#HillShill here

#HillShill here.

Convince me not to support HRC.

Hard mode: don't use anything that I can rationalize away as Republican-funded lie and a pathetic attempt to smear her campaign.

Other urls found in this thread:

lmgtfy.com/?q=Marc Rich
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Trump has a very impressive penis. It does not shame other men with its existence, but rather, such is its influence that it elevates other penises so that all dicks may shine, regardless of stature.

else you will end up like the netherlands

She went on a world tour selling out America preemptively through the Clinton Foundation. If she gets in office this country will be bled dry by all the foreign influence.

That's it. I am now a #cruzmissile

Clinton’s State Department Emails
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton checks her phone on board a plane from Malta to Tripoli, Libya. (Kevin Lamarque / Reuters / Zak Bickel / The Atlantic)
What? Setting aside the question of the Clintons’ private email server, what’s actually in the emails that Clinton did turn over to State? While some of the emails related to Benghazi have been released, there are plenty of others covered by public-records laws that haven’t.
When? 2009-2013
How serious is it? Serious. Initially, it seemed that the interest in the emails would stem from damaging things that Clinton or other aides had said: cover-ups, misrepresentations, who knows? But so far, other than some cringeworthy moments of sucking up and some eye-rolly emails from contacts like Sidney Blumenthal, the emails have been remarkably boring. The main focus now is on classification. Sixty-five emails contain information that is now classified. The question is whether any of it, and how much of it, was classified at the time it was sent. Clinton has said she didn’t knowingly send or receive classified material on the account. The State Department and Intelligence Community have disagreed about that. In addition, the Intelligence Community’s inspector general wrote in a January letter that Clinton’s server contained information marked “special access program,” higher even than top secret. Some emails that Clinton didn’t turn over have also since surfaced.

Benghazi
A man celebrates as the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi burns on September 11, 2012. (Esam Al-Fetori / Reuters / Zak Bickel / The Atlantic)
What? On September 11, 2012, attackers overran a U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, killing Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. Since then, Republicans have charged that Hillary Clinton failed to adequately protect U.S. installations or that she attempted to spin the attacks as spontaneous when she knew they were planned terrorist operations. She testifies for the first time on October 22.
When? September 11, 2012-present
How serious is it? Benghazi has gradually turned into a classic “it’s not the crime, it’s the coverup” scenario. Only the fringes argue, at this point, that Clinton deliberately withheld aid. A House committee continues to investigate the killings and aftermath, but Clinton’s marathon appearance before the committee in October was widely considered a win for her. However, it was through the Benghazi investigations that Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server became public—a controversy that remains potent.

Conflicts of Interest in Foggy Bottom
Kevin Lamarque / Reuters / Zak Bickel / The Atlantic
What? Before becoming Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills worked for Clinton on an unpaid basis for four month while also working for New York University, in which capacity she negotiated on the school’s behalf with the government of Abu Dhabi, where it was building a campus. In June 2012, Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin’s status at State changed to “special government employee,” allowing her to also work for Teneo, a consulting firm run by Bill Clinton’s former right-hand man. She also earned money from the Clinton Foundation and was paid directly by Hillary Clinton.
Who? Both Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin are among Clinton’s longest-serving and closest aides. Abedin remains involved in her campaign (and she’s also married to Anthony Weiner).
When? January 2009-February 2013
How serious is it? This is arcane stuff, to be sure. There are questions about conflict of interest—such as whether Teneo clients might have benefited from special treatment by the State Department while Abedin worked for both. To a great extent, this is just an extension of the tangle of conflicts presented by the Clinton Foundation and the many overlapping roles of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

She has no soul.
She commissioned murders throughout her political career
She whines about privacy even though she will do anything to be in the public eye
She worships the devil
Her policies are the direct influences of >le j00s

Throw yourself off the tallest building, cuck. How's it feel being the harbinger of the destruction of your own country?

