I've been pro gun my whole life. Watching closely the actions of both sides and listening to arguments...

I've been pro gun my whole life. Watching closely the actions of both sides and listening to arguments. I'm starting to think maybe they should be banned... what do you think?

OP is Pic Related

I want to hear more than guns don't kill people, people kill people.

I believe they should be banned also.

If the government takes away our automatic assault rifles then if we ever need to fight the government we will only be able to do that with small guns

brainwashed burgers

>guns don't kill people, people kill people.
I disagree

it's the bullets that come flying out of them

You can kill people with lots of things besides automatic rifles

>if we ever need to fight the government
have fun getting blown away by a tank or drone

yeah well my AR can take down the uhhhh
governmememement

O.P here, that's what I'm saying I haven't heard any other argument besides that

Banning all guns is not an option. Banning semi-auto guns is not an option either, because most guns are semi auto. banning semi auto assault rifles doesn't do much because anyone can turn a handgun into a rifle with the right attachments. What we need to do is make it harder for people to have access to these weapons, especially those who shouldnt have them like criminals and mentally ill, because right now its almost cake for anyone under those categories to get their hands on them

Youre a liar, and this is bait.

Anyone who is pro gun are the ones brainwashed. The 2nd amendment needs to be done with and through voting I'll do my best to see that accomplished.

Take this to pol, everyone on b are leftist snowflakes

>if we ever need to fight the government we will only be able to do that with small guns
>fight the government
>fight the fucking american government
The government that has F22s that can double the speed of sound and drop uranium loaded war heads, you and your boys will crack open a cold one and take over the government with assault rifles?

fuck off stupid americunt

I think the best option is to encourage the nuclear family, reform the school system, and continue to allow free speech.
Just my opinion though.

...

million of gun owners, how many tanks/drones they got?

I didn't say anything about banning all guns retard, read what I wrote

You've never seen my grandpappy then.

I don't think they should be banned.

Newfag

I think there should be tighter restrictions, changes in self defence laws (maybe).
They should have laws more like Germany's gun laws (look them up) except maybe a little more restricted. Less on particular guns and more on how easy they are to get

Lets say we ban guns. First of all, the criminals aren't going to turn in their guns. That's a definite. And the number of guns currently in circulation within American criminal elements is huge. The debate may have been worthwhile before we had a gun problem, but at this point it would only take guns out of the hands of responsible, law-abiding citizens. What we need is the reverse. Look at Switzerland - where people are required to own guns and also take gun safety courses. Not sure if you guys know, but Switzerland is an awesome place to be, with an extremely low crime rate.

No, you're a person who can't think for themselves or refuses to do so, sitting there in your camo hat, listening to all your redneck friends. Think for yourself

A few hundred thousand tanks
Allah knows how many drones

If we're speaking of a hypothetical situation, plenty of the armed forces would join the American people in such a situation. Having the American people well-armed would be a bonus.

Americans are stupid and lazy. They would miss their Facebook and realise this is hard work fighting a government and surrender within a day.

you sound like a cuck

You sound uneducated.

Civilians have RPGs and other Military Grade weapons? OMG

Firearms in US: 300,000,000
Deaths in 2016: 2,646,418
Firearm homicides: 11,008
That's 0.42% of deaths

It's not an epidemic
It's not even an issue

To be quite honest, considering how many guns we carry here, that number is astounding. That's the way a population keeps it's government in check and insures against foreign powers.

you sound like a cuck too

but muh guns muh freedom

...

Explain?

You are pathetic and disgusting.

...

Implying 100% of the military will fight alongside a corrupt government against the people. More reasonable scenario is millions of armed civilians and 50% of our active military vs the us military.

Great argument, really worthwhile stuff.

Looks good

>arguments

Side one: innocent people are routinely dying

Side two: muh guns

>I've been pro gun my whole life. Watching closely the actions of both sides and listening to arguments. I'm starting to think maybe they should be banned... what do you think?

Nice try retard, not even a potato could be that autistic. You suggested banning all guns...wait why am I taking this bait?

Typical , blah blah blah... Vegas shooter wasn't a criminal. And many more.

Lol liar

Satan get. Asking people why guns shouldn't be banned means you're Satan now.

THIS

...

Legitimately did not address my point in any way. Banning guns would not remove them from our society. If guns had been banned for the past ten years, the Vegas shooter still easily would have been able to get a gun. Our society is full of guns. They're everywhere. Making them an illegal trade would just make it harder for the average citizen to get.

>shot 50 people
>not a criminal
K

OP don't be a faggot

...

