There are 1.3 BILLION chinese people in the world

There are 1.3 BILLION chinese people in the world.
Think about it.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_chauvinism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marx's_theory_of_history
youtu.be/7Pq-S557XQU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It's pretty weird growing up as minority but knowing that you're the statistically most likely human.

大家好( •̀ ω •́ )y

There can only be one.

Yeah it's a pretty big problem

They're our next masters. Be careful with what you say. I should probably start learning mandarin.

hello :3

Take off that proxy, Zhang.

if dubs i will get japanese gf

Ni hao. How do I get chinese 屄

Chinese century

>tfw you were too stupid to learn chinese from your parents
>tfw I had to look up the character on google translate

What race are you? Assuming you look white, all you have to do is exist.

Brazilians eat sopa de macaco.
Think about it.

i hate being here in america.
i wish i was back in china.

stop thinking with your dick

sopa de macaco doesn't have any macaco on it
Think about it

But we got this practice from your, father.
Reminder that we descend from portuguese people who colonized the land.

all because of Mao, pre-Mao numbers was 500m, should have stayed around that number. A billion is too much to handle.

We need another great leap. And to kick anyone who isn't Han

...

han chauvinism is the stupidest thing ever
only idiotic banana people would be retarded enough

Chinks aren't human beings, they're some kind of weird ant colony.

I'm probably 75% white 25% ameridian/black
That's one of the few characters that I memorized, I actually memorized the pinyin bi1. I also once tried learning Japanese and read Remembering the kanji but the autism required to move on was too much. The grammar seemed easier though(yeah I know that japanese is totally different from mandarin).

Portuguese/Chinese mixed hybrids are surprisingly very good-looking and modestly humble.

hey man, i'm a real human bean just like you

This

Just crush their Queen (the chink commie party) and China will collapse once again

it's weird growing up as a majority but knowing you're actually a minority

Germany is a weak and powerless country.

Shut the fuck up Zhang Remember that time when you were out slaves and you chimped out so we had to genocide you

What does that have to do with anything, ameriman?

No
Weaker countries should not badmouth stronger, superior countries.

Germany is a pointless and garbage country

Yea, Japanese is harder than chinese as far as I can tell. The only hard thing stopped me from learning Chinese was memorizing characters/vocab. Everything else was easy for me (probably because of growing up with my parents).

Yes I recognize that you're a superior country and our country is currently a joke but I don't recognize that every American as an individual is superior to me. My IQ is decent and I've seen Americans who say they can't even learn Algebra.

>implying they won't get BLACKED too

All your country can do is produce nice cars.

Your military is shit.
Your economy is also shit.
Your politics is next level shit evolved.

>My IQ is decent
Are you over the 95th percentile of the population in intelligence? If not, don't reply to my message.

t. Jiao-long

>implying they aren't RICING africa as we speak

I've done only online tests and in English and my IQ always showed 120 but I realize it might be less than that. All people also always say I'm intelligent even the foreigners I've met.
I should also say that I lack social skills and I'm very autistic-like.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_chauvinism
"Han chauvinism is a term coined by Mao Zedong in 1956 to criticize ethnocentrism among the majority Han people of China."

Feel like I am about to get sniped by an angry german kid.

Point being?

yes

>only idiotic banana people would be retarded enough
What do you mean?

Brazilians eat sopa de macaco (uma delicia btw)
Think about it

not latinos of what not

bananas are yellow on the outside and white on the inside, deluded yellow americans

Can someone vocaroo uma delicia in chinese?

They look kind of happy. Is it because they are middle class of China?

Man, I watched one of the most fucked up shit ever recently. A cartel guy in mexico chopped off someone's leg with an blunt axe. How are people even capable of that? but Latinos should be bros and fight the gringo menace. I've studied our people and I've seen the greatness the pardo people are capable of that convinced me that we can do it. Most of the great people in my country are mixed even when we have the south we the muh pure german people. We just have to elect the right politicians.

Continuation: the fact that Chile has the highest HDI even being very mixed should be a counter-argument against the obsession over white people on this board.
Look also at the beginning. People who founded civiliziation were non-whites. They mock our indian blood but it came from asian people who are capable too
even in America they built civilizations like Maya, Aztec and built the inca civilization in only 100 years.

yes

The printing press was invented by the Chinese.
think about it.

It's a cultural thing, which transcends into the mentality of the average member of a society imo. For instance, you wrote "the fact that Chile has the highest HDI even being very mixed". The fact that you used the word "even" shows that you still think that being successful has to do with your "race" (which in latam is nothing more than the outer look, because this whole continent is mixed to oblivion) and not with your upbringing. Besides, every race chart in america self reported, so talking about race (even self reporting yourself as indian) is meaningless. We are an isolated country which helped us to develope a strong sense of nationality, and a work ethic, because nobody ever gave us nothing, and even if anyone would ever do it, it will have no significant effect because next week we will have a major earthquake, fire, flooding, volcano exploding, tsunami or whatever, and nobody is going to help us build it back again.

and the CCP menbers are more than your Germany population.