The Clintons’ Private Email Server
Jim Young / Reuters / Zak Bickel / The Atlantic
What? During the course of the Benghazi investigation, New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt learned Clinton had used a personal email account while secretary of state. It turned out she had also been using a private server, located at a house in New York. The result was that Clinton and her staff decided which emails to turn over to the State Department as public records and which to withhold; they say they then destroyed the ones they had designated as personal.
When? 2009-2013, during Clinton’s term as secretary.
Who? Hillary Clinton; Bill Clinton; top aides including Huma Abedin
How serious is it? The biggest question right now appears to be whether the server was hacked, which could have exposed classified or otherwise sensitive information. Even if not, there’s the question of whether using the serve was appropriate. The rules governing use of personal emails are murky, and Clinton aides insist she followed the rules. There’s no dispositive evidence otherwise so far. Politically, there are questions about how she selected the emails she turned over and what was in the ones she deleted. The FBI has reportedly managed to recover some of the deleted correspondence.

why are there so many white women who do this islamic shit? Do they realize that they lose any rights they have if it takes over or what?

I AM LONG SP500 AND US EQUITIES, DON'T YOU DARE ELECTING TRUMP I NEED THOSE FUCKING MONEY

This meme must die. Just like the little fairy divas you call your "national team".

Sidney Blumenthal
Blumenthal takes a lunch break while being deposed in private session of the House Select Committee on Benghazi. (Jonathan Ernst / Reuters / Zak Bickel / The Atlantic)
What? A former journalist, Blumenthal was a top aide in the second term of the Bill Clinton administration and helped on messaging during the bad old days. He served as an adviser to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, and when she took over the State Department, she sought to hire Blumenthal. Obama aides, apparently still smarting over his role in attacks on candidate Obama, refused the request, so Clinton just sought out his counsel informally. At the same time, Blumenthal was drawing a check from the Clinton Foundation.
When? 2009-2013
How serious is it? Some of the damage is already done. Blumenthal was apparently the source of the idea that the Benghazi attacks were spontaneous, a notion that proved incorrect and provided a political bludgeon against Clinton and Obama. He also advised the secretary on a wide range of other issues, from Northern Ireland to China, and passed along analysis from his son Max, a staunch critic of the Israeli government (and conservative bête noire). But emails released so far show even Clinton’s top foreign-policy guru, Jake Sullivan, rejecting Blumenthal’s analysis, raising questions about her judgment in trusting him.

R A R E

The Speeches
Keith Bedford / Reuters / Zak Bickel / The Atlantic
What? Since Bill Clinton left the White House in 2001, both Clintons have made millions of dollars for giving speeches.
When? 2001-present
Who? Hillary Clinton; Bill Clinton; Chelsea Clinton
How serious is it? Intermittently dangerous. It has a tendency to flare up, then die down. Senator Bernie Sanders made it a useful attack against her in early 2016, suggesting that by speaking to banks like Goldman Sachs, she was compromised. There have been calls for Clinton to release the transcripts of her speeches, which she was declined to do, saying if every other candidate does, she will too. For the Clintons, who left the White House up to their ears in legal debt, lucrative speeches—mostly by the former president—proved to be an effective way of rebuilding wealth. They have also been an effective magnet for prying questions. Where did Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton speak? How did they decide how much to charge? What did they say? How did they decide which speeches would be given on behalf of the Clinton Foundation, with fees going to the charity, and which would be treated as personal income? Are there cases of conflicts of interest or quid pro quos—for example, speaking gigs for Bill Clinton on behalf of clients who had business before the State Department?

The New World Order prophecy from the Bible is fulfilled if Hillary Clinton becomes the President of the United States of America.

What a sad time to be living in. I'd either see the world in chaos in my life time or see elites fall.

