Waifu thread
Previous: I'm much too lazy for that.
The rules are very simple:
>Claim your waifu/husbando
>Discuss yours and other's choices
>Keep ERP to a minimum
>Refrain from posting porn
/waifu/
Waifu thread
Austin Bailey
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
Nicholas White
...
Caleb Nelson
...
Nathaniel Harris
...
Nicholas Turner
inb4 angsty cat.
Cooper Kelly
...
Camden Jackson
once a crime that revolves gun happens, the case would go severer than without guns, for guns can kill more easily, more people than by any other weapon.
American redneck gringos often say "If we didn't have guns when the case happened, we would be killed!" but first of all,(even though the high rate of crimes cannot be helped by too simple the theory like gun-ban, for it may be based on something cultural which effects people's mind) the guns make crimes more hard, more torturing, more tragic, I think.
That's the matter.Sure single gan-ban theory cannot decrease the rate of crimes, but it can do the number of people killed in one crime
Welcome
Michael Lee
Liam Morales
Aнacтacия — звeздa, чтo вeдeт мeня
Parker Foster
The kind of people who are going to kill people with guns will have means to get a gun whether banned or not. That won't change, and it never will
Banning guns, and stricter gun laws will never change the fact that people who wish to do something like a mass shooting WILL get their hands on a gun, and will probably go through with it
Angel Russell
It honestly doesn't make a huge difference, according to the stats. In the US, areas with higher gun control laws generally have just as bad, or worse gun violence. It's just a cultural phenomenon that mass shootings have been so popular as of recent. To be perfectly honest, the trucks of peace rolling through the EU are just as bad, or worse than the shootings in the US.
Connor Cook
...
William Sullivan
#NotAllGuns
Isaiah Smith
Yeah...the mass murder might fulfill their desires at all cost, but except for the true terrorists who can get weapons from some battlefields, under the restriction and the literal lack of the stock of guns, they cannot get it easily.
To begin with, for the unique nature of America, it can be said that they cannot stop the guns from coming in from Mexico, or any other southern countries because of its geographical condition, while in contrast Japan can stop them from entering with ease.
So if they restrict harder and harder, in america, there must be the limit.That's the reality.
But at least the number of the people whom mass slaughterer would kill might go down if guns are not used.
Liam Rivera
I don't think the pro-gun view is without it' so arguments, but any side stating things with the certainty you have seems mistaken for me. You can't just deduce that gun bans can have no effect on principle without looking at the relevant data. This is a policy decision that requires loads of statistical analysis, and can't be reduced to armchair arguments.
For example, I recall reading some strides which suggested most illegal guns are stolen from legal gun owners or stores, or obtained by borrowing from legal gun owners. A ban like Australia's, which involves destroying guns taken, can possibly reduce the gun pool, and could decreases the chances of a criminal coming by a gun significantly.
Similarly, I think looking at accidental de deathe and suicides is much more interesting than mass shootings.
Either way, I'm not convinced of the need for a gun ban or that gun ownership should be a right, because the necessary research hasn't bourn out any universal conclusions. We need to apply big data like we've been seeing recently in the work of Thomas Picketty in economics for example. Until then, we're practically in the dark.
It greatly depends on the particular gun laws as I recall. Either way, we're unable to actually isolate any particular gun policy because of how much it varies, meaning reliable statistical inferences are hard to come by.
Jack Wright
...Bad time?
Kayden Martin
Las Vegas was an obvious false flag. Real people were hurt, but it was probably a CIA mind control slave or operative who did the shooting.
youtube.com
Jordan Richardson
Not necessarily, I wouldn't mind a break from the political talk if you'd prefer. How are you?
Liam Anderson
classic banana
Ian Allen
Tired, might be coming down with something. I think I'll clock in early tonight. Yourself?
Angel Hernandez
I should take the time to point out that I'm Canadian, and don't really believe that guns should be a right, nor that everyone should be allowed to own one. However, the right tools for the right people are required, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Moncton_shootings
Gunman using something which was illegal and far better equipped than our own law enforcement (who were recently found responsible for under equipping and under training personnel)
Are you so naive that you don't believe smuggling and organised crime can't get someone what they want from a first world country, just as easily as one might get one in a war torn country?
