda.

This is probably it. Sup Forums attracts social rejects and the social rejects go with the uncool party

The media pushes left thinking because they are regulated by government.

This ties them strongly to people in government power.

*The same goes for public schools and universities.

The reason the government is left-leaning is because this taps into illogical (but very human) fears that people have which may be taken advantage of, politically, to expand taxes and regulations.

Conservative thinking generally wants less taxes because it generally believes that giving people maximum freedom and liberty will lead to a prosperous society.

Conservative thinking leads us to this: "the government" is formed by an act of "theft," the forceful taking of taxes from people. The only activity that could possibly justify this act, is to use the money to defend the whole of the people from a threat that requires a central power to quickly deal with. In other words, war. Military power.

When government "builds schools" what it's really doing is inserting itself into a monopoly position in education. Because it can 1) do a terrible job 2) offer schooling "for free" to everyone 3) have lower prices for higher quality than other schools until private schooling vanishes 4) subsequently make regulate private schooling so that it is illegal unless it looks just like public schooling etc)

The above deductions apply to everything government does. Think military force, centralized "control" which is really just like a dick cumming that can only focus intensely on one thing unless it is pumped more and more with power.

Kek

Theres no labels for the graph so all youve done is post a bunch of words

Really? My family and I are white. We had nothing to do with creating "IQ" so explain how it was created by "whites".

considering that you aren't vigilant or interested enough to be informed, you should know that the left is just as hostile to people who disagree with them.

...

You're what's wrong with this country because you're so absorbed by everything you can't afford to pay attention to what your government is doing.

...

Here

Socialist Libertarian like a Carnivorous Vegan ay?

Facts like climate change? A topic a lot of republicans don’t believe in? Yeah the right is so factual and science based. Not based on emotions and biblical stories and fairytales. Banning abortions is totally backed by statistics to be affective *rolls eyes*

Am I the only person who thinks parties are like the end of this country? Maybe we should just say fuck everything and like work together like, I don't fucking know.... Humans?

Also I lean to the left, but I give NO FUCKS about some poor bitch niggers persons feels, Reals before Feels

>mfw im libratarian.

you guys can continue and fight umongst yourselves and let real adults handle the situation

George Washington thought so too
he was the only US president after the ratification of the constitution that did not have a party affiliation
and in his farewell address he warned against the dangers of partisan politics

What a retarded graph

you can't classify all of Sup Forums in one political spectrum but Sup Forums is definitely far right

Uninformed as expected try harder next time

...

>you act as if they're mutually exclusive
no. he was simply stating that fact trumps emotion. a truth the left frequently chooses to ignore because muh social justice.

this


oh and now the russians have invaded to shitpost it up

First of Checked, and yea, pretty much

Ether your a left cuck who legit fights only the rights and roles over for other left cucks. And then same deal with the right. Its like Black women with white guys, they never work together

Its the universal political graph your moron. Google it then take the test guaranteed your a centrist faggot

Shut up you pathetic faggot, never post on Sup Forums again.

Sup Forums is whatever you troll of it

*make of it

No, they don't. Quit assuming shit for no reason.

>what makes Sup Forums so conservative?
it's easier to piss off people with this flag

This. I've been here since 06. Sup Forums has never been only right leaning.

The real conservative issue is not about banning abortions. This is a misrepresentation which I don't accuse you or anyone else of purposefully making.

Climate change denying is not about disputing science. It helps if you think about it as being centered around critical questions about university education, university research, public school education, and the relationships between government agencies and energy industries.

If you think of it this way, you are better poised to approach an understanding of why conservatism might not believe the conclusions drawn by scientists whom they believe live and work deeply embedded and invested into a system that causes them to hold the economic, political, and professional views which would lead them to look for and select data, evidence, and studies that support what they believe to be true from their childhood: man is destroying the world.

Man is living. Let yourself.

When damn nice dubs, also did you forget the picture?

>any forum with free speech will lean to the right.
reddit.com/r/The_Donald/

FAKE NEWS

This boggles my mind because liberals tend to be high in openness and low in conscientiousness, whereas conservatives tend to be low in openness and high in conscientiousness. 4channers being high in conscientiousness? Laughable.

figurative speech

...

Of course Sup Forums leans right, if was left it would be \b\

Goddamn.
/thread

Neckbeards on b fashion themselves as strong and independent out of their need to justify their loneliness and social anxiety. Any indicication of actually caring for others is a sign of being a pussy because their cognitive dissonance must be compartmentalized and exaplained away.

I haven't been a Sup Forumstard for about 3 years (just popped over to visit on a one-off tonight), but it wasn't always this way. Used to be more liberal than anything, if you ask me. Gay, straight, furry, pedo, whatever. It never mattered here because everybody was a faggot

...

...

*you're

Dumbass

You sodding tic tac

that's not how it works my uneducated friend :)
but don't stop believing if it makes you and your retarded family happy

Are you some sort of dolphin lizard?

You like Nick Crompton.

I am well informed on issues that matter to me, like our tax policy, healthcare policy, and policies surrounding our investment banks. I understand that most people are pretty good and worthy of human dignity, regardless of race or economic status. I have read our history and can see how workers and average people in our country have been fucked since the 1980's. I believe the government should have an active role in our economy so that working people don't get fucked over when wealthy speculators crash the system. So I vote democrat.

inb4 sjw shill

I would much rather we have sjw's go on a slut walk then live in a literal feudal society.

If you fuck with a SJW, it won't end there, they will not hold back on making you and everyone else aware of how they feel, there will be a tumblr post, a hashtag, it will be trending for the week, and offend countless more people in the way.

In the end Sup Forums just wants to get lulz with little effort, and this method delivers.

