What would happen if an unstoppable force met an immovable object?

What would happen if an unstoppable force met an immovable object?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=wMmXCKxwa0k
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

It would turn out that at least one of the two wasn't as advertised.

wrong answer try again

Not the other user, but that was clever. Have you ever heard of the concept of "yes, and" you fucking degenerate?

the same thing that would happen if the coldest possible thing in existence met the hottest possible thing in existence

>What would happen if an unstoppable force met an immovable object

paradox, You cant have two at the same time
if an unstoppable force you cant have a immovable object

If you took a water sun and combined it with a fire sun, you would get a double-big rock sun that is slightly warm to the touch.

The unstoppable force would move through the immovable object

Everything else would move around them.

One will be weaker to the other to some degree

the moving one will break because it isnt unbreakable the immovable will do the same

They'll cancel each other out. Can't be stopped/moved if you cease to exist.

this is what would happen

Windows would crash

youtube.com/watch?v=wMmXCKxwa0k

Traps would become not gay.

right answer

cant have two in the same universe
because they can not both exist.

that the point of the question

explain how

It will move the rest of the world, so immovable object will be moved without changing its place.

A wedding.

Uhhhh it'd go around, dumbass

an explosion. If physics plays a huge part. Both would be cancelled out.

found this

n reality this "paradox" is just basic logic. If you say that there exists an unstoppable object, you are also assuming that there can be no unmovable objects (otherwise, how would your unstoppable object be unstoppable). For the next part of the riddle, you assume that there is an unmovable object--again, this assumes that there is no unstoppable object otherwise how would you have an unmovable object? So when you assume both exist and ask what happens when they meet, you've contradicted yourself. There is the "paradox".

However, if you force such objects to meet, I do like the simple solution of @WetSavannaAnimal that the unstoppable object would just pass through the unmovable object. Hence, it has not been stopped and the unmovable object has not been moved.

The force can't stop and just because the immovable object can't be shaken loose from the base doesn't mean it's impenetrable. It's possible for an object to be fastened tightly and still be penetrated by something moving at a great velocity or even something moving slowly, if there's enough force behind it.

They would both be annihilated.

Yes guess never saw it that way

and seems to back up both

The same thing that would happen if a Star Wars stormtrooper who won't hit a death star at 2 feet distance tries to kill a Star Trek redshirt who dies at the first shot.

the object would move and the force would be stopped

This, unstoppable force vs immovable object, they met & only chaos is remaining

If i you burp, sneeze, and fart you will disappear

Immovable doesn't mean unbreakable.

Also, all matter is moving all of the time, so that's that.

they would not interact
so the unstoppable force goes thru, and the unmovable object stays there.

Neither such thing can exist. In the long run everything in the universe is asymptotic.

What about an ice sun?

Unstoppable force would win as it would destroy the immovable object. It's immovable not indestructible.

...

you can't change the coordinates of any part of an immovable object. how would you program the change using particles in a 3D field? it gets "destroyed" and then its parts move? its parts can't move. no object is singular, and if it's destroyed it becomes multiple parts but always of the same microparts which CAN NOT MOVE.

The force would slow down to an infinitesimally small speed, but never quite stop

kermit the frog stuck his hard throbbing cock in miss piggy's cunt then banged her for 7 seconds and blown his load on her bacon tits.
Then she forced him to clean his frog spawn ejaculate off of her 8 pig tits and swallow it, which he did like a champ. Kermit then tied miss piggy up and butt fucked her so hard that her asshole cooked, Kermit thought it smelt good and went to eat miss piggy's ass which she thought was for "sexual pleasure" But he took a bite of miss piggy's ass, and it tasted delicious.
Kermit went on to murder miss piggy, cook her remains and eat her.
The leftovers were given to Ethan Bradberry and some were mailed to the city of England to Nick Crompton.
Kermit road his unicycle around town for a while, singing "here come dat boi, o shit waddup".
He then gave his unicycle to a nearby charity shop, after he went and bought a balloon and tied himself to it and let himself fly away

KERMIT HAS BEEN MISSING TO THIS DAY

This

This is the logical answer.

...

You get a whole lot of unstoppable shrapnel.

Computer Earl Grey Hot

but if you can move through it then that mean its not an unmovable object right? because the unstoppable object was able to move the matter of the object in order to keep progressing even if it id doesnt "move" it did give way in a sense.

i guess its unmovable not unbreakable but that seems to be like saying "well its unstoppable because it will just move around any obstacle and continue"

To find out, we need to divide by 0