Can any of you actually prove God doesn't exist?

Can any of you actually prove God doesn't exist?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-N5e1R4-G9I
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

That's not how it works.
If you want someone to believe in something the burden is on you to prove its existence, not on them to disprove it.

You do. no all knowing being could fuck up that badly.

okay if God doesn't exist why are sunsets so fucking romantic?

The truth of reality is beyond human fathoming, let alone yours.

Fuck off.

One single proof would destroy atheism. Too bad there is none

Your bait is bad and you should feel bad

You weren't aborted

sunsets
hot showers
tight hugs
forehead kisses
the bible
Jesus Christ

Define God.

Speaking as a more or less completely disinterested with religion agnostic, I'm pretty sure religion isn't about proof, it's about faith, otherwise if it was then we would either all be religious or we would all not be.

I'm not seeing any proof there.

The burden of proof doesn't fall on us. We simple don't believe your magic man in the sky exists. It's up to you to prove he's real.

why would the bible exist if god wasn't real?

Good point. Similarly, why would dianetics exist if scientology wasn't true?

Spinoza already proved that god can't not exist.

Bad bait. Logical fallacy

Why would Greek mythology exist if it wasn't true

This prolapsed uterus is proof god doesn't exist.

But the woman was black, gonna have to count that in the God exists category

Where god is defined as nature, which is silly.

How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren't real?

Actually, that's also not how it works. In science, it's a back and forth of proving and disproving ideas. One person comes up with an idea, and that idea is valid as long as no one can disprove it. And after centuries of disproving and coming up with new ideas, we get scientific theories.

Why ?

gr8 b8 m8
exactly the opposite, dumbass moron

No.

>One person comes up with an idea, and that idea is valid as long as no one can disprove it.
Not until the idea has experimental data to support it isn't. A fundamental part of the scientific method is testing. Until you test your idea, it's nothing.

>
>sunsets
Nature
>hot showers
Heat?
>tight hugs
Ummm, what?
>forehead kisses
What the actual fuck?
>the bible
Just a book that some people wrote
>Jesus Christ
Just a person that may or may not have existed

What's your point kid?

You can't prove he exists either

Because nature is already a perfectly good word that doesn't bring in all the baggage of a word like god.

You could define god to be a particular piece of string if you wanted, but why would you?

I'm so tired of the "burden of proof is on you" response. Can no one think for themselves?

if you come up with something, you´ve got to prove it, except sandnigger science

...

heard of knowledge? your ancestors are not smiling at you

If I remember correctly, Spinoza didn't redfined nature as god, he argued that god is something that we interpret as nature, which is different.

Until a certain point, because proof doesn't exist.

Time and space are constants. They were always here, they were also never anywhere, and that's why they're here.

The universe is constantly expanding and everything in the observable universe is so unobservable it shouldn't even be called observable.

In every galaxy there is a planet with enough similarities to earth that the chance of life not existing there already is impossible, due to probability and the size of the universe.

Yet nothing has been found, just because we can't see it yet, doesn't mean it's not there, but it gives me the option to believe that there is or isn't.

My religion wants me to believe that only humans inhabit our great and vast universe, and I believe that because I enjoy the thought of not entering eternal unconsciousness when I eventually die.

Also, considering time and space are constants, how was anything made given that at one point in TIME... only these two constants existed, no quarks no gas, no elements no LIFE.

SO HOW DID IT ALL COME TO BE?

We don't know, but I choose to believe that I do know. How do I know? I know because my religion says so, it says that God created everything.

Then how did God get created?

My religion tells me not to think of how God was created, but to admire his creations and let that represent his divinity and ability to create all.

Everything is a paradox, you see?

I don't know. I don't care. I just want to go to heaven.

>Given proof
>Denies it and acts like a faggot
Like clockwork. What's wrong? Mummy and daddie make you leave your precious Xbox for 1 hour out of the week for church?

so god isn't real, i guess everything in the universe exists for absolutely no reason

He effectively did, yes. Everything that exists is part of God, which is all that exists.

There is a god but he saw what a shit show his ant farm has turned into and chucked us into the trash and got some fucking sea monkeys instead

/thread

Why would anything have a reason to exist ?

Best post

No because athiests are soulless men, according to Nietzsche and devoid of ethos. Also, athiests are just vessels used by interdimensional demons to usher in transhumanism and compilenall the souls into an online database ao we can create a universe that is conteollable by the ruling elite who are enlightened by the real god.

Inforwars never lies.

Why does atheists think they can disprove something they don't know anything about?

>Being this fucking retarded

Why do theists think they can prove something they don't know anything about?

...

youtube.com/watch?v=-N5e1R4-G9I

Go ahead and define God for me.

