How could anybody be attracted to children? It just sickening

How could anybody be attracted to children? It just sickening

Other urls found in this thread:

sciencealert.com/girls-are-going-through-puberty-earlier-than-ever-before-with-long-term-effects
digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1234&=&context=psychfacpub&=&sei-redir=1&referer=https%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.co.uk%2Fscholar%3Fhl%3Den%26as_sdt%3D0%252C5%26as_vis%3D1%26q%3Dpsychological%2Bimpact%2Bof%2Bearly%2Bintercourse%26btnG%3D#search="psychological impact early intercourse"'
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

They are hot because of the innocence, their small bodies and the fact that they are virgins.
Do I need to say more?

aint teenagers fucking at like 13 now anyways?

Because of their small bodies.

Define "children"

16-17 isn't a kid bruh

"How could anyone like what I don't like?!?!?"

Not even a pedo but you're a fucking retard

lol ur a faggot

>It just sickening
sure is

>aint teenagers fucking at like 13 now anyways?
Yes, unless they start earlier

I don't get the little boy thing, I think that's fucking gross and the NAMBLA fucks should be burnt alive. Some girls are fucking smoking hot and you're lying if you say you've never noticed. The difference being you don't act on those thoughts like a fucking monkey.

Traci Lords

Bro, she didn't become hot until the very day of her 18th birthday. Before that there was absolutely nothing attractive about her.

>day
hour

Parents love their children, these people just love them even more

worth 30 years in jail

16-18
>thats reasonable
14-15
I guess? I'm not too sure how I feel about it.
11-13
>No.
10 and under
>I'll curb stomp you myself

everything 13 up should be allowed

...

Millie being the obvious exception right?

This. Anything Less than 15 y/o is just off limits.

Kek

Ha!

>worth 30 years in jail
easily

You all lose if you read this as 8 ah ah ah

>10 & under.. go ahead and try it faggot... I'll beat you with my tyrannosaurs cox.

it's not that people are attracted to children
it's that retard feminist countries like the US have a ridiculous idea of what counts as a child
as soon as puberty hits, they're good to go
you can't argue with biology

Each other, not sweaty, mentally stunted adults.

>tyrannosaurs cox
speaking of cox
That's the type of cable company we have here
Most guys and people who like sports have Directv
But a lot of chicks like cox
A lot of dykes who like sports, don't like cox
I have Directv, I'm not into cox

You can, because nobody who's 14 is psychologically ready for that shit

...

>nobody who's 14 is psychologically ready for that shit
bullshit

Bullshit. I know me and all of my friends were

>Bullshit. I know me and all of my friends were
exactly

You're the one making the absurd expression here, how would you prove that

Literally bullshit. Teenage pregnancy says otherwise.

If she is physically and sexually mature it's fine; however, if she isn't then your praying on a kid.

You weren't though, were you. You're delusional if you think you fully understood it. Plus, you're in this website so you're a guy, and you don't have to deal with shit going inside you. Different ball game.

It really doesn't. Just because people do things doesn't mean it's healthy

If so more teens would show signs of imbalance after having sex with people in their age groups. Which isn't the case at all. You should think these things through before saying them.

>What's a fetish
>What's a paraphilia
>What's a mental disorder
>What's projection

faggot chomo detected

Teenagers who fuck at 14 aren't the norm. Here's a recent study by durex

When in was 23 I met a 14 y/o in ALL chat rooms. She was already verybsexually active and had rug burns on her knees from sucking other guys off. At least that's why she told me had them. And she was really deep throating so I had no reason to doubt her. She was a thicker girl but wasn't fat and had DD tits. The first time we fucked she masturbated for about 20 minutes while giving me head without me even asking. Trhe oknly reason I stroppes seeing her was that on was over at her house and we were in her bed. She was naked and I was clothed. We were too long around and I looked up and her mom was standing in the doorway. Luckily I was clothed so I just got up and got the fuck out of there. After that I never talked to her again. That was 17 years ago..

