Do you think political correctness and SJWs had any part in Trump winning?

Do you think political correctness and SJWs had any part in Trump winning?

Pls be fake

Maybe, but nowhere near as big a part as Hillary Clinton did.

The one person who can lose to a guy who bragged about sexual assault.

I'm curious to know, those of you that hate SJWs so much that you rage about them, do you consider yourself social INjustice warriors? If so, is that because you were conditioned to believe selfishness and oppression are virtues (like in Ayn Rand 's FICTION)? Not trolling, just. Just curious.

Yes and or duh.

Yes and it keeps growing bigger every day

I don't care what people believe in. If you think you're a unicorn gender and hate all white men because the media told you to do it, fine. That doesn't effect me.

What I hate is this new wave of PC where anything right leaning is racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. The mainstream media is trying to shove PC values down every young person's throat and are convincing them that if they're not PC, they're part of the problem.

This false facade of "progress" is being pushed onto people because people's lives are too relaxed. We're a nation with so little problems that we think a guy sitting on a subway with his legs spread too far apart for your viewing convenience is an attack on women. We're not electing officials based on diversity rather than qualifications.

>Who cares if the newly elected Governor is qualified? They're the first transgender official!

Shit like that.

Kill yourself faggot

>I don't care what people believe in
>Rest of post criticizes what people believe in
Kek

Lol. Why do you say that? What's wrong with asking questions? What's your answer, tough/smart guy?

Not OP, but I think that you're the one that's been conditioned here. Your thinking that the opposite of a "social justice warrior" is a "social injustice warrior" shows that. You need to understand that groups label themselves to project a positive image. "Antifa" - the "anti-fascists" - is a positive label because, hey, fascists are bad and if you are against them, you're a good guy. But the acts of violence by the group speak otherwise. Anyone accepting of transgender people is labeled as "progressive", yet another leftist label to associate with something positive; anyone against it is not being progressive which means they are in the wrong and trying to hinder evolution.

Did you even read it? It's about people trying to shove their ideas and their made up fairytales of "progress" down people's throats, especially the young and gullible people of today.

Look at our colleges. A lot of them think ANTIFA is a good cause and hate anyone with right leaning beliefs.

yeah that and the russians.

You know what kills me? The left saying they want Trump impeached. Do these dipshits know Mike Pence takes over if he is? He is firmly against everything the left stands for.

Gotta jump on the Trump hate train because it's popular I guess. Make sure to get some free Colbert tickets too.

The world needs to be cleansed of left leaning faggots

>Crooked Hillary Clinton is the worst (and biggest) loser of all time. She just can’t stop, which is so good for the Republican Party. Hillary, get on with your life and give it another try in three years!

Lol what did Hillary say about him now?

Something something buy my new book something something Trump is sexist

Anything talking about how people are sexist is hilariously fucking rich coming from her.

It sounds like these new attitudes and philosophies are offensive to you. And I can see why they seem extreme to a normal person. But the people who are the beneficiaries of them have been the victims of extreme prejudice (and violence) for generations. So wouldn't it make sense that a certain amount of extremism would be necessary to move the direction of thought for normies even a little bit to the left? Granted it won't work on everyone but it clearly has worked on a shitload of people in the last 20 years or so. It took extremists like slave owners and the Klan to move the normie needle as far right as it got in the past. Isn't the pendulum just swinging the other way? Other than making you mad, what's wrong with that?

First off, I don't believe SJWs gave themselves that label. It was given to them as a pejorative. So I'm wondering if those that use it pejoratively do so because they consider themselves the opposite. Nothing unreasonable in that. Second, from what I've seen, anti-fascists clash with people in Nazi uniforms carrying torches and attacking people. How is that not simply an accurate description of what they are? But that aside, "conservative" is the same kind of propaganda label. Conserving is the opposite of wasting, so would could oppose conserving. Right?

Lol. Brilliant fucking contribution Benjamin Aaron Shapiro (kike).

That, identity politics, the race card, and Hillary being a total cunt. Apparently the left still hasn't learned their lesson.

Thia fake news helped him win too. If you listen to the whole conversation in context, the pussy grabbing is consentual. But cherry pick more, libtard.

She is the definition of you're your own worst enemy

As to not learning their lesson, the writing on the wall seems to suggest the pendulum is swinging back in the other direction in the next couple elections. But that aside, how is vilifying Mexicans, Muslims, and gays for votes not "identity politics?" Just because you believe in it? Doesn't that seem a little hypocritical (hypocrisy being the right's achilles heel)?

>do you consider yourself social INjustice warriors
No, retard. We're fully aware that the name "social justice" is rather ironic and make fun of people unaware of such ironic behaviour. This does not imply we're fighting for social injustice or some retarded ideological shit.

I suggest you google "critical thinking" before you ask such a dumass question again.