Because we assign romantic attributes to sunsets.

> (You)
>>Given proof
Proof has yet to be given. How are tight hugs and forehead kisses proof of there being a god? If anything, stating those two is nothing but proof of a sad virgin.

how exactly do we prove the existence of something?

The god of classical theism would be an all-powerful, all-knowing, completely good being.

proof works both ways

if i can prove something doesnt exist then i can disprove that it does exist

can you prove that i didn't make a teapot out of my pubes?

in a sense, there are no "disproofs"

any claim will claim truth and then attempt to prove itself through a proof

And how does God relate to humanity?

Furthermore proof is really subjective of you think about it. Your ideas of god are different than my ideas, so how can we argue about an objective being if we only experience god subjectively? It's a fools argument,

Hot nasty sweaty screaming sex
Oh, there is a god, it's just not Abraham's

>Also, considering time and space are constants, how was anything made given that at one point in TIME... only these two constants existed, no quarks no gas, no elements no LIFE.
But they aren't constants, are they? The conditions at the cellular scale were anything but constant in the earth's early age.
>made
Your choice of words is begging the question, that there must have been conscious design and engineering going on, rather than the emergent properties of fundamental particles leading to a cause and effect chain that, after enough attempts and failures and combinations, ten to the power of a few dozen, at least, which is not such a hard sell with a possible experiment every square meter on the surface of the planet, led to sentient, tool-using, abstract-reasoning beings.
>I don't know. I don't care. I just want to go to heaven.
You'd better make one for you and yours now than enslaving yourself to a Yemeni war god who is dead.

>needing a daddy this badly

we experience god?

how can we argue about an objective being if we only experience ANYTHING subjectively?

do we not experience everything subjectively? then how can we argue objectively?

Varies by the particular god concept. Theists are far from unanimous.

Define your God sufficiently that it might even be possible for it to exist in the first place, then we can determine how to prove it doesn't.

>completely good being
Created brain cancer and kills innocent little children. Definitely a good being

but what if i don't give a fuck if you believe in it or not?

For the record, I don't believe that the god of classical theism exists.

but here's the thing... we don't HAVE to prove shit to you.

you're not entitled to proof of god's existence just because you're atheist.

what if i said

god is a perfect being

a perfect being must exist

therefore god exists

what would you say? i've defined god, how would you disprove me?

The problem of evil is logical disproof of a God like this.

If it's eternal and all-knowing, it would have knowingly created evil, making it the most evil being in the universe.

Not that this is disproof, but why would you worship such a horrible thing?

...

If God's not real then who was Jesus dad? Have you even read the bible?

Machines expreience phenomena more or less objectively.

Joseph's premature ejaculation, why?

wifout bad ther be no guud

No the bible says Jesus was born a virgin idiot

We can't thats the point tard

That's fine, just don't think you're going to convert us or expect us to think your beliefs are justified.

What if I said God is not a being.

>enslaving yourself
I'm not enslaving myself if I'm enjoying and consent to what I'm doing, you absolute fucking moron. This is why people hate atheists.

Maybe you're just pretending to be retarded

Trips of truth this is now a spiderman thread

what about people who say "evil does not exist, everything that exists is true and good"?

it seems difficult to say "this thing experiences things on its own, by itself, locked up in itself"

and then to say "it experiences things objectively"

if it experiences things locked up inside itself, why should it assume its experience is objective?

so nothing is objective? thats a pretty big pill to swallow

i could say

"god is perfect and perfection requires existence. existence requires being, therefore god must be a being"

I would say that premise 2 (a perfect being must exist) is an unjustified assumption.

This isn't necessarily true. There are several words that aren't virgin that the original text can translate to.

You can't prove he exists
You can't prove he doesn't exist
Some people choose to have faith
Some people choose not to

Everybody fuck off and believe what you're going to believe

I know God exists because Spiders can't fucking fly.

They're wrong. I mean, even the Bible says some things are wrong/evil/sinful. Sin wouldn't exist if God was all powerful and all good.

...

...

why is that?

if we compared two things, one being and one non being, one potential and one actual, isn't the actual superior to the potential?

dont we give more credence to things as they exist and not as they could exist?

it seems strange to say "there is a natural evil, and thus a natural morality" and then turn around and say "there is no god"

the idea of a natural morality would imply the existence of a god, otherwise where did this morality come from?

if there were no god, and nature were merely objects, there would be no "natural morality"

A good God wouldn't have done it that way you retard

Ok

...

Who said there was natural morality?

...

the problem of evil assumes a morality, since it assumes evil

the problem of evil is not a disproof of god if we look at things from this angle, since morality implies god and the problem of evil implies morality

...