Considered illegal or not ?

Considered illegal or not ?

In the end it doesn't matter

I only obey the laws of the universe, so this is fine.
>someone post the one with the creampie.

...

Who made these ? Looks like a painting...

How about we ask the mods.

MODS MOODS!!!

If possible, pass the sauce

...

Got got the sauce? No ketchup. Just sauce. Raw sauce.

I consider it fuckin sad.

That bitch is from harry potter

Artist?

Do you live near any cliffs?

...

[email protected] she needs a letter she's lonely

Here you go

...

MODS

Should be!

GroSs AsS NigGa

Depends on what country. If you're 1st world, artists freedom of expression is usually legal.

Perfect pose and age. Nothing feels finer than a clean bottom.

God doesn't like this

naw dude

what a strange artist signature.

This one is even better

You're a great guy

Kinda gross faggot

...

No artist signature scrub

...

If I remember correctly, drawn underage porn isn't specifically illegal or legal.
No one in the US has been prosecuted for loli or whatever, but it has been used as evidence in cases with real CP.

We got a Spidey bread boys

It's not gross. At that age (10) a young girl knows what she wants. It just has to be applied in a loving and gentle manner.

...

THIS IS NOW A TRY TO GET BANNED THREAD

>At that age (10) a young girl knows what she wants. She just has to be groomed, coerced and gaslighted is all...
/fixed

...

Are you stupid?
No 10 year old girl would want to get with a 40 year old neckbeard like you

If Roy Moore can hit it, so can we!

...

...

GTFO cameljockey

...

Sometimes you can hear the bones crack when you slip a erect penis in so you must be careful.

he is? is this new? theres been no news suggesting that so far.

because pedophiles like prepubescent children, not 14 year old teenagers.

...

...

>because pedophiles like prepubescent children, not 14 year old teenagers.

spoken like a true pedo.

See

right, he's a hebephile or whatever. So, basically he's a slightly less creepy piece of shit than a true pedo...what a fucking champ he is.

...

>Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor.

Would be considered CP under US law because its an underage drawing of real person.

Post moooooore

[[MOOT]]
Delete this you lil shit

its a pretty big difference. one is actually wrong, the other is just a little unusual.

hasn't been definitively decided; that's almost certainly unconstitutional

No it wouldn't. Hermione Granger from the Harry Potter series is not a real person.

Spoken like a true pedo

The G-men have bigger fish to fry than this trivial BS.

Also, how do we know the CGI is not of a midget?

Could just be bad rendering

...

>Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights
Who is emma watson.

nah nigga, a foot fetish is unusual. A 30 plus year old man prowling malls for kids to fuck is disgusting.

type it again

...

>computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor

seems distinguishable to me.

Hey samefag here's your (you) now stop posting plain links to your own shit.

Emma Watson is a real person but Hermione Granger is not so the artist just has to say they were drawing the character not the person and its legal.

Also it's complicated further by the fact that Emma is no longer underage, and probably wasn't when this porn was drawn.
I'm pretty sure the law as it's written exists to stop people from drawing CP portraits of real models.

Clearly a fictional character so it's fine

yes, a 30 year old prowling malls for kids to fuck is absolutely disgusting

however 14 year olds are not kids; they're teenagers, who are sexually developed, with tits, periods, and hips. it's a reproductively valid behavior, which is why attempts to define it as a disorder (like foot fetish, paraphilia NOS) were overwhelmingly opposed by psychologists and psychiatrists

SAUCE

>no (you)

Just because you say its not Emma Watson doesn't make it not Emma Watson, the person who played Hermione and who the drawing is based off.

Just because I drew your 40-year-old sister as a 6-year-old doesn't make it not CP because shes currently 40. They go off the age depicted , not cUrReNt YeAr.

...

>however 14 year olds are not kids

yawn, we've heard all this shit. Welcome to 2017 in the first world, buddy. Feel free to fuck 14 year olds, just don't be surprised when the rest of society sends you to rot in jail for it.

well, technically speaking, she was above the age of consent at that time and you know how horny girls are when their hormones first start kicking.

yes they can, an artist could draw a circle and call it a square if they wanted, its there creation.

>just because you say a man isn't a women doesn't mean the man isn't playing as a woman how his identity is based off.
You were doing well till you said that

not if you Identify as a 14 year old and it was just a sexual exploration moment

>2016 is a joke
>2017 is an even bigger joke
>This could have been prevented

They didn't create the square or circle though, those are names used to define certain shapes. You can't just cut of your sick and be a woman, you are just a mutilated man with mental health issues

>B-b-but shes actually a 6,000,000 year old demon!

Say that to the judge, lmfao.

Nice strawman btw.

This should be illegal, because that's Hermione, with what is CLEARLY Harry's wand.

You're missing the point.
CP laws exist for one purpose, to prevent child abuse.
Do you also think that drawing rape should be illegal?
How about drawing a bank robbery?
What's the difference?

>Just because I drew your 40-year-old sister as a 6-year-old doesn't make it not CP because shes currently 40
yes, it literally does make it not CP -because it's a drawing.

germany and italy are the first world, i can go there to legally fuck 14 year olds.

@No.751029667

oh oh oh pick me pick me I'll tell you

drawing a depiction of a child being sexually exploited for cis men and pedophiles in a disgusting fucking manner

yes this is illegal and no way this will stand in the court of law as just a drawing you fucking child abusing rapists

this is why white people deserve to die

PLEASE DIE CIS SCUM :)

I TRY SO HARD

I don't see harry anywhere. I think she hasn't even gone through puberty tbh.

Well, it's been about an hour... seems like you have your answer.

HOLY SHIT I NEVER NOTICED THAT BEFORE

and got soooooo farrrr but in the end i fucking off myself

>CP laws exist for one purpose, to prevent child abuse.

that's not true
if it were true, simple possession would be legal, because it satisfies the urges of pedos and prevents more child rape than it causes, and because then all law enforcement resources could be redirected to people actually abusing children, instead of wasting time with cp viewers.

>nice strawman
I literally made an analogy so you can better understand how flawed your logic is.
Your the only one thats saying Hermione looks like Emma Watson. Makes be wonder were your fantasies lie.

what the fuck are you talking about you braindead chimp yes it is child porn

>germany and italy are the first world, i can go there to legally fuck 14 year olds.
not id you're American, then your own laws make it illegal for you. Look it up, I ain't even kidding (no pun).

Because people don't draw bank robberies to steal money. This is literally getting off to a child and even if you think that's harmless it could still adapt

>Arguing on Sup Forums
Even if you think you're trolling, you're losing.

Harry's WAND. As in, the 11 inch stick he uses to cast spells and charms.