CHINA IN THE HOUSE!!!

>responding seriously to a meme

>there are more people in a random city than my countries entire population

I used even because I was thinking of Sup Forumsacks arguments saying that progress is race based and I used Chile exactly to beat that argument that's why I used "even". I should have said "Chile is very mixed and is the country with the highest HDI"
Remember English is my second language

I'm also very mixed and I'm trying to defend latam so it'd make no sense if I had used even to mean that mixed people are inferior.

the blue eyed Frenchman Pinochet who saved your country from the hell of communism

chinese are subhumans

Huaxia tribal confederation was a mistake.

some of them are. Some of them are bearers of a very ancient and successful civilization.
And I think you are not the glorious German with the asian girl foot fetish but, at least here, second generation chinese girls are good looking and very thin.

That's Ikibey, bro.

>some of them are.
stopped reading

...

Don't mind me. Just dumping some jiffs.

...

>Chinese women

He is Greek

Hey, prostitutes built the American West, maybe Chinese prostitutes will built the African africa

I hate Asians and especially the Chinese people.

But I love CCP and their values. I think they do totalitarianism the right way with the original Marxist values (Reaching socialism through capitalism)

Just sad that the average person living in the country is barely human.

niiice

Oh my fucking god fuck mao

China is bigger than Europe. So, no problem.

You're wasting your time typing all this autistic shit out

Nobody here and nobody in the world claims white superiority. Meme all you want on me, it's just the truth. Nobody espouses that attitude.

You're acting like half of them live in Tibet though

>>But I love CCP and their values. I think they do totalitarianism the right way with the original Marxist values (Reaching socialism through capitalism)

Nigger what? They've been moving away from socialism for quite some time.

Wrong. There are exactly zero Chinese people as Chinks are not human.

I'd rather not tbhwy

So we often get mistaken for Chinese when we travel for other countries.

No. They have been moving more and more towards the original Marx steps to socialism.

Not a lot of people have actually read the communist manifest so I get why you are confused.

But Marx is actually a proponent of capitalism. He says that capitalism is absolutely needed because capitalism progresses to socialism out of itself when it is developed enough.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marx's_theory_of_history

This was the original theory of Marx. See how it is actually just a timeline with capitalism being a vital step.

Deng Xiaoping (that defined current Chinese government and economic policies) was a big fan and student of original Marxist thoughts of pro-capitalism. So he made China more Marxist by introducing more capitalism to China.

It's also funny to note that Marx said that the US should be praised for being a nation that has sufficient capitalism to progress quicker to socialism than other nations. He also hated lenin and other people that tried to skip the capitalism part which Marx said was impossible.

The ultimate Joke and irony is that Ayn Rand and Marx would 100% agree in ideology. With the difference being that Marx thinks Capitalism is just a form of pre-socialism waiting for automation to replace human labor before it turns full socialist. (And capitalism makes automation develop the fastest)

How are we supposed to tell you apart?

>capitalism will collapse by itself, just you wait

Not collapse it will naturally transform into socialism to stay profitable.

The basic premise is that when a lot of jobs get automated a lot of people will lose their jobs.

Now the sales of those companies are dropping because a lot of people don't have work so they can't buy products. To compensate this they will need to find a way so that unemployed people can keep consuming just to keep capitalism going. This will be a universal basic income... otherwise known as socialism.

The more capitalist a society is the quicker this happens. Because capitalism wants to maximize profit thus they need to cut costs (machines are a cheaper labor force) and maximize income (more sales). This just gives the perfect scenario where socialism becomes more profitable for companies than capitalism so it naturally evolves to socialism because of greed.

I agree that it probably wouldn't be called socialism though. Soviet Union ruined that word forever.

bump

Except the more capitalist the society is, the more opposed to basic income it's going to be. Take Switzerland. Rich as fuck and capitalist too. Resolutely denounced the basic income.

uhhh..... but East Asian(China Japan Korea Taiwan) people is so like(We can tell them because of their language)..
So would you stop judge east Asian are Chinese from first when you see east Asian and hear them ''Where are you from?''?

That's because it's not ready to go into the socialist part yet. Like I said it's automatic.

It won't come from democracy. It will come from companies. When capitalism isn't profitable enough anymore companies are going to demand national socialism such as basic income just to keep profitability up.

