I'm drunk and still smarter than any of you. I have a philosophy degree come at me

I'm drunk and still smarter than any of you. I have a philosophy degree come at me

> philosophy degree

I'm smart and still drunker than any of you I got a fishing license

What is the powerhouse of a cell?

Tell us in detail 5 steps to take to begin a stoic lifestyle

WTF? That's not me!

What's your job with that degree?

Nice, you could probably do something with that.

You're not.

>I have a philosophy
Not so smart after all...

Teaching philosophy, thus perpetuating the cycle of failure.

"Smarter"
>Philosophy degree
Top Kek

>smarter than any of you
>I have a philosophy degree

Hi there OP. You know what? I WOULD like fries with that

Do you ask people WHY the want fries with that at your McDonald's job

yell me the first thing about starting a business

lol 2 true

What do you think of Descartes Critique of Pure Reason?

...

Prove that log(x+1) < x for all x > 0. Hint: Use the Mean Value Theorem.

How do you change a tire, Albert?

He's googling an answer, give him time..

If you’re so fucking smart, why didn’t you get a degree that will earn you money?

Chek'd, Double dubs. Also, philosophy major...changing a tyre? uh huh

>Descartes
Kek

Why do faggots say "googling" about everything as if there's no other search engine?

what's your opinion on necrophilia OP

Is this the modern Diogenes?

I'm not OP but Wtf. This wasn't an AMA.

Do you believe there is right or wrong in our world?

here comes the black friday cazyness

necrophilia can lead to very philosophical conversation
it raises questions about consent, morality, religion
I'm challenging OP to discuss an unconventional subject
if he refuses to discuss it, he's obviously incapable of intellectual conversation

ok explain to me why Technocrats .INC are a bad word in the English language.

Why everybody says "fuck this technocrats"

Do you try to start conversations with people about autonomous cars and the trolley problem or do you actually have an IQ higher than 72?

...

Are concepts like love universal or subjective like the color blue?

Checked. Nice dubs.

Not op, but I would argue love would be subjective. I think everyone has their own perception of what love is.

There's nothing philosophical about it. And moral philosophy completely bores me.

>philosophy degree

Mitochondria! Sorry, not OP

You genuinely have no opinion on whether or not a corpse can consent?
You have no religious or atheist or agnostic concerns with the matter?
You legitimately have no interest with anything regarding moral philosophy? Are you serious? Can you elaborate a little more on that?

If a woman can fit a person's arm in her snatch, can she use her body pocket of a lady crevice to pull a plow like a horse?

>drinking the liquid jew
>smart

If you're such a genius then explain Nagel's Problem with Global Justice.

>You have no religious or atheist or agnostic concerns with the matter?
I have no such concerns with anything. Philosophy might be taken serious if it moved past such redundant concerns.

>You legitimately have no interest with anything regarding moral philosophy?
What's the point of it? Since there's no arbitrator (god) on the matter, why bother debating with people on these things.

Pic related; a necrophile.

You didn't acknowledge my question regarding consent at all.

Religion and morality are governed by the people around us. We are the arbitrators. Why wouldn't you debate with people about these things? What parameters do you actually care about? It seems to me like you're just dodging every question thrown at you.

I would make it illegal -- as it already is -- if I was the law, but not for moral reasons. I, personally, wouldn't trust a person that is predisposed to necrophilia, not to mention, the potential health problems it poses.

Would you care to elaborate as to why you wouldn't trust a person predisposed to necrophilia and/or why you would make it illegal? Is it exclusively the health risks?

It's so frustrating to talk to you user, it's like pulling teeth. All """"philosophers""" that I talk to seem to have the same problem. It's like you're afraid to actually express your thoughts. I'm challenging your ability to communicate here. Challenging your intelligence, like you asked us to in your OP.

Maybe it's just the subject. I could try to ask you about starvation or torture or economic crises or privacy or web neutrality or any number of things but I want to stay on topic and see if you're just uncomfortable or if you genuinely can't express yourself.

Obviously OP is a total sperg/ragpole (sperm shot into a rag) but I'll take a stab at this.