The same is true for Japan. Anyone could get a weapon with fair ease is my guess. Organised crime is everywhere, and they always know how to get things in
The idea that being stricter on guns will reduce gun crime is true, but it will just make the larger shootings stand out all that much more, because it is impossible to stop every single person who would want to do it from doing it. Gun culture is also rather entrenched in the US, as far as I can tell
It would be just as effective as they are at stopping organised crime. Which is to say, not at all
Imported weapons kill just as easily as domestically bought and stolen weapons, which again leads back to the fact that the people who want to do these things, will do them
Accidental deaths would probably go down, and so would suicide by gun. Although, suicide they would just do it another way, which isn't really much better
Unfortunately, the only way I see of gathering data would be for them to implement the bans or restrictions in question, otherwise it would all be speculation, and looking at cultures that are vastly different from their own to "prove their efficiency"
It's always a bad time to come here
Lincoln Thomas
To discuss guns, it is said that first of all the nature of Americans, including gringo, chinks, wasp faggot respectively, is worse than other regions.
These discussions are endless and barren, and fall into mere attacks to personality.
Fucking.
OK I can submit to the gun advocation, so instead please make 2d-porn acceptable in your country.
I have too many such pics to go abroad
Zachary Martin
...
Ryan Scott
Hmm?
Probably true, but there's no viable way to just temporarily implement those measures, and there's literal no way to get guns out of the hands of americans. It's straight up outside the purview of our legal system for something like that to take place. There's a huge list of things that keep it from happening, not least of all US case law, the constitution, the fact that anybody whoever tried to implement such a law and action would literally get shot... That kind of thing.
>Americans are naturally worse than everyone else
You've clearly either never been to America, or only been to huge trashy cities. Or maybe just suffer from massive confirmation bias.
Kayden Miller
>Japanese terrorism
>having brought many murder
>And Yakuza who use guns
>Oumu-shinrikyo, japanese cult who made AK-47 secretly to make rebellion
OK Canadian whose waifu is Russian, your opinion I got... but such crimes and cases by individual or less-organized crimes should be separate, for messing them leads to make the discussion more complicated and bring no conclusion.
David Taylor
it's not my opinion, but when the discussion go to such attacks, these statements occur.
Leo Murphy
Usually these threads are pretty comfy.
Sebastian Evans
Decent, trying better as the day goes by I suppose. Sorry you don't feel well. What're you up to atm?
My only question is this: have you actually looked at the data when it comes to whether import guns simply substitute local guns when gun restrictions are enacted? Again, I really don't think we can simply "reason" that any policy would have a particular effect, no matter how much it might seem logical, on words alone. To be clear, I'm not meaning this as a criticism of your standpoint, and I totally concede that people don't necessarily have time to look at all the relevant research with every policy they need to form an opinion. The only thing I'm criticizing is your particularly strongly language, which seems to indicate certainty.
I think that making the manufacturing of firearms illegal, and communities destroying their current firearms, would have a positive impact overall. I don't have enough evidence to argue the point strongly, but it's how I lean given what I've looked into, and I acknowledge that I've heard some arguments as valid as my own for some forms of gun ownership. I also acknowledge I could be wrong, I don't have a lot to go off of.
One thing I agree on is that we'd have to actually implement policy change to measure the effects to get better certainty, or at least improve our meta-analyses of the data we have to account for varying local conditions as best we can. While I acknowledge it's unlikely to occur, I wish we would treat policy more experimentally, as then we could at least learn from what doesn't work, which is better than not knowing the efficiency of our policies.
Michael Rogers
>so naive that you don't believe smuggling and organised crime can't get someone what they want from a first world country
which of following these do you mean by that?
>so naive that you believe smuggling and organised crime can get someone what they want from a first world country
>so naive that you don't believe smuggling and organised crime can get someone what they want from a first world country
Jacob White
dukeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Cooper Barnes
Just as a wild aside, with 3d printers getting more and more common, and people having already 3d printed guns, gun control of that nature is going to be becoming more and more impotent.
Colton Harris
Laying in bed, trying to sleep it off. Not much besides that, might pass out sometime soon here.
