Refute this

Refute this.

Other urls found in this thread:

slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2010/02/the_chemists_war.html
youtube.com/watch?v=jl9EjEQnI5w
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiskey_Rebellion
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

The bartender would lose his business the very next day or even get killed by husband, father, son, brother of some of them
He would not do that out of self of self-interest.

Adam_Smith.jpg

You're right. Regulations on alcohol were created immediately after fermentation and persisted until the present, and totally weren't invented in the last century or two.

Back in the day, people were dropping like flies because all the booze was poison. When Jesus turned water into wine, there was a certified Roman FDA member there to certify it was in fact safe to drink. They left logistical stuff like that out of the Bible.

why would a business kill their customers?

The bartender then has no business because no one trusts him.
No money, no food.
He dies.

also

"If mankind were thoroughly evil, no law would suffice. If mankind were perfect, no law would be necessary."

This gets reported by independent journalists. People read about it and stop going to the bar. The bar closes

>because serving poison is unregulated

Why would he do that to himself and his business?

fpbp and checked

tbqh I would totally go to a bar that poisons libertarians.

>Refute this
What, that nothing of value was lost? I can't.

>why would a business kill their customers?

Because strawmen are important to people with no real arguments.

But that's wrong. People sold tainted shit all the time. That's why we have regulations now.

>shitting on ayn rand
Damn, bitch. The fuck did she do to you? She wrote a mediocre book.

Deregulation does not make it legal to violate a contract. The bar would be legally liable for fraudulently selling a product sold as safe for consumption.

>regulation is present in the bar to stop the bartender from serving tainted beer

as brilliant as gun control

Holy shit this is the third time in like 14 hours that I've gotten 88. Is Kek speaking to me?

I wish I'd been capping these.

alcohol inherently filters the water when you add a positively charged reagent after fermentation, which is why it was such a valuable source of non-lethal calories

>Refute this

This same scenario could play out under total regulation as well. All it takes is one murderous bartender.

>worrying about regulations when you're serving beer that kills people.

> not joining up with the bartender in an exclusive profit sharing partnership to serve poison selectively only to road builders or road enthusiasts

Obama, Clinton, and Bernie walk into a bar. The bartender serves them tainted alcohol because he has no moral compass. They die.

Refute this.

>Back in the day, people were dropping like flies because all the booze was poison

Not like flies maybe but people did sometimes die from bad products before regulations

Libertarians are not anarchists. Refute this.

Paul Ryan is a goverment worshipping spineless faggot. He probably ordered juice and was fine

Ironic, given that the most deaths from bad alcohol happened during prohibition, when the government tainted it on purpose.

Not an argument

Other people don't buy tainted shit, they live
the world mourns some great people. and then keeps moving

And then his business died and he starved to death.

wow...really makes you think...
can libertarians recover?

WRONG!

All 4 have been dead for a long time because someone organized a deathsquad to kill all who stand agains them to rule the land.

Let's assume the alcohol was tainted at the company of those who produced the alcohol for sale to the bartender. How does this change?

>People sold tainted shit all the time.
They still do. It's just now we have an expensive (and expansive) bureaucracy devoted to doing what the free market does automatically.

>People sold tainted shit all the time.
Look at this fact checked statement, people.

>That's why we have regulations now.
So true. The government would never act out of self interest and try to make money through unnecessary regulation.

damn...really makes u think...

Why would a bar kill patrons? It's in the bars interest to keep them alive.

OP walks into a bar. The bartender serves him tainted alcohol because Prohibition has caused the government to mix in wood alcohol with ethanol in order to keep people from drinking it, killing OP and about 10,000 others.

2012 Czech Republic methanol poisonings
The 2012 Czech Republic methanol poisonings occurred in September 2012 in the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia.[1] In the course of several days, 38 people in the Czech Republic[2] and 4 people in Poland died as a result of methanol poisoning and many others were taken to hospital.[3][4] The poisonings continued for several years after the main wave, as of April 2014, there were 51 dead and many others suffered permanent health damage.[5]

DUH FREE MURKET WILL FIX IT

NOT AN ARGUMENT

Yes, and the retarded people who bought questionable products from questionable people would die.

I don't see any problem with this whatsoever.