I'm not naive enough to think that people will vote for it. But I am sure enough that companies are greedy enough to ensure their profits stay up and they will need to enact this when automation makes the majority of people jobless due to AI/robotics improvements.

Marx in late 1800's said that it would probably take ~200 years for society to reach the state where most of the people are jobless due to automation (then called Mechanization)

So that's around 2080. But Marx didn't expect the PC revolution to happen of course which has pushed the timeline a lot quicker.

youtu.be/7Pq-S557XQU video about current pace of automation.

Look up the mechanization because it's funny to know that a lot of economists in the 1800's already predicted all work being done exclusively by machines back then. That was the entire basics for Marx's thoughts.

>companies will push for basic income
>even though the only source of that income are going to be taxes the state levies on them

I don't see that happening

You would be correct in a world where there would be only 1 company.

But remember it's a capitalist society with a big number of businesses and almost 0 human workers to buy products.

There's still competition. So the companies get in a dilemma. "Either I support this to ensure a steady stream of income or I oppose this with a chance that my competitors are going to trample me"

This makes the 1st option of universal basic income really attractive for companies. Again remember that they are going to lose 100% if they don't have customers. But only have a chance at losing money if they pay taxes (because they can get more customers than they paid taxes)

>because they can get more customers than they paid taxes)

HOW? Zero human workers, where are they supposed to get the money? I can see a big business oligarchy springing up and the companies giving out products and money to keep power. If you want to call that socialism, be my guest, but that's moving the goalposts to the other side of the field.

Ah I thought I was clear.

Let's say you have 100 companies.

Situation A: They don't pay taxes= they lose customers because no one can pay their products, they all go out of business

Situation B: They pay taxes= There is only enough money to buy products from 20% of the businesses 80% go bankrupt due to not enough income

Because of the competition the companies will still choose option B because they at least have a chance. And yes over time more and more businesses will go bankrupt which will eventually turn the socialism into communism when this process is completed.

Of course in reality this is a lot more complex. There will still be scientific advances which might make businesses profitable for longer and in reality there are a lot more businesses than 100 meaning that it will take far longer before all get bankrupt.

But still companies will never ever pick option A because it is guaranteed bankruptcy. They also can't hire human workers because they will lose out to competition. They also can't stop AI progression because a competitor might advance and take all market share. So companies just have to see the inevitable coming and try to stay on top as long as they can.

The existence of wage laborers and consumers is a temporary phenomenon. A world where automation makes most people unemployed doesn't have to lead to socialism. An entirely possible outcome is that the group who owns the means of production start producing directly for themselves. No complex economic cycles and relationships, just machines and a low number of servants and specialised technicians taking care of the rich in their isolated settlements while the world burns. Of course this model isn't sustainable either because it won't be able to recreate the specialists who are necessary to maintain the level of technology we have today, the knowledge and skills will be lost without an organised society with functioning institutions.

>Because of the competition the companies will still choose option B because they at least have a chance. And yes over time more and more businesses will go bankrupt which will eventually turn the socialism into communism when this process is completed.

Nope. This just leads to one company monopoly. Nevermind the fact people have so far been able to come up with ways to make themselves useful to society and get paid for it. so this 0 worker nonsense is false to begin with.

>able to come up with ways to make themselves useful to society and get paid for it

This will not always be the case. Humans basically only have skills you can categorize in 3 real ways. Physical,Mental,Artistic or a combination of these things. The industrial revolution automated most of our purely physical work. And people say "we just find new work" this is untrue we just switched to Artistic and mental work or some mix between mental+physical work.

AI is going to automate mental and artistic work and all the mixes in between those 3 skills.

There is nothing left for humans to do once this is reached. There is 0 ways for humans to contribute when this happens simply because we would be inferior in every way.

There's still a democratic government in place which still is decided based on votes. I'm just going to go out and guess that 99.9% of the people are going to vote for socialism in such a scenario like what happened in the 1880s in Europe to form welfare agencies.

But I don't even think it will come to that. There's still competition with other companies. Technology is still progressing so companies will still scramble to get an edge over their competition in any way possible even if it would be a short-term loss. Isolating and producing purely for yourself would make you ineffective in innovating for competition and power consolidation.

>once this is reached

The thing is it won't. Also, people would hire people just for the virtue of being people. You can hire a robotic butler or a human one. The robotic butler doesn't need the job, the human one does and is far more personable. Which one will you hire?

Another thing, what's more probable are human worker quotas/robotic work taxation.

if they bump into you without acknowledging it, or if they cut in line, they are Chinese. If they apologize for something that your didn't even notice, they are Japanese. If they look disgusted that you are talking to them, they are wealthy Koreans.

If they sell me groceries, they are Vietnamese