Do you support the use of violence against him?

Do you support the use of violence against him?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=n0XVgioi29I
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

God he always pulls that card out when hes losing a debate. Still pays his taxes though.

>Using an actual argument is just "pulling a card"

you bet your ass I do

sure why not

Yes. What now?

Except for seeing his picture on here all the time I have no idea who this faggot is.

Yes, I want him shot.

Typical anarcho-capitalist, would be the first to get raped and killed in such a context.

No. He's doing god's work

Not an argument.

Holy shit, that is the most based molymeme yet. Ben Garrison confirmed Molyposter. UPB as fuck!

>WHAT ARE YOU JUST FEEDING ME RAW MEAT HERE !?
youtube.com/watch?v=n0XVgioi29I

Stefan suffers from cognitive dissonance. He says that a man should be free to live as he pleases. Then he gets all judgey and cunty about peoples personal choices. He says hes against taxes yet he still pays them. He supports trump but wants to end government. The man is fundamentally dishonest. He acts as if he word is gospel, but then he is unclear about what he actually believes. I can't follow someone who is that dishonest and intentionally vague. Neither should you.

>mfw I was worried about the molyeconomy being in recession

...

Not an argument

>but he still pays taxes
If he doesn't they will kill him.

literally who?

What do you guys think of based Bill Whittle?

Is he red pilled?

>believing in over bloated rhetoric.
Name me one Canadian that has been killed because of unpaid taxes.

What do you all think of based Bill Whittle? Is he redpilled?

Fuck, no substitute for the real thing, didn't think you were going to show up.

Stefan just used it with his FB post fyi

Is there really any need for you to do this in every fucking molythread? do you literally sit at home refreshing the catalog over and over until you see a rare Stef just so you can post this shit? I have to admire your commitment tbf, but get a life.

t. argumenter

>says people should be free to live as they please
>gets judgey about their personal choices

These aren't opposing ideas. He believes in voluntarism, so people can do what they want, but at the same time he's free to have an opinion on people's lives and to ostracise them for their choices.

>he's against taxes but pays them

Agree or disagree, in Stef's mind if you don't pay taxes they send you letters asking you to pay your taxes, if you continue to refuse, they'll issue a warrant for your arrest, if you refuse they will chase you and if you continue to resist they will shoot you. Stef doesn't want to be shot therefore he pays his taxes.

>supports Trump
>wants to end government

His support of Trump is only within the statist paradigm. His ultimate ideal is obviously a free society, but that's not going to happen tomorrow. His "support" for Trump (which is mostly contained to him simply dispelling media fictions about the man) doesn't overwrite his hate for the state.

>acts as if his word is gospel
>unclear about what he actually believes

I'm honestly not sure what you mean by this. Yes, he believes what he's saying to be true. He's willing to be proven wrong if someone comes forward with actual empirical evidence, but other than that he believes what he believes. As for him being unclear on what he believes, I honestly think he's been pretty clear on his stance on just about literally anything. Can you give an example of him being "unclear"?

go away stefan, this rampant self-promotion is becoming tiresome

The great man has arrived

That's what I do desu, though no to Whittlepost

It's pinned on the top of his twitter, too.

Mostly just deportation of Muslims.
There are Islamic Countries for their fucked ideology, they're welcome to go there and blow up/get blown up.

So you're saying if he doesn't pay them out of principle, then they won't come and take him? If he refuses to go to prison, they will kill him.

No he doesn't. Freedom in the libertarian context means freedom of choice and action, not freedom from critizism, which would be what the SJWs want. You can grant someone his freedom and still point out what you think about his choice.
He does not support Trump per se. The american political system basically lets you choose between shit and poop and Stefan only chooses the less smelly Turd. And when you consider Trump vs. Hillary/Bernie, Trump is the far better choice for a libertarian.
Your taxes arguement is stupid. By that logic you could critizise jews who got deported in nazi germany because they should be against that. If the state forces taxes on you, you can only voice your protest and he does.