s/fur
No pedophilia edition
S/fur
Jonathan Anderson
Logan Hernandez
...
Ian Rivera
there already is a s/fur thread here
Alexander Watson
Apparently you didn't see the title.
Nathan Rodriguez
...
Alexander Murphy
i did see the tittle, but making a second thread just because you dont like what's in the other is kind of childish, dont you think?
Brandon Bailey
No. I'm sick and fucking tired of seeing children. No one else wants to other than you sick fucks, and I'm not going to post in threads with pedophiles.
Jaxson Robinson
...
Nathaniel Martinez
This thread needs more cubs.
Ryder Williams
im not the one posting cubs, no reason to get mad at me, i was just saying that i think you are acting childish, good god man, chill
Easton Johnson
...
Cameron Evans
...
Owen Phillips
I don't care. I'm not going to associate with child rapists.
Adam Jenkins
...
Christopher Lewis
...
Jaxon White
...
Juan Hernandez
...
Jaxon Phillips
>chill dude it's just 2d cp no one wants to see :P
Lucas King
...
Camden Green
Associating with dog fuckers, though? Just dandy!
Samuel Hughes
>kind of childish
the irony of that statement... Then logically you should like it then?
William Stewart
Sexually mature dogs who like to fuck and know what they're doing. Which I'd much rather associate with than child rapists.
Anthony Wood
...
Julian Richardson
Post loli out of spite. lul
Isaac Price
...
Asher Wilson
...
Carter Thomas
>lives in a black and white world
Dominic Nelson
You summoned me?
Andrew Brown
...
Nathaniel James
Fuck off to your child rapist thread.
Matthew Flores
>Post loli out of spite.
yea that will get people to understand and be sympathetic! No wonder everyone hates you.
Brayden Watson
...
Aaron Nguyen
...
Jackson Price
I apologize for showing you that assortment of pixels on a screen depicting something that has not and cannot happen in real life for obvious reasons.
Adrian Howard
...
Hunter Howard
...
Gabriel Perry
>Currently two s-fur threads running
>thread banning cub has 1/3 as many images
Sucks to be you
Xavier Young
...
Jaxson Lee
Like you wouldn't molest a child if you were around any. Sick fuck.
Cooper Roberts
>depicting something that has not and cannot happen in real life
>implying child pron is not a thing, child rape is not a thing.
>disregarding logic
this the larger one is WAY older
try not counting the CP images
Josiah Long
>furfags not liking what someone else is posting
my, how the tables have turned
Jaxson Lewis
Y'all are fucking hilarious
Xavier Torres
>mine started later
>has 2 more IP's
Hmmmm
Jaxson Hughes
Make that 3
Carter Clark
...
Carter Phillips
You have proof that I would? And by what logic would you use to assume that I like children by seeing that I HAVE furry porn depicting anthropomorphic characters that appear to be younger doing a sexual act?
Adrian Ortiz
...
Mason Adams
...
Nolan King
...
Daniel Sanders
Logically you would be far more inclined to engage in sexual activity with them yes. To the same effect someone who posts and prefers non-anthro porn would be more inclined to engage or want to engage in bestiality. Its not hard logic to fallow.
Noah Barnes
The other thread was started at the end of the previous thread, just like this one. It is a minute or two older at best.
You're right about leaving out the cub images though. Then it only has twice the images as this thread, not three times.
Aiden Peterson
I was not implying either, rather I was saying that this unreal character doing sexual acts is not child porn because you are unable to prove its age beyond a reasonable doubt. Nor does it imply that one is a pedophile because it does not depict a human doing such things.
Jack Cooper
>It is a minute or two older at best.
Are you actually fucking retarded?
Juan Barnes
>very small children with large heads and body proportions of toddlers being penetrated by dicks as long as their arms and torso
>"unable to prove its age"
Liam Peterson
...
Zachary Evans
19:07:17 for the CP one
19:14:50 for this one
Its like you dont understand how time stamps work
>you are unable to prove its age beyond a reasonable doubt.
>cant prove the age, must be ok!
I guess its ok as long as you dont get caught or that it cannot be proven that you did it as well.
Xavier Cooper
>Using human proportions to prove a non-human's age
You think that that would hold up in court?
Nolan Ramirez
...
Nicholas Murphy
>sick fucks in one thread
>better make a new thread for non-sick fucks
>sick fucks invade new thread
>sick fucks
>its almost as if they enjoy being scum
Hunter Murphy
>attempting to justify children being raped
You think that would hold up in court?
Alexander Ross
Which standpoint are you arguing from (A legal or moral one)?
Grayson Harris
...
Jace Jenkins
>implications hold up in court often, so yes.
What is being post is legally CP in several countries.
en.wikipedia.org
Elijah Sanchez
...
Kevin Torres
...
Chase Brooks
And the smoking gun I was holding out on.
Dylan Garcia
Both! See
Jacob Garcia
For real life children, absolutely not, I find child rape abhorrent. However for pictures of these fake creatures doing sexual acts, I think that the jury would be grossed out by it however there is no law (to my knowledge) against drawling of non-human things doing sexual acts.
Aiden Foster
add me on kik
Julian Cooper
Oh, I'm sorry. You're right, that thread is a whole 7 minutes older then this one. Why it got 6 whole pics up before yours did.