"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of their folly is to fill the world with fools."
-Herbert Spencer

There will be regulations in an anarchist society, anarchy is no rulers not no rules


Its just a strawman

PRAGUE — The Czech Republic has banned the sale of liquor containing 20 percent or higher alcohol content after at least 20 people were killed and dozens of others were seriously injured from consuming methanol-tainted spirits.

The poisonings have raised questions about the effectiveness of European Union and Czech safeguards against bootleg alcohol, which has plagued the Czech market for decades. The country has the world’s second-largest rate of hard alcohol consumption, after Moldova, according to the World Health Organization.

The poisonings, which began about two weeks ago, have also brought into focus the penchant of the country’s less well off for hard alcohol on the lowest rung of the market.

According to Czech News Agency, Vladimr Lipina, a 51-year-old car Czech factory worker from the industrial town of Havirov and one of those affected, bought a bottle of rum from a street kiosk on his way to a soccer game two weeks ago. He said he had a few shots but thought that the drink tasted strange. Four days after his pregame celebration, Mr. Lipina became blind. “I woke up with a terrible headache and stomachache, but I thought I would just get over it,” Mr. Lipina was quoted as saying. Doctors are not optimistic he will ever see again.

In case you're wondering:
slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2010/02/the_chemists_war.html

Who will enforce the rules?

>Tainted alcohol

Alcohol was one of the first ways to actually make drinking water safe. In Rome a cup of wine was safer than a cup of water because the alcohol content made a hostile environment for microbes. At the time they didn't really grasp the reason why people who drank alcohol weren't getting dysentery and other shitty diseases, they just assumed wine was blessed (thanks Bacchus)

And then this slut comes along with the classic "if it weren't for government regulations everyone would die! Government regulations somehow work but contract enforcement and self interest do not!"

Remember kids, we need to put price ceilings on food, because companies could charge 80 bucks for a gallon of milk and 100 for a loaf of bread because people need to buy food to live! Watch out!

Why do drug dealers often kill their customers with bad product?

"Hey I heard that bar serves tainted stuff, let's not go there"

"No there's no regulations that means that we HAVE to drink at that bar no matter what"

>anarchist society
Anarchy's a transitional state between governments. Humans instinctively organize.

OP walks into a wal mart, he buys 100 twinkies and soda.

He dies at age 40 from obesity related illnesses. He is just another statistic, there are millions like him.

He trusted the FDA and not his own judgment

No. Its a stupid joke, even tho i get its point

>drinking alcohol
>complaining of the consequences

wew lads

Because drugs are illegal so only shitty people become drug dealers


Also,

>implying FDA approved drugs dont kill thousands every month

That is a myth.
99.9% of people who die from drugs, typically relapse then take their 'regular' dose, with 0 tolerance then die.

The other .01% of the time, it is because the product is actually HIGHER QUALITY. And once again the user goes to take their 'regular' dose and then die.

I've been an EMT in a city with a heroin epidemic for 2 years.
Never heard a story about 'bad' product.

Ayn Rand, Rand Paul, and Paul Ryan walk into a RupAyNuaPRaulYnPauLnUNAnDPLryUAPllR

Ayn Rand, Rand Paul and Paul Ryan all walk into a bar.

It knocks them unconscious.

>refute THAT

They don't actually, because they too would lose the fuck outta their clientele.

If anyone dies from drugs, it's because they were marked to die, they were too stupid and OD'd, or there was some kind of accident.

Dealers selling laced shit to their average consumer is a myth for exactly the same reason - killing clients ain't conducive to business. Unless they snitch.

>implying organization requires the initiation of force

calm down friend

fbpb, also czech'd

Watch Donald J. Trump destroy degenerate Current Year Icon John Oliver right here!
youtube.com/watch?v=jl9EjEQnI5w

What's to stop someone from doing that right now? You think there are regulations that tests alcohol? Fucking retard.

Security dilemma, my dear faggot. All it takes is for one chucklefuck to realize "hey, I can hit people with this huge stick to get what I want!" and its over.

When 6 year olds want to play a game and somebody cheats what do they do?

They ostracize.


Adults apparently need an extensive theft supported system to punish rulebreakers and them release them without fixing them

Came here to post this.

>Ryan
>Rand
>Rand
>Paul
>Paul
>Ryan

Are libercucks only given 3 options for their names during birth?

Czechmate.

