If you can get more than two million more votes and still lose then the voting system is a facade...

if you can get more than two million more votes and still lose then the voting system is a facade. how many more votes does it need to be? 3 million? 5 million? even 1 million is absurd. the system has to change

cry moar faggot donald is king XDD

hillary es bad she wants to take ur guns

fugg offf!!!!!!! snowflake lol!!!!

She was and is a shit heel. Bernie was yer boy

what a fucking faggot

bernie is a cug lol! XDDD

jus lieg u, go suk on some british broadcasting corp (BBC) fagit!!!

I no right.

how dare op be sug a fagit XDD

IT has been almost a year. It's really getting sad at this point.

Samefag some more.

SAD.

There's 300,000,000 people in this country. It's less than 2% of even the voting public (150mil). less than 1% of the country. And google Electoral College.

bathetic.

rage harder shill. ur prolly a jew. lol

when your guy wins so you rationalize throwing 2.8 million votes in the garbage

yeah uh huh

wot bbc got to do?

Bernie also had popular vote so he should have won.

I think it's the quality of the votes. They noticed a large portion of hers were from LA and NY so they said fuck that and did what needed to be done. The point is if she only won by 1 vote she would have been fine if it wasn't retards that were doing the voting. It probably would have taken 10 million to beat the Donald since the only people who voted for her were dipshits.

yer mam's a slapper

For fuck's sake, go back to your other thread.

It's about winning the states, not individual voters. Learn what a republic is.

...

Would you like to talk about gerrymandering?

if we had a "vote quality" mechanism it would require an IQ test thus making all of trumps votes useless

"Vote more"

Who made that? Ffs

it fug ur wife lol XD

cuck snowflaek

you're talking about the system now. im talking about how it should be

Sure, you mean the new case that the Supreme Court is going to throw out?

>this thing speaks truth, for once....

Well you saw the results didn't you? I'm just saying what obviously happened. Don't blame me, I didn't decide they were idiots. I had nothing to do with the bullshit that went down. It was very funny though. Everytime I see one of these threads I laugh my ass off.

you say its a facade but you can do the math to figure out your answer. Basically you would need to break up the states more. Smaller number of states would make a difference in popular vote more powerful becuase those pockets of support would get a better chance to become electrial votes.

If every person was their own state, then ever vote would be 1 electoral vote and then she would have won by a million votes. But if everone was their own state then half of hillary supporters would be states not in the union buecase they are illegal aliens.

>Learn what a republic is
It's a country without a monarchy and with a democratically elected government, it doesn't mean it can't have proportional representation

If you think the US is a democracy, you need to reconcile the following with that notion …

680,000 people in DC do not have a senator and only a non-voting delegate in the House of Representatives – taxation without representation! I bet they don’t feel so included in the idea of US “democracy”

The cabinet – the most influential group of people in the country – is made up of unelected individuals. They have no mandate yet they influence our everyday lives. In democratic countries, cabinets are selected from elected representatives

The president has the right of veto – a right not applicable in any other democracy in the world. So a single person can effectively block the will of the people (at least temporarily). Obviously this has no place in a true democracy

@748100823
play stupid games, win stupid prizes, assclown

sage

And if you want to feel even better, just remember that there are people who think Sanders would make a good president.

There is no difference between Trump and Clinton, they are literally the same.

The electoral college prevents any one state from spiking the vote. It's a safety contingency.

So... lube up the anus, because the butt hurt is gonna be real.

...

>Play objective-based game
>get the most kills in the game but didn't do the objective
>wtf whyd i lose

Fucking b8

...

op: " the system has to change"

trumptard interpretation: "i think the current system is a perfect democracy"

trumptard response: hurr hurr you're dump its a republic

>implying the objective of an election is not to get the most votes

> better version for ya, faggot....

do you truly believe every word Trump says? Almost everything that comes out of his mouth is a lie of distortion of the truth. Fucking hypocrisy

She got the most of the wrong kind of votes

only white people's votes should count tho

We have approximately proportional representation in the House of Reps. The Senate has equal representation for each state, basically, those against the electoral college disagree that each state has the same number of senators.

dont listen to the republicunt hypocrites. if hillary won with 2.8 million fewer votes than trump guess what they would all be saying? ABOLISH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE just like trump tweeted before it won him the election

>implying total votes decides outcome
Kek looks like someone failed civics

You must think that the winner of the World Series is should be the team that scores the most runs across 7 games, rather than win 4 out of the 7.

...

learn how to reply newfriend

You fucking sheep act like the Election even fucking mattered.

I'm also new. I want to learn all the things !

This discussion has been over for nearly a year now, user. Get over yourselves; nobody cares.

Clearly, the winner of the World Series should be decided not by who wins the most games, but by a select few rich people who aren't even watching the games.