It's already over a hundred. But hey, if it wasn't for those first six I'm sure you'd be neck and neck
Landon Johnson
>one person posting regular art every 15 seconds
It's like you enjoy looking like a fucktard.
Brandon Sanchez
never blocked you, also why for?
>going by CP dump count and not actual posters
Chase Gomez
And that's where you're wrong
Leo Taylor
...
Thomas Sullivan
to talk about nothing
Jordan Brown
>en.wikipedia.org
I did not read all of it; I skimmed through, it but I did find this interesting line " This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults."
Joseph Jones
...
Carson Lopez
...
Carter Adams
add me, I dont know your stuffs
>cherry picked quote
I can do that to!
>In December 2008, a man from Sydney was convicted of possessing child pornography after sexually explicit pictures of children characters from The Simpsons were found on his computer. The NSW Supreme Court upheld a Local Court decision that the animated Simpsons characters "depicted", and thus "could be considered", real people.
Julian Jenkins
Nice cherry picking.
The PROTECT Act also enacted 18 U.S.C. § 1466A, which criminalizes material that has "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting", that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is "obscene" or "depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in ... sexual intercourse ... and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value".
By definition, 99% of all cub art would be considered illegal as it is obscene.
Michael Baker
You're free to see cartoon animal children being stuffed with massive amounts of cum in america
Elijah Stewart
...
Aaron Garcia
I'm Sure you guys have seen my requests here and there. Just dropped 10 hits of lsd, and I'd love all the brightest colored floofs ya got. Please
Zachary Ross
Sure about that?
2005 Virginia case
In Richmond, Virginia, in December 2005, Dwight Whorley was convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1466A for using a Virginia Employment Commission computer to receive "obscene Japanese anime cartoons that graphically depicted prepubescent female children being forced to engage in genital-genital and oral-genital intercourse with adult males".[73][74][75] On December 18, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, consisting of 20 years imprisonment.[76] The court stated:
Thus, regardless of whether §1466A(a)(1) requires an actual minor, it is nonetheless a valid restriction on obscene speech under Miller, not a restriction on non-obscene pornography of the type permitted by Ferber. We thus find Whorley's as-applied constitutional challenge to §1466A(a)(1) to be without merit.[77]
Whorley appealed to the Supreme Court.[78][79] The request for rehearing was denied on June 15, 2009, and the petition for his case to be reviewed by the Supreme Court was denied on January 11, 2010.[80]
Samuel Hernandez
>Sydney
>Laws in Sydney
>I'm not from Australia
I don't care
Kevin Hill
2008 Iowa case
In October 2008, a 38-year-old Iowa comic collector named Christopher Handley was prosecuted for possession of explicit lolicon manga. The judge ruled that two parts of the PROTECT Act criminalizing "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting" were unconstitutional, but Handley still faced an obscenity charge.[69] Handley was convicted in May 2009 as the result of entering a guilty plea bargain at the recommendation of his lawyer, under the belief that the jury chosen to judge him would not acquit him of the obscenity charges if they were shown the images of question.[81]
Easton Morris
2010 Idaho case
In October 2010, 33-year-old Idaho man Steven Kutzner entered into a plea agreement concerning images of child characters from the American animated television show The Simpsons engaged in sexual acts.[82][83] The case was originally brought up due to the fact that the German Federal Police identified and reported to U.S. authorities Kutzner's IP address as one where a known file containing actual child pornography was being shared.[84] During the forensic investigation, which uncovered "six hundred and thirty two (632) image files, seventy (70) of which were animated images graphically depicting minors engaging in sex acts", "five-hundred-and-twenty-four (524) pornographic image files, most of which depict what appears to be teenaged females", and "more than eight-thousand files containing images child erotica involving younger children, many of them prepubescent",[84] Kutzner admitted that he had knowingly received actual child pornography "for at least eight years".
Camden Jackson
Not for long bub, there are a lot of new bills in the work to nip that shit in the bud. Enjoy it while it lasts.
>In October 2012, after being reported August 2011 by his wife, a 36-year-old man named Christian Bee in Monett, Missouri entered a plea bargain to "possession of cartoons depicting child pornography", with the U.S. attorney's office for the Western District of Missouri recommending a 3-year prison sentence without parole.
Jayden Gutierrez
lol fuck virgina
Logan Sullivan
Good job with that rebuttal, my dude.
Benjamin Murphy
>morality
>legality
>the law
>wants cp
>zero fucks given
>satin trips
Oh... it all makes sense now.
Evan Campbell
Is that all encompassing. IE literally anything that any human can possible imagine that has the possibility of being misconstrued as a minor doing sexual acts legally child porn.
John Martinez
...
Michael Taylor
>can't think of a rebuttal, so I'm just going to completely ignore every example provided
Jordan Hughes
Whoops, the other thread just maxed out.
But don't worry, I'm sure you'll get there before we max out the next one
Tyler Lee
What makes you think that I want CP (note: I have few pictures, if that, of furry 'CP')?
Xavier Nelson
...
Joseph Foster
Congrats dimwits you two drove away the rest of the thread with arguments. *slow clap*
Luke Myers
...
Jayden Rivera
...