Regulations can't even stop grocery stores and restaurants from serving ecoli, salmonella and other food poisoning incidents that occur in the hundreds of thousands each year.

>muh regulations will keep me safe

No. They would be shot.

>CUCX

WITNESSED

Before regulations or before capitalism made proper alcohol cheap as shit?

If they were drinking redneck moonshine was because they were poor and couldn't afford imported whisky from Scotland, not because there weren't regulations. Nowadays anybody can afford proper alcohol with firm reputation, specially if government didn't tax it to hell.

What happens when Ryan Ayn walks into a bar

but they still do, and people still die, except now they don't take any caution because they're promised by The Government that they're safe.

>people are so coddled by government regulation that they have no idea how to function on their own anymore
See the current welfare state.

Only 300 posts away from meaningful 88's.

>tfw you realize government is more concerned about the TAX on said booze, and is willing to kill you for it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiskey_Rebellion

When people did this shit back in the day they disappeared within a couple of days and setup shop in some other area.

Good luck finding them after that.

>muh no regulations meme

>HURRR DURRR LIBERTARIANISM AND ANARCHY ARE THE SAME THING HURRR FUCKIN DURRR PLEASE SHOOT ME IN THE FACE

>People sold tainted shit all the time.

The US Government intentionally tainted alcohol in the 1920s.

Guys, Poland got too drunk and fell over.

Why is Paul Ryan hanging with Ayn Rand and Rand Paul? or is she just picking people that have first and last names that match

Yes, MORE GUN CONTROL PLEASE!!!!

>c
You know as much about libertarians as you do about Socialists.

If you don't yet understand...You're a retard

>Bars that knowingly gain a reputation of serving tainted alcohol stay in business

Like the FDA gives a flying FUCK about you, your family, or your friends. You have no recourse if someone dies due to tainted product. You rely on an agency to investigate and get shit right, and then the corporation responsible pays out, but not the people responsible. If you kill the person behind it, you will face greater punishment than they did.

Authority keeps order among the stupid, but the intelligent feel trapped within the confines of a system geared towards the lowest common denominator.

Won't happen, since:
1. The bar would be owned by the Mega-Corporation, the merger of all world corporations since the abolishment of anti-trust laws
2. Late night alcohol drinking is illegal by the decree of Mega-Corporation CEO, since it makes workers less productive the next day

Not gonna happen either.

Mega-Corp employees (and all employees are Mega-Corp employees) are protected by the private army of Mega-Corp, and consumers are regularly fined by Mega-Corp "persuasion corps" if they don't consume enough Mega-Corp products (which are all products).

The last time people were dying from bad alcohol was when government regulation was the heaviest; when alcohol was fully illegal.

Poisoning your customers is not a smart business move, and even if you're careless enough to do it, it would still be illegal in a libertarian society.

It doesn't help that any three Libertarians will give you different opinions on anything but "Don't Tax Me Bro!"
Makes em out to be dubious tax dodgers like Scientologists and Mormonies.

no regulations
the bartender might accidentally bought counterfiet products and served the patron those.

Answer: Relatives of all 3 go to the bar and lynch everyone involved in the poisoning. If it was not a legitimate poisoning, no one is going to buy that guys shitty bootleg liquor again, and "tainted alcohol" is about the most retarded example possible.

People don't make money by putting out shitty products that no one will buy or ones that harm people. It already happens today, and when it does people speak with their wallets.

While they could burn it to the ground, they decide instead to rebrand it as a bar that serves decent alcohol purchased from reliable vendors who have been making quality alcohol for hundreds of years.

Everyone gets drunk and enjoys themselves, except teens who can't handle their liquor, because the bar can kick anyone out at any time because there are no regulations.

They also get to use their bar as a public house and a casino, because there are no regulations.

...

everyone in the bar who liked those people kill the bartender because in a lawless system vigilante justice is law. that took three seconds of thought

>Open a bar
>Poison your customers
>???
>PROFIT

>If it was not a legitimate poisoning
Subtle/10

>bartender kills his own customers
Sounds like a shitty business idea to me.

Dear God,
Hi, its me, user. Please bless Mommy and Daddy and Skip and Jan. And Spot, too!

And please tell me that the fucking morons on this board aren't so stupid they dont realize that the original joke was about government interference in business. Thank you.

>Amen

Nothing would happen because the bar owner donates to Hillery and is "protected" from any harassment.