Ah shit you made a valid claim theyll send you their autists who can copy paste their fsvourite arguments. Well it was nice knowing you user have fun

Confirmed for (((legacy))) admission

>liberals are leftist
>t.liberal media
C'mon, Sup Forums, no one has ever lied about their real nature before for purposes of selling themselves or their organization..

>Am I the only person who thinks parties are like the end of this country
no

Yet, energy companies openly admit that anthropogenic climate change is a legitimate phenomenon and that they have been working to sow doubt about that conclusion. Somehow the "profit motive" became altruism?

>implying the internet is right-leaning
hmmmmmmmm

>working people don't get fucked over when wealthy speculators crash the system. So I vote democrat.
If you were knowledgeable about economics, you would understand that the policies surrounding HAMP were not at all aimed at stopping foreclosures, but merely reducing them to a pace the financial system could handle, and that the ACA was a stealth bailout for the insurance industry and walking around money for party apparatchiks in the guise of Obamacare "navigators", never meant to actually supply a concrete universal material benefit.
Voting for either major party is voting neoliberal, which is voting against anyone outside the ruling class. I suggest you reconsider your support for a party who's only concerned about the professional classes.

>Classifying Sup Forums is like herding cats

"Somehow the profit motive became altruism?"

Altruism that causes regulations to be made.

Biggest companies have lawyers and "control" of government.

What company benefits from climate change being real? Is there an anti-climate change industry? Did they really get the drop on Exxon Mobil and the automakers with their lobbying?

this makes no sense at all. as humans we all experience emotions in our subjective ways. to deny feelings is to deny a human part of us.

although this can complicate things the only time one would want to make laws ONLY on facts is if society was ran by robots

Because people who spends 24 hours a day on the internet have completely severed ties to their emotions, almost always due to a crushing defeat at the hands of a female. What better way to deny the severe depression a single female has caused them, the sheer power she had over them, than by convincing yourself emotions are silly and pointless? It's a full time job stripping yourself of empathy, it's way the severely redpilled spend quite literally all day on the internet. It's way most of these "conservatives" and always stroking themselves over how logical they are, how just utterly well reasoned their thoughts are. There is no politics at all, it's all a matter of fighting emotion in any way possible.

iq isn't subjective as a concept - there is a set value everyone has

however, most iq tests usually only account for one's logical iq, leaving out languistic, spacial, philosphical, musical, etc. iqs. so its not iq as a concept but the iq tests that are problematic as there is no way to measure it

When an industry is heavily regulated, it is difficult for new companies to form.

This monopolizes the industries.

Rather than appeal to people's wishes and desires through entrepreneurial action and market demand and competition.

>You'll find that any forum with free speech will lean to the right.

No, that's not how it works.

Sup Forums is a nest for both pseudo-trolls that pretend to be in the far right and dumb people who think they found other far-righters.

While Reddit is a nest for stupid leftists that love to upvote anything dissing Trump. That and /r/The_Donald, who nests the same kind of stupid people as Sup Forums.

So let me get this straight...

Large oil companies have invented climate change, by paying off scientists to do credible scientific work all over the world, so that they can enforce stricter regulations on their own industry related to emissions and efficiency. They do this so that they can stop hypothetical competitors from cropping up and thriving (more than the large companies for some reason) in a country with less regulation. Then, in their foolishness, they forgot to also pay off the party that doesn't believe in climate change and ended up not getting stricter emissions regulations anyway. Well darn, I guess they should have seen that coming. Looks like they'll just have to live with all of that hypothetical competition after all, when it comes around.

Was hoping this would turn into a gfur porno but no it's dumbass 13 year olds

Being unable to grasp statistics isn't free speech.

Other than the fact that most liberals I run into are retarded and all of them seen to have reading comprehension problems. I wouldn't say I'm conservative because I'm more independent as I think independently with out a particular party telling me what to think. I have learned that they doth lie, but as of the last few decades the Democrats have become just plane corrupt. More so than the republicans though I don't trust either one of them. Liberals I have just grown to really hate.

>he thinks liberals are leftists
Hue

>with out
>plane
>nonchalantly insults others reading comprehension.

Well, take out all the "purposeful control."

I may have implied that people are conspiring, but for the most part, things just play out.

The party that doesn't believe in climate change is still part of "the system." It doesn't actually want smaller government at all.

Bigger government is what both parties in practice actually want.

Yeah, if there is a problem, it is bigger than I comprehend.

But I still don't give af about climate change. Real or not, I am against regulation via taxing people and handing over power to government officials who are mighty altruistic and generous and purposeful with other people's money.

>Biggest companies have lawyers and "control" of government.
This is a perfectly natural condition in an aristocracy. Yet it has been academia and the less partisan, more evidence-based corners of government who have attributed climate change to anthropogenic CO2 and halocarbon emissions, based on reproducible experiments. While a few fossil energy companies did divert some of their resources into renewables, their core businesses would still be harmed by de-carbonization of the energy industry.
So I'm not really seeing the coherence in your argument.

>iq isn't subjective as a concept - there is a set value everyone has
It's not useful to assume that spatial intelligence can be substituted for mathematical or social intelligence. So reducing IQ to one number that is some immutable, essential property of a person is dehumanizing, at the very least.

>When an industry is heavily regulated
Regulation is not merely a single-valued slider, contrary to lolbertarian dogma. Regulation can be written to encourage or discourage the formation of businesses, which are not in and of themselves some moral good. It is because the USA is an aristocracy that regulations are written to discourage the performance of some services. The fewer people rule, the more easily they can be bought. This is why only direct democracy can serve the needs of its citizens: it's harder to split off people against each other when they aren't all in one place and they're close to the point of service.