Girls are going into puberty way earlier now

Because I deflowered one of my GFs when she had just turned 15. She was more than ready for it, and that was a gazillion years ago. Kids today are far more sophisticated.

And apparently that's a bad thing:

sciencealert.com/girls-are-going-through-puberty-earlier-than-ever-before-with-long-term-effects

But it happens enough that any negative after effects would be more than discernible. You're making it out to be an anomaly

>Teenagers who fuck at 14 aren't the norm
and everyone who comes here is a normie

Odd that you focus on that visual description. What if it was a clean college grad working a job and an internship for his career, and he just couldn't say no to that oddly well developed tits and ass?

>couldn't say no to that oddly well developed tits and ass?
who can?

They are discernible, there's a clear cultural difference between those who fuck at 14 and those who don't.

Mate I'm not talking about anons, I'm talking about general themes in society as a whole

Other than teenage pregnancy what negative effects are there? Psychologically speaking given your previous claim

And to be clear I want specific examples that ONLY pertains to teenagers. Post anything that relates to both and you only serve to bolster my argument.

digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1234&=&context=psychfacpub&=&sei-redir=1&referer=https%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.co.uk%2Fscholar%3Fhl%3Den%26as_sdt%3D0%252C5%26as_vis%3D1%26q%3Dpsychological%2Bimpact%2Bof%2Bearly%2Bintercourse%26btnG%3D#search="psychological impact early intercourse"'

>For both boys and girls, earlier timing of first sexual intercourse was associated with longitudinal patterns of greater transition proneness and poorer psychosocial adjustment.

So not a natural problem? Sounds like you admit society pressure is the reason they are "not ready". If they were more prepared, there would likely be less teen pregnancies, right? Instead we shelter them to the point they are clueless what's going on when mother nature says to fuck. Confusion leads to bad decisions.

...

that's generally not true
and in the cases where it is true
it's not because they're fourteen
but because the culture they've been raised in
has retarded their development
instead of giving them a proper education

No, I'm suggesting that those who do tend to grow up acting in certain ways which differ to those who don't. I'm not saying don't educate them, that's fine. I'm not saying that 16+ is bad, because I reckon that feels like roughly the right age. My issue is with older guys liking younger girls who are

oh, sure, cos people are gonna admit to it in countries where it's illegal

I think it's hilarious that you think this supports your case

They smell nice and their skin is nice and they are not embittered, angry bitches. Yet.

Small size, cute bodies with soft skin

In an anonymous poll why wouldn't you. You're telling me you think all studies about anything illegal are not to be trusted?

It's just part of the evidence in the study mate, I reckon it does support the case.

Little boys are 1000% hotter than any other demographic.

I don't think you get the joke.

>Yet.
yet

pedo detected

Missed it

What's the difference between a healthy 16yo having sex with her vs a healthy 26yo?

What comes to mind for me is that typically a 16 year old guy is going to be inexperienced too, so they can learn about their bodies together, while a 26 year old is statistically more likely to be experienced, so they may well push the girl in ways the younger guy wouldn't. Honestly I'm not too sure why I don't like it, it just smells like manipulation to me.

*ephebophile

Dictionaries are still being made these days right?

She looks dead inside. Nobody wants that.

Admittedly I'm not sold on this grand metamorphoses that 16 and 17 year olds go through until the day of their 18th birthday. Especially considering it's not backed by any empirical data or anything.

...

Well I guess teens should just pray the hormones away until they turn 18

THIS

I'm from the UK where the age of consent is 16, and that's when I started. Just feels a bit young for sex with older guys though

It's those tight teen bodies that do it man.
Before they've put on a ton of McWeight.
Also, the playful, non-bitchie attitudes are attractive. Not like the attention seeking social media whores they almost all inevitably become these days...