If people have a right to not be organ donors (which is a right we respect in our society, and one I think we should), then they have a right to not be dug up and fucked when they die. It's an implicit violation of the rights of that person as they used to exist. Why implicit? Well, to be honest I just assumed that no one wants to be fucked when they're dead. Which raises the question, should there be another box on the back of our driver's licenses? One whose being checked constitutes consent of being fucked by an untouchable? I'll let those thoughts float for now and let someone else jump in.

>Would you care to elaborate as to why you wouldn't trust a person predisposed to necrophilia and/or why you would make it illegal?
I wouldn't consider such a person to be sane. They could engage in the same lascivious activity with either a living participant or a sex doll, making necrophilia pointless.

>Is it exclusively the health risks?
No, but that's the biggest factor.

>Obviously OP is a total sperg/ragpole (sperm shot into a rag) but I'll take a stab at this.
Why?

That doesn't mean shit, bitch.

You claim to be a philosopher but all of your responses are terse and unimaginative

If I had imaginative thoughts on things, why would I have to share it here? And, once again, I don't like moral philosophy.

Those are mutually exclusive. LARP.

There was a group in Europe some years ago that tried proposing body donations for necrophilia and they were laughed out of the building. There are people that have seriously considered such notions but because of taboo and people who will not discuss such matters at length, who just reject them outright, they'll never likely be seriously discussed or weighed by the general public.

Someone who suffers from a paraphilia is, of course, suffering from a mental/sexual illness. That's unquestionable. They're obviously not completely sane, you wouldn't trust them because they're not sane, that's fine. I just want to address that someone who has a paraphilia, like pedophilia or necrophilia or what have you, sometimes have an exclusive sexuality. Meaning that someone who's a necrophile cannot use a living participant or a sex doll. It wouldn't be "pointless," it would be their only option other than abstinence.

I have to agree with that your responses are unbelievably dull. You leave little to no room for discussion, make no interesting observations and address as little as humanly possible. How long have you been studying philosophy for? Do you have any ambition or any intention of doing more than poorly addressing posts on Sup Forums with as little imagination as possible?

So how's your job at starbucks going?

YOU started the thread you fucking shitter. Bet you have a fucking associates degree. At a community college.

In Haiti

Did someone say log?

Who's your favorite comedian?

Since I'm not concerned with moral philosophy, I don't feel the need to accommodate everybody, the same way everybody wouldn't care to accommodate me. There was a time when normal, rational people were considered "crazy" for simply being different, so I don't feel I owe much to necrophiliacs, not to mention, there are more important matters to focus on.

Kek Diogenes is muh nigga

i'm fishing and still smarter than any of you I still got drunk

I'm going to try and ignore your inability to discuss the subject reasonably and address the only thing in your post that you seem interested in:

>there are more important matters to focus on

Like what?

Ok.

If you were having your favorite conversation (disregarding the inevitable social missteps you would take to force the direction of said conversation), what would we all be talking about?

If you get paid to teach something that can't be used, and only taught, you might as well just get on welfare you're getting money for nothing

Because no one uses bing you retard

>I'm going to try and ignore your inability to discuss the subject reasonably
I think your confusing interest with ability on this one. These subjects don't always pique intense curiosity or interest in everybody. But you did offer to move on, so I will.

>Like what?
For example, MGTOW. I think they make many points that are relevant to everyday life.

MGTOW.

Bing is actually amazing for porn. They also have some dumb reward system thing and I've made probably $50 from just staying signed into my MS account, plus other various things since the rewards change periodically.

right now you can get money put into your paypal account. it's not a lot, but for searching porn over a few months? not bad.

Not OP, but also have a degree in philosophy and am 1 thesis away from a graduate degree in philosophy. I'm teaching at a university this semester while I continue procrastinating on my thesis.

Moral philosophy is fucking lame and there is practically no other area i'd rather discuss less.

I do, everyday. Not to mention other engines.