The Bad Old Days
Supporter Dick Furinash holds up cardboard cut-outs of Bill and Hillary Clinton. (Jim Young / Reuters / Zak Bickel / The Atlantic)
What is it? Since the Clintons have a long history of controversies, there are any number of past scandals that continue to float around, especially in conservative media: Whitewater. Troopergate. Paula Jones. Monica Lewinsky. Travelgate. Vince Foster’s suicide. Juanita Broaddrick.
When? 1975-2001
Who? Bill Clinton; Hillary Clinton; a brigade of supporting characters
How serious is it? The conventional wisdom is that they’re not terribly dangerous. Some are wholly spurious (Foster). Others (Lewinsky, Whitewater) have been so exhaustively investigated it’s hard to imagine them doing much further damage to Hillary Clinton’s standing. In fact, the Lewinsky scandal famously boosted her public approval ratings. But the January 2016 resurfacing of Juanita Broaddrick’s rape allegations offers a test case to see whether the conventional wisdom is truly wise—or just conventional. On May 23, Donald Trump released a video prominently highlighting Broaddrick’s accusation.

She went to the new Ghostbusters to rely on their feminist cred.

Movie quality aside, that should tell you something about her competence.

>emails
HRC didn't do anything wrong. You're holding her to an unfair higher standard just because she's a woman.

>Benghazi
Who cares? HRC didn't do anything wrong, it wasn't her responsibility, and our people get killed all the time by terrorists. Stop beating a dead horse.

>conflicts of interest
Literally nothing. Enriching herself is enriching America.

they bought into the leftist/marxist/socialist lies

to many of them here

>she commissions murder
Proofs?
>her policies are influenced by Jews
I'm a Jew, you dumb stormweenie.
>ebin cuck meme
Cuckoldry is the intellectual's fetish.

They're schoolchildren forced by their teachers to go on field trips to mosques to "Appreciate the culture of the world"

Surely you saw the picture of the paper slip saying a child would get a mark on their pemanent record if they didn't go.

>HRC didn't do anything wrong.
>HRC didn't do anything wrong,

>Sidney Blumenthal
Literally who?

>paid a lot for speeches
Not HRC's fault if people want to give her money. She was underprivileged for her whole life and you're upset that she's finally getting some recognition for her contributions to this country? Nice try.

Because with the state of the war in the Middle East right now, you need a president who knows how to resolve conflict without engaging in conflict. Hillary was a firm supporter of the Iraq war, and although she's said that she's anti-war now, she continues to fund the war effort. She's a liar, and quite frankly with ISIS' beliefs regarding women, the last thing you want is an 'inferior human being' as a president. Trump will keep them anxious until he eventually finishes his term and some other cuck comes in to bomb them.

And the Clinton Foundations pardon of Marc Rich?

The merchant has been exposed! Get him!

>voting for CIA personified
>convince me not to
Nah, keep doing your thing, keep turning the entire world to shit with your coups.

>"not being technologically illiterate enough to accidentally commit treason" is an unfairly high standard

>HRC didn't do anything wrong. You're holding her to an unfair higher standard just because she's a woman.
She leaked important information and I don't care about what's between her legs.

You're not coming up with an argument

...

Please just read some history of these guys. By "these guys" I mean the whole lot of them. Try "Jeb! And the Bush Crime Family" for starts, just released Feb 24. Just before Jeb bowed out, and has remained largely silent.

"Clinton's War on Women" is a good overview of their antics, past and present. The real eye opener is "JFK: The Case Against LBJ."

All of these are by Roger Stone, who has worked within the political system since Nixon. He does not discriminate Republican or Democrat. He has made himself thousands of enemies in the simple desire to expose the truth.

That truth is that the whole bloody lot of them are the same. The entire big bank big corruption big business big power elite has grown unchecked since Ike, whose departing message warned of its potential.

There are many other authors and hundreds of books, but you wanted the political slant left out and many other writers if use their "factual exposes" with personal agenda.

Hillary leaves a putrid wake of lies and corruption, perhaps no worse than some other professional attorney politicians of her caliber but certainly more visible. For chrissake she's under FBI investigation.