Because that would make way more sense than figuring out which one is the better team.

If they have time, maybe they could investigate all the players, and award points based on who does the fewest horrible things when they're not playing baseball.

Again, instead of trying to figure out which team is actually better at the thing they're competing in.

Maybe a fashion show ? Pretty much ANYTHING other than a test of skill in their chosen field, would be fine.

That would all be fine.

>this

we dont stop talking about injustice just because you say so

When you cucks stop crying about getting your asses kicked in the Civil War, we'll start the countdown to how much longer we can bitch about Trump.

Dubs of truth.

Yeah gerrymandering the national election. Because that happens.

this was a thing before even trump announced he was running

are you new?

Because talking and bitching about it totally solves the problem.

>Implying an entire state should decide the presidential election.

When they're illegal wetbacks, of course.

as if that is gonna trick me into staying quiet

Heritage is something you liberal twats never seem to understand

The election was a year ago. Why can't losers just move on?

we also dont understand racism and fucking our sister

>Implying anyone is trying to trick the internet autist into doing something he doesn't want to.

He certainly invented that ointment for himself.

see

@748102014
Homosexuals don't get (You)s.

The only reason why you are here is because you heard of a thing called Sup Forums helping Trump win. Sorry you are a massive faggot and should GTFO this board you pathetic vapid cunt. You literally do not understand nuance. Please, you look so funny reaching so far like that.

now you're trying to hide what you're doing (get me to stay quiet)

It worked for Obama twice but didn't work for Hilary and you want it to change. Fuck up liberal and accept the result.

Ok I'll try to avoid using big words for you.

People who think the same way, tend to stick together in the same place.

Especially people that can't or don't want to work for their living.

The places they get together are called cities.

The founding fathers knew that these people would generally feed off their own bullshit, and so they balanced the power between people who live in cites, and those that don't.

This prevents people like Hillary from being elected if she doesn't appeal to people other than the batshit crazy ones that actually believe her bullshit.

That's it. It's simple. She wasn't manstream enough. Got it?

...

>@
>mfw you're scared of catching a reply

How is posting this picture not racist?

obama won popular vote each term

Nice logical fallacy. Why don't you try coming up with a valid response, instead of digressing?

1. move on you lost deal with it
2. The electoral college is the states vote the popular vote is just to determine how the states vote, We live in a Republic not a Democracy. you cry about the fair and yet you don't even understand how your government works

This is so funny for us non Americunts. We laugh at you retards. You're so fucked.

Our votes don't matter. Electoral college is an outdated system that caused us to get a couple retards as president. We should do away with it, and popular vote only. Who ever gets the most votes wins. In case of ties, can use the same system we do now.

you can find this piece of toast racist if you're dump enough

You are correct. It was an ingenious plan but they underestimated one factor.

Bernie's a socialist. He would turn the country into Venezuela.

The thing is, women outnumber men in population. Why didn't Hillary win????

how many words are you gonna throw at me until you give up at keeping me quiet about this

OUR GOVERNMENT IS ARCHAIC

GET WOKE OP

Do you understand what the word "socialism" entails?

What people tend to forget, is if the election was decided by a popular vote, the outcome of the popular vote would be drastically different.

Trump focused on swing states and the state's he needed to win. If it wad a popular vote system, Trump would have been campaigning in LA and NYC, using the "The democrats say they help minorities and the poor, but you're still all poor" stuff he said during the debates.

Basically Trump forfeited many areas where he could have made an impact, because he know he couldn't win the state.

If you look at how well he did in Miami and Detroit and other cities, let's say he campaigned in LA and NYC and did half as good. If that was the case the popular vote would have been even.

Tldr; basically you can't say "look at the popular vote" because if we elected presidents by it, it would change their entire campaign strategy, and change what popular vote outcome would have been

/thread

>mfw you just admitted to having no argument, and that all you want is the last word.

This system has been in place for over 200 years. If you want to change it, fine. Petition your elected officials to start a constitutional convention and change the way the president gets elected.

But don't complain that your candidate didn't win when she simply did not meet the requisite requirements for winning

Illegals casted more than 3 million votes so Hilary didn't really win the popular vote.

Very true fellow pede, then it would have been Ron Paul who would have won! He's the best!!!

It's called a RACE and Trump was just ahead of the curve ;)

then why was the vote contested in florida for bush gore?
is it because a state decides on a popular vote Usually due to electors voting as a populace voted..and this been not been the case in the past in some state elections? yes? not enough to overhaul an entire system) and not on a federal level?
i can't imagine i'm wrong on this....

"the rules of the game are broken but we shouldnt fix them because we would have to adjust to fair rules"

/\ boy that was a lot of words to say that /\

Seeing as how 5 million more people than were illegible to vote in cali id say she still lost.

This sage and block