>philosophy degree
>smart

>Bing is actually amazing for porn.
It's actually amazing for nearly everything. I like it's format and I hope it never changes -- like it appears it's going to at times.

I don't think one needs a degree in philosophy to see you are being trolled by this guy.

"Since there's no arbitrator on the matter, why bother debating with people on these things?"

I mean, that is a sentiment that is almost in direct opposition to philosophy.

>I mean, that is a sentiment that is almost in direct opposition to philosophy.
You're confusing moral philosophy with just philosophy. This confusion is the very reason philosophy is not taken serious these days. I'll debate with people, but not on moral subjects that will never be proven to be right or wrong.

>HEY

When he got out of college he got a high paying job at the philosophy factory, right next door the the women's studies factory. Fifteen thousand CEO positions!

working hard doing schoolwork to get that fancy degree doesn't mean you know shit, faggot

How do you feel about Saul Kripke? Have there been any legit developments in philosophy since N+N?

No, I'm not confusing anything. You don't have to like moral philosophy or want to talk about it, but I really don't think someone who is seriously interested in philosophy would answer as you have.

So there's no one to settle our moral debates. Where is the grand arbiter that decides epistemological or metaphysical debates?

You're committed to some gross form of nihilism as best as I can tell. And no, I don't consider myself any sort of expert on these things, but I am definitely interested in philosophy.

What you said amounts to some disgusting form of nihilism

Please dig a hole fill it with cow shit and bury yourself alive

Leap that wall, if you're so great.

What's Aristotle's solution to the Sea Battle problem? What's yours, if yours is different?

make it Andy Sixx's log and I'm in

>You're committed to some gross form of nihilism as best as I can tell.
I'm not. I don't even identify as an "existentialist." I'll be real honest with you. I grew up with parents who were more obsessed with moralizing than anybody you could imagine, thus burning me out on the entire subject. Also, it became apparent to me that the majority of modern "philosophy" is basically ethics, and not really concerned with other aspects of life.

do you like r9k styled poetry?

>you're alone at home giving a nod and winking to your drinking
>you're expecting people to disagree you're smarter for your philosphy degree
>while chad is giving a cream pie to stacy

We've been having a bit of an argument in a few of these poetry threads. Where to we begin to determine if it's a poem or not if it does or doesn't have multi syllabic rhyming?
I'm under the impression they're just mad we make fun of them in response while rhyming but maybe you can throw your two pennies in

oh fuck meant to type "thinking" not "you're expecting" kinda screwed up the rhyme scheme a bit

>user sits around drunkenly pounding his dry dick on Sup Forums
>other people are out living their life and getting pussy

Pussy is overrated.

It's really not though. It's better than any of the shit you're doing. There's really nothing more satisfying than making a girl come impossibly hard.

>Pussy is overrated.
>user stated
>hated to be fated as never being a pussy hound
>he angrily pounds at the ground
>while chads gets around ,ejaculating on the girls mounds.

>mfw I'll never have this gift for verse

>philosophy degree
Are traps gay? If so describe how.

>I funny

>making a girl come impossibly hard
Once you graduate from middle school, you'll realize that the female orgasm is a meme. And besides that, a blowjob from a girl is a million times better than her pussy.

Sounds like you would like to help "Chad" with that, wouldn't you?

Is it possible to explain using science (materialism, physicalism) how photons activating neuronal impulses somehow becomes the subjective perception of color vision?

Plz tell me how, I need to write an essay on the topic

Let me get this straight. You're sitting by yourself at home tiddling your microdick and the thing you want to talk most about is how cool it is to sit around alone and tiddle your microdick? Get a life dude. MGTOW isn't philosophy, Jesus Christ.

That's certainly beating OP's degree

>blowjob is a million times better
disagree, but willing to accept I'm a minority here. Guess I have vulnerability problems and I'm not as comfortable getting head as I am being in control and giving it to her. I honestly couldn't care less what you think about female orgasms.

It's not exactly philosophy, but they asked me what subject most interested me.

Also, it's better to tiddle with your dick than to waste your life chasing brain-damaged women, under the delusion that others care or are noticing.