Bernie or Trump or SOMEBODY has got to start pulling in the reins if not derailing this gigantic governmental oligarchy while we still have a significant degree of personal liberty and citizen power.

I lean toward Trump because of Bernie's long career on the public dime sitting in Congress, part of the same gigantic omnipresent government at taxpayer expense that so needs to be constrained.

Hillary - that's just going to mean another 25000 new fed laws (about what Bush put in place, and what Obama has done so far) and another four or five baby steps toward an all controlling gov police state that manages every aspect of our lives.

Decide for yourself, but read for yourself too.

NEWFAGS OFF MY BOARD

This was in her email.

>HRC didn't do anything wrong. You're holding her to an unfair higher standard just because she's a woman.

Hello! It is never authorized to use personal communications devices or methods to transmit classified material. In an email to an aide, when a classified fax wasn't working, she literally says "turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure."

Removing the headings doesn't magically make something unclassified.

...

>Egypt
You're just mad that a woman brought freedom, democracy, and human rights to your shit country.

>blaming Muslims for terrorism
The U.S. is the biggest terrorist in the world. Peddle your Islamophobia elsewhere.

>Marc Rich
Literally who?

>being antisemitic
You're not even a real country, hope China occupies you.

You're only upset because HRC is a strong woman and you feel threatened by that.

>she leaked important information
Says who, Fox News? This is just a smear issue, or else she would be in trouble with the law.

>or else she would be in trouble with the law.
What is an FBI investigation?

>strong woman
>islamophobia
>smear campaign

Holy shit and i thought shills had more fantasy

Right on Egypt.

>procedural investigation with no criminal charges
>anything significant
The "FBI investigation" is about as worrisome as an IRS audit.

Which woman? When? How?

>Literally who?
lmgtfy.com/?q=Marc Rich

>>procedural investigation with no criminal charges
>dude everyone gets investigated by the FBI, it's not big deal

Also, why aren't you addressing how she blatantly told her aides to mishandle classified information?

Are you picking her because she is really the best for the job or are you picking her because she will be the first woman? I highly doubt that the only qualified people are from the Bush or Clinton trees.

It seems very odd to me that everyone is so upset that the Bush family won so many elections, but not many care that the Clinton's want a similar legacy. Why not opt for something new and not a cut from the same old cloth? These people are always manipulating themselves and their family's into positions of power, and everyone eats it up. Are you actually pleased with how the last 30 years have gone? I don't understand why anyone would want more of the same

>be OP
>cook up shitty bait thread faggotron 9000 style
>ask to be persuaded on political matters without resorting to politics
saged

She has a vagina.

>Cuckoldry is the intellectual's fetish.
Now we know he's a shill. You have to be a true goy to fall for this one.

Other than OP being an idiot troll with no sound refutations, there is actually some decent info from other anons here and the thread looks to act like a window into the general election. If FagOP's attempts to counter these arguments against her are an indication of what her campaign will use then her evident health issues are going to collapse under the stress of the next 5 months. First the Bushes, now the Clintons. Excellent.

>OH HAHA NO BIG DEAL HAHA!!!

It's not just that she broke the law the the end effect and the most logical reason why she did it was the avoidance of FOIA requests which is illegal in and of itself. She is guilty by ignorance or intended malfeasance. Judging from her poor attempt to bury it and her history of destroying evidence and obstructing the numerous investigations against against her I firmly believe that it was intentional. What I don't understand is why nobody brings up that intentionally obstructing FOIA requests is also illegal.

I'm with you. All I have ever seen or heard from Hillary backers is baseless hate speech as an offense, and ignorant (don't know who Marc Rich is, really?) repetition of wishful denials and blind worship for defense. Not one Hillary supporter has read any substantive truthful history about her, or they sure as hell would not be Hillary supporters any longer.

These intentionally ignorant libtards, and the banking/foreign power elite/Richie Rich set is all she's got left. For a list of the latter two, see a list of Clinton Foundation investors, er, "donors."