I think it's all part of an agenda centered around destabilizing our country. It's just a means to an end , and the end result is division amongst the people. So far it's working out great since people are fucking stupid and couldn't think their way out of a wet paper bag

It's making the world into faggots parents are telling their kids that they are trans and gay before they even hit puberty and these sjw half wits reply saying how great the parents are and how the kids brave even though the kid didn't say it they did

Not so much, not this election but probably future elections. I think millennial SJWs are pushing Gen-Z away from the left. Honestly, this has been a shitshow and the next generation wants nothing to do with it.

Given how criticism of SJWs is brought up here over and over and over and over again, it seems to go a little deeper than what you're suggesting. The fact that you feel the need to attack me for asking the question is proof you mad. Let's say, for example, someone opposes Republican voter ID laws that demonstrably make it harder for dumb black people to vote. What about that makes SJWs ridiculous and makes you mad? Why would you even care if you're so detached?

>Yes
If the left hadn't gone full-mental-sjw, people would still respect them. Not saying everyone is a trumpf supporter, but the majority of people don't care about stupid lgbt bullshit.

i miss the old left, that hated bourgeoisie faggots, job-stealing immigrants & considered feminism a mental illness caused by capitalism

The criticism is against their co-opting the term justice. They fight for a perverse justice. One that takes the onus of interpretation from the interpreter to the speaker.

In philosophy, interpretation relies on the principle of charity (best articulated by Donald Davidson).

Charity stipulates that one must interpret their interlocutors argument in its strongest form. This is because part words have multiple meanings and because all arguments contain a vast (perhaps infinite) number of hidden clauses.

SJWs work with what I can only charactorize as the principle of anti-charity. They take the worst reading of an argument and shout "how dare you, facist" Ie. Trump wants limit US admittance of foreigners from areas that DOS function is compromised. The SJW shouts islamaphobe despite many muslim majority nations not being affected whatsoever.

Then they try and limit free expression based on what they think is harmful language. The kicker is their idea of harm goes away in many causes by applying charity.

Again, SJW is a pejorative term given to them, they didn't assign it to themselves. But that aside, how is OP's picture attached to his question about SJWs, and the characterizations of their beliefs (lumped all together) articulated in this thread, not exactly a reflection of the tendency you just described? How are anti-SJWs any different than SJWs?

Tangential point. Tangential point.

Showing a tendency to mischaracterize arguments by one side is not a mischaracterization of a their arguments (or lack thereof).

Your last rhetorical question is moot.

Damn. I knew lefties were daft but this is like arguing with a child.

Social justice in and of itself is fine.

It starts to bother me when it becomes so skewed that it's not about actual justice anymore and it's instead hypocritical.

I still consider myself a feminist because I think equal rights between the sexes are a good thing.
But holy fuck do some other feminists need a verbal smackdown, if not a physical one.

Kek. Alright autistic professor. Don't answer the questions. Sorry, I didn't realize your IQ is 163, and have synaesthesia (absolute pitch). Or that things as diverse as math, music, and art come naturally to you and you get straight A's without studying much at all.

Safe bet

Yes. Between the retarded left and Hillary being his opponent, his win was assured.

It's all under the false pretense that existing social norms were implemented under selfish and oppressive reasons rather than organically occurring....

>This is the very root of these opposing views
>I vote naturally occurring, organic society model
Every disfranchised teenager, whether it be real or imagined, seems to be hell bent on customizing the rest of society's attitudes in favor of their impulsive life choices

Trump didn't win, but democracy lost. He lost by over 3 million votes bud.

Allowing this shit is child abuse

Why didn't he win?

It's because they're so far gone they're making up victims now. Like really, "It's okay to be white" is now an offensive phrase?

Good, democracy is garbage.

ITT

"I took more of your chess pieces despite you putting me in checkmate. Therefore I win."

...

3 million more American citizens voted for his opponent over him. But thanks to the U.S.'s archaic political election system he somehow gets to be president... Hopefully after has 4 years are over someone competent gets in there and this blunder is fixed and forgotten within a few years. The road to progress isn't easy, and the Trump regime is a bump in the road that we will overcome.

...

>How are anti-SJWs any different than SJWs?
They believe pretty much opposite things. Hope that helps!

...

...

>Every disfranchised teenager, whether it be real or imagined, seems to be hell bent on customizing the rest of society's attitudes in favor of their impulsive life choices
How is that different from every generation of teenagers (at least from the early 20th century forward) that has come before us? Isn't that what younger generations SHOULD do? Why does that make you mad? Because you're backwards looking and are left outside the party looking in?

yes. the Dems will either have to cut them loose or forever remain a broken party. people can shillpost and hate trump as much as they want but he was a vastly superior option for the health of the nation and our economy.

really, should these people traumatizing kindergarten kids be running the show? we know push over bernie who was shoved off stage by BLM would have been controlled completely by this demographic and shillary would do anything to keep them happy because that was her main platform, social justice.

TLDR: Bigot points out the obvious

...

If we remove the electoral college, New York and California will determine who becomes president. At that point, what's stopping the other 48 states from seceding?

