/pol will defend this

>/pol will defend this

have a (You)

the penis gets inserted into the vagina

maoists will try to worm out of that but they will fail

>Sup Forums defends degeneracy meme

>lock and key theory
A key that can open many locks is called a master key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock.

That's not how a flowchart works son

>A key that can open many locks is called a master key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock.
damn, really makes u think

By nature men are supposed to fuck more women than women fuck men. This culls out the betas. Unfortunately, because this hasn't been the case there are more cases of numales and cucks, much to the grief of western civilization.

>
>>A key that can open many locks is called a master key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock.
>damn, really makes u think
damn, really makes u think

May as well be:

==MAN?==
Yes no
==HAVE TITS?==
yes no yes no
bad good good bad

Sounds like a metaphor for rape tbqh

True Sup Forumsacks believe that men should be just as monogamous and committed to loving relationships as women. These frauds who are saying that men should fuck around but women should be chaste are just degenerates, polluted by western society, who think they are 'red-pilled'.

What it mean is that :

A man is judged by two things his social standing(money + job) and his charisma(Body + sexual ability) while a woman is judged by her beauty and by her purity.

A man who fuck a lot of women mean he possess sexual experience, so this is good, but a woman who fuck a lot of men mean she lost her purity, so this is bad.

doing something that is difficult gives you respect and admiration.

it is never difficult for women to get laid almost no matter how ugly or weird they are.

kekd, nice one, dubs, good post please get a VPN

This person doesn't understand how flowcharts work.

This

Women...

what's wrong with it?

That's deep m8

No men having lots of sex is degenerate

Actions have consequences which ive come to realize women will never understand,

No men is gonna "man up" and give her the traditional wife treatment if she was the town whore. The life long sacrifice is simply not worth it

Women can fuck around all they want but shouldnt expect to be applauded when there is no work for them to get it unlike with men.

Also STD/STIs are far more dangerous for women since it can affect their fertility and infect any potential kids during childbirth and last but not least women dont process casual sex very well mentally because their sexuality is different compared to men

Damn really makes you think

man's yes/no goes to "lots of sex?" regardless of the answer and "lots of sex?" has multiple yes/no's.

"lots of sex" should be split in two for both man and woman.

>female
>notits
>bad
faget

yes it is if they're ugly

I know what is meant, it's a popular analogy. But like many analogies, they can be damn silly when comparing two unrelated things.

The purpose of locks is to keep people out, so doesn't that say something bad about the key?

Joe Rogan is that you?

>so doesn't that say something bad about the key
no because a key is the appropriate way to get past a lock

Up until a few decades ago, the natural consequences of sex have always been far more significant for women than for men; i.e. pregnancy.

You can't just erase millions of years of evolution in a couple of decades.

>man
>lots of sex
boss

>man
>lots of partners
degenerate manwhore

>man
>no sex
loser

>woman
>lots of sex
perfect

>woman
>lots of partners
degenerate whore

>woman
>no sex
angel

FTFY

A specific key for a specific lock. Your master key benefits someone who doesn't want that restriction.

Unless the master key is yours, in which case pic related

Evolutionary biology has a simple answer for this -

But simple and correct answers are always "wrong" to liberal dipshits.

important is actually the partner count
not the sex count

It's hard to be a stud, shit.
We gotta be good looking, fit, witty, pretty, smart, educated, strong, tall, well dressed etc. We gotta be players to get into many girls' pants

But it's fucking easy to be a slut
All you gotta do is.... be there.

/thread

Exactly. A woman can love sex with her partner and everyone cheers, it's when she's fucking random bar losers she's lost value. They understand but the juden is strong in our society and he pushes his degeneracy as best he can.

You can make any argument you like when you make up things out of thin air.
a whore is a whore, whether male or female.

>A key that can open many locks is called a master key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock.
Really makes you think

...

If evolutionary biology means anything you should be impregnating women, not just pumping and dumping them.

Whores are only called so because they are overt about it. Most everybody has a lot of sex, but it defines some people. It's like the difference between a normal gay person and a flaming faggot

>Sperm is cheap/pltnyful
>Eggs are expensive/rare
This is basic biology. Every social constructed sexual more that "restricts" women is based around this reality

damn really makes u think

In 2016 you are a loser no matter what you do, unless you are jewish.

Holy shit

You guys do know that girls call out other girls for being whore's all the time.

It is a fucking retarded to expect woman to be virgins when you would fuck any person you just met.

makes u think tbph senpai

A man who has a lot of sex is only seen as a boss among the dregs of society

Well yeah, anyone would like that for themselves. But concerning real keys and locks, just like some keys are designed to open more than one lock, some locks are designed to be opened by more than one key. That's not a bad thing, it's convenient. And that's actually closer to the truth, as far as sex goes: men gravitating to these loose "locks" for their sexual satisfaction, to the anger of more typical locks.

Seems like the analogy should be defending a standard rather than valuing a particular deviancy over another.

>standard
That being monogamy.

I think Sup Forums exaggerates the "women want studs who fuck tons of women". Sure I can see its appeal to them, but I think the average woman would much prefer a man who isn't going to just dump them. Most expect relationships to be lasting rather than ephemeral. Of course that doesn't mean women desire robots and similar ilk.

Or maybe I'm being idealistic, idk. I believe it takes two to tango, so I'm not fond of all the shitting solely on women. Adding "beta males" isn't any better.

This.

People who don't have sex are seen as losers these days because of rock and rap culture that glorifies the pubescent rebellion against society

Every married couple should have lots of sex between themselves. Unmarried couples and single people should have no sex.

You are being a retarded. Women fight for guys who has lots of girls. Displays power. Displays dominance.

But they settle for less. Not that they do it happily. They only love the powerful. The rest, they tolerate and settle down.

>Sup Forums is one person

... but women are the ones primarily calling men losers and other women whores.

perhaps is these so called "angels" would stop holding out, there would be less losers...

Came here to post this. Fucking atrocious diagram.

OP BTFO

Sounds like /r9k/-level ooga booga shit. I could apply that to men too and say they unhappily settle for lower caliber women.

everyone thinks they settled for less
if they dont, its called love
thats why after a while love fades, people start to see their so's mistakes