I'm not saying it makes it right, but the fact that she liked it so damn much has to, at least...

I'm not saying it makes it right, but the fact that she liked it so damn much has to, at least, make it a bit less wrong.
Thoughts? Should the enjoyment of the performer be a factor when the judge sentences the producer?

No, gtfo.

Wut u on about m8y?

Story?

Illigal tap dancing saloon?

I hope you make the right decision OP.

Could someone fill me in as to what OP is talking about?

maybe, whats the context?

...

Guilty

>said to have autism
youdontsay.jpg

r

Wait. Why isn't that shocking to you?
You noticed her autism from her videos?

There are two aspects to this. Morally wrong and legally wrong. This seems pretty clearly legally wrong. Morally wrong is also pretty clear. A child in somebody's care should not be exploited for any reason. The "adult" in this situation took advantage of somebody else's innocence, immaturity, disability, and dependency on them for his own gratification. Pretty disgusting all-around.

It's not shocking, as it seems everyone has fucking autism these days.
Your reply is proof.

No. Otherwise all rapists would just start carrying MDMA.

>disability

uh huh.

She clearly had a great old time, and she made her daddy and LOTS of other people very happy.

Where's the harm, really?

There is none.

QED.

Fair enough.

I've had a great old time doing meth


But I still wish I didn't

Question is rethorical: where the fuck do you watch this Shit?

2007 - wherever you want
2012 - darknet
2017 - in your head while in prison

Long long ago, from a link posted on a website called Sup Forums. You may have heard of it.

Ah, yes. The days when the more sensible lads would avoid Sup Forums