Dylan Bennett
That's a cool point that actually kinda makes me pause for thought. It certainly could be the case that 3D printers could make any gun control arguments mute, particularly for someone who supports a very liberal (in the non-political sense) view of freedom of information. Thank you : )
Okay, I hope it all goes well. A good nap might be due for myself as well sometime coming up here.
Landon Howard
First of all. so-called gun problem can be attributed to the crime rate in a country.
In the low rate countries it can be said "if our small amounts of mass-killing crimes are caused by guns, wipe it out to calm down the society!"
In the high rate countries, in contrast it can be said "we are put under the circumstances which would kill us suddenly, so for self-defense guns are needed! it's our right to have one!"
Both logical are respectively correct under their own environment. it is natural that it won't work to put the Japanese/European logic into America forcibly.
Sorry for anti-politics guys.
Austin Turner
*moot I mean
Jayden Wright
Nothin wrong with anti-politics. I prefer non-political talk here, despite my love for debate otherwise. I don't want any hurt feelings, everyone here is niceness enough when I talk to them and I don't want that to change.
Hudson Robinson
yep you are right.
Actually it can't be done easily to persuade someone to throw away their own thoughts, have the same opinion as mine.
I am not good at such things as discussion likely to be done in universities or something, which try to lead the atmosphere into one perspective, for we, at least I, cannot move someone by word itself.
You, western have very strong personality, so Jap whose identity is always trembling cannot defeat it lol
Evan Richardson
Boo!
Matthew Gonzalez
...
Connor Young
...
Levi Parker
...
Brody Morgan
Fucking retard.
Levi Price
fucking retard
Jackson Powell
Retard
Nicholas Myers
FUCKING REEEEEEEEEEEETARD
Jaxon Harris
Wew. 4 different IPs. How fun. I guess it's true if that many people say it.
David Allen
...
Ian Torres
Night.
Charles Richardson
Sorry, my bad.
Alexander Wood
im sorry user
Daniel Allen
Sorry my bad
Isaac Lewis
fucking retard
Luke Morgan
sorry faggot
Grayson Mitchell
Oh and btw
Noah Hill
Obviously a "let's wait for XXXXXXXXXXX and bully them" thread.
Austin Johnson
samefag
Xavier Sanders
? What.
Jacob Morgan
Same concept, you blithering retard. Not sorry.
Joshua Perry
>4 different IPs
>implying you can see all posters IPs
William Moore
I can't see their IPs. I can see it's "new posters", which means different IPs.
Ok retard?
Bentley Bailey
No it isn't you fucking mongoloid. We aren't bullying anyone. And we say sorry afterwards. It's better than the normal trap threads, wwyd threads, rate threads, furry threads, etc. Come have fun with us. Unless you think anonymously calling someone a retard and then apologising is BULLYING LMAO idiot
Gavin Powell
Ok anime loving faggot.
Now I'm bullying him. Queer anime nigger
Caleb Garcia
>Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrhe called me out on being dumb. Time to call him a faggot!
Ok
Jaxson Russell
BTFO
Parker Bennett
...
Hunter Robinson
Fags please get out
Thomas Kelly
Do you want.. ramen? I can feed you if you'd like.
Justin Brooks
Leaving so soon?
No, i'm ok. Hi though. What's up?
Brody Johnson
Not today, friend
Hudson Diaz
...
Jaxon Robinson
...
Cameron Campbell
...
Christopher Allen
...
Jack Hall
...
Jackson Edwards
...
Joseph Nelson
...
Dominic Green
...
Andrew Evans
...
Jeremiah Reed
...
Ian Brown
...
Jonathan Morales
...
Jaxon Lewis
What's up, homo?
David Walker
...
Colton Johnson
...
Jose Allen
...
Cooper Cox
...
Jose Morgan
...
Noah Cook
...
Michael Cruz
...
Tyler Lewis
This dick :^)
Really, I'm about to have dinner and then take a shower. What a bout you, you lovebird
Isaac Stewart
...
Alexander Green
...
Jaxson Murphy
...
Austin Nguyen
...
Julian Ortiz
...
Lucas Rodriguez
...
Henry Stewart
...