Ew

My thoughts extactly

She's squinting slightly user. Relax beloved

...

depends on the methodology
but you can't deny there's motivation for respondents to be dishonest

then you're as uneducated as you look

They should have sex with someone who they trust and feel safe with regardless of age. Even if the older man is fake caring about the girl it doesn't matter because that shit happens to males and females regardless of age.

What do you feel about someone who is 18-19 fucking someone who is 45 or older. Shouldn't that be just as bad? The gap is smaller than a 16 year old and a 23 year old fucking. It's minuscule in comparison.

We have incentive to lie? About something we aren't allowed to talk about? About something we have no empirical data on? About something we are arguably percent more interested in than you could ever be you normalfag cucklord? Fuck your insinuations.

*?

Think about the phrase "Don't take candy from strangers."
Sounds to me we aren't preparing our teenagers not to be manipulated, likely because no one wants to address the teenage years with a 10' pole.

My idea on that is that properly addressing any teenage issue will make someone be in an environment where they are reminded of their years then, confusing hormones, seeing things they associate with back then, making them relive things maybe they don't want to. Trauma, maybe they're successful now and don't want to regress into their badboy stage again, romantic mishaps, ect. It makes them uncomfortable, so future teenagers are left to figure shit out on their own. Parental worry then makes them always see their offspring as younger, and actively ignore what's going on because it's so uncomfortable for them. No one is really sure what happens as you reach, turn, and pass the "adult" line. You just start to have to for shit for yourself once everything is open all of a sudden. There's no "transition", just a fuckload of chemicals that we can't figure out how to get sorted right for years.

That being said, there's this 17 I used to work with who I really wanna smash, and she's already been with a lot of older guys.

lol, go and look up what 'respondents' means you fucking retard

So I guess being a single mom is hot now?

Exactly my argument is ethics and deviating from the social norm. My ethics is, listen. Take your age. Divide it in half and add seven. Ok. Yeah. If your dating girls under that it might be seen as creepy. Ok. Now. dating and sexually attracted is different. You CAN be sexually attracted to girls 16-18 thats pretty normal. Jailbait tho. I think 15 is iffy. 14 is weird, and anything under that is shit. IF your going under 12 please get your head checked. That said you REALLY shouldn't be dating under 18 if your over 25ish.

I find hetero and homo repulsive with adults. Does that mean it's wrong?

Why is Austria in there twice? Shitty graph.

Teenagers we're fucking at 13 when I was 13. That was 25 years ago.

How is the rest of their psychological well being affected as a result of their psycho-social adjustment being affected. Since of course the human psych isnt a compartmentalized separated thing.

...

1/3
Laws come into existence for diverse reasons with disparate degrees of merit. Before the Prohibition of alcohol, it would have been a very bizarre legal notion for a liberal western democracy to write a law that criminalizes the ingestion of a chemical substance. Now it is hard to imagine a world without the enormous, hideously-expensive, and demonstrably usesless drug enforcement aparatus.

Some laws are starkly rational and data-driven, like traffic laws. Others are both rational and moral, based on an orthodox social contract, like laws against murder and theft. Then there are laws strictly spiritual in nature, and though they may have backing warrants about societal harms, these arguments are little more than post-hoc rationalizations to get rid of something that uniformly repulses people. The prohibition of child pornography is fascinating; Historically an obscenity law, it began as a child welfare lobbying effort, was investigated through the postal system for many years, and now has settled into the 21st century as a "cyber-crime", and may in its final metamorphosis become a thought crime, which is what it was always meant to be. Based on recent rulings about drawn or depicted child sex acts, it would seem to make no difference if these depictions had any materiality whatsoever. In other words, the real end-goal of these laws is to put people in jail for fantasizing about performing sexual acts with children, which is not expressly illegal, if only because it cannot yet be surveilled what a man thinks.

Also it's easier to get rid of the body once you're done.

Are you sexually attracted to kids?