Those people should also be banned

I put automatic assault rifles in the options line

muh selfdefence against the goverment

To be fair, this is mostly the nigs killing each other.

seems legit

>a hypothetical situation, plenty of the armed forces would join the American people
See I don't think it would be that easy and such a narrative. People rise, army joins the people etc. First of all civilians couldn't manage to form such a milita that would have the potential to make up for a "civilian army" that american soldiers would just join. It would stay at just that, a milita. and if we're talking about hypothetical situations one could also come up with hundred different ways of government preventing the form of such resistance through the power of law, FBI, CIA etc. It would end before it even starts.

I was mostly referring to the dude thinking it would just be the military vs. the people in a traditional war sense, which would be insane. Hypothetically speaking, yeah, the war would probably more of an FBI/CIA thing. CIA is realistically the most powerful organization in the world. Could shut down the internet and cut off our power at any given moment.

Why homicides by firearm? Let's see all forms of homicides. If you remove the firearms, it's unlikely that people intent on killing are just not going to. The numbers would just most to other kinds of weapons. Don't be disingenuous.

Yes ban it now! I'm so sick of this country. I've finally decided I'm out of here. I'm almost at my amount that I need to move to beautiful England. Piss on America and you alt-right rednecks. When you sell guns the violence comes back on innocent people in tenfoils. I'm finally going to be free in a beautiful liberal country.

Was alive , not a criminal, now dead criminal.. see how stupid you sound?

Let me clear this up for you., banning automatic assault rifles. Not all guns , automatic assault rifles

...

That you are actually anti-gun or at best you are only OK with bolt action rifles and only if the person is heavily monitored by the government and you are masquerading as a pro-gun person who has suddenly "had a change of heart".

And that this is common, to the point of cliche, psychological method to undermine dissent.

You are a Jew.

Vegas shooter =average citizen, up until that night

>CIA is realistically the most powerful organization in the world. Could shut down the internet and cut off our power at any given moment.
Exactly. That's why I don't think that whole taking over/resisting the government thing is possible, not in the slightest.

Implying a more reasonable scenario LOL

>And that this is common, to the point of cliche, psychological method to undermine dissent.
>You are a Jew.
kek

How come you assholes ignore the part of the 2nd amendment about having to be a part of a well regulated militia?

Notice you conveniently leave that part out of gun ownership rights?

>buh buh but muh 2nd ammendmunt

The whole people are the militia.

So if a truck hits some people, we should ban trucks?

This is how stupid you libtards sound

As funny as that is, I am not Jewish, but I do have bolt action rifles and several pistols, so the Jew thing aside, what is your argument?

Post more Miley like in pic

And the "well regulated" part?

Every able bodied man is a potential militia member.

...doesnt mean controlled by the government. It means maintained.

Not me because I do not believe in guns

Imagine having to pass a test before being allowed to drive a truck.
Having to pay insurance in case it causes any injury.
For the trucks to be on a national register, as well as the drivers.

Stupid, right?!

No, but maybe we should register them and ensure them and make sure that the person operating them has a license. Of they don't the truck should have a unique mark, such as a license plate, or a VIN number. That would be weird .. huh?

even if guns get banned they will still find away to get them or if they really want to kill people they will find away

We need Chicago style gun control. No one ever gets shot there.

Well....you should....you know...because they exist....

>well regulated means "maintained"

That's not what it means, though.
That's you retardedly misinterpreting it for your own ends

Maybe even have them drive only on roads with laws and police? Or should we let the trucks into casino hotel rooms?

please be bait. won't be able to live with myself if I'm actually lurking a board with such retards

Sure thing kid

That's not.. how that works my dudes.

Im going to vote to do away with your 1st amendment rights. Crack a book you ignorant fool.

That's already a thing you dolt

Show me ANY definition ANYWHERE that equated "regulation" with "maintenance"

It's called English motherfucker, do you speak it?

Go back in time 220 years, dipshit

You know what I meant.

You fucking made me post this cunt.

Leave this place

Hmmmm. So if some enemy nation invades, they have to worry about a little more than the Army huh?

As it should be for guns? Think before you comment man.

They had dictionaries at that time...the word "regulated" still doesn't mean "maintained" in this, nor any alternate time stream.

Retarded fuck.
You deserve to be killed in a mass shooting

And who will regulate the militia? The government? The militia is supposed to stand apart from the government.

And if you don't think there is a "militia", check out all the pro 2A vets and the gun culture as a whole. There is an active culture of civilian weapons and tactics training alive and well in the US right now. They're not centralized, but they exist in huge numbers.

Registration = unlawful confiscation. Austrailia, UK, Canada, etc. Government stealing property with no actual change in violent crime.