...

...

...

>Isn't that what younger generations SHOULD do?
No.

...

...

shadows under fingers...

The obvious being that your party is being torn in half and is going to break into two parties soon, competing against one unified one? In case you haven't heard, per Fox News, Obama is more popular in Alabama these days then Trump.

...

...

...

Felix?

...

I wish i could offer a free cruise to all the sjws in usa, drive them out to international waters and sink the boat

So what should they do, adhere to the outdated beliefs of their elders as technology and demographics change at lightning speed? If that's what you believe, fine. But don't blame progressives for wanting to keep up with the speed of change. Blame yourself for why you feel so alienated.

>Africans starving and dying from malaria and the black plague in CURRENT YEAR
>Venezuelans forced to eat zoo animals
>Chinese children forced to make american products because of offshoring factory jobs instead of automation
>be American
>be well over 150lbs over weight
>The Struggle is REEL
mfw

imho yes absolutely. I work with a number of union guys (laborers/operators) that voted democrat for years and switched to trump because of the sheer faggotry thats taken hold of the democratic party

...

Yes.

Democrats were worried about alienating a core base of voters so they never condemned these groups or distanced themselves, not once.

Want to inject a four-year old with an aggressive battery of hormones to change their sex because they came home saying they felt like a girl one afternoon? Want to throw people in jail for using the wrong pronouns? Want to allow people to use any bathroom as long as they say "I'm a woman" or "I'm a man" before walking in?

The result was that average people began to associate the Democratic Party as an institution that literally wanted to give power to these views making the party completely unpalatable to large swaths of people.

Also, Hillary was a cunt.

...

Pol and Nazi fags only consider idpol bad when the left does it.

...

...

Not for dumb black people but for all dumb people, that's not a bad thing
Nice to see you think all blacks are dumb and they are the only dumb ones

...

...

...

Must be nice to have such a clear-cut definition of which way "forward" is. Who drew your map, though?
>progress is more tech
>progress is more diversity
>progress is cultural homogeneity
>progress is gender equality
Sounds like corporations did. Easier to sell shit when everyone is the same. Go buy a new phone, goy.

Oh, absolutely. You think I voted for him because of his brilliant policy? He's the fucking sledgehammer America needs more than ever right now. If he can't get the left's head out of its ass, nothing is ever going to do it.

Trump should break off into his own party. the GOP has proven to be full of nothing but obstructionists that demand things stay the same and we force welfare recipients stay dependent on social services rather than provide them the support they need to provide for themselves.

anyone trying to force social services rather than make people work for themselves simply wants their dependents to continue to vote for free stuff.

welfare should be reserved for those who really need it and not those who leech for life and never look for work.

oh, whats that? there "are no jobs?" huh thats strange, there would be jobs if you voted to force big corporations to return to the us instead of slaving out child labor in 3rd world nations. you dont want a factory job or a tech support job? well thats the direction we have been heading for a while. dont like it? continue to work in food service or retail. dont like that? must be socialist if you dont want to work for money.

...

Kek. I think all sides can agree this bro is an fucking hero.

...

Nice analysis. Is it really yours?

...

That's interesting and makes a lot of sense.

I've always thought there was very little difference intellectually between those extreme SJWs and the maga crowd on the right - they're both just conservatives but with a different set of ideals.

...

The problem with SJW is the same as the problem with Antifa or BLM, they're bullshit terms designed to paint anyone who questions or opposes them in a negative light right out of the gate.

SJWs don't want social justice, they want 90% of the population to make numerous unreasonable concessions for 10% of the population. That's the opposite of social justice and the definition of spoiled, selfish elitism.

BLM is shit because no one ever said black lives don't matter, but they chose that name to give people the impression that the popular opinion is that black people are expendable or something.
They refuse to address their own rampant self-destruction in places like Chicago and Detroit, then go nuts when a single black dude is killed by a white cop. The fact they don't care when a black cop shoots a black suspect only proves their own racism and thus, their hypocrisy.

Antifa is the most Orwellian shit show of the lot.
They engage in the very practices fascists do, then label themselves ANTI-fascist? Yeah. Fuck them. The fact google changed the definition of fascism to make it an exclusively "right wing" phenomenon proves that there is more to this than people believe...or want to believe.

Also, "not trolling but Ayn Rand sucks" is a shitty, transparent troll line, but I figured I'd say my piece because you're obviously a petulant turd who thinks forcing everyone else to pay for their health care and school tuition is somehow "progressive" "magnanimous" or "selfless."
It's none of those things. SJWs are the selfish cunts.

...

That is one fat nazi

Isn't the content of their ideology more significant than the manner in which they express it? I never understood horseshoe-theory people who say "the left and the right are the same". They might talk the same, but their ideas are vastly different.

I feel sorry for the dude on the right. He just wants some pussy.

...

What?
If every vote counts the same how should Newyork or California decide anything alone?